Italian Gothic Horror Films (1980-1989)

Home > Other > Italian Gothic Horror Films (1980-1989) > Page 25
Italian Gothic Horror Films (1980-1989) Page 25

by Roberto Curti


  end, Michael himself has been trapped into a

  mare—one of Murder Obsession’s most derided

  web of deception, and his own mother is revealed

  sequences, and understandably so, given the

  to be the spider- like spinner of the events that—

  ridiculous appearance of patently fake bats flap-

  in typical Freda fashion—lead to a circular ending,

  ping about on wires and a giant rubber spider

  an eternal return that mirrors the ineluctability of

  which the girl runs across at one point. Deborah

  fate.

  is chased in the mansion’s crypt by a pair of

  On Murder Obsession the director returned

  hooded, monstrous- looking figures, finds a way

  to the primordial core of his conception of

  out into the garden, experiences horrid visions

  Gothic: a family melodrama, excessive and mor-

  (such as skulls hanging from a tree like ripe

  bid, soaked with psychoanalytic undertones, in

  fruits and dripping blood from their empty eye

  which the horror blossoms and feeds on the dy-

  sockets), is tied to a St. Andrew’s cross and sub-

  namics of parental relationships. As portrayed

  jected to an incomprehensible ritual. At first

  by the ravishing 43-year-old Anita Strindberg,

  glance, the scene seems pointless, a shock seg-

  Glenda is Freda’s last and perhaps ultimate

  ment whose only function is to provide cheap

  monster, the true point of no return after the in-

  thrills to an undemanding audience. And yet,

  cestuous father of Beatrice Cenci, the beauty-

  despite its sloppy effects work, which elicits

  obsessed nubile old lady of I vampiri, the

  comparison with a similarly awkward moment

  necrophile husband of L’orribile segreto del Dr.

  82 1981: Murder Italian lobby card for Murder Obsession, featuring silvia Dionisio (left) and Anita strindberg. the tagline promises “100 minuti di terrore” (100 minutes of terror).

  Hichcock, and the scheming wife of Lo spettro.

  is a vital part of human nature, and as such it

  She is a young- looking, sexy, desirable mother,

  will always win.

  who meets her son in bed while dressed in a

  The director’s reversal of the ancient Greek

  transparent nightgown, and whose feelings for

  myth is sneering: not only is it Jocasta who lusts

  her offspring leave no room for doubt. She is

  after her son, but she ends up killing the object

  also a vampire of sorts, feeding off other men’s

  of her desire in order to forever keep him with

  lust for her, and using them like puppets.

  her. Freda ends the film with a final and blas-

  “The story nevertheless interested me.

  phemous act of annihilation, with one of the

  What can happen in our tragic childhood? What

  most powerful—perhaps at least in part because

  are the consequences when guilt and murder

  unexpected—endings in his oeuvre, one that

  mingle?”8 the director observed, while offering

  openly recalls those of Il conte Ugolino (949)

