by Mir
Edited and Translated by Raza Mir
THE TASTE OF WORDS
An Introduction to Urdu Poetry
With a Foreword by Gulzar
Contents
About the Author
Foreword
Preface
Introduction
A Note on Poetic Form
POEMS
Amir Khusrau
Quli Qutub Shah
Wali Dakkani
Mirza Sauda
Khwaja Mir Dard
Mir Taqi Mir
Nazeer Akbarabadi
Insha
Mir Anees
Mirza Dabeer
Bahadur Shah Zafar
Zauq
Mirza Ghalib
Momin
Dagh Dehlavi
Maulana Hali
Akbar Allahabadi
Mohammed Iqbal
Brij Narain Chakbast
Jigar Moradabadi
Firaaq Gorakhpuri
Josh Malihabadi
Makhdoom Mohiuddin
Majaz
N.M. Rashid
Faiz
Miraji
Ali Sardar Jafri
Jan Nisar Akhtar
Majrooh Sultanpuri
Kaifi Azmi
Sahir Ludhianvi
Sulaiman Khateeb
Habib Jalib
Mustafa Zaidi
Ahmed Faraz
Gulzar
Shahryar
Asif Raza
Iftikhar Arif
S.M. Shahed
Javed Akhtar
Fahmida Riaz
Parveen Shakir
Jameela Nishat
Ishrat Afreen
Zeeshan Sahil
Notes
Copyright Acknowledgements
Follow Penguin
Copyright
PENGUIN BOOKS
THE TASTE OF WORDS
Raza Mir teaches management at William Paterson University, USA. He is the co-author of Anthems of Resistance: A Celebration of Progressive Urdu Poetry. He can be reached at [email protected].
Foreword
Urdu is a nation unto itself. Wherever it travels, it creates its own world. It was born in India, but does not belong to India alone. It is the official language of Pakistan, but does not belong to Pakistan alone. When it reached Oslo (Norway), it settled there. It went to Great Britain, and created its own home. It reached Canada, and a community emerged. It reached the United States, and became a native tongue. For it was embraced by Raza Mir.
The truth is that instead of ‘embraced’, if we could use a different metaphor, we would say ‘adopted by lips’. Wherever Urdu goes, it clasps people in a bear hug. It becomes a tradition unto itself. For Urdu is after all, the lingua franca of a culture.
Urdu
Ye kaisa ishq hai Urdu zaban ka
Maza ghulta ha lafzon ka zaban par
Ke jaise paan mein mehnga khimaam ghulta hai
Nasha aata hai Urdu bolne mein
Gilori ki tarah hain moonh lagi sab istelaahen
Lutf deti hain
Halaq chhooti hai Urdu to
Halaq se jaise mai ka ghoont utarta hai
Badi ‘aristocracy’ hai zaban mein
Faqeeri mein nawaabi ka maza deti hai Urdu
Agarche maani kam hote hain aur alfaaz ki ifraat hoti
hai
Magar phir bhi . . .
Buland aawaaz padhiye to bahut hi motabar lagti
hain baatein
Kahin kuchh door se kaanon mein padhti hai agar Urdu
To lagta hai
Ke din jaadon ke hain, khidki khuli hai, dhoop andar
aa rahi hai
Ajab hai ye zaban Urdu
Kabhi yoonhi safar karte
Agar koi musafir sher padh de Mir, Ghalib ka
Vo chaahe ajnabi ho
Yahi lagta hai vo mere vatan ka hai
Bade shaista lahje mein kisi se Urdu sun kar kya
nahin lagta
Ke ek tehzeeb ki aawaaz hai Urdu!!
Janaab Raza Mir, Urdu mein aap ka hissa yaad
rahega.
Urdu
What is this love of Urdu
That the taste of words dissolves on the tongue
Like expensive tobacco dissolves with a bite of paan?
Urdu speech produces a mellow high,
Like the many flavours of a delectable morsel of betel
That frolic in the mouth.
When Urdu touches the throat
It descends like a sip of wine.
A strange aristocracy it possesses
That, even in penury, Urdu yields a sense of immense
prestige.
