‘Your head’s in a draught, Daddy,’ said Joan. He put his hat on. A scrap of conversation reached them from the stairs: ‘I’d rather sit well at the back, I think,’ said the younger of the two.
‘We shall have to, probably,’ was the reply; ‘it’s always full. And remember — just keep an open mind and listen. The quackery doesn’t matter, nor the grammar. He was only a railway guard’ — then something inaudible as they turned the corner— ‘his idea of a New Age is true somewhere, I’m positive. It was the speed of the train, you know — always rushing through space — that made him . . .’ And the voices died away.
‘Come, Joan, we’ll go in too. What are you dawdling about for?’ exclaimed Wimble on the spur of the moment. Something in that interrupted sentence caught him.
‘You, Daddy,’ she said, as she tripped after him up the stairs.
People were standing in the corridor and in the little hall; the room beyond, where a heavily-moustached man, with an eager, soap-polished face, cheerful expression, and bright earnest eyes, stood lecturing, was full. The two ladies who had preceded them were sitting on a window-sill. ‘I’m afraid there are no seats left,’ whispered a pleasant, earnest woman beside the door, ‘but I’ve sent for some chairs. They’ll be here presently. I hope you’ll hear something out here.’ Wimble thanked her with a nod and smile; he leaned against the wall with Joan and looked about him.
Some thirty people were crowded into the small inner room, three-quarters of their number women, what are called ‘nice’ women. They were well dressed; there was a rustle of silk, a faint atmosphere of perfume, and fur, and soft expensive garments; young and old, he saw, a good many of them in mourning. The men looked, generally speaking, like well-to-do business men; he noticed one clergyman; a few were shabbily dressed; one or two were workmen, mechanics possibly. There was an alert attention on most of the faces, and in the air a kind of eager expectancy, serious, watchful, yearning, and waiting to be satisfied; sympathetic, it seemed, on the whole, rather than critical. One or two listeners looked vexed and scowling, and a tall, thin-visaged man in the corner was almost angry. But as a whole he got the impression of people just listening patiently, people for the most part empty, hungry, wondering if what they heard might fill them. He was aware of minds on tiptoe. Here, evidently, he judged, was a group of enquiring folk following a new Movement. ‘One of the Signs of what’s in the air To-day,’ he thought. ‘Five years ago these people would have been in Church, convinced they were miserable sinners with no good in them. That mechanic-looking fellow would have been in Chapel. That portly man with the stolid face, wearing a black tail-coat, a low collar, a heavy gold watch-chain and a black and white striped tie surely took round the plate in Kensington.’ The thin-faced angry man was merely a professional iconoclast.
He wondered. He thought a moment of the unimaginative English standing about the island in hordes, marvellously reliable, marvellously brave, with big, deep hearts, but childishly unobservant, conservative, conventional, not to be moved till the fire burns the soles of their feet, sturdy and unemotional, and constitutionally suspicious of all new things. He saw these hordes, strong in their great earth-qualities, ballast of the world, but at the same time world-rulers. . . . And then his thought flashed back with a snap to the scene before him. What was this group after? Why was it dissatisfied? Why had it turned from the ancient shibboleths? Something, of course, was up. He wondered. These people looked so earnest. This Aquarian Society, he knew, was one of a hundred, a thousand others. It might be rubbish, it might contain a true idea, it was sure to prove exaggerated. The people, however, were enquiring. He glanced at Joan, but her eyes were fixed intently upon the speaker’s face — the face of a former railway guard whose familiarity with speed (certainly not on his own crawling line, thought Wimble!), with rushing transit from scene to scene through the air, had opened his mind to some new idea or other.
‘I wonder if he sang “Wherever I am, I go!”’ he whispered to Joan. ‘He ought to, anyhow!’ But Joan was too intent to hear him. He swallowed his smile and listened. The speaker’s rough, uncultivated voice rang with sincerity. There was a glow about his face that only deep conviction brings. To Wimble, however, it all sounded at the moment as if he had fallen out of his Express Train and picked up his ideas as he picked up himself.
