Forensic Psychology

Home > Other > Forensic Psychology > Page 19
Forensic Psychology Page 19

by Graham M Davies

Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.

  Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Second Edition. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

  Hart, S. D., Cox, D. N., & Hare, R. D. (1995). The Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL-SV) (1st ed.). Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

  Hemphill, J. F., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and criminological Psychology, 3, 139–170.

  Hurlemann, R., Patin, A., Onur, O. A., Cohen, M. X., Baumgartner, T., Metzler, S., & Kendrick, K. M. (2010). Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 4999–5007.

  Insel, T. R., & Winslow, J. T. (1998) Serotonin and neuropeptides in affiliative behaviours. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 207–219.

  Jones, A., Laurens, K., Herba, C., Barker, G., & Viding, E. (2009). Amygdala hypoactivity to fearful faces in boys with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 95–102.

  Kalin, N. H., Shelton, S. E., Davidson, R. J., & Kelley, A. E. (2001). The primate amygdala mediates acute fear but not the behavioral and physiological components of anxious temperament. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2067–2074.

  Karpman, B. (1941). On the need for separating psychopathy into two distinct clinical types: Symptomatic and idiopathic. Journal of Criminology and Psychopathology, 3, 112–137.

  Kirsch, P., Esslinger, C., Chen, Q., Mier, D., Lis, S., Siddhanti, S., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2005). Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11489–11493.

  Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673–676.

  Kosson, D. S., Lorenz, A. R., & Newman, J. P. (2006). Effects of comorbid psychopathy on criminal offending and emotion processing in male offenders with antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 798–806.

  Kruh, I.P., Frick, P.J., & Clements, C.B. (2005). Historical and personality correlates to the violence patterns of juveniles tried as adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 69–96.

  LaBar, K. S., & LeDoux, J. E. (1996). Partial disruption of fear conditioning in rats with unilateral amygdala damage: correspondence with unilateral temporal lobectomy in humans. Behavioral neuroscience, 110, 991–997.

  Lang, S., Af Klinteberg, B., & Alm, P. O. (2002). Adult psychopathy and violent behavior in males with early neglect and abuse. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 106(s412), 93–100.

  Larsson, H., Andershed, H., & Lichtenstein, P. (2006). A genetic factor explains most of the variation in the psychopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 221–230.

  Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.

  Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488–524.

  Lykken, D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Clinical Psychology, 55, 6–10.

  Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2007). Longitudinal evidence that psychopathy scores in early adolescence predict adult psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 155–165.

  Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying insecure-disorganized/disoriented infants: Procedures, findings, and implications for the classification of behaviour. In M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti , & M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 121–160). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  Marsh, A., Finger, E., Mitchell, D., Reid, M., Sims, C., Kosson, D., & Blair, R. (2008). Reduced amygdala response to fearful expressions in children and adolescents with callous-unemotional traits and disruptive behavior disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 712–720.

  Marshall, L. A., & Cooke, D. J. (1999). The childhood experiences of psychopaths: A retrospective study of familial and societal factors. Journal of Personality Disorders, 13, 211–225.

  Mitchell, I. J., Smid, W., Troelstra, J., Wever, E., Ziegler, T. E., & Beech, A. R. (2013). Psychopathic characteristics are related to high basal urinary oxytocin levels in male forensic patients. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24, 309–318.

  Mokros, A., Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., Santtila, P., Habermeyer, E., & Nitschke, J. (2015). Variants of psychopathy in adult male offenders: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 372–386.

  Morris, J. S., Frith, C. D., Perrett, D. I., Rowland, D., Young, A. W., Calder, A. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1996). A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions. Nature, 383, 812–815.

  Morris, J. S., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 1680–1685.

  Muñoz, L. C., & Frick, P. J. (2007). The reliability, stability, and predictive utility of the self-report version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 299–312.

  Nelson, E. E., & Panksepp, J. (1998). Brain substrates of infant–mother attachment: contributions of opioids, oxytocin, and norepinephrine. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 22, 437–452.

  Neumann, C. S., Johansson, P. T., & Hare, R. D. (2013). The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), low anxiety, and fearlessness: A structural equation modeling analysis. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 129–137.

  Neumann, C. S., Vitacco, M. J., Hare, R. D., & Wupperman, P. (2005). Reconstruing the “reconstruction” of psychopathy: A comment on Cooke, Michie, Hart, and Clark. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 624–640.

  Panksepp, J., Nelson, E., & Bekkedal, M. (1997). Brain systems for the mediation of social separation-distress and social-reward evolutionary antecedents and neuropeptide intermediaries. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 807, 78–100.

  Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1992). Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 274–285.

  Porter, S., Woodworth, M., Earle, J., Drugge, J., & Boer, D. (2003). Characteristics of sexual homicides committed by psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 459–470.

