The Copyright Handbook

Home > Other > The Copyright Handbook > Page 27
The Copyright Handbook Page 27

by Stephen Fishman


  the Holy Grail to write his book, but these

  also included editorial material prepared

  were not copyrightable. The architecture,

  by West that was protected by copyright.

  structure, or way in which these facts and

  Although the database publisher deleted

  ideas were presented could be protected, but

  the protected editorial material before

  Brown had not appropriated the architecture

  permanently storing the public domain

  of the 1982 book. Rather, he “put together

  cases in its database, it was still found guilty

  these generalized facts and ideas in to a

  of infringement. The court held that the

  well received thriller.” ( Michael Baigent and

  temporary copies of the West editorial

  Richard Leigh v. The Random House Group

  materials infringed West’s copyrights even

  Limited, [2006] EWHC 719 (Ch).)

  though they were subsequently deleted.

  ( West Publishing Co. v. On Point Solutions

  Inc., 1994 WL 778426 (N.D. Ga. 1994).) l

  C H A P T E R

  Adaptations and Compilations

  6

  Derivative Works ..................................................................................................................................... 146

  Types of Derivative Works ..........................................................................................................147

  When You Need Permission to Create a Derivative Work ........................................149

  When You Don’t Need Permission to Create a Derivative Work ..........................150

  Derivative Work Doesn’t Affect Existing Copyright Protection ............................151

  Registering Derivative Works ....................................................................................................151

  Compilations ...............................................................................................................................................152

  Fact Compilations (Databases) .................................................................................................152

  Collective Works .............................................................................................................................152

  Extent of Copyright Protection for Compilations ..........................................................153

  Preexisting Material in Collective Works Must Be Used Lawful y .........................158

  Copyright in Preexisting Material Unaffected by Inclusion

  in Collective Work .......................................................................................................................159

  Registering Compilations ........................................................................................................... 160

  146 | THE COPYRIGHT HANDBOOK

  When ’Omer smote ’is bloomin’ lyre,

  EXAMPLE: Sheila writes a screenplay based

  He’d ’eard men sing by land an’ sea;

  upon a novel. In doing so, she takes the

  An’ what he thought ’e might require,

  novel’s expression (words) and adds her own

  ’E went an’ took—the same as me!

  expression to it—she organizes the material

  —Rudyard Kipling

  into cinematic scenes, adds dialogue and

  Barrack Room Bal ads

  camera directions, and deletes prose

  T

  descriptions and other material that can’t

  he old saying “there’s nothing new

  be filmed. The result is a new work of

  under the sun” may be the truest of

  authorship that can be separately protected

  all platitudes. If Kipling was right,

  by copyright: a screenplay that is clearly

  not even the earliest authors created their

  different from the novel, yet clearly based

  works out of whole cloth. Since authorship

  upon, or derived from it.

  began, authors have been borrowing and

  Of course, all works are derivative to

  adapting what others created before them.

  some extent. As Kipling declared, all

  This chapter is about works that are created authors “take” from each other. Authorship

  by using previously existing material. It covers is more often than not a process of

  derivative works—works created by trans-

  translation and recombination of previously

  forming or adapting preexisting expression

  existing ideas, facts, and other elements.

  —and compilations—works created by

  Rarely, if ever, does an author create a work

  selecting and arranging preexisting material that is entirely new. For example, writers of in new ways.

  fiction often draw bits and pieces of their

  characters and plots from other fictional

  Derivative Works

  works they have read. The same is true of

  writers of factual works. For example, it’s

  If you take a molten lump of copper and add likely that any new book on the impact

  tin to it you’ll end up with something new:

  of the electronic media on society would

  bronze. A similar process of transformation

  be derived to some extent from Marshall

  can be used to create new works of author-

  McLuhan’s The Medium Is the Message

  ship; an author can take expression that

  (Random House, 1967).

  already exists, add new expression to it, and

  However, a work is derivative for copyright

  end up with something new—that is, a new purposes only if its author has taken a

  and different work of authorship. Such works substantial amount of a previously existing are cal ed derivative works.

  work’s expression. As discussed in detail

  CHAPTER 6 | ADAPTATIONS AND COMPILATIONS | 147

  in Chapter 5, “What Copyright Protects,”

  the verses fit the music better, but the

  copyright only protects an author’s expression:

  show is nothing more than Eliot’s poems

  the words used and the selection and

  set to music. Cats is a derivative work of Old

  arrangement of material, if original. So,

  Possum’s Book of Practical Cats.

