Marathe, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2011). What drives customization? Control or identity? Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11), 781–790.
Marcus, B. H., Lewis, B. A, Williams, D. M., Dunsiger, S., Jakicic, J. M., Whiteley, J. A., et al. (2007). A comparison of Internet and print-based physical activity interventions. Archives of internal medicine, 167, 944–949.
McCalley, T., Kaiser, F., Midden, C. J. H., Keser, M., & Teunissen, M. (2006). Persuasive appliances: Goal priming and behavioral response to product-integrated energy feedback. In W. A. IJsselsteijn, Y. A. W. De Kort, C. J. H. Midden, J. H. Eggen, & E. A. W. H Van den Hoven (Eds.), Persuasive 2006 (pp. 45–49). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
McMillan, D. W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 315–325.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413–439.
Miller, G. R. (1980). On being persuaded. In M. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Persuasion: New directions in theory and research (pp. 11–28). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nass, C., & Mason, L. (1990). On the study of technology and task: A variable-based approach. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfeld (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 46–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Noar, S. M., Pierce, L. B., & Black, H. G. (2010). Can computer-mediated interventions change theoretical mediators of safer sex? A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 36, 261–297.
Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2011). The ‘IKEA Effect’: When labor leads to love. Harvard Business School Marketing Unit Working Paper No. 11-091. Retrieved from SSRN, May 11, 2012: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1777100
Oenema, A., Brug, J., Dijkstra, A., de Weerdt, I., & de Vries, H. (2008). Efficacy and use of an internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention, targeting saturated fat intake, physical activity and smoking cessation: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 125–135.
Overberg, R., Otten, W., de Man, A., Toussaint, P., Westenbrink, J., & Zwetsloot-Schonk, B. (2010). How breast cancer patients want to search for and retrieve information from stories of other patients on the Internet: An online randomized controlled experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(1). doi:10.2196/jmir.1215
Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12. Retrieved May 11, 2012, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue3/pan.html
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. Y. (2000). Attitude functions and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach to matched versus mismatched messages. In J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 133–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.
Pirolli, P. (2007). Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with information. Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press.
Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643–675.
Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. Hawkins, J. Weimann, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 124–181). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Read S. J., Miller, L. C., Appleby, P. R., Nwosu, M. E., Reynaldo, S., Lauren, A., et al. (2006). Socially optimized learning in a virtual environment: Reducing risky sexual behavior among men who have sex with men. Human Communication Research, 3, 1–34.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (2000). Perceptual user interfaces: Perceptual bandwidth. Communications of the ACM, 4, 65–70.
Richardson, C. R., Buis, L. R., Janney, A. W., Goodrich, D. E., Sen, A., Hess, M. L., et al. (2010). An online community improves adherence in an internet-mediated walking program. part 1: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24. doi: 10.2196/jmr.1338
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Salomon, G. (1979). Media and symbol systems as related to cognition and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 131–148.
Schlosser, A. E. (2003). Experiencing products in the virtual world: The rule of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 184–198.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.
Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42, 73–93.
Strecher, V. J., McClure, J., Alexander, G., Chakraborty, B., Nair, V., Konkel, J., et al. (2008). The role of engagement in a tailored web-based smoking cessation program: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(5). doi:10.2196/jmir.1002
Sundar, S. S. (2000). Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 480–499.
Sundar, S. S. (2007). Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 89–104). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sundar, S. S. (2008a). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 72–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sundar, S. S. (2008b). Self as source: Agency and customization in interactive media. In E. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 58–74). New York, NY: Routledge.
Sundar, S. S. (2009). Media effects 2.0: Social and psychological effects of communication technologies. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 545–560). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sundar, S. S., & Bellur, S. (2010). Concept explication in the internet age: The case of interactivity. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques (pp. 485–500). New York, NY: Routledge.
Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Jia, H., & Kim, H. S. (2012, May). The importance of message contingency: An experimental investigation of interactivity in an online search site. Paper presented at the 62nd annual conference of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S. Oh, J., Xu, Q., & Jia, H. (2011). User experience of on-screen interaction techniques: An experimental investigation of clicking, sliding, zooming, hovering, dragging and flipping. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Sundar, S. S., & Constantin, C. (2004). Does interacting with media enhance news memory? Automatic vs. controlled processing of interactive news features. Paper presented at the 54th annual conference of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating website interactivity: Impression-formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication R
esearch, 30, 30–59.
