Italian Gothic Horror Films (1980-1989)

Home > Other > Italian Gothic Horror Films (1980-1989) > Page 27
Italian Gothic Horror Films (1980-1989) Page 27

by Roberto Curti


  acters are repeatedly attracted to the under-

  of time and space and soothes the terrible notion

  ground lair where they will all lose their life, and

  at the heart of the story, that is Freudstein’s un-

  they keep descending that set of stairs which

  stoppable need of fresher and younger bodies.

  leads only to horror and death.

  In Fulci’s cinema, children often die in terrible

  The story’s central character is the kid, Bob.

  ways, but not in Quella villa accanto al cimitero,

  Throughout the film, he oscillates between this

  and this is yet another indication of the film’s

  French lobby card for Quella villa accanto al cimitero, featuring the titular house—oak Mansion in the film—which hides a horrible secret...

  1981: Quella 89

  core, which despite its overall gruesomeness is

  contrast between the ground and top floor on

  filled with a gripping melancholy, underlined by

  the one hand and the basement on the other—

  the closing line that appears on screen: “No one

  through dollies and tracking shots, and builds

  will ever know whether the children are mon-

  an unnerving mood through a crescendo which

  sters, or the monsters are children.” In a move

  confines most of the gore to the last part, unlike

  typical of the glorious tradition of Italian Gothic

  Paura nella città dei morti viventi and L’aldilà.

  horror cinema, the quote—attributed to Henry

  Some of the gory sequences are played for their

  James—was in fact made up by Fulci and/or Sac-

  nerve- wracking value, like the one where Boyle

  chetti.

  is attacked by a bloodthirsty bat (a nod to Sus-

  One of the main differences between Quella

  piria’s bat scene but done better). Others are an

  villa accanto al cimitero and Fulci’s previous

  exercise in the macabre, like the one where

  Gothic films is that it is centered on a couple of

  Boyle listens to a tape with Petersen’s comments

  kids, marking at the same time a return to the

  about Freudstein’s experiments, with Fulci’s

  themes of Non si sevizia un paperino as well as

  prowling camera wandering in the basement

  anticipation of some of his future works in the

  amid severed body parts and disemboweled

  genre, focused on horror as seen through the

  bodies, thus hinting at the doctor’s macabre ex-

  eyes of children, namely Manhattan Baby (982),

  periments.

  La dolce casa degli orrori (989) and Voci dal pro-

  Despite the credits indicating the special

  fondo (990). With her red hair and pale com-

  make- up effects as the work of Giannetto De

  plexion, Silvia Collatina somewhat recalls Nico-

  Rossi and Maurizio Trani, only the latter did in

  letta Elmi, and is quite convincing as Freudstein’s

  fact work on the film, creating Freudstein’s de-

  ghastly child, who acts as a link between the

  composed face as well as the other effects. Gino

  world of the living and the afterlife; she would

  De Rossi took care of the special effects. Fulci

  appear again, uncredited, in Murderock—Uccide

  liked to work with the same team of collabora-

  a passo di danza (984). On the other hand, the

  tors, as in the old days of genre cinema, but

  blond Giovanni Frezza would turn up again in

  Quella villa accanto al cimitero marked at least

  next year’s Manhattan Baby. Reportedly, the di-

  one important difference from the previous

  rector maintained a detached attitude toward

  films, with the music score being composed by

  the kids, “like a schoolteacher who demanded

  Walter Rizzati: the result differs notably from

  things from us and wanted them exactly as he

  the director’s other films of the period, and has

  said,”9 as Collatina recalled.

  a remarkable melancholic quality, starting with

  The rest of the cast comprised familiar

  its impressive Bach- inspired main theme.

  faces in Fulci’s cinema, such as Catriona Mac-

  As with L’aldilà, Quella villa accanto al

  Coll, Carlo De Mejo, Dagmar Lassander and

  cimitero underwent remarkable changes from

  renowned voice actor Giampaolo Saccarola. The

  Elisa Briganti’s original story and Dardano

  lead, Paolo Malco, was a capable stage and TV

  Sacchetti’s script—originally titled La notte del-

  actor who had starred in such diverse works as

  l’inferno (The Night of Hell), which became La

  Antonio Bido’s giallo, Il gatto dagli occhi di giada

  casa di Freudstein, then Quella casa accanto al

  (977) and Franco Brogi Taviani’s Masoch (980),

  cimitero—to the screen. Sacchetti’s script—writ-

  a biography of Leopold von Sacher- Masoch; he

  ten as usual on a tight schedule—was then re-

  would turn up again in Lo squartatore di New

  vised by Fulci and Giorgio Mariuzzo. As for his

  York (982). As for Ania Pieroni, her stunning

  contribution, without going into detail, Mariuzzo

  looks were not enough to make up for her lim-

  claimed to have acted as script doctor, changing

  ited acting (something she was not asked to do

  here and there to make the screenplays work:

  in Inferno), and reportedly the director was very

  Sacchetti’s scripts, he said, were often too short,

  harsh toward her.

