The Satanic Bible

Home > Other > The Satanic Bible > Page 28
The Satanic Bible Page 28

by Michael A Aquino


  movements and change.

  Fritz Lang (1890-1976), “who made moving

  blueprints”, was an Austrian film director who made

  such classics as Metropolis (1926) and M (1930).

  Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900), “a realist”,

  was a German philosopher and forerunner to the

  existentialists. His ideas of the overman (or

  “superman”) and the “will to power”, as well as his

  ideas concerning the existence of natural “masters”

  and ”slaves”, are greatly admired by modern

  philosophical Satanists.

  W.C. Fields (1880-1946), “who saved me a

  journey to Tibet”, was the stage-name of William C.

  Dukinfield.

  P.T. Barnum (1810-1891), “another great

  guru”, was the American showman famous for his

  exhibits of freaks and establishment of circuses.

  Barnum’s supposed basic philosophy - “There’s a

  sucker born every minute.” - was taken to heart by

  LaVey and used as a mainstay of his worldview.

  Hans Poelzig (1869-1936), “who knew all the

  angles”, was a German architect who specialized in

  grandiose and imaginative structures. An example is

  the Grand Theater in Berlin, also called the Max

  Reinhardt Theater (1919). He was also the set

  designer for The Golem (Deutsche Bioscop, 1914).

  Reginald Marsh (1898-1954), “a great artist”,

  was an illustrator, scene designer, and painter of

  - 356 -

  gritty street scenes, greatly admired by LaVey, who

  is himself a painter of unusual subjects.

  Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957), “who knew

  more than cabinet making”, was a German

  psychologist who held that there was a material

  force called “orgone” which worked in conjunction

  with the human orgasm. This force could also be

  collected in “cabinets” called “orgone accumulators”.

  Mark Twain (1835-1910), “a very brave man”,

  was the pen name of Samuel Langhorn Clemens, the

  great American writer. LaVey much admires Twain

  for his works Letters from the Earth (1962) and The

  Mysterious Stranger (1969). In an early Church of

  Satan document, LaVey praises Twain as “one of the

  greatest of the Devil’s advocates in history” and as

  “the most noble embodiment of the Satanist”.

  This list of influences provides invaluable

  insight into the formation of LaVey’s philosophy and

  outlook on life. Of the 16 identifiable men fully half

  of them are artists of one kind or another. Of these,

  five dealt with the creation of visual imagery and

  two, W.C. Fields and P.T. Barnum, were best known

  as “trickster” figures. The idealization of image

  makers should provide some clue as to the true

  nature of LaVey’s philosophy and magic.

  That most of LaVey’s ideas are not original, and

  that his philosophy is largely made up of bits and

  pieces of the philosophies of others which he

  recomposed according to his own tastes and style -

  unique to himself and to his time - might also be

  said of some of the other subjects in Lords of the

  Left-Hand Path. We could say the same of every one

  - 357 -

  who ever created a religion, whether Gautama the

  Buddha or Gerald Gardner.

  What makes LaVey somewhat unusual in this

  respect is that he often seems to insist on the idea

  that he invented a way of thinking, that his Satanism

  is something akin to a product upon which he has a

  “copyright” of some sort.

  But more remarkable than the idea that LaVey

  invented his Satanism out of bits and pieces of

  obscure philosophies is the fact that he actually

  invented himself out of the depths of his own

  mind.

  - 358 -

  - 359 -

  A2: Satanic Bible

  1972 Introduction

  - by Michael A. Aquino IV°-I’

  Each successive era of man’s cultural and

  ethical development has upraised its literary

  manifesto - an argument challenging existing norms

  and proposing a novel approach to the enduring

  issues of civilization. It has not infrequently been the

  case that the realities of political nationalism have

  been blended with the idealisms of extranational

  emphasis to produce what we now cautiously term

  existentialism. Pertinent works might include the

  Republic of Plato, the Politics of Aristotle,

  Machiavelli’s Prince, and the writings of Nietzsche,

  Hobbes, Locke, Marx, and Sartre.

  This is the book of our era.

  The dawn of the Satanic Age was celebrated on

  April 30, 1966 - the Year One. On that date Anton

  Szandor LaVey consecrated the Church of Satan in

  the city of San Francisco and assumed office as its

  first High Priest. What had begun several years

  earlier as an intellectual forum dedicated to the

  investigation and application of the Black Arts has

  since expanded into an international philosophical

  - 360 -

  movement of the first magnitude. Satanism, once

  the isolate province of furtive outcasts and radical

  eccentrics, has now become a serious alternative to

  the doctrines of theism and materialism. In its

  championship of “indulgence instead of abstinence”,

  the Church of Satan rejects the notion that man’s

  progress is contingent upon his acceptance of a self-

  imposed morality. Sound judgment derives from the

  comparison and resolution of opposites, Satanists

  maintain, and one cannot presume to justice by

  honoring a single standard of behavior.

