by Bart Schultz
reconciliation project, –; Broad on
EMS on M, ; as ideologue of
S’s use of, ; versus alternative solutions
imperialism, ; on a career in Indian
to dualism, ; and future society,
Civil Service, ; on Cowell’s Alpine
–; Myers’s key statement of, –,
Club, ; Arther S to, on S’s life review,
; S on Tennyson and, ; S and, ;
and S’s life project, –; significance
truth: Millian struggle toward, ; Apostolic
of S’s Apostolic friendships and, ;
pursuit of, and S, –, ; S’s mode of
Symonds to S on, , –; S’s
inquiry and, ; Maurice on, –; S
continuing concern with in s, ; S,
writes to Noel about, ; and philosophy,
PSR on, –; S to Ward on sociology
–; Coleridge on love of, ; and
and, ; S’s “On the Nature of the
progress, –; Noel on Christ and, ; S
Evidence for Theism” on, –
and Myers and, ; S does not love
Theocritus, , ,
enough, ; about theology and moral
Theognis,
philosophy, S worries over, –; and
theology, see Christianity; religion; theism
Clough’s poetry, –; to Dakyns about
Theosophical Society: history of, –; S
value of, –; S, CS on free inquiry
on growth of, –
versus religion and, –; Mill on
theosophy: and feminism, ; S on
utility and, , ; and S’s ideal, ; S,
investigation of, ; Oppenheim on, ;
ME on perfectionism and, –; S, ME
draws from Buddhism, Hinduism, ,
on indirect pursuit of, –; duty of
; Dixon on, –; basic philosophy
veracity in Whewellian ethics, –; S’s
of and differences with spiritualism,
critique of Whewell on, –; S,
P: GCV
ind.xml
CY/Schultz
February ,
:
Index
ME and four conditions for self-evidence
reason, ; and psychical research, ; and
and, –; and epistemology of ME,
S’s Apostolic vision, ; and epistemology
–; and Government House
of the closet, ; and esoteric morality, ;
utilitarianism, –; Myers on S’s
Government House, ; and imperialism,
Platonic love of, ; Podmore on S’s
; and religious orientation of S, ; S’s
commitment to, ; and paradox of
conversion to, –; and Seeley’s Jesus,
Theosophy, ; S versus Green on,
–; S’s early belief in, ; J. S. Mill’s,
–, –; and S and teaching of
versus M. Arnold’s perfectionism,
philosophy, –; Noel on, –; S
–; S’s, versus M. Arnold’s
on the only way to, ; S on poetry and,
perfectionism, –; of CS, –;
; S’s Apostolic pursuit of, –; S
S’s as indebted to Kant, ; and
on Plato, Descartes and, ; S on theism
psychology, ; and scientific method,
and coherence argument for, –; see
; Russell on, ; S’s development of,
also “Apostles”; epistemology; reason
; and need for intuitions, S to Dakyns
Tullberg, Rita McWilliams: on S, EMS, and
on, –; account of in S’s paper to
Newnham versus Davies, –; on
Grote Club, –; S’s early Millianism
move for full university membership
and, –; S’s departures from
for women, ; on S’s pedagogical
classical, Schneewind on, –; as
activities, ; and EMS’s exchanges with
method of ethics, –; Hayward on S’s
A. Marshall, –
departures from classical, ; S’s revisions
Turgot, A. R. J., S’s view of colonization and,
of, ; as universalistic hedonism,
–; and animals, ; S and Mill on
Turner, Frank, on S, Bryce, and Athenian
resistance to, ; and indirect pursuit of
democracy,
good, –; as a method, –;
Twain, Mark, and racism, –
arguments for, –; how common
Tylor, E. S., DEP cites,
sense leads to, –; Schneewind on S’s
Tyrell, Father: and Synthetic Society, ;
systematization and dependence
and Myers’s paper to the Synthetic
arguments for, –; Mill on rules and,
Society, ; S to, on prayer,
; S and Mill on commonsense morality
Tyrwhitt, Richard St. John: Dowling on
and, –; contemplative, of Hume and
Hugh Heron of, ; critique of Symonds,
Smith, ; axiomatic grounding of, ;
–; against Socratism, ; S as
self-evident element in, Shaver on, ; S
nemesis of, ; threat of,
on J. Grote on, –; and stress on
external sanctions, ; and high-minded
Ulrichs, K., ; Symonds visits,
indirect startegies, –; and character
ultimate end, see good/goodness
development, cultivation of sympathy,
ultimate good, see good/goodness
–; Crisp on S as dualist, –;
unconscious: S and, , –; Gurney on,
and killing/letting die argument, Crisp on,
; and telepathy, EMS, S on, –;
; and Shaver’s reading of S on egoism,
James and Myers on, –; Myers on
–; indirection of and difficulty of
subliminal self and, –; Symonds on
calculations in, ; Rawls on importance
Myers on,
of S for, ; S raises most of the problems
universalistic hedonism, see utilitar
ianism
with, –; M. Singer on S and
universalizability, see ethical theory; Hare, R.
population problem and, –; and
M.; justice; Kant/Kantism
imperialism, ; and need for intuition,
utilitarianism, , ; S’s different, –; S as last
–; S as Government House
of classical tradition, ; too-narrow
utilitarian, –, ; S and Mill as act
interpretations of, ; caricatures of, ;
utilitarians, ; and the exemplary
complex nature of, –; and issues of sex
reformer, politics, –; Skorupski’s
and gender, –; and differences
philosophical, , –; Mill to Venn
between Bentham and J. S. Mill, –;
on acts and, ; Green on ME on,
and cultivation of sympathy, –; hidden
–; S’s critique of Green on,
history of, ; S in line with Mill’s, ;
–; S’s critique of Bradley on,
Bryce on S’s, ; and dualism of practical
–; indirect theological form of, ;
P: GCV
ind.xml
CY/Schultz
February ,
:
Index
utilitarianism ( cont.)