  a new book on the impact of the media on

  society would be derivative of The Medium

  Is the Mes age for copyright purposes only if

  Types of Derivative Works

  its author copied or paraphrased substantial

  There are many different types of derivative

  portions of the words McLuhan used to

  works. Let’s look at those of most interest

  express his ideas.

  to writers in terms of the type of expression

  The ideas and facts themselves are not

  the author takes from a previously existing

  protectable and are therefore free for anyone work and the expression added to it to

  to use. Likewise, this year’s novel about

  create a new, derivative work.

  boy meets girl is not derivative of last year’s

  novel on the same theme unless its author

  Editorial revisions and elaborations

  copied substantial portions of its expression. Preexisting expression taken. The entire text How much is substantial? Enough so

  of any preexisting work.

  that the average intended reader of the work

  New expression added. Editori
al revisions

  would conclude that it had been adapted

  or other new material.

  from or based upon the previously existing

  expression.

  EXAMPLE: Dr. Blood writes a new edition of

  his ten-year-old textbook on heart surgery.

  EXAMPLE 1: Edna writes a poem about

  He adds several new chapters on new

  her cat. She includes one line from a

  surgical techniques and revises the other

  poem in T.S. Eliot’s cat poetry collec tion,

  chapters in light of recent developments.

  Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats. She

  The new edition is a derivative work based

  probably has not used enough of Eliot’s

  on, but designed to take the place of, the

  expression for her poem to be considered

  earlier edition.

  a derivative work of Old Possum’s Book of

  Practical Cats.

  Fictionalizations

  EXAMPLE 2: Andrew Lloyd Webber and

  Trevor Nunn write a musical entitled Cats.

  Preexisting expression taken. A substantial

  The musical is based entirely on the poems

  portion of the protected expression con-

  in Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats. Here

  tained in a factual work (biography, history,

  and there a word or two is altered to make

  and so on).

  148 | THE COPYRIGHT HANDBOOK

  New expression added. Editing, reorganiza-

  EXAMPLE: Kitty makes a sound recording of

  tion, new dialogue, descriptions, and other

  selected highlights from her unauthorized

  new material needed to transform the

  biography of Hil ary Clinton. The recording

  preexisting nonfiction work into a novel,

  is a derivative work based on the written

  play, screenplay, or other work of fiction.

  biography.

  EXAMPLE: Art takes the nonfiction work

  The Diary of Anne Frank and transforms it

  Translations into a new language

  into a stage play. To do so, he deletes prose

  Preexisting expression taken. All the expres-

  descriptions, adds new dialogue, organizes

  sion contained in a preexisting work.

  the work into scenes and acts, and adds

  New expression added. Translation of

  new scenes and incidents that weren’t in the the work’s expression into a new version in diary. But he also retains as much of Anne

  another language.

  Frank’s expression—her words—as possible.

  The play is a derivative work based on the

  EXAMPLE: Miguel translates Stephen King’s

  nonfiction diary.

  latest bestseller into Spanish. To do so, he

  takes King’s expression (the words contained

  in the novel) and replaces them with

  Dramatizations

  Spanish words. The resulting translation

  Preexisting expression taken. All or a sub-

  is a derivative work based on the original

  stantial part of the expression in a fictional

  English-language novel.

  work not meant to be performed in public

  —that is, a short story, novel, or poem.

  Abridgements and condensations

  New expression added. Editing, reorganiza- of fiction or nonfiction works

  tion, new dialogue and other new material

  needed to transform the work into a work that Preexisting expression taken. A substantial can be performed in public—for instance, a

  portion of a work’s protectable expression.

  stage play or screenplay.

  New expression added. Editing and other

  revisions that transform the work into a

  Translations into a new medium

  new, shorter version.

  Preexisting expression taken. All or a sub-

  EXAMPLE: Reader’s Digest condensed books

  stantial portion of the protected expression

  are derivative works based on the unabridged

  of a work in one medium—for instance, a

  editions of the works that are condensed.

  published book.

  New expression added. Transfer of the

  Annotations

  work’s protected expression into a new

  Preexisting expression taken. All or a substan-

  medium.

  tial portion of a work’s protected expression.

