Signs & Wonders
   JOHNS HOPKINS: POETRY AND FICTION
   John T. Irwin, General Editor
   Signs & Wonders
   Poems by Charles Martin
   This book has been brought to publication with the generous assistance of the G. Harry Pouder Fund.
   © 2011 The Johns Hopkins University Press
   All rights reserved. Published 2011
   Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper
   9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
   The Johns Hopkins University Press
   2715 North Charles Street
   Baltimore, Maryland 21218-4363
   www.press.jhu.edu
   Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
   Martin, Charles, 1942–
   Signs & wonders: poems / by Charles Martin.
   p. cm. — (Johns Hopkins: poetry and fiction)
   ISBN-13: 978-0-8018-9974-4 (hardcover: alk. paper)
   ISBN-10: 0-8018-9974-5 (hardcover: alk. paper)
   I. Title. II. Title: Signs and wonders.
   PS3563.A72327S54 2011
   811′.54—dc22 2010042463
   A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library.
   Special discounts are available for bulk purchases of this book. For more information, please contact Special Sales at 410-516-6936 or [email protected].
   The Johns Hopkins University Press uses environmentally friendly book materials, including recycled text paper that is composed of at least 30 percent post-consumer waste, whenever possible. All of our book papers are acid-free, and our jackets and covers are printed on paper with recycled content.
   TO JOHANNA
   Contents
   Directions for Assembly
   I/ THE LIFE IN LETTERS
   The Flower Thief
   Souvenir
   Some Kind of Happiness
   The Sacred Monsters
   Words to Utter at Nightfall
   Mind in the Trees
   Autopsychography
   Support
   East Side, West Side
   1/ Vermeer at the Frick: His Mistress and Maid
   2/ John Koch at the New-York Historical Society: The Party
   To Himself
   Brooklyn in the Seventies
   This Organizing Solitude
   Theory Victorious
   II/ SOME ROMANS
   On a Roman Perfume Bottle
   Ara Pacis
   Ovid to His Book
   Three Sonnets from the Romanesco of G.G. Belli
   1/ The Good Soldiers
   2/ The Spaniard
   3/ The Coffee House Philosopher
   III/ NEAR JEFFREY’S HOOK
   The Twentieth Century in Photographs
   Poem for the Millennium
   Who Knows What’s Best?
   Getting Carded
   For the End of the Age of Irony
   Near Jeffrey’s Hook
   Foreboding
   After 9/11
   After Wang Wei
   Poison
   Acknowledgments
   Signs & Wonders
   Directions for Assembly
   Signs is a noun (as in DO NOT DISTURB);
   Wonders (as in “with furrowed brows”), a verb.
   I/ The Life in Letters
   The Flower Thief
   At last he struck on our block and snatched
   Geraniums out of the flowerpots
   And window boxes we had left unwatched,
   Plucked the plants whole, took flower, stem and roots,
   Danced down the street in glee and merriment,
   Every so often letting out a whoop,
   Asperging us with soil mix as he went,
   Until he settled on an empty stoop.
   And there gazed on his prizes, fascinated
   By something in them only he could see,
   While those who called the local precinct waited,
   Watching him with or without sympathy.
   He learned the essence of geranium.
   We learned that the police don’t always come.
   Souvenir
   1/
   Somehow it had escaped
   By the time that we had flown
   Back to New York City
   And on to our new home---
   That slender insect, shaped
   From a green husk of corn
   Twisted until crickety
   On a cobbled street in Rome.
   2/
   A Chinese emigrant,
   Perched by a cardboard box,
   Fashioned these vegetal
   Crickets and grasshoppers;
   His wiry fingers bent
   And tied the sheathes to flex
   In forms that would appeal
   To bargain-hunting shoppers.
   3/
   Bagged up in plastic, tied
   With little wire collars,
   Like goldfish in their bowls
   Waiting for adoption,
   Each silent cricket vied
   For euros or for dollars
   And waited to be sold:
   It had no other option.
   4/
   If it had been poverty,
   The dull incessant grind
   Of want which went unheeded,
   That snatched up and replanted
   Him here in Italy,
   What put it in his mind
   To sell what no one needed
   And almost no one wanted?
   5/
   Was it just ignorance
   Of the foreign market---
   That and the optimist’s
   More than half-filled glass?
   “What every Roman wants
   Is a good cornhusk cricket---
   With a few deft ties and twists
   My dream will come to pass!”