  An empirical approach to morality is not a

  recent innovation; such theorists as Pythagoras,

  Hegel, Spencer, and Compte advanced the original

  propositions for man’s intellectual independence

  from the natural order. And, though this concept has

  invariably provoked adverse reaction from society-

  oriented institutions, it is not an insubstantial

  viewpoint. One need only consider the spasmodic

  cataclysms of history to see how inadequately Homo

  Sapiens cooperates with his fellows.

  By itself, however, all theory is inconsequential.

  Until now the only advocates of a subjective

  morality were professorial abstractionists and -

  occasionally - the scattered and disorganized

  devotees of the traditional “White” witchcraft.

  Indeed the latter have enjoyed some notoriety of

  late, as their supposed proclamation of a liberal

  morality tempered by social correctness appeals to

  the bored but timid dilettante. Such aficionados of

  the occult profess a righteous horror of Black Magic

  or Satanism, which they denounce as a maleficent,

  degenerate creature of moral and carnal abuse.

  The Satanist, on the other hand, regards

  traditional witchcraft as merely a neurotic reaction

  against the established religions of the parent

  - 361 -

  culture. The worship of any deity or deities - under

&nbs
p; any guise whatsoever - is repulsive to the Black

  Magician, who considers all protestations of faith or

  trust in a supernatural protectorate to be

  humiliating demonstrations of cowardice and

  emotional insecurity. Satanism has been frequently

  misrepresented as “devil worship”, when in fact it

  constitutes a clear rejection of all forms of worship

  as a desirable component of the personality. It is not

  so much an anti-religion - a simple rebuttal of any

  o n e b e l i e f - a s i t i s a n u n - r e l i g i o n , a n

  uncompromising dismissal of all insubstantial

  mysticism. As such it represents a far more serious

  threat to organized theologies than do the archaic

  customs of the old dæmonologies.

  Ritual and fantasy play a very real part in the

  activities of the Satanic Church, on the assumption

  that the experience and control of mental and

  metaphysical irrationality are necessary for the

  strengthening of the psyche. Thus a distinct effort is

  made to avoid what was perhaps the Achilles’ heel of

  the Gurdjieff-Ouspensky school of subjective

  psychological evolution; earlier disciples of self-

  determined transcendentalism postulated that all

  non-materialistic sensations were a danger to the

  coherence of the student. Crucial to the concept of

  Satanic ritual is an appreciation of its illustrative

  and inspirational qualities without necessarily

  regarding it as inflexible reality.

  Satanism is more accurately identified as a

  disposition than as a religion, as it is actively

  concerned with all the facets of human existence,

  not with only the so-called spiritual aspects. Yet

  those who proclaim it to be a danger to justice and

  cooperative order have missed the point entirely.

  Satanism advocates unrestricted freedom, but only

  - 362 -

  to the extent that one’s preferences do not impinge

  upon another’s. It should also be noted that

  Satanism is a philosophy of the individual, not of the

  mass. There are no collective policy statements save

  the famous Crowley admonition: “Self-deceit is the

  gravest of all ‘sins’.”

  While the majority of the populace may

  instinctively incline to a de facto Satanism, the

  Church cautions that its propositions are not for the

  irresponsible. There are no Satanic missionaries,

  and to affiliate one must meet exacting standards.

  Inexperience is not dishonored, but pretentiousness,

  hypocrisy, and pomposity are treated with the scorn

  that they deserve. Satanism is no less an art than it

  is a science, and there is “no standard of

  measurement deified”.

