Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe

Home > Other > Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe > Page 140
Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe Page 140

by Bart Schultz


  . And, to be sure, Millians.

  Chapter . Spirits

  . Quoted in Janet Oppenheim, The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, – (New York: Cambridge University Press, ), p. .

  . Theodor W. Adorno, The Stars Down to Earth and Other Essays on the Irrational

  in Culture, ed. S. Crook (London: Routledge, ), p. .

  . This chapter is deeply indebted to C. D. Broad, “Henry Sidgwick and Psy-

  chical Research,” Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research  (), pp. –, and Lectures on Psychical Research (London: Routledge and Kegan

  Paul, ); Alan Gauld, The Founders of Psychical Research (New York: Schocken Books, ); Oppenheim, Other World; Alison Winter, Mesmerized: Powers of the Mind in Victorian Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ); and Joy Dixon, Divine Feminine: Theosophy and Feminism in England (Baltimore: The

  P: GnI

  notb.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  Notes to Pages –

  

  Johns Hopkins University Press, ). Although my own interests are more con-

  genial to the concerns of Winter and Dixon, who address the links between psychi-

  cal research and the history of gender/sexuality and the culture of imperialism, the

  other works just listed are standard reference guides for anyone working on these

  topics and represent highly valuable research efforts. Roger Luckhurst’s valuable

  study, The Invention of Telepathy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, ), appeared just as I was preparing the final version of this manuscript for the press, but it appears to comport well with the analysis of this chapter. Although Luckhurst’s

  book contains surprisingly little on Sidgwick, it goes far to fill in the cultural

  context of the psychical researchers and is particularly valuable on such figures as

  Myers.

  . See also Oppenheim, Other World, pp. –, for some discussion of Sidgwick’s early efforts.

  . This is one theme of Dixon’s insightful work, Divine Feminine.

  . Quoted in Oppenheim, Other World, p. . This statement was made by William Crookes, to be discussed.

  . I am grateful to R. L. Bland, a recent headmaster of Clifton, for calling this poem to my attention and explaining its possible authorship.

  . See the discussion of this passage in the previous chapter.

  . Eleanor Sidgwick, “On the Development of Different Types of Evidence for

  Survival in the Work of the Society,” Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research

   (), p. .

  . In Sidgwick’s December , , address to the SPR (CWC); this first appeared

  in the Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research  ().

  . This first appeared in the Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research  ().

  . Myers quoted the relevant testimonial at length at the end of his own obituary

  to Sidgwick, included in his posthumously published Fragments of Poetry and

  Prose, ed. Eveleen Myers (London: Longmans, Green, ). This work contains a somewhat abridged version of Myers’s autobiography, “Fragments of Inner Life,”

  the excised portions of which are available in the Myers Papers, Wren Library,

  Trinity College, Cambridge. What follows draws heavily on the latter.

  . Myers, Fragments, pp. –.

  . Ibid., p. .

  . Ibid., pp. –.

  . Ibid., pp. –. Sidgwick doubtless would have regarded Myers’s passionate

  idealization of him as rather characteristic.

  . Gauld, Founders, p. .

  . Ibid., p. . Sidgwick rather clearly took a certain delight, however mixed with

  disapproval, in Myers’s sensual side. One of his more intriguing letters to Myers

  has him moving directly from admiration of Kant to admiration of flirtation. On

  Nov. , , he wrote to Myers: “Each day I have wished to write to you how

  delightful and salutary your visit has been to me. You always do me good, though

  you make me feel more deeply the perplexities of conduct. I wish I had more

  wisdom to impart to those whom I love: it is not for want of seeking it. Sometimes

  P: GnI

  notb.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  

  Notes to Pages –

  I console myself for fundamental scepticism by the feeling that it is necessary, if we are to choose Good per se: if we were too sure of personal happiness, this unselfish

  choice would be impossible. I do not think with Kant that Noble Choice is the

  only good thing in man: but I do think it a great good. However at other times this seems to me a very over-drawn and metaphysical consolation. Now as I write it is

  real to me.

  Your narrative is of thrilling interest: I have no doubt you were the right man for

  the situation – (see Testimonial). I confess I tremble a little at the thought of the amount of emotional Electricity generated by your passage through these feminine

  atmospheres: but I rely on you: if only you will not so systematically court danger.

  Please regard me henceforward as thoroughly convinced of your power. I will

  idealize you if you like into a sort of Genius of Flirtation: with ‘loving eyes a little tyrannous,’ leonine splendour of countenance. . . . ” A marginal note beside “the situation” reads: “Something about a Schoolmistress who had got into a mess,” and

  Sidgwick notes that the phrase in quotation marks is from an unpublished poem

  of his. Sidgwick Papers, Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge University,

  Add.Ms.c., pp. –.