Sundar, S. S., & Kim, J. (2005). Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5, 6–29. Retrieved May 11, 2012, from http://www.jiad.org/article59
Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36, 298–322.
Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 52–72.
Sundar, S. S., Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Xu, Q. (2008). The bandwagon effect of collaborative filtering technology. Proceedings of CHI’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 26, 3453–3458.
Sundar, S. S., Oh, J., Bellur, S., Jia, H., & Kim, H. S. (2012). Interactivity as self-expression: A field experiment with customization and blogging. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12), 395–404.
Sundar, S. S., Xu, Q., Bellur, S., Jia, H., Oh, J., & Khoo, G-S. (2010, June). Click, drag, flip, and mouse-over: Effects of modality interactivity on user engagement with web content. Paper presented at the 60th annual conference of the International Communication Association, Singapore.
Sundar, S. S., Xu, Q., Bellur, S., Oh, J., & Jia, H. (2011). Beyond pointing and clicking: How do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement? Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’11), 1477–1482.
Sundar, S. S., Xu, Q., & Dou, X. (2012). Role of technology in online persuasion: A MAIN Model perspective. In S. Rodgers & E. Thorson (Eds.), Advertising theory (pp. 355–372). New York, NY: Routledge.
Sundar, S. S., Xu, Q., & Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2009). Authority vs. peer: How interface cues influence users. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09), 27, 4231–4236.
Walshe, D. G., Lewis, E. J., Kim, S. I., O’Sullivan, K., & Wiederhold, B. K. (2003). Exploring the use of computer games and virtual reality in exposure therapy for fear of driving following a motor vehicle accident. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 6, 329–334.
Wang, J., & Calder, B. J. (2006), Media transportation and advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 151–162.
Weissman, J. R. (1988). Have it your way: What happens when users control the interface. In M. A. Siegel (Eds.), Design and evaluation of computer/human interfaces: Issues for librarians and information scientists (pp. 95–104). Urbana, IL: Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., et al. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology, 9, 493–525.
Wise, K., Hamman, B., & Thorson, K. (2006). Moderation, response rate, and message interactivity: Features of online communities and their effects on intent to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 24–41.
Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. N. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290.
Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36, 285–312.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341–352.
Zanbaka, C., Goolkasian, P., & Hodges, L. F. (2006). Can a virtual cat persuade you? The role of gender and realism in speaker persuasiveness. Proceedings of CHI 2006, 1153–1162.
Author Index
Aarøe, L., 155
Aarts, H. A. G., 323, 325
Abbott, H. P., 200, 201
Abe, S., 316
Abelson, R. P., 200, 205
Abramowitz, C. V., 176
Abramowitz, S. I., 176
Abrams, D., 356
Abroms, L. C., 283
Ackerman, B., 16
Adams, B., 342
Adams, J. Q., 11
Agrawal, N., 160
Ahern, R. K., 281, 286, 296, 304
Ahlering, R. F., 266
Ahola, A. S., 341
Ah Yun, J. K., 202, 206, 262
Ajzen, I., 54, 55, 59, 61, 78, 80, 120, 121, 122, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 146, 161, 241, 280, 297, 315, 379
Akaro, E. M., 299
Albada, K. F., 238
Albarracín, D. D., 55, 57, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 130, 131
Albrecht, T. L., 238, 246
Alcaraz, K., 201, 202, 203