  Poythress, N., & Skeem, J. (2006). Disaggregating psychopathy: Where and how to look for variants. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 172–192). New York: Guilford Press.

  Raine, A., Venables, P. H., & Williams, M. (1996). Better autonomic conditioning and faster electrodermal half-recovery time at age 15 years as possible protective factors against crime at age 29 years. Developmental Psychology, 32, 624–630.

  Rosenstein, D. S., & Horowitz, H. A. (1996). Adolescent attachment and psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 244–253.

  Seara-Cardoso, A., & Viding, E. (2014). Functional neuroscience of psychopathic personality in adults. Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/jopy.12113

  Seara-Cardoso, A., Neumann, C., Roiser, J., McCrory, E., & Viding, E. (2012). Investigating associations between empathy, morality and psychopathic personality traits in the general population. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 67–71.

  Seltzer, L. J., Ziegler, T., Connolly, M. J., Prososki, A. R., & Pollak, S. D. (2014). Stress-induced elevation of oxytocin in maltreated children: evolution, neurodevelopment, and social behavior. Child Development, 85, 501–512.

  Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Fischer, M., Dvash, J., Harari, H., Perach-Bloom, N., & Levkovitz, Y. (2009). Intranasal administration of oxytocin incre
ases envy and schadenfreude (gloating). Biological Psychiatry, 66, 864–870.

  Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1993). Adult romantic attachment: Theory and evidence. In D. Perlman & W. Jones (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 4, pp. 29–70). London, UK: Kingsley.

  Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22, 433–445.

  Skeem, J. L., Poythress, N., Edens, J. F., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Cale, E. M. (2003). Psychopathic personality or personalities? Exploring potential variants of psychopathy and their implications for risk assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 513–546.

  Skeem, J., Johansson, P., Andershed, H., Kerr, M., & Louden, J. E. (2007). Two subtypes of psychopathic violent offenders that parallel primary and secondary variants. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 395–409.

  Taylor, J., Loney, B. R., Bobadilla, L., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on psychopathy trait dimensions in a community sample of male twins. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 633–645.

  Viding, E., Blair, R. J. R., Moffitt, T. E., & Plomin, R. (2005). Evidence for substantial genetic risk for psychopathy in 7-year-olds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 592–597.

  Viding, E., Jones, A. P., Frick, P. J., Moffitt, T. E., & Plomin, R. (2008). Heritability of antisocial behaviour at 9: Do callous-unemotional traits matter? Developmental Science, 11, 17–22.

  Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1996). Attachment style in sex offenders: A preliminary study. The Journal of Sex Research, 33, 17–26.

  Weiler, B. L., & Widom, C. S. (1996). Psychopathy and violent behaviour in abused and neglected young adults. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 6, 253–271.

  Whalen, P. J., Shin, L. M., McInerney, S. C., Fischer, H., Wright, C. I., & Rauch, S. L. (2001). A functional MRI study of human amygdala responses to facial expressions of fear versus anger. Emotion, 1, 70–83.

  Woodworth, M., & Porter, S. (2002). In cold blood: Characteristics of criminal homicides as a function of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 436–445.

  4 Understanding Risk Factors for Offending: The Contributions of Neuroscience

  ANTHONY R. BEECH, BENJAMIN NORDSTROM, ADRIAN RAINE AND DAWN FISHERM

  CHAPTER OUTLINE

  4.1 INTRODUCTION

  4.2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BRAIN

  4.3 THE SOCIAL BRAIN 4.3.1 Evidence Suggesting Problems in the Structural Integrity of the Brains of Offenders

  4.3.2 Evidence Suggesting Functional Problems in the Brain of Offenders

  4.4 RISK FACTORS FOR OFFENDING 4.4.1 Genetic Factors and Offending

  4.4.2 Abnormalities in Foetal Development

  4.4.3 Other Prenatal Risk Factors

  4.4.4 Perinatal Risk Factors

  4.4.5 Post-natal/childhood Risk Factors

  4.5 MODIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS

  4.6 SUMMARY

  LEARNING OUTCOMES

  BY THE END OF THIS CHAPTER, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO:

  Gain an understanding of brain development and the parts of the brain underpinning social and antisocial behaviours

  Appreciate the types of risk factors that can have a negative impact upon brain development and brain function

  Be aware of the types of interventions that can help ameliorate the problems stemming from the risk factors outlined in the chapter.

  4.1 INTRODUCTION

  Neuroscientific findings are becoming something that the forensic field has to deal with more commonly than ever before, as there is now a growing body of evidence that suggests that predisposition to offend can be associated with genetic, hormonal or neurobiological factors (Beech, Carter, Mann & Rotshtein, in press). Hence, the aim of this chapter is to investigate the contribution of forensic neuroscience to the understanding of the aetiology of criminal behaviours. In the first part of the chapter we will examine how the brain develops and the parts of the brain that are said to constitute the social brain. Also in this section we will describe some of the techniques to look at the structure and function of these areas. Next we consider the prenatal and post-natal risk factors, sometimes in combination with genetic factors, that can have an effect upon brain development that can potentiate the probability of offending. Then, we will examine what effects these risk factors have on critical areas of the social brain, particularly the amygdala, the insular, the orbital prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex, which constitute the social brain; and how problems in these areas may in part lead to offending. Finally, we will describe some interventions to address these problems.

