Table of Contents
Popular Culture and Philosophy™ Series Editor: William Irwin
Title Page
Dedication
Chapter 1 - “What’s All This Then?” The Introduction
The Importance of Being British
What, That’s Not Enough for You?
Bloody Hell, There’s More!?!
Okay, That’s All for Now
And Where the @#$%^& is the Queen?
Philosophical Aspects of Monty Python
Chapter 2 - “Life’s a Piece of Shit”: Heresy, Humanism, and Heroism in Monty ...
“Blessed Are the Cheese Makers”: The Question of Heresy
“A New World, a Better Future”: The Question of Humanism
“Life’s a Piece of Shit”: The Question of Heroism
Chapter 3 - What Mr. Creosote Knows About Laughter
To Laugh, or To Scream?
Who’s Afraid of Mr. Creosote?
Just Desserts
Chapter 4 - The Limits of Horatio’s Philosophy
What I Think My Chapter May Be About
Wittgenstein and Meaning: The Absurd and The Funny
Meaning and Practice
Chapter 5 - Why Is an Argument Clinic Less Silly than an Abuse Clinic or a ...
What Kind of Argument Would You Like?
The Philosophical Argument and Reflective Equilibrium
Suppose You Were Attached to a Dead Parrot: The Role of Thought Experiments
Chapter 6 - A Very Naughty Boy: Getting Right with Brian
How I Was Saved
God Is Dead (and I’m Not Feeling so Good Myself)
This Deity Is Bleedin’ Demised
The Plumage Don’t Enter into It
Romani Ite Domum
A Good Spanking
Getting Right with Brian (Just in Case)
Chapter 7 - Monty Python and the Holy Grail: Philosophy, Gender, and Society
Mynd You, Moose Bites Kan Be Pretty Nasti . . .
Why the Pythons Chose Arthur and the Grail
Come On, You Pansy!
We Have Found a Witch. May We Burn Her?
We Have but One Punishment. . . . You Must Tie Her Down on the Bed and Spank Her
Er, Well . . . the Thing Is . . . I Thought Your Son Was a Lady
Yes, but What About the Killer Rabbit?
Chapter 8 - Against Transcendentalism: Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life and Buddhism
Is There Really Something Called ‘Transcendental Metaphysics’?
What’s So Wrong with Transcendental Thinking?
What’s So Grotesque about That?
Back Down to Earth
Mind the Mindfulness
Chapter 9 - Is There Life After Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life?
Life, the Journey: The Axial Answer
Death and (the Meaning of) Life
Philosophy as an Answer
Liberating Laughter
And Now for . . . Comedic Eliminativism
Aspects of Pythonic Philosophy
Chapter 10 - God Forgive Us
In Alphabetical Order: Birth Control (and Other Intimate Matters)
Blasphemy (Name-Calling: With Sticks and Stones to Break Your Bones)
Heaven (Capitalize for Effect)
Bonus Material: The Origin of Monty Python’s Christmas in Heaven Is Revealed ...
Hell (Capitalized because Heaven Was Capitalized)
A Short but Grave Reflection about God and Hell (You Can Use This at Your ...
Justice (A Philosopher Is Observed)
Prayer (A Euphemism for Butt-Kissing and Begging)
Chapter 11 - Monty Python and David Hume on Religion
Causes and Reasons
The Ontological Argument
Get Me to the Argument Clinic!
The Conceivable versus the Possible, Or, How to Confuse a Cat
The Argument from Design, or, “All Things Dull and Ugly”
The Argument from Miracles, Or, “He’s Been Taken Up!”
