The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion

Home > Other > The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion > Page 87
The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion Page 87

by James Price Dillard


  discrete emotions and appraisal theories, 151–153

  effects of, 157–161, 160 (table)

  framing and, 29, 155–156, 160

  inoculation theory and, 228, 231

  marketplace persuasion and, 325

  message features evoking, 154–157, 154 (table)

  message-induced, 156–157

  message-irrelevant, 157

  research, future, 162–164, 162 (table)

  research designs and elicitation of, 156–157

  style and, 155–156, 163–164

  valence models, persistence of, 162–163, 162 (table)

  valence plus arousal, 151

  Affect heuristic, 161–162

  Affective ambivalence, 41

  Affective communication skills, 247, 250

  Affective misattribution procedure (AMP), 60

  Affirmative defenses, 335–336

  African Americans, 61, 335

  Agency model of customization, 392

  Agenda setting, 43–44

  Aggregated behavior, 54–55

  Ailes, Roger, 261

  Alcohol drinking by college students, 61–62

  Alibi evidence, 338

  Alien and Sedition Acts (1798), 12

  Alternative realities, 395–397

  Ambivalence, affective, 41

  American rhetorical tradition, 9–15

  AMP. See Affective misattribution procedure

  Amusing Ourselves to Death (Postman), 15

  Analogical evidence, 21

  Analytical self-referencing, 210

  Ancient rhetorical tradition, 4–5

  Anecdotal evidence, 21–22

  Anticipated affect improvement (AAI), 246

  Anticipatory-evaluative attitudes, 108

  Anti-climax, 24

  Appeals:

  incentive, 285–287

  multiple, 286–287

  negative, 286

  positive, 286

  See also Fear appeals Appraisal-Tendency Framework, 325

  Argument:

  narrative persuasion versus, 200

  novelty of, 163

  quality of, 139, 142–144

  Aristotle, 4

  Asch, Solomon, 354 Assault on Reason, The (Gore), 15

  Associative networks, 230

  Attention, motivated, 160

  Attitude-behavior problem, 79

  Attitude formation:

  channel and, 40

  context and, 42

  message and, 39

  recipient and, 41

  source and, 38–39

  Attitude objects, 110–111

  Attitudes:

  accessible, 57–59, 230

  affect and, 161

  anticipatory-evaluative, 108

  defined, 84

  ego-defensive, 106–107, 114–115

  elaboration likelihood model and, 146

  evaluative function of, 108

  experiential and schematic, 108

  experiential and specific, 108

  explicit, 322

  expressive function of, 108

  implicit, 57, 59–61, 322

  inoculation theory and, 229

  as intervening variable, 78–79

  knowledge function of, 107

  as outcome of persuasion, 56–61

  racial, 61

  in reasoned action theory, 126–127

  sexual, 375

  social-adjustive, 106, 114, 115

  utilitarian, 105–106, 113–114

  value-expressive, 106, 113–114, 115

  See also Functional attitude theory; Functional attitude theory

  Attractiveness, endorser, 318

  Audience:

  for drug prevention, 303–304, 309(n1)

  favorability of, 23

  functional attitude theory and, 116–117

  for health campaigns, 281–285, 290

  tailoring messages to, 116–117, 290, 392, 393

  technology and, 392, 393

  Autonomy, 130

  Avatars, 395–396

  Awareness of persuasive intent, 204–205, 299

  Bandwagon heuristic, 391

  Batson v. Kentucky (1986), 334

  Battered woman defense, 337

  Behavior:

