Campanella became convinced by 1598 that certain dismal events
and celestial signs would bring great upheaval at the end of the
millennium. He became involved in a conspiracy to remove the
Habsburg rulers in Calabria and reestablish the region (including
the Pythagorean city of Croton) as an independent republic in opposition to the Spanish government in the Kingdom of Naples. But the plot was exposed. Campanella and others were arrested in 1599.
He was put on trial in Calabria and Naples. Allegedly, Campanella
sought not only to support a political revolt, but to contrive a new
religion based on heresies and the recovery of ancient liberty. There
were two separate and simultaneous investigations: one, headed by
royal authorities, concerned the conspiracy for a rebellion; the other,
an investigation for heresy, was headed by the Inquisition.74
117
burned alive
It was alleged that Campanella had been influenced by the
Devil.75 Campanella later divulged some of the accusations against him: ‘The first time, when they asked me: “How do you know that
which you have never learned? Do you have a demon at your command?” I replied, “To learn that which I know, I have not used more oil than what you have drunken in wine.”’76 Witnesses testified that Campanella had said that Jesus Christ was not God’s son and had
not resurrected, that his body had just been stolen and hidden, as ‘the
same had been done with Moses, Pythagoras and others. ’77
Allegedly Campanella had also said that the Christian religion
was a political scheme; that Jesus had not established the sacraments; the Eucharist was ‘an absurdity and it is craziness to believe in it’; Mary was not a virgin; heaven, Hell and demons do not exist;
biblical miracles were imaginary, but Campanella himself ‘could
revive the dead and other extraordinary things’.78 As if those were not enough heresies, allegedly he had also tried to prove that God
does not exist and said that the Holy Trinity is an illusion, that Jesus
had lovers, that sexual acts are licit, and that the tyrannical Pope
was the Antichrist. Reportedly Campanella had further said that
Christians are ignorant asses who were subdued by the apostles into
believing by faith and against reason.79
Furthermore, Campanella later recalled that the Inquisitors
accused him ‘of having the opinions of Democritus’, but he replied
he had actually written books against Democritus. He also recalled:
They accused me of being a heretic, I who have composed
a dialogue against the heretics of our times. In sum, they
accused me of rebellion and heresy, for having said that
there are spots on the Sun, the Moon and the stars, against
Aristotle who made the world eternal and incorruptible. For
that it was that they threw me, like Jeremiah, into the lower
lake, where there is neither air nor even light.80
Like Bruno, Campanella defended himself against the accusations by arguing that they were ridiculous and false. He also
argued that his alleged participation in planning a revolt had consisted merely in making an astrological prophecy. Witnesses testified against him. He denied their allegations. So the Inquisitors tortured
him by hanging him from a corda. He protected himself by acting
118
Aliens on the Moon?
Tommaso
Campanella,
sculpted by Ettore
Ferrari, on the base
of Bruno’s statue
at the Campo de’
Fiori.
insane. He babbled incoherencies. He yelled that he had been murdered but that the Pope would save him! When asked how long he had been imprisoned he said ‘always, always’. To the threat of
further torture he reportedly said, ‘yes, yes, do it, do it.’ And when
asked what he expected from ‘these lords’, he replied, ‘let me shit.’81
Pope Clement viii did not believe that Campanella was mad. At
one point the Pope ordered that Campanella be tortured by both
the corda and the cavaletto, a procedure whereby the prisoner was tied to a chair suspended from the walls for forty consecutive hours
while kept awake.82
An account of another of the tortures endured by Campanella
says that he was interrogated ‘for thirtyfive hours, held harshly and
cruelly, all the veins and arteries around his rear end were broken
by the inhumane device of torture, with such force that they emitted blood that could not be stopped’. 83 At some point Campanella wrote a poem to God about his sufferings, which I translate literally
as prose:
that the hard example of my lasting hel , may be seen without
my consent. Six and six years, spent in painful punishment,
the affliction of all the senses, my limbs tortured seven times,
the blasphemies and the fables of fools, the Sun denied to
the eyes, the nerves plied, the bones injured, the pulp lacerated, the roughness on which I sleep, the irons, the spilled 119
burned alive
blood, and the raw fear, and the food scant and foul; in hope
worthy of Your lance and shield.84
If a prisoner endured torture without confessing, especially multiple
tortures, then the Inquisitors usually surmised that he was not guilty
of heretical intentions.85 This could lower the accusations to the minor rank of unintended heresies. The prisoner could eventually
be released. Also, having an ‘injured mind’ could prevent an ecclesiastical tribunal from issuing a death sentence ‘because the accused’s inability to perform penance would lead to a loss of his soul, with
grave consequences for his judges’.86
Campanella’s alleged insanity kept him alive, but his defence
failed inasmuch as he remained imprisoned in Naples for years. Still,
in 1602 Campanella began drafting a manuscript titled City of the
Sun, in which he described a utopia based on astrology. Its inhabitants worshipped the Sun and shared wisdom like the Pythagoreans.