Though, at times, there is a paucity of meaning
And a surfeit of words,
But even so . . .
When declaimed in a firm voice, words appear
weighty and solemn
When Urdu reaches the ears from a distance
It appears
As if on winter days, the window is open and
sunshine is pouring in.
Strange is this Urdu tongue
That, when on a journey,
Should a wayfarer declaim a couplet from Mir, from
Ghalib,
Be that a complete stranger
He still appears a compatriot.
Does it not feel
That the lingua franca of a culture is this Urdu!
Janaab Raza Mir, I will remember your role in Urdu.1
Gulzar
Preface
This is first and foremost a gift for my wife Farah. It was she who laid out the idea of this book for me in detail, as a volume that would not only help her dip her toe in the vast ocean that constituted Urdu poetry, but also provide her with an entry point into the language itself, with its occasionally intimidating metaphors and linguistic peculiarities.
Like Farah, I know a lot of people whose interest in Urdu poetry vastly exceeds their ability to engage with it, partly because of their unfamiliarity with the script, but also because of its often mystifying and outsider-unfriendly albeit tantalizing metaphorical conventions. Indeed, I am one of them. In school, I formally studied Hindi and Telugu, and despite Urdu being my putative mother tongue, I never engaged with it (except orally) till I was in my teens. It is only my unhealthy obsession with Urdu poetry that finally forced me to teach myself the Urdu script, and resolve the helplessness I felt when the joy of hearing a good poem was rendered ephemeral by my illiteracy. While my ineptitude with regard to Urdu poetry has been happily resolved, it obviously persists in other theatres—such as when I attend a Carnatic music concert, and watch the cognoscenti among the listeners keep beat with their palms and speak of kritis and adi-taalam, while all I can say is ‘That sounded nice!’ I would also love to read a good book on relatively alien cultural traditions, albeit one that is not too dense and impenetrable, with lines like: ‘One margam of Bharatanatyam consists of allaripu, jatiswaram, sabdam, varnam and tillana.’ I hope I will not bamboozle you in this book with unexplained references to radif, qafiya, musaddas or such technicalities. This book seeks to enhance your affective enjoyment of Urdu poetry, with as little interference from me as possible.
The intended readership of this book does not necessarily comprise Urdu experts or those who have read a lot of Urdu poetry in the original. Rather, I visualize an intelligent reader who, while interested in poetry as a genre, may not have a working knowled
ge of the Urdu script, and may not even be familiar with or fluent in Devanagri either. They would have read poetry in English and other languages to varying extents, but their exposure to Urdu might primarily be oral (Indian film songs, CDs of ghazals and poetry, the company of Urdu-literate friends). They do enjoy the spoken cadence of the language, but might have been deprived of the non-trivial pleasure that comes from a reflective reading of the poems.
In this anthology, I have attempted to provide an entry point to Urdu poetry for such interested non-insiders. To these readers, I offer a quasi-formal introduction to the canon and the contemporary landscape of Urdu poetry, with a highly arbitrary and subjective selection of around 150 poems from approximately fifty poets. Many of these poems have been abridged due to space considerations. I begin with a brief historical essay on Urdu and Urdu poetry (which is quirky, idiosyncratic, contingent and incomplete, but hopefully interesting) before laying out my selection of poems. I am also happy to offer a brief Internet roadmap of websites where one can read more about the poets and find more translated work. I have also identified websites in the public domain where these poems can be heard and viewed as performance. I have included biographical notes on the poets, which are not meant to be exhaustive, but just an attempt to render them human enough. The poets are ordered chronologically; and while I have chosen the list with care, there will obviously be omissions, of poems and poets, that some readers will consider unforgivable. If reviewers of this book express anger over the fact that I overlooked certain poets, poems or verses (or was foolish enough to include some ‘lightweight’ in this august company), I will be delighted. For in my wilder dreams, I envisage a series of sequel anthologies, like a good B-grade Hollywood horror film franchise, which people will disparage, but will be drawn to, as if to unhealthy street food. So do drum up the outrage. I briefly considered ignoring Ghalib in my selection to ensure such a backlash, but there is a line between quirkiness and insanity that even I am aware of!