  aggregated, 54–55

  detection, 29–30

  as outcome of persuasion, 54–56, 73–80

  prevention, 29, 284–285

  promoting healthy, 284–285

  proxies for, 54–56

  in reasoned action theory, 123–124

  self-predictions regarding, 125

  self-reports of, 54, 56, 123–124

  sexual, 375

  Behavioral inhibition/activation systems (BIS/BAS), 29

  Behavioral intentions, 55–56, 124–126, 130, 229

  Behavioral willingness, 56, 125

  Being persuaded, 70–80

  about, 70

  behavioral outcomes, 73–80

  elements, central, 71–73

  as response-changing process, 77–80

  as response-reinforcing process, 76–77

  as response-shaping process, 74–76

  Beliefs. See Discrepancy models of belief change

  Belletristic rhetorics, 6–7

  Bernays, Edward, 14

  Bernoulli’s principle, 85

  Bipolar valence, 150–151

  BIS/BAS. See Behavioral inhibition/activation systems

  Blair, Hugh, 6, 7

  Body image, 375

  Breast self-exams, 59

  Brezhnev, Leonid, 72

  Brigance, W. Norwood, 3

  Burden of proof, 333

  Burke, Kenneth, 7–8

  Bush, George W., 41, 266

  Capacity, 129–130, 209

  Carter, Jimmy, 261

  Case evidence, 337–342

  Categorical valence, 151

  Central-route persuasion, 138, 139, 140–141, 144–145

  CFM. See Cognitive-functional model

  Change. See Discrepancy models of belief change; Response change

  Channels, 40–41, 264–265, 271–272, 289–290

  Charges, legal, 332–333

  Children, television watching by, 42

  Choice-enhancing postscripts, 176–177

  Choice shift, 355–359, 365

  Cicero, 5

  Civil War, 12–13

  Climax versus anti-climax, 24

  Clinton, Bill, 261

  Closing statements, 343

  Coercive force, 71–72

  Cognitive appraisal theories, 151–152

  Cognitive dissonance theory, 91–92, 91 (figure), 99–100

  Cognitive elaboration, 92

  Cognitive-functional model (CFM), 160

  Cognitive heuristics, 389–391

  Cognitive-motivational-relational theory, 29

  Cognitive responses, 99

  Cognitive rules model, 244

  Coherence markers, 30–31

  College students, alcohol drinking by, 61–62

  Commercial persuasion. See Marketplace persuasion

  Committee on Public Information, 14

  Communication, 247, 250

  See also Supportive communication; specific topics

  Communication and Persuasion (Hovland et al.), 187–188

  Communication channels, mediated, 289–290

  Communication-persuasion matrix, 280

  Community psychology, 392

  Compatibility principle, 123

  Compliance, 377

  Conclusion explicitness, 24–25

  Confession evidence, 338

  Constitution (U.S.), 10

  Constitutional Convention, 263

  Construal level theory, 132

  Consumer behavior. See Marketplace persuasion

  Content. See Message content

  Context, 42–43

  Contrast principle, 90

  Control, 129–130, 392

  Control heuristic, 390

  Conviction, 72–73
/>   Coordination, 378

  Coping component of fear appeals, 185–186

  Counterarguing:

  discrepancy theories and, 92

  in inoculation theory, 222–223, 227

  metaphor and, 27

  in narrative persuasion, 205–208

  Courtroom persuasion. See Legal persuasion Credibility:

  advertisement versus non-advertisement, 23

  components of, 261

  conclusion explicitness and, 25

  in discrepancy theories, 88–89

  in elaboration likelihood model, 139–140

  expertise and, 261

  good will and, 261

  metaphor and, 27

  in political persuasion, 261–262

  in social judgment theory, 90, 91, 91 (figure)

  trustworthiness and, 261

  Cross-examination, 342–343

  Cultivation theory, 44–45

  Curiosity, 299–300

  Curves, family of, 188

  Customization, agency model of, 392

  Danger control, 189

  Decay, in inoculation theory, 225

  Decisions, deliberative versus spontaneous, 55–56

  Defendant testimony, 339

  Defense case strategies, 335–337

  Defiance, 377–378

  Deficit model, 42

  Deliberative decisions, 55–56

  Deliberative democracy, 10–11, 16–17

  De Oratore (Cicero), 5

  Depth capacity, 289

  Descriptive norms, 128

  Detection behavior, 29–30

  Deviance regulation model (DRM), 301, 303

  Differences, individual, 362–363

  Diffusion of innovation theory, 47

  Direct examination, 342

  Direct-to-consumer advertising, 376

  Disconfirmation versus discrepancy, 96–97

  Discrepancy, defined, 84

  Discrepancy models of belief change, 84–101

  about, 84–85

  auxiliary issues, 96–98

  cognitive dissonance and discrepancy, 99–100

  cognitive dissonance theory, 91–92, 91 (figure)

  cognitive responses and discrepancy, 99

  counterarguing, 92

  defined, 85

  disconfirmation versus discrepancy, 96–97

  discrepancy and oscillation, 98–99

  discrepancy models in scientific theory, 85

  dynamic models, 95–96, 100

  involvement, 100

  linear model, 86–90, 87 (figure), 88 (figure)

  longitudinal designs, 97–98, 100

  mathematical integration, 93–94

  measurement, 100

  message order, 89–90

  message repetition, 87–88, 87 (figure), 88 (figure)

  methodological wish list, 100–101

  multidimensional models, 100–101

  physical models, relevance of, 85

  positional versus psychological discrepancy, 94–95

  relation between discrepancy and beliefs change, 93–96

  research, future, 98–101

  social and psychological factors, 97–98

  social judgment theory, 90–91, 91 (figure)

  static models, 94–95

  theories regarding discrepancy, 90–92, 91 (figure)