For at first he could not understand a single word, as though, coming out of the busy human street, he had plunged neck-deep into a stream of ideas that took his breath away. Having missed what had gone before, he could not catch the drift of what he heard. Then gradually, and by degrees, his listening mind fell into the rhythm of the minds about him; he slipped into the mood of the meeting; his intelligence merged with the collective intelligence of the others; he merged with the group-consciousness of the little crowd. The hostile interjections had no meaning for him, since those who made them, not being included in the group-consciousness, spoke an unintelligible language.
The speaker was very much in earnest evidently; he believed what he was saying, at the moment anyhow. Possibly this belief was permanent; possibly it was merely self-persuasion. Though obviously he expected hostile comment from time to time, when it came — usually from the iconoclast in the corner — he rarely replied to it. This method of ignoring criticism was not only easier than answering it, it induced an appearance of contemptuous superiority that increased his authority.
Wimble and his daughter had come in at a happy moment, for the long stretch of argument and explanation was just over, it seemed, and a summing up was about to begin.
‘So where are we, then, with it all?’ asked the lecturer. ‘Where ‘ave we got to? Where do we stand?’
He paused, and into the pause fell the angry voice of the thin-faced man: ‘Exactly where we started. You haven’t stated one single fact as yet.’
The speaker looked straight in front of him without a word, and the audience, almost to an individual, ignored the criticism. They supported the lecturer loyally, to the point at least of not even turning their heads away. They stared patiently and waited.
‘Where ‘ave we got to,’ repeated the man on the platform, ‘that’s wot we want to know, isn’t it? After all we’ve listened to this morning, ‘ow do we stand about it?’
‘That’s it exactly,’ from the interrupter in a contemptuous but intense tone of voice. He seemed annoyed that no one was intelligent enough to support him. At a Society of Rationalist Control across the road he would have been at home. He, too, was a seeker, and a very earnest one, only he had tumbled into the wrong group. Across the road he might have been constructive; here he was destructive merely.
‘Well, on the physical plane,’ resumed the speaker, ‘on wot I might call the scientific and materialistic plane, as I’ve tried to show you, the ‘ole trend of modern civilisation is towards speed and universality. That’s clear — at least I ‘ope I’ve made it so. Air, and wot air represents, shows itself in the physical plane like that. Distant countries are getting all linked up everywhere — by wireless, by motor, by aviation, by cinematograph, and the like. A kind of telepathy all over the world is—’ he hesitated an instant— ‘engendered.’
‘Go on,’ from the critic, ‘any word will do as well.’
‘That’s the scientific side of the business, as it were,’ he went on, ‘the practical, everyday aspect we can all understand. It’s the universality of the new element, air, as it affects the practical mind, so to speak; the technical understanding and mastery or space — wot I called aether a little while ago, as you’ll remember — or, as the Aquarian Society prefers to call it, as being simpler and shorter — air.’
‘Well,’ he added, ‘we now want to see ‘ow we stand with regard to the ‘igher side of life, the mental, spiritual aspect. Wot does this new Age, in which air is the key — the symbol like — wot does it mean to the race on that side?’
‘Gas,’ interjected the other, but in a lower voice.
From several books lying beside the wa
ter-bottle the lecturer selected one. He adjusted a pair of heavy reading-glasses to his eyes.
‘The link between the two is better expressed than wot I can express it,’ he resumed quickly, ‘in this little volume, The New Science of Colour — and colour means light, remember, and light means aether, and aether means space, universality — so it’s all the same.’
‘Every bit of it,’ came the contemptuous comment from the corner.
‘Just this short paragraph — I came across it by chance — except that there reely is no chance at all — and it puts it well. It supplies the link. So I’ll read it.’ He heavily emphasised certain words:
‘We are approaching an age of mental telepathy, in which the organism of the race is about to become attuned to the second sense of the earth and to the third element that sustains her — i.e. air — and in which our action and our outlook will alike assume the characteristics of that element, which are elasticity and brilliance.’