I would also like to eschew any claims of genre-originality. This task of popularizing Urdu among its script-challenged enthusiasts is not new. As I have mentioned, I myself grew up without learning the Urdu script formally, and am indebted to a host of teachers.1
In this collection, I have tried to accomplish three inter-related tasks. First, readers can use this volume as a rudimentary dictionary, a source of learning Urdu, or a way of engaging more organically and contextually with the words in a poem. The Internet roadmap adds greater charm to the experience: for example, it is fun to read Amir Khusrau’s thirteenth-century qawwali (for instance, ‘Chhap tilak sab cheeni re . . .’ ) in translation, but the charm is infinitely multiplied if one can do so while listening to it being belted out by Abida Parveen!
The second task that I have set myself is that of translating in an idiom that is accessible to a relatively heterogeneous readership. It is here that I have had to make some difficult choices. Should one translate poetry as rhyme to reflect its potential ‘singability’ (and risk it degenerating occasionally into doggerel)? Or should one strive to preserve the verbal integrity of the poem and eschew rhyme and metre, in the hope that readers will understand the underlying poetics by themselves? Not only did I mentally agonize over this question, I actually wrote the entire first draft of this book as free verse, before deciding impulsively that, sometimes, ‘not to rhyme, was a cryme’ (indulge my puns, please!). Thus I chose to retranslate several—but by no means all—poems rhythmically. Even when I have tried my hand at rhyme, I have done my best to not inject myself, the translator, into the relationship between the poet and the reader. You will be the final arbiter of whether my choice has worked out.
I also want to raise the tricky issue of the transliteration scheme to be adopted. A number of formats have been proposed by academics dealing with Urdu, many of them highly precise and consistent. However, they tend to be themselves very arcane and intimidating to the eye. To maintain the popular flavour of the book, I have deliberately chosen to go with an unscientific, ‘vernacular’ format. My schema (if I may call it one) is derived from the way in which Hindustani words have been portrayed in movie posters in India over the years. For instance, a standard transliteration scheme deployed by the Annual of Urdu Studies, a respected journal, would represent a line from a song in the film Hum Dono as: ‘Har fikr kō dhûēN mēN urādā ĉalā gayā’. I would have instead gone in this book with: ‘Har fikr ko dhuen mein udaata chalaa gayaa’. Readers from the subcontinent, who are in the habit of reading transliterated movie posters and advertisements, will be familiar with this format. I beg the indulgence of others, on the plea that those who are finicky about transliteration are usually familiar with the original script, and can therefore make do with the originals.
I would like to acknowledge gratefully the following for giving me permission to reproduce some of the poems in this book. Gulzar, Javed Akhtar, Jameela Nishat, Ishrat Afreen, Fahmida Riaz, Iftikhar Arif, Asif Raza and S.M. Shahed permitted me to use their own work. In addition, I obtained permission from Fariha and Sambreen Rashed (for N.M. Rashid’s poem); Saba Zaidi (for Mustafa Zaidi’s poems); Tamkeen Khateeb (for Sulaiman Khateeb’s poem); Shabana Azmi (for Kaifi Azmi’s poems); Javed Akhtar (for Jan Nisar Akhtar’s and Majaz’s poems); Ali Nazim Jafri (for Ali Sardar Jafri’s poems); Faridoon Shahryar (for Shahryar’s poems); Ali Madeeh Hashmi and the Faiz Foundation (for Faiz’s poems); Syed Abid Raza (for Zeeshan Sahil’s poems); Parveen Qadir Agha, the Perveen Shakir Trust and Murad Publications (for Parveen Shakir’s poem); Shibli and Saadi Faraz (for Ahmed Faraz’s poems); and Andalib Sultanpuri (for Majrooh’s poems). While every possible effort was made to contact the heirs of deceased poets, I would be happy to include and acknowledge the heirs of any missed poets in future editions.