  . Indeed, at this point, Symonds was far closer to Arthur Sidgwick, who along with

  Henry Graham Dakyns formed his most intimate early group. In a letter of ,

  Symonds wrote of Myers: “He is a scapegrace: but he will be a considerable man:

  and a turbulent, even a presumptuous & criminal, youth may be ignored in silence

  when there is hope of so great a manhood” (Symonds, Letters, vol. , p. ). This was an improvement on his still earlier judgment; when he first met him in 

  he was fairly aghast at Myers’s conceit and anti-intellectualism. But it was Myers

  who would first and fatefully introduce Symonds to the poetry of Walt Whitman,

  and who would continue to stimulate his psychological – if not parapsychological –

  interests, as the discussion in the following chapter will demonstrate.

  . This passage is taken from the original proofs of Myers’s memoir – Myers Papers,

  Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge University, .(). The published

  version is more carefully censored, delicately dropping the word “lust” from the

  line about “no check for lust or pride.”

  . Myers Papers, Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge University, ..,

  p. .

  . Myers, Fragments, p. .

  . Gauld, Founders, pp. –.

&n
bsp; . F. W. H. Myers, Introduction to Phantasms of the Living (New York: Arno Press,

  ), pp. xxiv–xxv.

  . Myers, Fragments, p. .

  . Ibid., p. .

  . Myers Papers, Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge University, ..,

  p. .

  . Myers, “Fragments of Inner Life,” pp. –.

  . Myers, Fragments, p. .

  . Myers, “Fragments of Inner Life,” pp. –.

  P: GnI

  notb.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  Notes to Pages –

  

  . Myers Papers, Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge University, ..,

  p. .

  . Myers, Fragments, p. .

  . Ibid.

  . Ibid., p. .

  . Sidgwick, journal entry for October ,  (CWC); the manuscript of Sidgwick’s

  journal is in the Sidgwick Papers, Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge

  University, Add.Ms.c...

  . Myers, Fragments, pp. –.

  . Gurney, Tertium Quid (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, ), p. .

  . Oddly, Gurney receives scant attention in Winter’s important study, Mesmerized.

  . Gurney, “The Stages of Hypnotism,” Proceedings of the Society for Psychical

  Research  (), pp. –.

  . Gauld, Founders, p. .

  . Ibid., p. .

  . Though the evidence for any such conclusion is scarcely compelling, and gains

  force mainly from the fact that a number of Gurney’s friends and colleagues feared

  as much. The psychical researchers, as we will see, thought there was some evidence

  for Gurney’s personal survival of death and communication from the other side.

  A full account, and one appropriately skeptical of the suicide hypothesis, is in

  Gauld, Founders, pp. –. Gordon Epperson, The Mind of Edmund Gurney

  (Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, ), is an admiring overview of

  Gurney’s work, and very dismissive of the suicide hypothesis, but does not really

  engage the thoughts of the psychical researchers on this score. Oppenheim’s The

  Other World also suggests that the evidence for suicide is inconclusive and likely to remain so. The main argument for the suicide hypothesis is Trevor Hall’s The

  Strange Case of Edmund Gurney (London: Duckworth, , nd ed. ), which

  holds that Gurney committed suicide because he was depressed by various events,

  particularly the discovery that G. A. Smith, his secretary and one of the subjects

  from whom he had gained positive evidence for telepathy, had been engaged in

  fraud and thus that his evidence was discredited. Smith always denied this, but an

  early partner of his in the experiments later claimed that they had tricked Gurney

  and Myers. Even if this were so, however, the specific links to Gurney’s death

  in the St. Albion’s Hotel in Brighton are all purely speculative, since there is no

  sound evidence that Gurney had discovered any such thing.

  . Gauld, Founders, p. .

  . Oppenheim, Other World, p. .

  . Quoted in Oppenheim, Other World, p. .

  . Ibid.

  . Oppenheim, “A Mother’s Role, a Daughter’s Duty: Lady Blanche Balfour, Eleanor

  Sidgwick, and Feminist Perspectives,” Journal of British Studies  (April ), pp. –. I am much indebted to this essay, which suggests how valuable

  Oppenheim’s planned biography of Eleanor Sidgwick would have been, had she

  lived to complete it.

  P: GnI

  notb.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  

  Notes to Pages –

  . Oppenheim, “A Mother’s Role,” pp. –.

  . Ibid., p. .

  . Ibid., pp. –.

