A Fine & Pleasant Misery

Home > Other > A Fine & Pleasant Misery > Page 11
A Fine & Pleasant Misery Page 11

by Patrick McManus


  Most of the adventure in kid camping came from the cooking of exotic and original dishes. Eating them was even more adventurous. Some of the dishes were undoubtedly fit for human consumption, although the sight and aroma were generally enough to give a starving and unusually indiscriminate hyena a fit of the dry heaves.

  There was, of course, that old favorite: fried pork 'n' beans accented with charred potato scraps dislodged from the bottom of the serve-all skillet.

  This was frequently accompanied by a side order of bacon, either still flaming or recently soused with a bucket of water.

  There was the aforementioned spaghetti-and-oatmeal omelet, which made an excellent dessert when topped with catsup. It is true that most of the raw eggs would have leaked away before arrival at the campsite, but usually the bottom of the pack would retain a sizable puddle, which could be augmented by the egg squeezings from the change of underwear and the extra pair of socks.

  These eggs had the advantage of being prebeaten, something that cannot be said for the dehydrated kind.

  It goes without saying that all dishes were spiced with various curious, careless, and low-flying species of insects.

  There was one rule of the code that no one ever mentioned but everyone adhered to, and that was that there was to be absolutely no praying on the camping trip. One time my regular fellow kid campers and I invited along a boy who lied and swore and smoked discarded cigarette butts and generally appeared to be a normal and respectable fellow. We were unutterably embarrassed by his crass display of character when, in the flicker of our dying campfire and the mirthful glow of the last bawdy joke, he knelt down by his sleeping bag, folded his hands, and said his prayers. In one fell swoop, he dealt a death blow to what otherwise showed promise of being a robust and pleasantly vulgar camping trip.

  In all honesty, I must confess that I, too, once violated this particular tenet of kid camping. But I at least had the decency to do it discreetly and not in such a way as to unnerve my companions. As it happened, they were already unnerved enough.

  In the middle of the night it suddenly came to our attention that a large and obviously famished bear had entered camp under the cover of darkness. He was making a terrible racket, whetting his appetite on our vast store of provisions, prior to getting on to the main course, which lay paralyzed in its sleeping bags and had all but ceased to breathe. The time had come, I realized, to invoke the aid of the Almighty, and immediately set about invoking. The next morning the other guys wrote the whole terrible affair off as a case of mistaken identity. Little did they know that it was due to my inspired efforts in our common behalf that the bear had been changed into a huge black cedar stump. The racket, they supposed, had been caused by a chipmunk assaulting a bag of potato chips. I never bothered to set them right.

  Experiences like this provided the educational element in kid camping.

  For example, we learned that it is merely an old wives' tale that extreme fear will turn your hair snow white all over. Our hair was only a little gray about the temples, and that returned to its normal color four days later. I distinctly remember, because it was a short while after I got my voice back and just before the shaking died down to where it couldn't even be noticed from more than ten feet away.

  Kid camping undoubtedly is a thing of the past, but perhaps somewhere back in the hinterlands there are a few rugged lads who practice the sport in its pure form. If there are, I must say they're mighty lucky--mighty lucky if they avoid ptomaine poisoning, permanent curvature of the spine, or growing into adults who break out in a purple rash and hysteria at the mere glimpse of a can of pork 'n' beans.

  How to Fish a Crick

  There is much confusion in the world today concerning creeks and cricks.

  Many otherwise well-informed people live out their lives under the impression that a crick is a creek mispronounced. Nothing could be farther from the truth. A crick is a distinctly separate entity from a creek, and it should be recognized as such. After all, a creek is merely a creek, but a crick is a crick.

  The extent of this confusion over cricks and creeks becomes apparent from a glance at almost any map, where you will find that all streams except rivers are labeled as creeks. There are several reasons for this injustice. First, your average run-of-the-mill cartographer doesn't know his crick from his creek. The rare cartographer who does know refuses to recognize cricks in their own right for fear that he will be chastised by one of the self-appointed chaperons of the American language, who, like all other chaperons, are big on purity. A case in point: One of the maps I possess of the State of Washington labels a small stream as S. Creek. Now I don't know for certain but am reasonably sure that the actual name of this stream is not S. No. just by looking at the map one can tell that it is not shaped like an S, the only reason I can think of for giving it such a name. S therefore, must not be the full name but an abbreviation. Why was the name abbreviated?

  Was it too long or perhaps too difficult to pronounce? Since the map also contains such stream names as Similkameen and Humptulips and Puyallup, all unabbreviated, one would guess not. This leaves only one other possibility.

  The cartographers felt that the actual name of the stream was obscene.

  They did not want it said of them that they had turned out an obscene map, the kind of map sinister characters might try to peddle to innocent school children, hissing at them from an alleyway, "Hey, kid!

  Wanna buy a dirty map?"

  Well, I can certainly sympathize with the cartographers' reluctance to author a dirty map. What irks me is that they use the name S. Creek.