Campanella managed to send some manuscripts out of prison, but
his efforts were obstructed by a Decree of the Index in 1603, banning
all of his works. 87 The same decree also banned all of Bruno’s books.
It prohibited such works for including ‘false doctrines, heretical,
erroneous, scandalous, corrupting’, and ‘against God’.88
In 1607 Gaspar Schoppe visited Campanella in prison in Naples.
Whereas Schoppe despised the ‘monstrous’ Bruno, whom he never
met, he had an opportunity to talk with Campanella. Schoppe and
Campanella both shared an interest in producing a Christianized
version of ancient Stoic moral wisdom.89 Hence Schoppe became sympathetic towards Campanella’s plight. Consequently, when
Campanella worked on a manuscript against atheism, he dedicated
its Preface to Schoppe. He there described the interrogations and
tortures he had endured:
I have been locked up in fifty prisons and subjected to the
most atrocious torture seven times. The last time it lasted
forty hours. I was strangled with a garrotte with very taut
ropes that ripped my bones, suspended, my hands tied
behind my back, over a sharp wooden stake that devoured
me, the sixth part of my flesh, and drew out ten pounds
of blood, after forty hours they thought me dead, so my
ordeal ended; some of them [Inquisitors] injured me, and,
&
nbsp; 120
Aliens on the Moon?
to increase my pains, they shook the rope from which I was
hanging; the others very softly praised my courage. Nothing
has broken me and it could not tear from me a single word.
After six months of illness, miraculously, I was finally cured;
[but then] I was plunged into a pit. Fifteen times I have
been put on trial.90
Despite Schoppe’s sympathy, Campanella remained in prison.
Meanwhile, a philosophy professor in Florence criticized
Copernicus and Galileo. His name was Ludovico delle Colombe.
He circulated a dissertation that gave physical reasons why the Earth
cannot move, by insisting that all heavy things must go to the centre
of the world. He also denied the notion of a living Earth: ‘it is an
impossible thing that the Earth is of an angelic intel ligence or substance that moves and spins. ’91 Delle Colombe also said that at first sight the telescope seemed to confirm ‘the opinion of Pythagoras’
that the Moon is ‘another Earth’, by apparently showing that it
is irregular, with mountains and cultivated valleys. 92 But Delle Colombe argued that philosophy, reason and the scriptures showed
that this was a ‘deception of the senses’.93 He insisted the Moon’s surface is truly smooth. He said Galileo’s claims were ‘vanities’, that
everyone disparaged as ‘temerarious’. He quoted the Jesuit theologian Pineda, ‘it is worthless, temerarious and dangerous to the faith, and taken from the ancient philosophers. ’94
Campanella had the opposite reaction. By 1611, still imprisoned
after many years, he heard about Galileo’s discoveries. He wrote
effusively to Galileo:
In astronomy Ptolemy and Copernicus had put us to shame,
but you, enlightened man, not only have retrieved for us the
glory of the Pythagoreans, stolen from the subtle Greeks,
resurrecting their dogmas, but you extinguish all the glory of
the world with your splendour. ‘ And I saw a new heaven and
a new Earth’, as [John] the Apostle and Isaiah said, blinding
us; you purged the eyes of men, and show us a new heaven
and a new Earth on the Moon.95
Campanella thus quoted a phrase from the New Testament, about
the Apocalypse, which I have italicized:
121
burned alive
Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire.
The lake of fire is the second death. If anyone’s name was
not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into
the lake of fire. Then I saw a new heaven and a new Earth,
for the first heaven and the first Earth had passed away.
(Revelation 20:14–21:1)
Campanella also referred to other notions by many writers. He
cautioned Galileo that if ‘theologians should murmur’, some ancient
theologians could serve to defend himself, including Augustine and
Origen, so that the scriptures would not be used against mathematicians: ‘You have Origen, who taught that the Earth is an animal and all the stars, and praises the Pythagorean dogmas and tested by
the Scriptures. ’96 Campanella did not explain this remark further, but indeed in one work Origen had argued:
but as our one body is provided with many members, and is
held together by one soul, so I am of opinion that the whole
world also ought to be regarded as some huge and immense
animal, which is kept together by the power and reason of
God as by one soul.97
Furthermore, Origen had similarly argued that stars and planets ‘may
be designated as living beings’. Because only bodies with souls can
move, living things are always in motion. The stars move regularly
so they must be rational beings. Furthermore, apparently stars were
subject to sin (Job 25:5). Finally, because the stars receive orders from
God, as the Bible says: ‘I have given a commandment to all the stars’
(Isaiah 45:12).98 These had been the beliefs of Giordano Bruno.
Origen claimed to have discovered, from the scriptures, that
heavenly bodies have life, reason and, probably, souls. But Origen
did not attribute this to the Pythagoreans. He had criticized stories
about Pythagoras, Euphorbus, Hermotimus and Apollonius. Origen
said the Pythagoreans were wrong about transmigration and about
souls’ alleged descent from the vaults of heaven and from the
planets. 99 So, in writing to Galileo, Campanella was linking Origen with ideas that seemed Pythagorean to him.