  4.2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BRAIN

  Brain development and organisation is an extremely long and complex process, given that it contains approximately 86,000,000,000 (86 billion) neurons, and has around 100,000,000,000,000 (100 trillion) synaptic connections. Brain development through the formation of neurones (brain cells) begins shortly after conception, and continues throughout a person’s life, and is subject to specific developmental milestones. Once formed, these neurons begin to migrate to the correct location in the brain, and some synapses (connections) begin forming. Prenatal conditions, such as temperature, pressure and foetal movement stimulate the development of these connections. By five weeks after conception, the cells in the developing brain begin dividing rapidly to form the neurons that an individual will have for the rest of their lives. Processes such as myelination (the process of forming a coating or sheath of fatty substances on the axon of a neuron, which allows faster transmission of nerve impulses); and synaptogenesis (the formation of synapses between neurons in the nervous system) are well underway. At birth there is a rapid increase in the growth in the brain, and connectivity with neurons in all parts of the brain making trillions of connections (known as exuberant synaptogenesis). Myelination continues in most parts of the brain and is the major cause of the increase in brain size.

  Early childhood years contain a period of rapid increases/changes in connectivity in the brain; in fact in the first four years the brain increases to 80% of its adult size. The process of changes in connectivity is both genetically and experience-driven, with the brain producing many more synapses than it will ultimately contain. In order to counter these over-connections, synaptic pruning occurs where connections are refined based on sensory, motor, language and cognitive experience, and parental-child interactions. Connections that are used regularly become stronger and more complex, while those that are not used are lost. The pruning process enables the brain to operate more efficiently and provides room for networks of essential connections to expand.

  The brain continues to change and mature throughout adolescence, through myelination and synaptic pruning (most of which occurs between the ages of 10 to 16), where adolescents (if brain development goes well) become capable of insight, judgment, inhibition, reasoning and social conscience. Increased activity in the frontal lobes (the part of the brain that regulates decision-making, problem solving, control of purposeful behaviours, consciousness and emotions) enables the young person to make more sense of the world at both cognitive and emotional levels. This development increases into adulthood, with frontal-lobe development (an area of the brain responsible for judgment, planning, assessing risks and decision-making) being the last area to develop. This development continues until the individual is at least 25 years old, by which time individuals are generally less risky. For example, the UK Automobile Association reports that 26% of car user deaths, and 12% of all road deaths, are young people aged between 17 and 24 travelling in cars in the UK (AA, n.d.).

  We will now briefly outline the areas of the brain that underpin social functioning and that, if dysfunctional, can underpin antisocial behaviours.

  4.3 THE SOCIAL BRAIN

  Social/antisocial behaviours are underpinned by neurobiological action. As a brief introduction, the most important parts of the brain associat
ed with social functioning are the limbic system and areas of the cerebral cortex.

  The limbic system is a collection of structures that includes the hippocampus, amygdala, anterior thalamic nuclei, fornix, columns of fornix, mammillary body, septum pellucidum, habenular commissure, cingulate gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, limbic cortex, and limbic midbrain areas. It supports a variety of functions including emotion, behaviour and motivation. Emotional life is largely housed in the limbic system, and it has a great deal to do with the formation of memories.

  Probably the most important areas to consider are: the orbital prefrontal cortex (OPFC), situated at the very front of the brain, which is considered as the apex of the neural networks of the social brain, and is critical to the adaptation of behaviour in terms of controlling intense emotions and impulses; and the amygdala, which is found deep within the temporal lobe. This area’s functions are related to arousal, the control of responses associated with fear, emotion and memory. Other important areas include: (a) the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) situated below the cerebral cortices. This first appeared in animals demonstrating maternal behaviour, and provides the basic circuitry for communication, cooperation and empathy. Damage to this area can include decreases in empathy, emotional stability, and inappropriate social behaviours (Brothers, 1996); (b) the insular cortex, a portion of the cerebral cortex, which is a crucial area for understanding what it feels like to be human and is the source of social emotions such as lust, disgust, pride, humiliation, guilt and shame. Together with the premotor cortex, the insular is part of the circuitry that allows individuals to vicariously share the emotions of others; and (c) the basal ganglia, situated in the forebrain, associated with a variety of functions including cognitions, and emotions. Box 4.1 shows the types of techniques that have looked at structures of these and other brain areas, while Box 4.2 describes techniques that examine the functional processes that are carried out in these (and other areas) of the brain.

 

‹ Prev