  a psychoanalytic reading to his film. The weight

  and Lo spettro and which truly lives up to

  of the past is connected to a horrific primary

  Jacques Lourcelles’ definition of the director as

  scene that is repeated twice—half-Rashomon,

  “one of the great aesthetes in cinema history.”9

  half-Marnie—to bring to the surface, and to

  The scene recreates one of the most awe-

  human form, the torments of the unconscious

  inspiring icons of classical art, Michelangelo’s

  which previously took the shape of grotesque

  Pietà (Pity), in a way that is as elegant as it

  nightmarish creatures. Freda’s ultimate mockery

  is cruelly mocking. The image of the Virgin

  is to load his unhappy Oedipus with a burden

  Mary cuddling Jesus on her womb after cruci-

  of guilt that is not his own; here the sins of the

  fixion becomes the sight of a murderous mother

  mother are literally passed on to the son, who

  who cries over the dying son whom she has

  must cope for the better part of his existence

  just killed; a “hellish composition” in which

  with the fabricated notion of having murdered

  “through the harmony of Renaissance art, dear

  his father. The process of discovering the truth—

  as always to Freda as a painter and sculptor, and

  that is, his own innocence—leads him to ruin

  within the most reassuring image, the mother

  all the same. To Freda, as it has ever been, evil

  with her son … earthly monstrosities thrive.”20

  1981: Murder 83

  As Jacqueline Freda recalls, “we spent one day

  so far as labeling it “shit.” When the interviewer

  on that scene. It was the only one in the movie

  asked him why such a severe judgment, Freda

  which took a whole day to shoot—and one day,

  curtly answered, “It’s not a good film. The actors

  to my father, was like a whole week on a normal

  were poor and so was the budget. I’d rather not

  set! But he really cared about it. I think it was

  talk about it.”24 He was less trenchant, but

  probably the only thing he really cared about in

  equally critical toward Murder Obsession, when

  the movie… . ”2

  discussing it with fellow film director Giuseppe

  Once again, as in Lo spettro, the camera’s

  Tornatore:

  eye takes on a moral function. But the film’s

  Unfortunately it didn’t turn out as I had wanted, also

  memorable final image can be read in many

  because there just weren’t the necessary means, be-

  ways. Perhaps, to Freda, it was an ideal way to

  cause it’s strange how people are convinced that hor-

  connect to his own past, to his early days as a

  ror films are easy to make, even though they’re some

  sculptor in Adolfo Wildt’s shop, where he tried

  of the most difficult because you’re always trying to

  his hand at reproducing the Pietà; in a way, it

  balance, like a tightrope walker, right? It just takes

  was yet another circular ending, like the ones he

  one wrong footing and you fall, you can’t save

  loved most. Moreover, it even works as a biting

  yourself by doing another sequence like in other

  metaphor on the state of the Italian film industry,

  films… . Here, there’s nothing you can do, either you

  murdered by the maternal hands of the State by

  fall into the ridiculous, or it gets boring, or you

  way of absurd and useless laws, its remains ex-

  achieve the desired effect.2

  posed for us to mourn. Therefore, the door that

  On the other hand, over the years the film

  closes by itself, peremptorily, subtracting the

  has been overrated and championed by some as

  mother, the son and the heroine to the world and

  the director’s testament and a culmination of his

  to our view, and delivering them to oblivion, ac-

  whole body of work, wi
th a blind eye to its many

  quires a further, powerful symbolic meaning. It

  flaws, both in style and substance, starting with

  is Freda’s hand that closes that door, sealing—

  the blatant budgetary limits and the compro-

  with this premature yet late burial—his own film

  mises on the part of Freda in order to adapt to

  career, and a whole season of Italian cinema.

  a market that demanded conspicuous bouts of

  Murder Obsession was submitted to the rat-

  nudity and violence. Most reviewers would

  ing board on October , 980, and given a

  rather focus on the overall mood which con-

  screening certificate on October 3; yet it took

  veyed the feeling of the end of an era—the same

  several months before it came out to theaters.

  that exuded from the pages of Freda’s own au-

  Even though it was initially announced to have

  tobiography.

  been selected in competition at the 980 Sitges

  Far from being a summation of his own

  Film Festival,22 eventually it was replaced by an-

  work, Murder Obsession was supposed to be a

  other Italian film, Antonio Margheriti’s Apoca-

  shortcut for the director to return to the lime-

  lypse domani. Released in Italy in June 98, after

  light. Immediately after finishing it, in fact,

  being screened at that year’s Mystfest, it did

  Freda was attempting to put together new and

  mediocre business: Boetani blames the distrib-

  more ambitious projects. Such a one was an

  utor, who also failed to pay back the expected

  adaptation of Alexandre Dumas’ Ascanio, on

  sum. Reviewers were also rather tepid, praising

  which the director worked in late 980, whereas

  the cinematography and the narrative tension

  the other, co- written with the French critic

  but blaming the poor script and bad acting.23

  Jacques Lourcelles, was La Dernière momie d’E-

  Nevertheless, the film was met with enthusiasm

  gypte (The Last Mummy of Egypt), a story of love

  by a small group of fierce supporters, including

  and reincarnation that should have been pro-

  the eminent film critic and historian Goffredo

  duced by Tarak Ben Ammar. Neither ever mate-

  Fofi (who helped Freda put together his memoir,

  rialized.

