[11]. Ehrman, “Jesus and the Adulteress,” 33 (modified).
[12]. Against the suggestion that the author paraphrases the traditional form, see Ehrman, “Jesus and the Adulteress,” 33–34, esp. nn. 42, 44.
[13]. Note that Eusebius in fragment 3 made exactly the same mistake with respect to the Gospel according to the Hebrews.
[14]. F. Loofs, Theophilus von Antiochien Adversus Marcionem und die anderen theologischen Quellen bei Irenaeus, TU 46 (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1930), 311–12; earlier: J. B. Lightfoot, Essays on the Work Entitled Supernatural Religion (London: Macmillan, 1889), 194–202. Cf. Schoedel, Polycarp, 124. Against connecting them with Papias, see T. Zahn, Forschungen zur Geschichte des neutestamentlichen Kanons, vol. 6, I. Apostel und Apostelschüler in der Provinz Asien. II. Brüder und Vettern Jesu (Leipzig: A. Deichert, 1900), 88–94. For Polycarp as a possible source of anonymous fragments in Irenaeus, consult Pier Franco Beatrice, “Der Presbyter des Irenäus, Polykarp von Smyrna und der Brief an Diognet,” in Eugenio Romero-Pose, ed., Pléroma: Salus Carnis: Homenaje a Antonio Orbe, S.J. (Santiago de Compostella, 1990), 179–202, and Charles E. Hill, From the Lost Teaching of Polycarp: Identifying Irenaeus’ Apostolic Presbyter and the Author of Ad Diognetum (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006).
The Apostolic Fathers in English Page 44