   6/
   That isn’t even funny:
   He sleeps on a low cot in
   A single crowded room
   On the shift assigned him.
   He owes his landlord money.
   He fears he’s been forgotten
   By his family back home:
   Will Good Luck ever find him?
   7/
   Perhaps: Que sera, sera.
   But now among the fakes,
   The faux Gucci scarves and shoes,
   The double-A batteries
   And plastic ephemera,
   He stands by his box and makes
   A life he did not choose,
   From what would otherwise
   8/
   Be overlooked as waste
   (As he himself might be
   In this world’s new order):
   But how shall the genuine
   Not be wholly effaced
   From life and memory
   And taught to slip the border---
   How, if not by design?
   Some Kind of Happiness
   A windblown grain of happiness
   Has just now taken residence
   Between the moistened surfaces
   Of eye and lid: I blink and wince,
   Not recognizing it as such,
   And then I grimace to expel
   What I can feel but cannot touch,
   This moonlet torn from Planet Hell,
   Whose photo, magnified, would show
   A wilderness of jagged peaks
   And icy crevices below.
   It threatens to stay on for weeks,
   And with no fixed plan traverses
   The jellied pond that runs with tears,
   Paying no mind to my curses.
   Then suddenly it disappears.
   What kind of happiness was this?
   One more likely than another:
   Briefly here, abruptly gone---bliss,
   If not unalloyed with bother.
/>   The Sacred Monsters
   The legend, built up over many years,
   That told of how the spells the monsters cast
   Reduced the hapless children to hot tears
   And left the grown-ups they became aghast
   And swaddled in unmanageable fears
   Originating in the nightmare past---
   That legend needs revising, it appears,
   Now that we see the monsters plain at last:
   How this one, backed into a corner, snarls,
   While that one rears to strike, but must give way
   Before these oldsters from the suburbs, clad
   In polyester leisurewear, who say
   How pleased they are to be here.
   Then, “Mom, Dad, I’d
   like you both to meet my good friend Charles…”
   Words to Utter at Nightfall
   So here I am in Oakwood, a funeral
   park built in 19th-century Syracuse,
   tracing out names while windblown snow swirls
   down at my ankles. December, twilight:
   another failed quest for immortality
   come to completion under a polished grey
   stone---but tonight I halt before it,
   stopped by its one-word inscription: utter
   *
   “Utter?” Say what, I ask myself cluelessly:
   If utter had been somebody’s cognomen,
   who would have raised this stone, neglecting
   either a given name or initials?
   And UTTER lacks apparent connection to
   any of many words it may come before:
   “bliss,” say, or “rot”---intensifying
   joy in the outcome, or indignation
   at learning that oblivion isn’t a
   concept, merely. When once we eliminate
   noun and adjective, only verb is
   left to consider. So I consider
   UTTER a sharply worded imperative,
   bitten in stone, unknown as to origin,
   aimed, it may be, at finding someone
   who goes off rambling in cemeteries,
   hoping to be instructed by randomness,
   hoping, among the dead ends so evenly
   spaced out in ordered rows, to find the
   one that might signify: Here continue
   *
   Easy to say, but where is continuance?
   For certain, unaccompanied UTTER is
   awkward at best---an unvoiced, barked-out
   syllable trailed by a schwa, dissolving
   in the thin night air, cold and companionless,
   unheard by anyone, unresponded to.
   Take it, then: weave it into measure’s
   ancient invention, this shopworn form, now
   frayed at the edges, far from original:
   use it to make an evensong utterance,
   passed on by one whose heartfelt wish is
   not to have either the first or last word
   Mind in the Trees
   I was of three minds
   Like a tree
   In which there are three blackbirds.
   —Wallace Stevens
   But Wallace, what if there were, say,
   Three hundred of them in one tree?
   Of how many minds would you be?
   I saw three hundred here one day---
   Not blackbirds, since not every black
   Bird’s a blackbird---these were crows,
   So densely driven, you’d suppose
   The branches of the tree would crack.
   Yet the tree didn’t seem weary
   Of bearing them without a fuss---
   One of the few eponymous
   Oaks of Oakwood Cemetery.
   The next day came three hundred more
   And formed a second colony
   On branches of another tree;
   They spread across its upper floor.
   Day after, a prodigious din
   Proclaimed the transfer was complete:
   All the tall trees across the street
   Appeared to have been settled in.
   This was in autumn. They had flown
   From the bare cornfields west of us
   To spend their nights in Syracuse.
   At first light they would be long gone.