democracy, ; Mill and, –; Ryan on
Government House and S’s educational
continuing significance of, ; S on
reformism, –; S, ME on common
hypocrisy of, ; and Clough, –; S
sense on sexual purity versus, –; S,
on Mill and, –; and conclusion to
ME on common sense on suicide versus,
ME, –; and religious subscription,
–; S, ME on politics and, –;
–; Tennyson expresses, –,
S, ME on reformism and, –; and S’s
, ; evangelicalism of, ; and
approach in EP, –; and S’s political
science, ; and sympathy versus egoism,
practice, –; S, EP on, as more basic
; and same-sex relations, ; and
standard than individualistic one, –;
economic depression, –; and
S, EP on reformism and, ; and British
realities of imperialism, ; racism of,
involvement in India, ; S, EP and
–; and eugenics, –; and war,
international relations and, ; and S on
; and interiority, ; see also
duty to spread civilization, ; and S’s
imperialism; progress; religion
anti-Machiavellian belief in international
Virgil: Myers on, –; Myers’s debt to,
morality, –; and racism in S, ME on
; and S, Symonds,
circle of sympathy, –; S on
virtue: Chapter passim; and hedonistic
cosmopolitan ideal and, –; S on
account of good, –; indirect pursuit
duty to colonize and, –; S on
of, –; and perfectionism, Hurka on,
relations with “uncivilized” peoples and,
–; wages of dust, –; and
–; and Singer on esoteric morality,
internal sanctions, –; and Rashdall’s
–; and larger significance of S’s
perfectionism, ; and S’s utopia,
esotericism, ; see also ethical theory;
–; Myers on, –; as only a
metaethics; sympathy
species of good, S on,
utility, see happiness; utilitarianism; utility
Viswanathan, Gauri, on Maine on India,
theory
utility theory: modern –, ,
vivisection, ; Gurney on,
–; S on orthodox political economy
Vlastos, Gregory: on Socrates versus Plato,
on, –; and S on declining marginal
; on Socratic method,
utility, , ; S and, , ; S strikes
Voltaire,
at heart of, –
utopianism and S’s ideal utilitarian society,
Walker, Margaret Urban, and feminist
–, –, –, –; S’s
critique of S, –
qualified vision of, –, –; and
Wallace, Alfred Russel, ,
Symonds’s Whitmania, , –,
war: S on avoiding both international and
–
industrial, –; S on party politics and
industrial, –; S to Browning on
Vaughan, C. J., and Pretor affair, ,
avoiding at all costs, –; S on
–
federation as the solution to, –; S to
Venn, John: on J. Grote, ; Mill to, on act
Lytton on prevention of, –; and S’s
utilitarianism,
critique of Machiavellianism in
Veracity, see truth; utilitarianism
international relations, –; and
Verrall, Margaret: and cross-correspondence
“spiritual expansion,” –; S versus
cases involving S, Myers, Gurney,
Bryce on U. S. and industrial, ; S on
–
Spencer and, ; laws of, and first Hague
Vickers, Randall,
Conference, ; craze for, in s, ;
Victoria, Queen, Empress of India,
Kiernan on,
Victorian worldview, , , , ; imperialism
Ward, G. S., as “Ideal” friend of Clough’s,
of, ; and liberal anxieties, ; during S’s
; background of,
first decade at Cambridge University, ;
Ward, Mrs. Humphrey, uses Green as model
and psychical research, , ; Maurice
for Prof. Grey, –
and, –; and Platonic revival, , ;
Ward, James: anticipates critiques of S, ;
and belief in progress, –, ; and
background of, links to S, ; objections
P: GCV
ind.xml
CY/Schultz
February ,
:
Index
to S’s account of “good,” –; S’s
Symonds’s development, ; Tyrwhitt on
support for,
Symonds and, ; Symonds versus Pater
Ward, Mary: and settlement movement,
on, ; Symonds’s poetic vocation and,
Green, –, ; and S’s vision,
; and S’s sexuality, ; and Symonds’s
Ward, Wilfrid: and Synthetic Society, ;
conversion experience, –; Symonds
background, career of, ; S to, on prayer,
to, on adhesiveness, ; Symonds’s vision
science, –
of, –; on Symonds’s “Love and
Warner, Henry Lee, and Savile Club,
Death,” ; as symmetrical person, ;
Symonds presses on meaning of Calamus,
Waterhouse, A., architect of Girton,
; Symonds to Carpenter on, –;
weakness of will: and S’s interpreation of
Socrates versus, in Symonds, ; limits
good, ; S’s “Unreasonable Action” on,
of, ; Noel on equality and, –;
versus Mr. Gradgrind, ; and vision of
wealth: S, PPE on problem of defining,
S’s EP, –; racism of, ; and S’s
–; S on support of culture and,
religion if he were dying, ; see also
–; S, EP on democracy and,
Greek love; poetry; Symonds, J. A.
–, –; see also laissez faire;
Whittingehame, ; life at, –
political economy; socialism
Wickstead, Phillip,
Webb, Beatrice, on Bloomsbury and Moore’s
Wilde, Oscar: ruin of, , , ; S helps
Principia,
Symonds avoid the fate of, ; Symonds
Webb, Philip, architecture of,
criticizes, ; Balfour and, ; martyr for
Wedgwood, Hensleigh,
later gay liberation movement,
Weeks, Jeffrey, on S as pioneer of gay studies,
will, see free will; psychology
Willett, Mrs. (Winifred Coombe-Tennant)
Welby, Lady Victoria, and S’s philosophy of
(medium who supposedly communicated