He laid down the book, slowly removing the heavy glasses from his nose, and while ‘that’s no proof was heard to snap from the corner, the other repeated with emphasis of manner, yet lowering his voice at the same time: ‘the organism of the race — becoming attuned to air — elasticity and brilliance.’
Fingering his glasses and looking very thoughtful, the speaker kept silence for a minute or so. He drank a few sips of water slowly, while everybody, even the interjector, waited, and those who had been staring at him turned their eyes away from his face, as though embarrassed to watch him drink. He produced a big handkerchief from his coat-tail pocket, wiped his lips, and replaced the handkerchief with some difficulty whence it came. The pause lengthened, but no one stirred. Then the earnest-faced woman near the door touched Wimble on the arm and indicated an empty chair, but Wimble, too absorbed in the proceedings, shook his head impatiently. Joan slipped into it. Joan, he noticed, did not seem interested; the keen attention she had shown at first had left her face, she looked half bewildered and half bored. ‘She’s too much in it to need explanation,’ flashed across him.
The slight shuffling warned the lecturer that the mind of his audience needed holding lest it begin to wander. Picking up a sheet of paper covered with notes, he advanced to the edge of the little platform and cleared his throat.
‘As I’ve been trying to explain,’ he began, ‘‘umanity has now reached a crushial moment in its development. The planet we live on belongs to the sun, and the sun has just entered — in 1881, to be igsact, — the sign of Aquarius. Aquarius, according to the old Chaldean system, is wot’s called an Air Sign, and the new powers waking in us all — coming down into our world now — will be ruled by the element of air. The Age of Pisces, a Water Sign, is just finished and done with. We are entering another period. A new Age is beginning — the Age of Air.’ And he glanced about him as though to catch any evidence of challenge.
‘What is an Age?’ asked a thin voice from the rear. It was not hostile, and heads were turned to find the questioner, but without success.
‘An accomplice,’ muttered the habitual interrupter to himself. No one noticed the comment, and Wimble, now completely captured by the collective sympathy, even wondered what he meant.
‘I’ll tell you,’ continued the lecturer, and referred to the sheet of notes in his hand. ‘I’ll tell you again with pleasure.’ He emphasised the word ‘again.’ The glasses were readjusted. With a certain air of mystery, as though he knew far more than he cared to impart, he read aloud, emphasising frequent passages as his habit was, and making here and there effective and semi-theatrical pauses. Behind this cheapness, however, burned obviously a deep sincerity and belief. He deemed himself a prophet, and he knew a prophet’s proverbial fate.
‘Astronomers tell us that our sun and his fam’ly of planets revolve around a central sun, which is millions of miles distant,’ he read slowly, ‘and that it requires about 26,000 years to make one revolution.’
Remembering one of his most successful Primers, Wimble sat forward on his chair, all eagerness. Here was what the critic called a ‘fact’ at any rate.
‘This orbit is called the Zodiac,’ continued the other, ‘and it is divided into twelve signs.’ He mentioned them, beginning with Aries and Taurus, and ending with Aquarius and Pisces. ‘Now, you asked what is an Age, didn’t you?’ He paused a second. ‘Well, our solar system takes a bit over 2000 years to pass through each of these Signs, and this time is the measurement of an Age. And with each Age certain new things ‘appen.’
He made this announcement with a certain mysterious significance.
‘Certain things ‘appen to the planet and to us as lives on it. Certain changes come. They’re sure as summer and winter is sure — that is, you can count on them. Those who know can count on them — prophets and people with inner vision. There you get prophecy and the meaning of prophecy. Vision!’ And without a vision the people perish — miss their chances, that is. The seers, the mystics, always know and see ahead, and this end of the Age — and of the world as it’s sometimes called stupidly — has been prophesied by many.’
