That “good behavior” means fewer murders. “We're not seeing violence across the cartels,” he said. “They're just not in conflict. Some people would say that at this end of the distribution chain they're more interested in cooperating and making money than in conflict. Others would say there's plenty [of business] to go around, so there's no need for conflict.”
But while murder rates in border cities are not increasing, kidnapping is. But again, the victims are almost entirely illegal immigrants involved in trafficking. “We don't know how many have been kidnapped, but guesstimates by local law enforcement put abductions in border towns at four to eight a week,” said Fred Burton, STRATFOR's vice-president in charge of counterterrorism studies. “They are snatched in the U.S. and taken to Mexico.”
That relative calm seemed to ebb in the summer of 2008. With gunfire from Mexico sometimes heard on the U.S. side of the border and the Red Cross having abandoned its efforts in places like Reynoso, it was a tense time for border cities. On August 25, the El Paso police department received an alert from the Department of Homeland Security that violence could well slip over the border soon. “We received credible information that drug cartels in Mexico have given permission to hit targets on the U.S. side of the border,” said El Paso police spokesperson Chris Mears. While police forces in border cities and the Border Patrol were on heightened levels of security, nothing major occurred.
Mexico on the edge
In November, the still-new Obama administration commissioned a report on national security from the U.S. Joint Forces Command. It said that Mexico and Pakistan were at risk of a “rapid and sudden collapse” and stated that: “The Mexican possibility may seem less likely, but the government, its politicians, police and judicial infrastructure are all under sustained assault and pressure by criminal gangs and drug cartels. How that internal conflict turns out over the next several years will have a major impact on the stability of the Mexican state.”
Retiring CIA director Michael Hayden agreed. He described the Mexican drug cartels as the biggest concern to the U.S. after Iran and ahead of al Qaeda, North Korea, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Not surprisingly, the Mexican government tried to downplay the idea that it was in danger of collapsing. “It seems inappropriate to me that you would call Mexico a security risk,” Interior Secretary Fernando Gómez Mont said. “There are problems in Mexico that are being dealt with, that we can continue to deal with, and that's what we are doing.”
That following February 2011, the U.S. State Department issued its most strongly worded warning about traveling to Mexico. It particularly warned spring breakers, many of whom go to Mexico's beaches every year, and, in an unprecedented move, also warned people traveling to vacation spots on the U.S. side of the border, like South Padre Island, Texas. It advised visitors to border areas to “exercise common sense precautions such as visiting only the well-traveled business and tourism areas of border towns during daylight and early evening hours.”
Home invasions escalate in Arizona
While little violence has spilled over into Texas, it is another story in Arizona. The city of Tucson, not far from the Sonora border, has seen a rash of home invasions with more than 200 in 2008, a crime, authorities said, that was “unheard of” in Tucson just a few years ago. “The amount of violence has drastically increased in the last six to 12 months, especially in the area of home invasions,” said Pima County Sherriff's department Lieutenant Michael O'Connor. “The people we have arrested, a high percentage are from Mexico.”
Tuscon police sergeant David Azuelo was investigating one such home invasion with a reporter from The New York Times in tow. In this particular attack, masked, armed men burst into a Tuscon home and pistol-whipped the father until he was unconscious. Upon finding a mother bathing her three-year-old son, they demanded money and drugs. “At least they didn't put the gun in the baby's mouth like we've seen before,” Azuelo told the reporter. Azuelo also told the reporter about a similar home invasion in which a 14-year-old boy was abducted and another in which the attackers got the wrong house and shot a very surprised woman who was watching television.
While Azuelo was asking the pistol-whipped man questions, he determined that the attack—like the bulk of Arizona home invasions—was linked to the cartels. A quick search of the house revealed a blood-stained scale, marijuana buds and leaves and a bundle of cellophane wrap. Police acknowledge that most home invasions are to collect debts, but there is a growing number that are simply robberies. When dealers find out that another dealer has received a large shipment, Azuelo claimed, they will just go and take it from them and sell it themselves.
Azuelo said that the assailants he saw “were not very sophisticated.” But they had an easy time escaping because the victims frequently refused to cooperate. “For me, the question is how much they got away with,” he said. “The family may never tell.”
One of his detectives predicted that the trend in home invasions would continue to increase. “I think this is the tip of the iceberg,” Tucson detective Kris Bollingmo said. “The problem is only going to get worse.”