The Cause of Religion, Or “Oh Father, Please Don’t Boil Us”
The Epilogue: A Question of Belief
Chapter 12 - Madness in Monty Python’s Flying Circus
Michel Foucault: Madness as a Social Construct
Pythonic Madness
Urban Idiots: Foucauldian and Pythonesque
Chapter 13 - Monty Python and the Search for the Meaning of Life
Markets and Motives: Utilitarianism and Monty Python’s Flying Circus
Tradition and Traits: Virtue Theory and The Holy Grail
Religion and Rules: Deontology and Monty Python’s Life of Brian
Knowledge and Nihilism: Science and Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life
Chapter 14 - Existentialism in Monty Python: Kafka, Camus, Nietzsche, and Sartre
Kafka, Camus, and the “Absurd”
The Individual and the Meaning of Life
Sartre, Bad Faith, and Freedom
A Nietzschean Conclusion
Chapter 15 - “My Brain Hurts!”
Hair of the Dog
Making Sense
So Show Us
Do You See It?
Through Them, on Them, over Them
An Exercise for the Reader
No Ambition
How to Patent Nonsense
“Is There Life After Death?”
“Language Games”
“I’d Like to Put This Question to You, Please, Lizard”
Does It Sit on a Chair?
“But—They Simply Do Not Talk”
“Is There Enough of It About?”
Chapter 16 - Why Is a Philosopher Like a Python? How Philosophical Examples Work
Complaints about Complaints and Thinking about Thinking
Madmen, Blancmanges, Violinists, and Abortion
The Practical Value of Philosophical Examples
So, What Have Philosophers Ever Done for Us?
Pythonic Aspects of Philosophy
Chapter 17 - Tractatus Comedo-Philosophicus
A Senseless Waste of Human Reason
The Overcoming of Philosophy through Comical Paralysis of Language
Coda
Chapter 18 - Monty Python’s Utterly Devastating Critique of Ordinary Language Philosophy
What the Fly Saw
The Story of Ordinary Language Philosophy: Britain’s Most Influential ...
The Problem with Brilliance
Bruces
A Knockout of an Argument
Chapter 19 - Word and Objection: How Monty Python Destroyed Modern Philosophy
In My Day . . .
The Trouble With Dead Parrots, and Sketches About Them
What Is to Be Done?
Chapter 20 - My Years with Monty Python, or, What’s So Funny About Language, ...
Hume’s Gap
Hume’s Incomplete Advice
The Complete Two-Minute Introduction to Conceptual Schemes
And Therefore . . .
No Shoes for Muskrats: How the 1956 Olympic Games Destroyed Indonesian Art
Chapter 21 - Themes in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy as Reflected in the ...
“International Philosophy,” from Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl
“Dead Parrot,” Episode 8 of Monty Python’s Flying Circus, “Full Frontal Nudity”
Arthur Meets the Black Knight, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
“Argument Clinic,” Monty Python’s Flying Circus, Episode 29, “The Money Programme”
“Nudge Nudge,” Monty Python’s Flying Circus, Episode 3, “How To Recognise ...
Burn The Witch, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
“The Cheese Shop,” Episode 33, M
onty Python’s Flying Circus, “Salad Days”
Everyone Remembers Their First Time: About the authors, nearly all of whom have ...
What Was All That,Then?