  in accordance with Fulci’s claims, and even

  But the main star of Quella villa accanto al

  Fulci’s script supervisor Rita Agostini agreed

  cimitero is Fulci’s direction, which is more con-

  with this. Sacchetti’s version is as follows: “Mar-

  trolled and subdued than in the past. With the

  iuzzo always intervened afterwards, either be-

  help of Massimo Lentini’s inventive set pieces

  cause I had to leave to work on another film or

  (most notably the narrow metal staircase which

  refused to make those changes that Lucio de-

  leads to the bottom of Freudstein’s gravestone,

  manded. That was the reason for our arguments.

  like a theatrical stage trap), the director enhances

  I accused Fulci of looking for shortcuts, and triv-

  the spatial qualities of the titular house—and its

  ializing things. He wanted simpler, more tradi-

  90 1981: Quella tional stories. He hadn’t identified himself yet

  but Fulci was not satisfied and eventually dropped

  with the role of master of horror.”0

  it in favor of the make- up we get to see at the

  A look at the script deposited at the CSC—

  film’s climax. Another key detail missing from

  titled Quella casa accanto al cimitero, with the

  the CSC script is Freudstein emitting baby cries,

  original La casa di Freudstein erased in pen, and

  while on the other hand, in an inane dialogue

  credited to Elisa Briganti (story) and Dardano

  exchange, Boyle describes Freudstein as “a

  Sacchetti (screenplay)—can hel
p get an idea on

  Barnard before its time,” referring to the noted

  who wrote what. It is dated February 0, 98,

  heart surgeon Christiaan Barnard, to which

  one month before shooting began, and it is likely

  Lucy replies: “Or a Baron Frankenstein, if you

  the last version before the rewritings. At 223

  prefer.” Fulci could indeed turn hollow dialogue

  pages, it looks considerably long, but many

  into an asset, as with the scene of McCabe and

  pages consist of extremely brief scenes of a cou-

  Liza flirting in the bar in L’aldilà; but he was well

  ple of lines, often describing just one shot (i.e.,

  aware of the border between the disposable and

  the exterior of the house) and making it seem

  the ridiculous.

  much longer than it really is. The script displays

  The CSC script is totally devoid of the am-

  interesting differences with the finished film, re-

  biguous, ghost story elements that we find in the

  vealing the extent of Fulci and Mariuzzo’s con-

  film. There is no Mae Freudstein, but an 8-year-

  tribution, which is considerable.

  old kid, Mark Hauser, who is very much alive,

  The CSC script opens with a lengthy intro-

  and whom we first meet listening to the grisly

  ductory sequence (33 pages long) which differs

  stories on Freudstein told by his grandmother.

  sensibly from the one in the film. Two lovers are

  Mark becomes Bob’s friend and turns up in the

  exploring Freudstein’s house (not called Oak

  final scene as the savant. Missing are also the

  Mansion here), when suddenly the man stabs

  backstory of Boyle’s predecessor, the scene be-

  the girl in the head (the knife protruding from

  tween Boyle and Muller in New York, the meet-

  her mouth is the only detail kept in the film) and

  ing with the real estate agent Laura (a character

  drags the body in the basement—apparently, he

  absent from Sacchetti’s script), and the references

  brought her to the villa to get rid of her. But he

  to Boyle having been there in the past. Ann the

  remains locked downstairs in the dark too and

  babysitter is just a normal girl (no sign of the

  meets a grisly end in turn. “By the light of the

  ominous shop window sequence), the Boyles are

  flame the most terrifying image that the human

  a happy couple, and most of the elements bor-

  mind can conceive appears before his eyes, an

  rowed from The Shining are absent. The only

  image originated from infernal darkness”: the

  connection might be seen in the fact that Nor-

  fleshless, rotten face of a living cadaver. Leaving

  man Boyle here is a historian, who moves to

  aside the grotesque build- up (the man gives the

  Freudstein’s house for a couple of months to

  girl a ring box which turns out to contain a mag-

  complete his book on the Civil war. Incidentally,

  got instead of a ring), this rather senseless mur-

  the references to the American Civil War are

  der scene gives away Freudstein’s appearance

  much more relevant than in the film: Freudstein’s

  immediately, and the horrible doctor will turn

  backstory deals with him performing transplants

  up repeatedly during the course of the story, a

  on the unfortunate soldiers he operates—and in

  choice that Fulci wisely discarded.

  one of the final scenes he is explicitly described

  Speaking of Freudstein, the script describes

  as wearing “an old and dirty army uniform” (p.

  it as follows: “Then the incredible monstrous

  209)—until the doctor was lynched by an angry

  being gets up and shows itself: an unequal body,

  mob (an idea recycled from the prologue of

  with two right arms, an enormous head, dispro-

  L’aldilà) when they found out he was also using

  portionate, on a very thin torso” (p. 06); “He is

  children for his experiments. The mob killed

  very tall, very skinny, completely bald, the face

  Freudstein’s wife Mary and buried her outside

  reduced almost to a grinning skull, covered with

  the villa—hence the gravestone in the garden

  horrible putrefied flesh … he looks like he is

  that features prominently in the script.

  composed of body parts from several men” (p.