  Divoratori di celluloide, released in 98 as well,

  Several months after the making of Murder

  and mostly derived from the interviews the di-

  Obsession, Boetani and Freda traveled to New

  rector had given during the previous decades in

  York to discuss the possibility of making more

  France) and critic/scriptwriter Patrizia Pistag-

  low- budget horror movies with American pro-

  nesi.

  ducers. The director was trying to cash in on his

  Over the years, Freda’s swan song under-

  by- now established fame as the father of the Ital-

  went a peculiar fate. On the one hand it was

  ian horror film, but the timing and circum-

  harshly dismissed by its author, who once went

  stances proved unfavorable. “Since Riccardo was

  84 1981: Quella not in good economic conditions in that period,

  8. Ibid.

  I agreed to go with him and help him find a

  9. Stefano Patrizi, phone interview with the author,

  February 206. Patrizi did one more acting appearance in

  deal,” the producer recalls. “We went and stayed

  2006, in the movie Quale amore, whereas he denies having

  there for a couple of weeks, but without really

  worked on 2008’s Chi nasce tondo … which nevertheless

  coming up to anything concrete, because we re-

  is listed in his IMDb filmography.

  alized that those potential financiers were not

  10. Boetani, interview with the author.

  so brilliant and, so to speak, reliable.”26

  11. J. Freda, interview with the author.

  12. “‘Is it true that your first film was Murder Obsession

  In the 980s and 990s, Freda’s work met a

  (98) by Riccardo Freda?’ ‘Yes, I have been attributed this

  renewed interest on the part of critics, film fes-

  paternity [sic], but it is not a film that I can say I signed. I

  tivals and young cinephiles. His status of “master

  collaborated with Angelo Mattei who did the effects, I was

  of horror” was also celebrated in a three- part

  in his workshop, but I only did a few things, working on

  some tricks. Nothing special.’” Pierpaolo De Sanctis, “In-

  TV program called Il cinema della paura, di-

  tervista a Sergio Stivaletti,” www. nocturno. it, May 3, 20.

  rected by his former assistant Marcello Avallone

  13. Boetani, interview with the author.

  and Patrizia Pistagnesi, and broadcast in No-

  14. Cristiano Pogany was married to actress Pamela Vil-

  vember 986 on Rai Tre. The elderly director ap-

  loresi, whom he had met in 978, and they had three chil-

  peared in the first installment: sitting on an arm-

  dren. He died of cancer in February 999, at only .

  15. J. Freda, interview with the author.

  chair by a fireplace, in a studio set made to look

  16. Riccardo Freda, Divoratori di celluloide (Milan: Edi-

  like a castle hall, complete with thunder and

  zioni del Mystfest, Il Formichiere, 98), 80. In Poindron’s

  lightning, he played with gusto the part of the

  interview book, however, he claimed differently: “I never

  world- weary lord of the castle, explaining for

  thought of Bava. It is a gory and perverse story like those

  he loved, but when I made it, I did not think of anyone. I

  the umpteenth time his conception of fear and

  tried to put myself in the criminal’s skin… . ” Éric Poindron,

  of the horror film in general with his usual elo-

  Riccardo Freda. Un pirate à la camera (Lyon-Arles: Institute

  quence and property of language. Despite his

  Lumière/Actes Sud, 994), 30.

  age, he was as sharp and intellectually brilliant

  17. Ibid., 88.

  as ever, but the many sincere homages only

  18. Poindron, Riccardo Freda, 349.

  19. Jacques Lourcelles, Dictionnaire du cinéma. Les films

  served to underline his belonging to a past age

  (Paris: Robert Laffont, 992), 440.

  that would never come back.