  One does not have to be a mentalist to know that the fellow who named the stream S. did not use the word creek. He used crick. He probably saw right off that this stream he was up was a crick and immediately started casting about for a suitable name. Then he discovered he didn't have a paddle with him. Aha! He would name this crick after the most famous of all cricks, thereby not only symbolizing his predicament but also capturing in a word something of the crick's essential character.

  The cartographers in any case chose to ignore this rather obvious origin of the name and its connotations in favor of a discreet S. and an effete Creek. If they didn't want to come right out and say crick, why couldn't they have had the decency just to abbreviate it with a C.

  and let it go at that.

  Maybe I can, once and for all, clear up this confusion over cricks and creeks.

  First of all a creek has none of the raucous, vulgar, freewheeling character of a crick. If they were people, creeks would wear tuxedos and amuse themselves with the ballet, opera, and witty conversation; cricks would go around in their undershirts and amuse themselves with the Saturday-night fights, taverns, and humorous belching. Creeks would perspire and cricks, sweat. Creeks would smoke pipes; cricks, chew and spit.

  Creeks tend to be pristine. They meander regally through high mountain meadows, cascade down dainty waterfalls, pause in placid pools, ripple over beds of gleaming, gravel and polished rock. They sparkle in the sunlight.

  Deer and poets sip from creeks, and images of eagles wheel upon the surface of their mirrored depths.

  Cricks, on the other hand, shuffle through cow pastures, slog through beaver dams, gurgle through culverts, ooze through barnyards, sprawl under sagging bridges, and when not otherwise occupied, thrash fitfully on their beds of quicksand and clay. Cows should perhaps be credited with giving cricks their most pronounced characteristic. In deference to the young and the few ladies left in the world whose sensitivities might be offended, I forgo a detailed description of this characteristic. Let me say only that to a cow the whole universe is a bathroom, and it makes no exception of cricks.

  A single cow equipped only with determination and fairly good aim can, in a matter of hours, transform a perfectly good creek into a crick.

  Now that some of the basic differences between creeks and cricks have been cleared up, I will get down to the business at hand, namely how to fish a crick.
r />   Every angler knows how to fish a creek. He uses relatively light tackle and flies, and his attire consists of waders or hip boots, a fishing vest, creel, lightweight slacks, and a shirt in a tasteful check. The creek is worked artfully, with the fly drifting down like the first flake of winter snow. Everybody knows that's how you fish a creek.

  But the crick, as I've pointed out, is an altogether different species of water and demands its own particular approach.

  No fancy tackle of any kind is ever used to fish a crick. Since fiberglass rods came on the market, it is difficult to find a good crick pole.

  The old steel telescope rods were fairly good, but the best crick pole I've ever seen was one I owned as a kid. It consisted of a six-foot section of stiff pipe, with a piece of wire that pulled out from the tip to provide the action. Stores sold it as a fishing pole, but it could also serve fairly well as a lightning rod, fencepost, or a lever for prying a car out of the mud.

  Rod action, it should be noted, is of little importance in crick fishing, since the crick itself usually provides about all the action one can stand.

  Hook size should never be less than NO. 4, and leaders, if they are used at all, should be short and test about the same as baling wire.

  This saves a good deal of time, since if you hook up on an old log, tractor tire, or Model T submerged in the crick, as happens every third cast, you can simply haul it out and not have to bother replacing leader and hook. Sinkers must be large and fat in order not to frighten off the fish. If the splash is large enough, they think it's just another old log, tractor tire, or Model T being dumped in the crick. The reel should be an old bait-caster with the worm gear busted and the handle off. A crick reel, if you don't happen to own one, can be improvised by loaning a perfectly good creek reel to one of your kids for a period of one to five minutes.

  The experienced crick fisher never wears hip boots or waders on a crick.

  Old oxfords with floppy tongues are all right, but tennis shoes in the final stages of decay are the first choice of crick fishers everywhere.

  Whatever shoes you select, they should have sizable holes both fore and aft. The holes allow for good circulation of the crick water through the shoe and help to cut down on the risk of fermentation of the feet.

  Another advantage is that the crick fisher can thrust his toes out through the holes and get a good grip on banks of submerged clay, rotting logs, old tractor tires, and Model Ts.

  The creel is shunned in crick fishing. All fish are carried on a forked stick, which adds immeasurably to the enjoyment of the sport.

  Most of this enjoyment comes from laying the forked stick down, forgetting it, and then spending several happy hours looking for it.

  Once the crick fisher tires of this pastime he usually vows to keep the stick in hand at all times. This brings into play the ultimate in crick-fishing skill, since the angler must now land his fish by taking up his slack line with his teeth and one ear, accomplished by a quick, dipping, circular motion of the head.

  Flies, of course, are never used on a crick. The crick fish just gaffaw at them. They want real meat--fat, wiggling worms, grasshoppers on the hoof, and, occasionally, toes.