Finally, this book is an attempt to build another tiny bridge between the modern subcontinent and a language that is currently under siege on a variety of fronts. In the recent past, Urdu has struggled to gain acceptance from elitist rulers, dismissive linguists and political conservatives who have either sought to belittle it as a crude indistinct dialect or tainted it by association with putatively traitorous minorities. What has led to its survival in the South Asian landscape is the fact that it was embraced by the masses, and has remained alive as a spoken tongue. Perhaps reflecting this public-oriented ethos, its literary tradition, especially its poetic tradition, is simultaneously erudite and accessible, with a rhythm that can be intoned by a theologian and also sung by a street beggar. From culturally mobile ambiguities in words like sanam (simultaneously meaning ‘beloved’ and ‘stone’) to geographically ubiquitous slogans like ‘Inquilab Zindabad’ (‘Long Live the Revolution’), Urdu is a part of the lived experience of the Indian subcontinent, even among those who seek to deny and denigrate it. This book is my attempt to keep the language alive among its westernized friends as well. I hope you like it.
Introduction
The Flutter of Angel Wings
Naddi ka mod, chashma-e shireen ka zer-o-bam
Chaadar shab-e nujoom ki, shabnam ka rakht-e nam
Moti ki aab, gul ki mehak, maah-e nau ka kham
In sab ke imtezaaj se paida hui hai tu
Kitne haseen ufaq se huvaida hui hai tu
Lehja maleeh hai ke namak-khwaar hoon tera
Sehat zaban mein hai ke beemar hoon tera
Aazad-e sher hoon ke giraftar hoon tera
Tere karam se sher-o-sukhan ka imam hoon
Shahon pe khandazan hoon ke tera ghulam hoon
The bend of the river, and the stream’s bubbly path
The veil of the starry night, and the moist dew of the morn
The pearl’s clarity, rose’s fragrance and the new moon’s swathe
All came together harmoniously and you were born
What a beauteous horizon have you arisen from!
Sweet is my speech for having tasted of your salt1
Healthy my tongue that I am ill with love for you
My verse flies free, for I am entombed in your vault
It is your boon that I rule the realm of poetry too
I mock the kings now that I am your slave.
This beautiful ode to Urdu, written by Josh Malihabadi, was never published, but has found its way to Urdu lovers over time through a rich oral tradition.2
Contrast this verse with the playful comedy of Dilawar Figaar, a Pakistani poet who laments the replacement of Urdu by English in common usage. Here are two shers (couplets) from his poem ‘Pure Ghazal in Urdu’ that exemplify how English has been incorporated into daily speech alongside colloquial Urdu:
Na ho jab heart in the chest, phir tongue in the mouth kyon?
To beautify this line, throw some light in Urdu
There should be yaqeenan no milawat in the literature
Therefore I never call shab ko3 night in Urdu.
Urdu has prided itself on its mongrel roots and cosmopolitan ethos. It was never a language of kings and courts (though a surprising number of rulers tried their hand at Urdu poetry), nor did it confine itself to any religion (despite its deployment by communalists and divisive rulers to drive a wedge between communities). It is a quintessentially modern language, with neither a distinct writing style (no formalized diacritics, and a borrowed script) nor any claim to a direct link with a root language. To chart the emergence of Urdu is itself a fraught task, full of political pitfalls and contradictions. The progression between Hindavi, Rekhti and Urdu is a continuous one, and to break that continuity into a linguistic taxonomy is an act of social construction that is neither helpful nor productive. In this anthology, for instance, I have included Amir Khusrau, who lived in the thirteenth century, as an Urdu poet. Others may choose the sixteenth-century Deccan king Quli Qutub Shah as an originary Urdu poet, while some may play safer and commence with the seventeenth-century poet Wali Dakkani. At any rate, it is correct to say that the language has primarily thrived through an oral tradition, much of which is predicated on its poetry. That tradition has always been engaged with the direct reality of its purveyors, and I would venture to say that the best Urdu poetry is rarely the kind that is steeped in metaphysics, but one which talks of real issues: love and other relationships, jobs and occupations, bazaar scenes, feelings of marginality and oppression, revolution, the yearning of enslaved people to be free, and matters of religion (not metaphysical exegeses but rather matters of practice, celebrations of martyrs and making fun of hypocritical proselytizers).