Copyright Page
Popular Culture and Philosophy™ Series Editor: William Irwin
VOLUME 1
Seinfeld and Philosophy: A Book about Everything and Nothing (2000) Edited by William Irwin
VOLUME 2
The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D’oh! Of Homer (2001) Edited by William Irwin, Mark T. Conard, and Aeon J. Skoble
VOLUME 3
The Matrix and Philosophy: Welcome to the Desert of the Real (2002) Edited by William Irwin
VOLUME 4
Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy: Fear and Trembling in Sunnydale (2003) Edited by James B. South
VOLUME 5
The Lord of the Rings and Philosophy: One Book to Rule Them All (2003) Edited by Gregory Bassham and Eric Bronson
Volume 6
Baseball and Philosophy: Thinking Outside the Batter’s Box (2004) Edited by Eric Bronson
VOLUME 7
The Sopranos and Philosophy: I Kill Therefore I Am (2004) Edited by Richard Greene and Peter Vernezze
VOLUME 8
Woody Allen and Philosophy: You Mean My Whole Fallacy Is Wrong? (2004) Edited by Mark T. Conard and Aeon J. Skoble
VOLUME 9
Harry Potter and Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts (2004) Edited by David Baggett and Shawn E. Klein
VOLUME 10
Mel Gibson’s Passion and Philosophy: The Cross, the Questions, the Controversy (2004) Edited by Jorge J.E. Gracia
VOLUME 11
More Matrix and Philosophy: Revolutions and Reloaded Decoded (2005) Edited by William Irwin
VOLUME 12
Star Wars and Philosophy: More Powerful than You Can Possibly Imagine (2005) Edited by Jason T. Eberl and Kevin S. Decker
VOLUME 13
Superheroes and Philosophy: Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way (2005) Edited by Tom Morris and Matt Morris
VOLUME 14
The Atkins Diet and Philosophy: Chewing the Fat with Kant and Nietzsche (2005) Edited by Lisa Heldke, Kerri Mommer, and Cindy Pineo
VOLUME 15
The Chronicles of Narnia and Philosophy: The Lion, the Witch, and the Worldview (2005) Edited by Gregory Bassham and Jerry Walls
VOLUME 16
Hip Hop and Philosophy: Rhyme 2 Reason (2005) Edited by Derrick Darby and Tommie Shelby
VOLUME 17
Bob Dylan and Philosophy: It’s Alright Ma (I’m Only Thinking) (2006) Edited by Peter Vernezze and Carl J. Porter
VOLUME 18
Harley-Davidson and Philosophy: Full-Throttle Aristotle (2006) Edited by Bernard E. Rollin, Carolyn M. Gray, Kerri Mommer, and Cynthia Pineo
VOLUME 19
Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think! (2006) Edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch
IN PREPARATION:
Poker and Philosophy: Pocket Rockets and Philosopher Kings (2006) Edited by Eric Bronson
U2 and Philosophy (2006) Edited by Mark Wrathall
The Undead and Philosophy: Chicken Soup for the Soulless (2006) Edited by Richard Greene and K. Silem Mohammad
To Kiah, Cheshire, and Quinn, who’ve never had to be told to think for themselves
—G.L.H.
And to Bruces Everywhere
—G.A.R.
1
“What’s All This Then?” The Introduction
GARY L. HARDCASTLE and GEORGE A. REISCH
Pythonist: A person who professes to prophesy through some divine or esoteric inspiration.
—Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged
England. Sunday evening, October 5th, 1969. A big surprise awaits those switching on their television sets and settling in for an evening of entertainment. A game show features Genghis Khan dying, his death scored by panelists. An advertisement for butter heralds its superior taste, all but indistinguishable from that of dead crab. And excited sportscasters cover Pablo Picasso painting while riding a bicycle through England (“It will be very interesting to see how he copes with the heavy traffic round Wisborough Green!”). It’s . . . Monty Python’s Flying Circus!
At the end of the 1960s—a decade of race riots, student protests, undeclared wars, political assassinations, Woodstock, the first moon landing, and the rise of the sensitive singer-songwriter—perhaps nothing could be entirely new and unexpected. Yet Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin—collectively, Monty Python—pulled it off week after week. When a tuxedoed John Cleese intoned “And now for something completely different . . . ” (mocking the BBC, naturally), he was completely right. Characters suddenly announced their desire to be not only lumberjacks, but cross-dressing lumberjacks. Sketches were interrupted by characters from other sketches. Viewers were taught self-defense techniques against fresh fruit. Somehow, the Pythons consistently found ways to move their audiences—within minutes, sometimes even seconds—from blunt incomprehension (the Fish Slapping Dance?) to fits of hearty, memorable laughter. Python fans vividly remember their first time.