Aldrich, R., 290
Aleman, C. G., 238
Alexander, G., 393
Alexander, S. C., 241
Alfini, J. J., 332, 337
Allen, D., 200
Allen, M., 21, 22, 23, 143, 186, 188, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 202
Allison, M., 338, 340
Allport, G. W., 54, 57, 58, 78, 79, 122
Allum, N., 42
Allyn, J., 299, 307
Altpeter, M., 362
Alvaro, E. A., 306
Alvaro, E. E., 306
Alvaro, E. M., 172, 173, 174, 175, 179, 297, 299, 300, 304, 306, 307, 308
Ammerman, A. S., 393, 399
Amodio, D., 60
An, C., 224, 227, 228, 229, 230, 232
Andersen, P. A., 184–185
Anderson, D. M., 16, 303
Anderson, I. W., 244, 247
Anderson, J., 226, 228, 231
Anderson, J. R., 230
Anderson, J. W., 196, 238, 243
Anderson, L. R., 230
Anderson, N. H., 86, 99
Andrade, E. B., 325
Andreasen, A., 280
Andreoli, V. A., 140, 168
Andrews, J., 57
Andrews, K. R., 362
Anghelcev, G., 157
Ansolabehere, S., 269
Antieau, L. D., 342
Antonakis, J., 382
Antone, C., 28
Antonijevic, S., 272
Anumba, N., 344
Apanovitch, A. M., 29, 30, 156
Appel, M., 203
Appleby, P. R., 397
Applegate, J. L., 238, 241
Archer, R., 168
Areni, C. S., 26, 143
Arens, R., 336
Ariely, D., 392, 398
Aristotle, 27, 157, 331
Armitage, C. J., 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130
Armoudian, M., 272
Armstrong, G. B., 94, 97, 98
Arndt, J., 341
Arnerson, S., 393
Aronson, E., 88, 91, 99, 323
Arpan, L., 59, 64, 65
Arsenault, D. J., 334
Asch, S. E., 354, 359
Asuncion, A. G., 363, 366
Atkin, C. K., 132, 278, 281, 282, 288, 289, 290, 291, 297
Atkin, R. S., 337
Atwood, E. L., 372
Averbeck, J. M., 225
Axsom, D., 140
Baesler, E., 202
Bagozri, R. P., 316
Bailenson, J. N., 38 (table), 39, 266, 396, 398, 399
Bailis, D. S., 207, 210
Baird, A. C., 5
Balakrishnan, B., 397
Baldwin, C. S., 5
Ban, H., 43
Banas, J. A., 225, 226, 227, 232, 271
Bandura, A., 42, 43, 45, 129, 203, 212, 281, 392, 396
Banerjee, S. C., 156
Bang, M., 389
Baranowski, J., 399
Baranowski, T., 399
Barbee, A. P., 242, 246, 247
Bargh, J. A., 314, 323, 324, 325, 326
Barker, D., 38 (table), 39
Bar-Meir, G., 85
Barnes, G. E., 168, 174
Barnett, M., 336
Baron, R. S., 356, 361
Barone, M. J., 316
Barron, C., 204, 322
Bartels, R. D., 29, 30
Barth, J
., 38 (table), 40
Baseheart, J. R., 177, 297
Bassili, J. N., 58, 59, 141
Bates, B. R., 175, 178, 285
Bates, S., 261, 265
Bathelt, A., 203
Bauer, C. L., 86, 89, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99
Bauer, U. E., 178
Baumeister, R. F., 326
Baumgartner, H., 210
Baxter, L. A., 238, 247, 248
Bayly, M. J., 335
Beard, D., 9
Bearden, W. O., 321
Beck, K. H., 189, 190
Beck, V., 203
Becker, H. M., 280
Becker, L. A., 299
Becker, L. B., 259, 263
Becker, S. L., 73
Beenackers, M., 126
Belkin, D., 267
Bellman, S. B., 361
Bellur, S., 390, 391, 394, 395, 398, 399
Bem, D. J., 64
Bendahan, S., 382
Benedict, K. M., 341
Bennett, W. L., 37, 48, 49, 260, 269
Benoit, W. L., 174
Bensley, L. S., 174
Bente, G., 395
Berelson, B., 43, 259, 362
Bergami, M., 316
Berger, C. R., 241, 244
Berger, J., 306
Berkman, E. T., 124, 326
Berkowitz, A. D., 300
Berlin, J., 9
Berlo, D. K., 24, 88
Berman, G. L., 342
Berman, J. J., 336
Berman, T. R., 200
Bermant, G., 342
Bern, D. J., 355, 356
Berry, S. H., 203, 204
Berscheid, E., 396
Bertelsen, D. A., 46
Bettinghaus, E. P., 73, 77, 355
Bettman, J. R., 210, 316
Betz, A. L., 323
Bhagat, R., 315
Bichsel, I., 58, 64
Biddle, S. J. H., 125, 126, 128, 130
Biek, M., 303
Biener, L., 178
Bilandzic, H., 201, 207, 208, 210, 213
Biocca, F., 396
Birch, J. D., 250
Birk, T., 224
Bizer, G. Y., 141, 145, 302, 392
Black, H. G., 399
Blackstone, T., 360
Blair, H., 6, 7
Blank, M., 121
Blankenship, K. L., 117
Blanton, H., 55, 125, 301, 306
Blascovich, J., 398, 399
Bless, H., 139
Blood, R. W., 43
Bloom, J., 336
Blumler, J. G., 279
The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion Page 82