  CHAPTER 6 | ADAPTATIONS AND COMPILATIONS | 149

  New expression added. Notes or other

  Such permission usually takes the legal

  materials that clarify the meaning of the

  form of an exclusive license to prepare a

  preexisting text.

  particular derivative work—for example, a

  screenplay—from the preexisting material.

  EXAMPLE: The annotated version of Lewis

  (See Chapter 8, “Transferring Copyright

  Carrol ’s Alice in Wonderland is a derivative

  work prepared from the original version

  Ownership.”)

  of Alice.

  What Happens If You Fail

  to Get Permission

  When You Need Permission to

  Create a Derivative Work

  If you create a derivative work without

  obtaining permission from the owner of

  One of the five exclusive copyright rights

  the copyright in the preexisting work, your

  that automatically come into existence the

  original contributions will ordinarily enter

  moment an original work of authorship

  the public domain. For example, if you

  is written down or otherwise fixed in a

  translate a Spanish novel into English without

  tangible form is the exclusive right to

  permission, you will lose any claim to

  prepare and distribute derivative works

  copyright protection in the original elements

  based on the work’s protected expression.

  you added in your translation—that is, your

  This means you cannot create and publish

  choice of English language words to convey

  a derivative work by using someone else’s

  the meaning of the Spanish original. Anyone

  protected expression without obtaining

  would be free to copy your translation

  their permission. If you do, you violate that

  without obtaining your permission, but they

  person’s copyright and would be subject to a

  would have to obtain permission from the

  copyright infringement suit.

  owner of the original Spanish work (but the

  owner of the Spanish novel would need no

  EXAMPLE: Rhonda writes a critical y

  permission at all to copy your translation).

  acclaimed novel. Rex writes a screenplay

  based on Rhonda’s novel without obtaining

  her permission to do so. Rex sel s the

  screenplay to a Hol ywood studio. Rhonda

  If you intend to create a derivative

  has a valid claim against Rex for infringing

  work from preexisting expression that is

  on her right to create derivative works from

  still under copyright, be sure to get the

  her novel.

  copyright owner’s permission to use the

  work before you go to the time and trouble

  of adapting it into a new work.

  150 | THE COPYRIGHT HANDBOOK

  When You Don’t Need Permission

/>   the public domain. Public domain material

  to Create a Derivative Work

  belongs to the world, and anyone is free

  to use it in any way he or she wishes. (See

  In some instances, it is not necessary

  Chapter 5, “What Copyright Protects ,” for

  to seek anyone’s permission to create a

  a detailed discussion of the public domain.)

  derivative work, and the only legal issue

  A work may be in the public domain because

  the author must deal with is registering the it was never copyrighted or the copyright

  derivative work with the Copyright Office.

  expired. The expression in such works may be

  Registration of derivative works is discussed used in any way without permission.

  in Chapter 3, “Copyright Registration .”

  Author owns right to prepare derivative

  Fair Use of Protected Expression

  works from preexisting expression

  An author doesn’t have to get anyone’s

  Even if a derivative work author uses some-

  one else’s protected expression, permission

  permission to create a derivative work if

  may not be required if the use constitutes

  the author owns the entire copyright in

  a fair use. Pursuant to the fair use privilege,

  the preexisting protected expression or the

  an author may take a limited amount of

  right to prepare derivative works based

  the protected expression in preexisting

  upon it. Authors start out owning all the

  works without the copyright owner’s

  copyright rights in their works, including

  permission. Whether or not a use is fair

  all derivative rights, but they often transfer

  is determined according to the facts and

  them to publishers, film producers, and

  circumstances of the particular case. Courts

  others. An author cannot create a derivative

  consider the purpose of the use (whether

  work from his or her own work if he or she

  for educational or commercial purposes,

  has transferred his or her derivative rights

  for example), the nature of the preexisting

  to others. (See Chapter 8, “Transferring

  expression, the amount of preexisting

  Copyright Ownership.”)

  expression taken, and whether the use

  reduces the value of the copyright owner’s

  EXAMPLE: Livia writes a novel and sel s the

  rights in the preexisting expression. A

  exclusive right to prepare a screenplay based

  parody of a wel -known work might be one

 

‹ Prev