  . Ibid., p. .

  . Sidgwick Papers, Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge University,

  Add.Ms.c..

  . Oppenheim, Other World, p. .

  . Gauld, Founders, p. .

  . Quoted in Linda Simon, Genuine Reality: A Life of William James (New York: Harcourt Brace, ), p. . The wedding was held at St. James Church, London.

  . In Ethel Sidgwick, Mrs. Henry Sidgwick: A Memoir (London: Sidgwick and Jackson, ), p. .

  . Myers, “Fragments of Inner Life,” excised sections, Myers Papers, .().

  . Ironically, given the role of the SPR and Myers in calling attention to Freud’s

  work, one could do a very interesting Freudian interpretation of their form of

  mourning and melancholia. For suggestive arguments about how to apply this side

  of Freud to some such social analysis (though not with specific reference to the

  psychical researchers), see Peter Homans, The Ability to Mourn: Disillusionment

  and the Social Origins of Psychoanalysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,

  ).

  . Gauld, Founders, pp. –.

  . The house still stands, and some of its older neighbors can recall hearing, when they were growing up, that it was haunted. But its recent residents, mainly Cambridge

  students, have not to my knowledge reported any difficulties with apparitions.

  . William James, “The Confidences of a ‘Psychical Researcher,’” in William James: Writings – (New York: Library of America, ), pp. –.

  . Ibid., pp. –.

  . Ibid., p. .

  . He recounted it in Phantasms of the Living, though the same account is reproduced in the Memoir, pp. –.

  . Henry Sidgwick, “The Society for Psychical Research: A Short Account of Its

  History and Work on the Occasion of the Society’s Jubilee, ,” Proceedings of

  the Society for Psychical Research  (–), p. .

  . Ibid., p. .

  . Gauld, Founders, pp. –.

  . See Sidgwick’s essay on “Involuntary Whispering” (CWC); the original appeared

  in the Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research  ().

  . Eleanor Sidgwick, “On the Development of Different Types of Evidence,” p. .

  . Ibid., pp. –.

  . Ibid., p. .

  . The best attempt to situate the Theosophists in their proper historical contexts is Dixon, Divine Feminine.

  . Oppenheim, Other World, p. .

  . It is worth noting here that another of the accomplishments of F. D. Maurice

  was to have given a comparatively sober account of Hinduism and Buddhism, in

  P: GnI

  notb.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 


  :

  Notes to Pages –

  

  Moral and Metaphysical Philosophy, and that Sidgwick would have been familiar with this.

  . Dixon, Divine Feminine, p. .

  . Oppenheim, Other World, p. .

  . Sidgwick’s correspondence with Bryce is in Bryce MSS, Modern Political Papers,

  Bodleian Library, Oxford University.

  . Oppenheim, Other World, p. . Remarkably, the Theosophical Society would long continue to publish rebuttals of Hodgson’s report.

  . Myers and Gurney, Phantasms, p. xviii.

  . “Prefatory Note” to V. Solovev’s A Modern Priestess of Isis, abridged and translated by W. Leaf for the APR (London, ).

  . Quoted in Gauld, Founders, pp. –.

  . Henry Sidgwick, “The Possibilities of Mal-Observation (discussion with C. C.

  Massey),” Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research  (), pt. 

  Sidgwick’s exchanges with Massey – another stalwart of the SPR – are extremely

  illuminating, and deeply suggestive of his Apostolic faith in the truth-promoting

  properties of discussion among intimate friends.

  . On Mill, see various works by Georgios Varouxakis, including “John Stuart Mill

  on Race.” See also the essays in Schultz and Varouxakis, eds., Classical Util-

  itarianism and the Question of Race; and the cogent essay by Graham Finlay,

  “John Stuart Mill on the Uses of Diversity,” Utilitas , no.  (July ),

  pp. –.

  . Dixon, Divine Feminine, p. xii.

  . Sidgwick Papers, Wren Library, Trinity College, Cambridge University,

  Add.Ms.c..

  . Journal entry for August ,  (CWC).

  . Myers and Gurney, Phantasms, p. xxxii.

  . Broad, “Sidgwick and Psychical Research,” p. .

  . Myers and Gurney, Phantasms, p. ix.

  . Ibid., p. xix.

  . Ibid.

  . Ibid., p. xx.

  . Ibid., p. xxv.

  . Ibid., pp. xx–xxi.

  . Myers, “Fragments of Inner Life,” p. .

  . Compare the remarks at the conclusion of the previous chapter concerning the

  evolution of sympathy.

  . Myers and Gurney, Phantasms, p. .

 

‹ Prev