  Boyle’s research is more conventionally de-

  209). Trani had indeed devised an alternate

  veloped in Sacchetti’s story. He finds out that

  make- up for Freudstein similar to the one de-

  pages from a history journal regarding the mys-

  scribed in the script, as a skinned man with flesh

  terious Freudstein are missing. The CSC script

  and tendons in sight, predating the sight of the

  introduces a character absent in the film, a li-

  dead Frank (Oliver Smith) in Hellraiser (987),

  brarian named Howard Grimm, who turns up

  1981: Quella 9

  at Boyle’s house in his absence to hand him the

  tions. Moreover, the Henry James connection,

  missing pages and becomes one of Freudstein’s

  which is very feeble on paper, comes to the fore

  victims, as would happen to Dagmar Lassander’s

  in the film thanks to the addition of the character

  character in the film. Other horror scenes, such

  of Mae Freudstein and her mother as well as of

  as the bat attack and Ann’s murder, are almost

  the final literary epigraph (a recurring element

  identical on paper, but in the movie Freudstein

  in the director’s later work, as shown by the

  kills by way of ordinary weapons, such as a knife

  quotes from Balzac and Hawthorne that open

  and a poker, while in the script he uses his bare

  his diptych in the TV series “Le case maledette”).

  hands, gouging victims’ eyes out and so on

  Despite Sacchetti’s remarks about Fulci’s

  (something too similar to what the zombies did

  indecisiveness toward his status as “master of

  in L’aldilà, evidently).

  horror,” Quella villa accanto al cimitero comes

  The CSC script features some odd details

  off as one of the director’s strongest films. It may

  that Fulci discarded. For instance, Lucy Boyle

  lack L’aldilà’s visionary qualities, but it is taut

  discovers dozens of human teeth in a drawer, in

  and scary as few other Italian horror films and

  a nod to Edgar Allan Poe’s story Berenice. An-

  stands up to repeated viewings. Fulci considered

  other sequence has Lucy discover a hole in the

  it one of his best works, going so far as claiming

  closet wall, from which a swarm of moths—

  it as an influence on subsequent and far more

  “black, horrible, disgusting”—come out, cover-

  celebrated titles—a retribution of sorts for a film

  ing her face in a moment obviously patterned

  born as a patchwork of other, more famous

  on the infamous maggot rain in Paura nella città

>   works. In a 990 interview he raised the suspi-

  dei morti viventi. In the hole, Boyle will find a

  cion that Spielberg might have taken inspiration

  box with documents on Freudstein’s dismissal

  from his film for Poltergeist (impossible, as film-

  from the army because of his experiments (a

  ing for Poltergeist took place from May to

  much less suggestive idea than the tape recording

  August 98); in one of his last interviews he

  from his predecessor that he listens to in the

  even accused Paul Verhoeven of having ripped

  film). The marble gravestone in Freudstein’s

  off the scene where MacColl is dragged down a

  house (which in the script is placed in the

  set of stairs in Robocop (but with the titular robot

  kitchen) doesn’t lead to the basement, but, once

  in the woman’s place).2 An attitude which recalls

  Boyle opens it, it reveals a grave “four feet deep,

  that of some Fulci scholars who obtusely—and

  a rottenness in which maggots, limbs, bones,

  without even checking whether it might actually

  skulls and feet teem.”

  be possible—try to pinpoint influences of Fulci’s

  If Fulci decided to tone down Sacchetti’s

  work in that of American filmmakers, as if this

  fondness for all things putrefied, it was not only

  would make it more valuable.3

  to limit the similarities with his previous zombie

  Quella villa accanto al cimitero had some

  films, but also to enhance the ghost story side

  marginal issues with the rating board, who re-

  of the tale. This is all too evident in the script’s

  quested a brief cut (3.20 meters, about 6 seconds)

  climax, which is disappointingly conventional

  in the sequence of the killing of Dagmar Las-

  compared to what we see in the film. Here Fulci

  sander’s character Laura Gittleson before granting

  and Mariuzzo added a self- reference to enhance

  a screening certificate with the expected V.M.8

  the tension (Freudstein pushing Bob against the

  rating. This can be noticed in the shots showing

  door while Boyle is breaking the door with an

  the aftermath of the killing, as Laura appears to

  axe), and completely revised the ending. In the

  have had her left eye gouged out (most likely with

  CSC script, Freudstein kills Norman and Lucy

  the poker used to puncture her chest and

  (whom we see disappear in the dark of the base-

  throat). It opened in Turin on August 4, 98,

 

‹ Prev