  20. Patrizia Pistagnesi, “Omaggio a Riccardo Freda,” in

  Freda would never make another movie be-

  Freda, Divoratori di celluloide, xiv.

  fore his death in 999. La Fille de d’Artagnan

  21. J. Freda, interview with the author.

  22. “Un festival del terrore in Spagna,” La Stampa, June

  (994), a project concocted with the help of his

  9, 980.

  friend Bertrand Tavernier, turned up a bitter dis-

  23. See a.v. [Aldo Viganò], “Il regista Freda è tornato

  appointment. Freda walked off the set and was

  con l’horror di un delitto,” La Stampa, July 3, 98.

  replaced by Tavernier himself. It was one last, de
-

  24. Gian Luca Castoldi, “Riccardo Freda o del decaden-

  tismo dell’orrore,” Amarcord #8–9, May–August 997, 09.

  finitive sign that cinema—now a very different

  25. Giuseppe Tornatore, Il quarto moschettiere. Quattro

  creature from the one he had learned to know

  chiacchiere con Riccardo Freda (Taormina: TaorminaFilm-

  and master since his early years in Egypt—did

  Fest, 2007), 24–2.

  not need Riccardo Freda anymore.

  26. Boetani, interview with the author.

  Quella villa accanto al cimitero (The

  Notes

  House by the Cemetery)

  1. “It is a basic scheme, in which, from time to time,

  D: Lucio Fulci. S: Elisa Livia Briganti; SC:

  you can put everything,” Piccioni commented. See Davide

  Lucio Fulci, Giorgio Mariuzzo, Dardano Sac-

  Pulici, “Il grido del capricorno,” Nocturno Cinema #47,

  chetti; DOP: Sergio Salvati (Kodak, LV- Luciano

  January 20, 9.

  2. For more details on the project, see Curti, Italian

  Vittori); M: Walter Rizzati [and Alessandro

  Gothic Horror Films, 1970–1979, 68.

  Blonksteiner]; M: Vincenzo Tomassi; PD, CO:

  3. Jacqueline Freda, interview with the author, May

  Massimo Lentini; MU: Maurizio Trani; SE: Gino

  20.

  De Rossi; AMU: Antonio Maltempo; Hair:

  4. Enzo Boetani, interview with the author, August

  206. As of this writing, Superhuman is still listed as com-

  Maria Pia Crapanzano; AD: Roberto Giandalia;

  pleted in Freda’s filmography on the IMDb.

  C: Franco Bruni; AC: Maurizio Lucchini; AE:

  5. Ibid.

  Pietro Tomassi; SD: Mariangela Capuano; PrM:

  6. Manlio Gomarasca and Davide Pulici, Io Emanuelle.

  Rodolfo Ruzza; SO: Ugo Celani; B: Eros Giustini;

  Le passioni, gli amori e il cinema di Laura Gemser (Milan:

  Mix: Gianni D’Amico; STC: Nazzareno Cardi-

  Media Word Publications 997).

  7. Ippoliti and Norcini, “Una favola chiamata cinema.

  nali; SP: Antonio Benetti; ChEl: Alfredo Fedeli;

  Intervista a Martine Brochard,” 36.

  KG: Giacomo Tomaselli; ACO: Claudia D’Obici;

  1981: Quella

  8

  W: Bertilla Silvestrini; SS: Daniela Puccini,

  was already at work on a new film. The title,

  Daniela Tonti; DubD: Pino Colizzi. Cast: Kather-

  Quella villa accanto al cimitero, echoed the

  ine [Catriona] MacColl (Lucy Boyle), Paolo

  Italian one for Tobe Hooper’s Eaten Alive

 

‹ Prev