  Discrete emotions approach, 151

  Disease detection behavior, 29–30

  Disguise, 341–342

  Distance-proportional model. See Linear discrepancy model

  Distribution of valence model (DVM), 357–358

  Domineering language, 174

  Dramatism, 8

  Drift and Mastery (Lippmann), 14

  Drive model, 187–188, 196

  DRM. See Deviance regulation model

  Drug prevention, 296–309

  about, 296

  audience, targeting, 303–304, 309(n1)

  awareness of persuasive intent, 299

  curiosity, 299–300

  emotion-arousing communications, 305

  framing, 301

  iatrogenesis, 298–301

  messaging model applications, 304–308

  misdirection and indirect influence effects, 307–308

  mis- or nonapplication of theory and level of analysis, 296–298

  normative considerations, 300–301

  opinion leadership and, 362–363

  overpromising, 305–306

  problems and solutions, 296–298

  reactance, 299

  resistance enhancement, 300

  social norming, 300–301

  socio-personal expectancies, 306–307

  suggestions for, 301–303

  Dual-process theories:

  group persuasion, 360

  supportive communication, 245–246, 249

  See also Elaboration likelihood model

  DVM. See Distribution of valence model

  Economy, in health campaigns, 289

  Effectance motivation, 244

  Effectiveness types, 292

  Effects:

  intra-audience, 364, 366

  limited, 259

  matching, 160–161

  message, 239, 241, 297

  propaganda, 259

  Proteus, 196

  third-person, 372–373, 383

  Effects-based message feature definitions, 31

  Efficacy, response, 186

  Ego-defensive attitudes, 106–107, 114–115

  See also Functional attitude theory

  Ego involvement, 91, 96

  Elaboration:

  in elaboration likelihood model, 137–138

  influences on, 138

  narrative persuasion and, 208–211

  stimulated, 27

  supportive communication and, 245

  Elaboration likelihood model (ELM), 137–147

  argument quality, nature of, 142–144

  as attitude change model, 146

  central-route persuasion, 138, 139, 140–141, 144–145

  discrepancy models of belief change and, 99

  elaboration, 137–138

  framing, 28

  functional matching hypothesis and, 112–113

  involvement, nature of, 144

  marketplace persuasion and, 317–319

  narrative persuasion and, 208

  peripheral-route persuasion, 138–141, 144–146

  persuasion variables, multiple roles for, 141–142

  political persuasion and, 265–267, 271

  research, future, 142–146

  See also Dual-process theories

  Elaboration motivation, 137–138

  Elaboration-persistence hypothesis, 318

  Elaboration-resistance hypothesis, 318

  ELM. See Elaboration likelihood model

  Elocutionary Movement, 7

  Emotional evidence, 337–338

  Emotions:

  cognition and, 152

  communications arousing, 305

  expression of, 152

  fear appeals and, 184–185

  function of, 152–153

  message features evoking, 154–157, 154 (table)

  motivation and, 152

  neurological activity and, 152

  physiological domain and, 152

  subjective experience and, 152

  See also Affect

  Empathy, 177

  Endorser attractiveness, 318

  Engagement, user, 393–395

  Entertainment-education approaches, 213, 290

  Entrapment defense, 337

  Environmental primes, 323–324

  Episodically framed news coverage, 155

  EPPM. See Extended parallel processing model

  Evaluation, formative, 281–282

  Evaluations, message, 239, 241

  Evaluative beliefs, 84

  Evaluative function of attitudes, 108

  Evidence:

  alibi, 338

  analogical, 21

&n
bsp; anecdotal, 21–22

  case, 337–342

  confession, 338

  emotional, 337–338

  in health campaigns, 287

  inadmissible, 340–341, 345(n4)

  in political persuasion, 262

  presentation of, 341–342

  scientific, 340

  statistical, 21–22

 

‹ Prev