For many of us, this kind of humor was just what we needed to survive the 1970s, not to mention the 1980s. By then, Monty Python had found its audience, wiggled into the collective consciousness, and become one of the most successful and influential comedy institutions of the twentieth century. After four seasons and forty-five episodes of Monty Python’s Flying Circus, the Pythons did the proper British thing and established an empire of books, audio recordings, and feature films, notably Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975), Monty Python’s Life of Brian (1979), and Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life (1983). As of this writing, the empire has conquered Broadway, where Monty Python’s Spamalot, a musical adaptation of Monty Python and the Holy Grail, plays to packed houses (well, at least, we can’t get tickets) while its creators, chief among them Eric Idle, try out various spots on the mantel for the Tony Awards© that the show has won. Indeed, much of popular culture has been Pythonized. Watch George Carlin, Richard Pryor, Steve Martin, Andy Kaufman, Mike Myers, and their comedic progeny, or Saturday Night Live, The Simpsons, In Living Color, Kids in the Hall, Arrested Development, and their comedic progeny, and you’ll see Python again, echoed in dozens of ways. Read contemporary criticism of entertainment and culture, or nearly anything “postmodern,” and you’ll see the word ‘pythonesque’ or knowing references to “spam” or “nudge nudge, wink wink” that mark a common bond between author and reader—yep, Python fan.
Not everyone, of course, belongs to the club. We all know one or two who stare at a Python sketch the way a dog looks at a card trick. They just don’t get it. That’s okay, of course—just don’t offer them a Whizzo Chocolate or tell them you weren’t expecting the Spanish Inquisition, lest you get a blank stare in return. This book, on the other hand, is for people who do get it. Actually, it’s a book for people who not only get it, but who have, on occasion, wondered what that “it” is exactly. You’ve probably noticed the book’s title, so you won’t be surprised that we think that Monty Python’s absurdities bear a deep and interesting connection to philosophy.
Really? What sort of “deep and interesting” connection? It’s a good thing we didn’t have to answer that question before we found contributors and put this book together, for back then we didn’t have an answer. Fortunately, our philosophical colleagues and acquaintances (whom, naturally, we hit up for chapters) were as intrigued with that question as we were. Now that we’ve assembled the book, however, we still won’t declare any simple, final theory about this connection. It remains somewhat mysterious. But thanks in no small part to our contributors, we understand much better why Monty Python and philosophy go together. It all starts with . . .
The Importance of Being British
Britain was a philosophical mecca for much of the twentieth century, especially the universities of Cambridge an
d Oxford, where the British Pythons studied in the 1960s. Here, too, philosophical superstars like Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein, A.J. Ayer, G.E. Moore, and Gilbert Ryle spent the first half of the twentieth century living, working, playing, and, apparently, threatening one another with pokers.1 (Gilliam, for the record, spent the 1960s at Occidental College in Southern California, which, as they say, explains a lot.) For better or worse, what gets taught in philosophy classrooms around the world to this very day derives from what these philosophers achieved at Oxford and Cambridge.
True, none of the Pythons specialized in philosophy. Chapman studied to be a physician, Cleese a barrister, Jones an historian, and so on.2 But they didn’t have to be philosophers to get a healthy dose of Russell, Wittgenstein, and the rest. The way these philosophers approached philosophical issues, leaning heavily on an analysis of the language in which philosophical problems were cast, was in the air and influenced nearly every region of the intellectual landscape. And thus it seeped, much like advertising, muzak, or spilt Tate & Lyle’s golden syrup, into so much of what the Pythons did.
That’s why we’re calling the first part of this volume Philosophical Aspects of Python. These chapters look at the ways in which particular Python sketches or films illustrate some issue or idea from philosophy. They differ in a number of ways, but they all take up a particular bit of Python and wring from it the philosophical content that we suspect is, more often than not, the vestige of an Oxbridge education, circa 1965. These chapters show what happens when twentieth-century philosophy gets run through a filter consisting of equal parts British music-hall tradition, 1960s-style anti-authoritarianism, and straightforward intelligence.
Monty Python and Philosophy Page 1