And, as had been the modus operandi in Mexico for years, the home invaders in Arizona were beginning to masquerade as police. “We are finding home invasion and attacks involving people impersonating law enforcement officers,” said Commander Dan Allen of Arizona's State Department of Public Safety. “They are very forceful and aggressive; they are heavily armed, and they threaten, assail, bind and sometimes kill victims.”
International drug dealing
According to Homeland Security Director and former Arizona governor Janet Napolitano, it was getting worse. Appearing before a senate panel on February 19 asking for authorization for National Guard troops to help the Border Patrol, she pointed out that the cartels had established themselves in at least 230 U.S. cities. “The cartels have fingertips that reach throughout the United States,” she said.
The cartels' major center for export, according to the DEA, is Dallas. “We've got some of the major cartel members established here dealing their wares in Europe,” said James Capra, head of the U.S. DEA's Dallas office. “[The cartels] are dealing with Italy, Spain, you name it. They can operate their logistical center from here and coordinate between Mexico, Central America and Europe.”
This information came after a 23-year-old Dallas-area jail employee named Brenda Medina Salinas illegally used the jail's database to check up on two ex-boyfriends who had been arrested on drug charges. The two men—Moises Duarte and Henry Hernandez—were questioned and agreed to cooperate with police. Wiretaps revealed that the men (and others) had been importing cocaine to Dallas, then moving it to the eastern United States and Europe in coordination with the Camorra (Neapolitan Mafia).
In April 2010, the U.S. military announced that it would be using the techniques it had acquired from fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan to assist the Mexican military in combating the drug cartels. “We've learned and grown a great deal as we've conducted operations against networks of terrorists and insurgent fighters,” said U.S. Air Force General Gene Renuart, commander of Northern Command. “Many of the skills that you use to go after a network like those apply ... to drug-trafficking organizations.” He pointed out that the Mexican military had been much more successful fighting the cartels than police had, and that their tasks were not unlike urban warfare.
But while the effort was well publicized in the U.S., it was largely kept quiet in Mexico. “The Mexican army doesn't want to be seen in the press as cooperating too closely with the U.S. Army,” said Craig Deare, a professor at National Defense University. “One of the conditions of the cooperation is staying out of the visibility of the press.” Not only was the Mexican military's pride at stake, but many people south of the border remembered how the U.S. and other sophisticated militaries had trained the soldiers who later became Los Zetas. If the best-trained and armed members of the Mexican military had left for the cartels' higher pay a few years ago, there woul
d be little, they speculated, to prevent it from happening again.
Gunfire in the desert in Pinal County
Just a week after the passage of Arizona's controversial law regarding illegal immigrants on April 23, 15-year-veteran Pinal County deputy sheriff Louie Puroll was patrolling a lonely stretch of Interstate 8 on April 30. The region, known as the Vekol Valley, is true desert, where vegetation is sparse and plants over a foot high are very rare. He said he came across five men, two with rifles, and what appeared to be bales of marijuana in heavy backpacks. He followed them discreetly for about a mile to a trash-strewn area known by locals as an illegal immigration route just under Antelope Peak. He lost sight of them, then as he crested a ridge he came face to face with the smugglers. One shot at him with an AK-47. The bullet sliced through his back, just above his left kidney, but caused only a superficial wound. He fled and the men kept firing, but missed him. He called 911 from his cell phone. Shots could be heard in the background of the call. Puroll gave his location coordinates from a handheld GPS, then shouted “Triple 9s!” the universal police code for an officer in danger and requiring assistance. Then he said: “I'm taking fire! Get me some help! Send Ranger [the force's helicopter]! I've been hit! I've been hit! I've been hit!”
The following day, 17 illegal immigrants were rounded up as the sheriff's office collected suspects in the Puroll case. None had AK-47s or backpacks full of marijuana.
Of course, the incident caused a firestorm of controversy in the media. Supporters and opponents of the new law rallied on each side of the Puroll case. Many people claimed Puroll was lying to further the state's clampdown on illegal immigration. One of them was Phoenix New Times reporter Paul Rubin, who wrote an article called “Pinalcchio: Renowned Forensics Experts Say a Pinal County Deputy's High-Profile Tale About Getting Shot After Encountering Drug Smugglers Doesn't Add Up.” In it, he accused Puroll of embellishing the story and Sheriff Paul Babeu of using it as leverage for his own political aims.