Campanella did not warn Galileo that, posthumously, the
almost saintly Origen had been denounced for heresies, just like
122
Aliens on the Moon?
Bruno. Against Origen, the Fifth Ecumenical Council of 553
decreed that anyone who says that the Sun, Moon or stars are animated is a heretic. 100 That Council condemned Origen for asserting the ‘preexistence of souls’, or the transmigration and immortality of souls, which were Pythagorean notions. Therefore prisoner Campanella was not giving Galileo entirely useful advice. In addition
Campanella cited titles of works that he had written, suggesting that
Galileo read them, starting with his ‘three books On the Philosophy of
the Pythagoreans’, now lost. And Campanella gave several other arguments to embolden Galileo. Still, Galileo did not pursue any claims about Earth, stars and planets being living, rational entities, unlike
Bruno. Instead, he reported his telescopic findings in descriptive
ways, though noting their broader significance. Then one of Bruno’s
Inquisitors became concerned about Galileo’s claims.
Bellarmine and the Enemies of Bruno
Soon after Bruno’s execution, Cardinal Bellarmine became known as
‘truly the hammer of the heretics’.101 This same Catholic compliment had been used for St Augustine, owing to his work On Heresies.102
Bellarmine was admired for his encyclopaedic critiques of Protestant
beliefs and for his extensive knowledge in theology. Pope Clement
viii praised him for being unmatched in learning in the Church
of God. 103 Bellarmine laboured for decades to build and defend a Christian republic, a spiritual commonwealth that would transcend
political boundaries, ruled by the Pope – what one historian rightly
calls ‘an empire of souls’.104
Bellarmine’s views on Bruno are not known, because, as historians have noted, apparently his papers include no discussion of Bruno’s trial. 105 However, I wil il uminate this by identifying remarks that Bellarmine voiced in his theological writings. I’ll also
show his influence on his allies. There is a trail from Bruno’s trial to
the Inquisition’s first confrontation against Galileo.
In 1603 all of Giordano Bruno’s works were banned, placed on
the Index of Forbidden Books, ‘for religious reasons’. Still, some of
his doctrines continued to be discussed, as we have seen. The following year a Catholic convert in the Netherlands, Justus Lipsius, published a book in which he tried to harmonize ancient Stoic
ideas with Christianity. Lipsius was a correspondent of Cardinal
123
burned alive
Bellarmine, who had defended Lipsius three times against critiques
of one of his books in 1592, 1601 and 1611, even against other censors
of the Index.106
In his new book of 1604 Lipsius briefly discussed Pythagorean
notions that tied the Earth’s motion to the belief
that the Earth has
a soul. He cited Diogenes for writing that Philolaus the Pythagorean
said that the Earth moves. Lipsius noted that in the ‘Life of Numa’
Plutarch too said that about the Pythagoreans. Lipsius likewise mentioned Aristarchus, Hicetas and others, and linked their ideas to Plato’s account in Timaeus that Earth and the Moon have
souls. Then Lipsius complained: ‘See these deliriums. What else to
call them? Or what is this inquiry? Although (it is such a love of
Paradoxes) the era of the famous mathematician has agitated this
heresy, but is buried with him.’107 I think he referred to Copernicus.
Importantly, Lipsius derided such beliefs as heresies. He also
quoted Ovid’s Pythagoras for saying that the Earth is a living
animal, and enquiring whether ‘primal matter’ is permanent and
‘nothing perishes’.108 Lipsius also discussed ‘Whether the World is one of many?’ and whether it is eternal.109 He did not refer to Bruno, but it was improper for Catholics to write about heretics. Yet
Lipsius berated several of the offensive notions that Bruno advocated: Earth’s motion, that it has a soul, because it’s a living animal, plus the plurality of worlds, and the eternity of the material universe.
Lipsius wrote, ‘some in our times have the temerity to assert that
there are celestial Animals, and even that the World is animated. ’110
Incidentally, one of Lipsius’s friends saw Bruno’s execution:
Gaspar Schoppe. 111 Schoppe’s standing in the Catholic world had grown, thanks to his zealous attacks against the Protestants.
He enjoyed titles and pensions, and by 1605 Cardinal Bellarmine
personally granted him a licence to read heretical books.112 Some zealots were allowed to study heretical works, to decry them and to
educate Catholics in general.
In 1608 Ubbo Emmius, a friend of the Dutch astronomer
Nicholas Mulerius, worried about opinions that are ‘fantastical and
absurd’, namely that Earth moves and that ‘the Moon is inhabited.’
Emmius then complained:
Good God, how far impiety goes! What could do more to
overthrow all of our doctrine and religion! It contradicts the
124
Aliens on the Moon?
foundations. In fact, if this is true, as I sense that the author
vehemently contends, [then] Moses is false, all of our Holy
Burned Alive: Bruno, Galileo and the Inquisition Page 16