  That pretty much covers the technique of crick fishing. Naturally one cannot expect to master it so quickly as creek fishing, unless, of course, he happens to be under the age of fourteen. Eight-year-olds are naturals at crick fishing, and if you have one handy you might take him out to a crick and observe him in action. Despite the opinion of all parents and most behavioral Psychologists, eight-year-olds are good for something, and teaching the art of crick fishing is it.

  At least once a year I try to fish Sand Crick, the crick of my youth.

  Admittedly, I have lost a good deal of my technique and most of my stamina but I still manage to have a good time. Usually I come back with a few fish, some good laughs, and a charley horse that extends from my trapezius to my peroneus longus.

  Last summer my cousin Buck accompanied me, and I got one of those terrible scares that only crick fishing can give you. We had no more than started when Buck stepped into quicksand. It startled him so badly that he could only manage to get off three or four casts before total panic set in.

  The quicksand by then was halfway up to his knees.

  "Hey," Buck said. "I don't think I'll be able to get out."

  A cold chill shot through me. Not only was a lifelong friend and relative in peril but he was carrying the communal worm can.

  "Quick," I yelled. "Toss me the worm can!"

  "Nothing doing," Buck said. "Not till you drag me out of here."

  I wasted a good ten minutes of fishing time getting him out of that quicksand. On the other hand, I probably would have used up more time than that digging a new batch of worms besides having to knock off a little early to tell his wife there was no point in waiting supper on him.

  Incidentally, in order to prevent a similar emergency from occurring, I took the precaution of putting a handful of worms in my shirt pocket, where they were eventually discovered by my wife on washday. It is interesting to note that dehydrated worms cannot be reconstituted by even three cycles in an automatic washer. Also of interest is the fact that it is almost as difficult to reconstitute the wife who conducts the experiment. After such an occurrence, the wise though absentminded crick fisher should take care to eat all his meals out for several days, and in the unlikely event that the wife does offer him something to eat, he should first give a bite to the dog and observe the animal carefully for a couple of hours afterwards.

  Buck and I fished a couple of miles of Sand Crick together that day, reminiscing every step of the way over our adventures as kids along this same crick. We came upon a half-submerged car, a 1937 Packard that someone had dumped in the crick under the pretext of preventing bank erosion but actually to be rid of a 1937 Packard. Buck drifted his line in through the gaping holes of the front windshield and hooked a fine Eastern brook out of the back seat.

  "First time I ever caught anything in the back seat of a 1937 Packard," he said.

  "I've never been that lucky," I said enviously, "but I came pretty close once in a '48 Hudson."

  The last hole of the day was one known affectionately as The Dead Cow Hole. The particular cow that the hole was named after was one of the most malicious beasts ever to deface the banks of a crick. I don't know what the farmer called his cow but I know some of the names fishermen called her, always preceded by the same presumably accurate adjective. You always knew when a fellow planned on fishing the stretch of crick presided over by the cow, because he carried his fishing pole in one hand and an ax handle in the other. (Usually you could get in at least one good blow each time the cow galloped over the top of you.) Then one day the cow took ill and died, thus, or so I thought, effectively removing herself from action. The news reached me on a sweltering summer day, but nevertheless I made ready immediately to take advantage of the cow's misfortune. I scarcely touched the tops of the withered grass in my rush to get a line in the water.

  As I neared the crick, however, I noticed a flock of magpies flying hurriedly in the opposite direction, and several of them, I observed, showed definite signs of nausea. At about the same time a hot, dry gust of wind criminally assaulted my olfactory nerves with such violence as to bring tears to my eyes.

  "No!" I thought. "Could it be? Could she actually have been that fiendish?" The question was shortly answered in the affirmative. On peering down from the top of the hill above the crick, I could see her carcass ripening in the summer heat not ten yards from the fishing hole! Evidently she had seen the end coming and rather than spend her last moments repenting her sins she had, with malice aforethought, used them to drag herself into a strategic position so that, even in death, she would dominate not only the immediate area of the fishing hole but four-hundred yards on all sides.

  Several times I took a deep breath and tried to rush the hole but my wind always gave out before I could cover the distance. It was hopeless, at lea
st for me. Cousin Buck did manage to fish Dead Cow Hole that same summer, and with considerable success apparently. He told me about it a week later and I believe he said he caught a couple of good fish. I couldn't be sure because he was still gagging so hard it was difficult to understand him.

  That's the nature of crick fishing, though. Some people may not have the heart for it, or even the stomach, but for those who do, it has its rewards.

  They escape me at the moment, however.

  Further Teachings Of Rancid Crabtree

  Gram sliced off four great slabs from a loaf of her homemade bread.

  She spread them with butter, piled on a couple pounds of ham, slices of onions, pickles, cheese, and the leftovers from the previous night's supper. Then she stuffed the sandwiches in a paper bag and thrust them into my hands.

  "But I tell you I don't need food," I protested. "Rancid is going to teach me how to live off the land."

 

‹ Prev