   I’d have to have a mind of crow
   To tell you where it was they went,
   Although I think that their intent
   Was plain enough for us to know:
   To feed as well as they were able
   On gleanings from some barren field,
   Or test what a town dump would yield
   In scraps scraped from a kitchen table.
   From where they’d been, they’d all fly back
   To our neighborhood and roost
   Right around dusk: a sable host,
   A giant beating wing of black,
   Dissolving until each crow finds
   Its nightly perch.
   Regarding their abidance
   in our area,
   I was myself of several minds:
   Their raucousness by night and morning,
   The paintballs of their excrement
   (Mixed, it would seem with fresh cement)
   That dropped among us without warning,
   Clearly would not gain them favor.
   What would, then? Their ability
   To make do on the little we
   Allow them, and, indeed to carve a
   Niche, however scant and dire
   From our gleanings and our rot
   Speaks well of them, though we may not.
   It’s also easy to admire
   The way they seem to get along,
   The nice civility each shows
   (Or seems to show) his fellow crows,
   Despite the discords of their song.
   And there’s the beauty of their flight
   Whether they glide, now high, now low,
   Or struggle though grey squalls of snow,
   Racing against impending night;
   Or when they form a canopy,
   A treetop-level aggregate---
   Each one a fine black cuneate
   Shape on the lemon yellow sky;
   It seemed each little mark they made
   Was capable, collectively,
   Of making one text of each tree,
   A book whose upturned page displayed
   The tree’s own thought.
   And then, one day,
   The first or second day of spring,
   At sunrise, all of them took wing
   At once and hoarsely flew away,
   Not to return until next fall
   With a noise like blackboard-grating chalk.
   I’m practicing a crow-like squawk
   To greet them when I hear their call.
   Autopsychography
   Fernando Pessoa, Autopsycographia
   The poet knows just how to feign.
   So very thorough his pretense is,
   That he pretends to have the pain
   He honestly experiences.
   Those who read the poet’s verses
   As they read them, keenly feel
   Not the two pains he confesses,
   But just their own, which is unreal.
   So round and round in every season,
   Upon its tracks this gaily smart
   Toy train goes on, beguiling reason,
   And it is called the human heart.
   Support
   Support is what the film of oily dust
   Is put upon and slowly bonded to
   Until it forms a thin, ambivalent crust
   That disappears when there comes into view
   Whatever we are here today to see:
   A vase of flowers, Wolfe dying at Quebec,
   A virgin with an infant on her knee,
   Some woman grinning at Toulouse-Lautrec.
   If it cannot be said to face the wall,
   There’s nonetheless a wall or ledge or shelf
   Supporting
 it, though the provisionality
   of that support says that support itself
   Moves through such portals, all of which depend
   On yet another and so never end.
   East Side, West Side
   1/ Vermeer at the Frick: His Mistress and Maid
   Light flickers gaily over those surfaces
   that, in this painting, represent what, if not
   beauty and pleasure, health and value?
   Framed by the background, the homely servant,
   whose downcast glance suggests her uneasiness,
   presents a note appearing to startle her
   seated mistress, who must have found it
   either unwelcome or unexpected
   if not unwelcome. We cannot ever know
   if what she had begun writing one lover
   was interfered with by another’s
   well-timed or untimely importuning.
   Soon, other readings, each just as possible,
   will come to press their claims on the spectator.
   But we can say no more for certain
   than that there has been an interruption;
   unconscious act and conscious reflection were
   caught as she touched her chin with the fingertips
   of her left hand, while from her right, she
   let the pen drop to the covered table.
   So, if I claim Vermeer must have wanted this
   uneasy painting read as a secular
   Annunciation, where the one picked
   happens to be neither maid nor maiden,
   I mean it just as a thought experiment:
   there’s not the slightest hint of submissiveness
   in her demeanor, and the drama
   played out about her is her own doing.
   Nor do I find it even implausible
   to see the maid as angelic messenger:
   in an Annunciation, brightness
   flows into darkness, and so transforms it,
   while here, a girl constrained by her poverty
   briefly enters a plane of great privilege;
   whatever right she has to be here
   is one that she has been granted merely.
   But this is not about the inequality
   inherent in a common relationship,
   nor will some god reduce the mistress
   to the sealed chamber of his abidance:
   This is about the free play of consciousness
   in steady light that limns and illuminates
   those whom it falls upon: the favored
   few, constrained only by what they’ve chosen.
   
 
 Signs & Wonders Page 1