  Dr. LaVey is uniquely prepared to author the

  new Diabolism. An American of Georgian, Alsatian,

  and Romanian Gypsy descent, he was quick to

  display the characteristic restlessness of his nomadic

  ancestors and an unusual empathy for their earthy,

  arcane lore. An early preoccupation with the

  military sciences led him to read the various

  logistical publications of the World War II era, only

  to discover that the proud visions of martial glory

  entertained in the first world war had given way to a

  detached, mercenary realism in the second. His

  experiences as a student did nothing to dispel this

  first taste of human cynicism, and LaVey’s growing

  impatience with the sterile regimentation of

  conventional education drove him to seek the

  strange, surrealistic enchantments of the circus. He

  assisted Clyde Beatty as a wild-animal trainer, and

  he soon developed a strong affinity for the cats

  which was to mark his personality in a most curious

  manner. All animate creatures are basically bestial,

  - 363 -

  he reasoned, and even the most refined social orders

  achieve at best only a flimsy suppression of this

  innate savagery. From the circus he proceeded to a

  carnival, where the glitter of the performing arts was

  tinged with the ever-present struggle for daily

  subsistence. Here LaVey worked in a pathetic but

  quietly dignified world of misfits, sideshow freaks,

  and human oddities; and here he was to learn the

  craft of the stage magician, whose success depends

  upon the contrived distraction of the audience’s

  attention. With a certain grimness he noted the

  fascination with which the “normal” man regards his

  deformed comrades - a gloating satisfaction over the

  visiting of misfortune upon another instead of

  oneself. Becoming increasingly interested in this

  cruel, lycanthropic attribute of human nature, he

  studied criminology in college and eventually

  worked with the San Francisco Police Department as

  a photographer.

  As a circus professional he had seen carnal man

  at his most artistic; now he was to view him at his

  most vicious. Three years of the gore, brutality, and

  abject misery that permeate the criminal subculture

  left him sickened, disillusioned, and angered with

  the rampant hypocrisy of polite society. He turned

  to the pipe organ as a means of living and devoted

  the greater part of his efforts to what was to become

  his life’s work - Black Magic.

  LaVey had long since rejected the stereotypical

  tracts on ceremonial sorcery as the hysterical

  products of medieval imaginations. The “Old Craft”

  with its superstitions, affected mannerisms, and

  infantile parlor games was not for him; what he

  sought was a metaphysical psychology that would

  approach the intellectual man only after giving due

  - 364 -

  consideration to his brutal, animalistic origins. And

  so he came at last to the Goat of Mendes.

  Satan is easily the most enigmatic figure in

  classical literature. Possessed of every conceivable

  wealth, and the most powerful of the Archangels, he

  spurned his exalted allegiance to proclaim his

  independence from all that his Heavenly patron

  personified. Although condemned to the most

  hideous of domains, a Hell totally shunned by the

  divinity, he embraced such privations as the burden

  of his intellectual prerogative. In his Infernal

  Empire one might indulge even the most

  extraordinary tastes with impunity, yet amidst such

  wanton licentiousness the Devil maintained a

  peculiar nobility. It was this elusive quality which

  Anton LaVey determined to identify.

  After long years of research and experiment, he

  pronounced the guiding principle of Satanism: that

  the ultimate consequence of man lies not in unity

  but in duality. It is only synthesis that decides

  values; adherence to a single order is arbitrary and

  therefore insignificant.

  LaVey’s disturbing theories and bizarre

  operations of ceremonial Black Magic eventually

  attracted a following of similarly minded

  individuals. From this first small
circle the Church

  of Satan was to emerge, attuned to its founder’s

  contention that its messages would be presented

  most effectively through “nine parts social

  respectability to one part of the most blatant

  outrage”.

  The social impact and spectacular growth of

  the Church were to become something of a legend in

  themselves, but it was an essential part of LaVey’s

  convictions that the formal institution’s role was

  principally that of a catalyst. Contemporary

  - 365 -

  civilization has proved too interdependent to permit

  the luxury of monastic isolationism. Satanism must

  accordingly assume a stance comprehensible to the

  average intellect. It was with such intent that the

  Satanic Bible was conceived.

  The Satanic Bible is a most insidious

  document. One is strongly tempted to compare it

  with that obscure, malefic mythology The King in

  Yellow, a psychopolitical work that supposedly

  drove its readers to madness and damnation. As

  candid and conversational as the Satanic Bible

  might seem at first glance, it is not a volume to be

  gently dismissed. It is very much the product of our

  time, not only because such a book - together with

  its author - would more than likely have been

  destroyed in an earlier era, but because its creation

  was an evolutionary inevitability.

  You, the reader, are about to be impaled upon

  the sharp horns of a Satanic dilemma. If you accept

  the propositions of this book, you condemn your

  most cherished sanctuaries to annihilation. In

  return you will awaken - but only to the most fiery of

  Hells. Should you reject the argument, you resign

  yourself to a cancerous disintegration of your

  previously subconscious sense of identity. Small

  wonder that the Archfiend’s legacy has won him so

  many bitter enemies!

  Whatever your decision, it can be avoided no

  longer. The Satanic Bible finally articulates what

  man has instinctively dreaded to proclaim: that he

  himself is potentially divine.

  - 366 -

  - 367 -

  A3: Ceremony of Ordination to

  the Priesthood of Mendes

  - by Michael A. Aquino IV°-I’

  [From 1966 to mid-1972 Church of Satan

  ordinations to the Satanic Priesthood - the

  Priesthood of Mendes III° - were conducted at the

  Central Grotto in San Francisco by High Priest

  Anton LaVey and personalized to each Priest or

 

‹ Prev