The audience was on tiptoe with anticipation. Each individual possibly hoped that certain personal peculiarities of his own were going to be explained, made wonderful. Wimble was particularly aware of this excitement; it dawned upon him that he was about to receive an explanation, and a semi-scientific explanation too, of his own strange ideas and feelings. He glanced across at Joan. She seemed, to his amazement, asleep; her eyes were closed, at any rate; her attention was not held. He wanted to poke her. He wanted to say ‘I told you so,’ or rather ‘You told me so.’ But the speaker had ended his pause, and, to Wimble’s delight, was explaining that this movement of the sun passes through the Zodiacal Signs in reverse order— ‘precession of the equinoxes,’ as it is called — Pisces therefore preceding Aquarius instead of following it. Here was another ‘fact’ that his Knowledge Primer justified.
The personal anticipation in the audience was not immediately satisfied, however. The speaker intensified it first by a slight delay. Aware that he held the minds before him, he took his time.
‘Now, these Signs’ — lifting his eyes from the sheet of paper and fixing them upon a woman in the front row, who at once showed nervousness, as though she would believe black was white, if only he would stare at some one else—’ these Signs ain’t just dead things. They reveal and express and convey intelligent life. They’re immense intelligences, they’re Zodiacal Intelligences. That’s wot they are. The ‘ole universe, remember, is alive, and you and I ain’t the only living beings in it, nor the ‘ighest either. We’re not the only bodies. No one can say wot constitoots a body, a living body, nor define it. Our planet is a tuppeny-’alfpenny affair compared to the others, and we’re nothing but a lot of hinsects like ants and so forth on it. But if the ‘ole universe is alive — and we know it is — —’
‘Hanwell,’ interrupted the angry man.
‘ —— each and every part of it must be alive too. And you can’t leave out the planets, stars, and suns, the most magnificent bodies, called the ‘eavenly bodies, as you know. They’re all living bodies. They’re the bodies of beings, living beings, but beings far higher than wot we are. And the Zodiacal Signs are ‘igher still. They represent functions of the universe, as the ancients knew quite well. They’re a kind of intelligence we may call per’aps a Group Intelligence.’
Again he paused a moment. Then, as no interruption came, he went on with greater emphasis than before:
‘Now, each of these Zodiacal Intelligences — as the sun, with our little earth alongside, passes through it — rules over its partickler period. With every period we enter a new current of forces. Each period, therefore, of about 2000 years has new Gods, new characteristics, new types of ‘uman beings with new tendencies and powers and possibilities in them — a new point of view, if you like to call it so, or, as we Aquarians call it, a new consciousness. Well, the Aquarius Sign just beginning, is an Air Sign. We’re getting our new p
owers, our new point of view and hattitude, our new consciousness — from the air.’
In his excitement and deep belief the word ‘air’ was dangerously near ‘hair,’ but no one smiled. Perhaps even the critic experienced similar difficulties in his home circle that prevented his noticing it, or caring to take advantage of it if he did.
‘I’ve already referred,’ the speaker continued, ‘to its effect on the physical plane, new inventions and the like, and ‘ow men now navigate the air as fish do the sea, and send their thoughts spinning round the world with the speed of lightning. That’s easy enough. I mean, you can all see it for yourselves. The areoplane’s a fac’ nobody can’t get away from, whichever way you take it. But the effect on the spiritual plane is not so simple. It’s not so easy to describe — far from it, I admit. When a new mode of consciousness begins to hoperate in men and women, they find difficulty in expressing it. They’re puzzled a bit. They don’t know where they are with it quite. Those ‘oo get it first are called quacks and charlituns, and maybe swindlers too. The slower ones regard them with suspicion, and they may think themselves lucky if they ‘ain’t stoned or burned alive or crucified as they once was.’
He smiled, and the audience smiled deprecating with him.
‘And the chief reason for their difficulty,’ he went on, ‘is simply this: They ‘aven’t got the language. Nor the words. That’s it. The words describe the experiences of a new type of consciousness don’t exist at first. They come later, slowly, gradually. They evolve as the new powers in the race evolve.’
Collected Works of Algernon Blackwood Page 210