After the story appeared, Rubin met with Puroll again. This is how he described the meeting:
After four hours of dialogue, I shut down my tape-recorder at the truck stop. Puroll tells me: “Now that that's off, let me tell you something. You're lucky to be alive right now.” The deputy explains that a friend of his, a “rancher of Mexican descent,” recently offered to murder me because of what I wrote in “Pinalcchio.” I ask the deputy what he'd said to his pal. “I said that it wouldn't be a good idea, not to worry about it,” he says evenly. I ask him why he's telling me this. He sees me taking notes, but continues. “Thought you'd like to know some people were upset with you, that's all,” the deputy replies, smiling slightly.
Puroll was later fired for remarks made to another reporter that he had been approached by cartel members who offered him cash to cooperate. “They didn't want me to sell or buy the stuff,” he said. “Just that they'd make it worth my while to look the other way out in the desert if I bumped into them.” Although he did not say he took the bribes, he did not follow police procedure by arresting the men, reporting the offers or calling for backup.
While Puroll's integrity suffered serious setbacks, Babeu was still making hay with the event. In June, he appeared on television to discuss the deaths of two alleged drug smugglers (one of whom had been caught and deported seven times) in the same part of the desert Puroll had been shot in. He showed night vision videos of men with assault rifles carrying backpacks he alleged were full of drugs to vehicles parked on Interstate 8 in an area of Pinal County well known to be a highway for illegal immigrants. “How is it that you see pictures like these, not American with semi and fully automatic rifles. How is that okay?” he asked, claiming that he had lost control of large parts of the county to the cartels. “We are outgunned, we are outmanned and we don't have the resources here locally to fight this.” He pointed out that many areas of Arizona that had been popular recreation spots now had signs warning that dangerous drug smugglers frequented the area.
He was not alone. While the mainstream media and many other politicians argued that Babeu was overstating the cartels' presence on U.S. soil, his supporters went online with their observations. One of them, syndicated conservative radio host Roger Hedgecock, published photos of warning signs posted by the U.S. federal government that read (in part): “Danger—Public Warning Travel Not Recommended” and pointed out that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had closed off a 3,500-acre section of the Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge to visitors because of what he called cartel activity. The staff at Buenos Aires played the incident down. Bonnie Swarbrick, the park's outdoor recreation planner and spokeswoman, said that the closure was to allow “National Guard and construction workers to patrol the area” without encountering the public. She also said that since the park had replaced its old barbed-wire fence with a 12-foot wall in 2006, there had been fewer sightings of illegal immigrants in the park. She did not explain what exactly the National Guard was doing in the park, however.
Babeu and his supporters were not convinced. When asked if the 1,200 National Guard troops promised by President Obama to reinforce Border Patrol would help, Babeu replied: “It will fall short. What is truly needed is 3,000 soldiers for Arizona alone.”
A month later, another Arizona sheriff —Maricopa County's Joe Arpaio, a nationally known opponent of illegal immigration who styled himself “America's Toughest Sheriff” after his treatment of inmates had been challenged as cruel and unethical—made the news. A man who wished to remain anonymous told local news that his wife had received a garbled Spanish message on her voice mail that offered a $1-million bounty on Arpaio's head and $1,000 for anyone who wanted to join the Juárez Cartel. “She showed it to me. I was kind of disgusted,” he said. “I reported it to the sheriff's department yesterday ... they said they were going to direct the threat squad on it.” It also gave instructions to pass the threat along, and soon other people in the area were reporting that they had received the same message.
The sheriff's office took the threat seriously. “Arpaio gets threats pretty routinely, but obviously with this heightened awareness of his role in the immigration issue we've got to take this one a little bit more seriously with a million-dollar contract out on him,” said county spokeswoman Lisa Allen. “It's going so many different places that our folks are looking at it and thinking well at any given point in time it could land in front of some crazy person who thinks ‘I can do that.’”
Cartel involvement in the banking crisis
Any thought that the Mexican cartels' presence in the U.S. was local and small-time were shattered in the summer of 2010. As part of a widespread investigation into U.S. banks after the economic collapse of 2008, financial giant Wells Fargo made a plea bargain with the federal prosecutors. The deal was made in March, but only made public in July.
As financial institutions all over America were failing in 2008, Wells Fargo had purchased North Carolina-based Wachovia, which the federal government had forced to sell its assets to prevent a failure. According to a report by Bloomberg World News (which broke the story), investigators found that Wachovia “didn't do enough to spot illicit funds in handling $378.4 billion for Mexican currency exchange houses from 2004 to 2007. That's the largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money-laundering law, in U.S. history—a sum equal to one-third of Mexico's current gross domestic product.” In a three-year period, one loosely run American bank had in effect laundered as much money for the cartels as was legally earned of all of Mexico in a year.
The investigation began in April 2006 when Mexican soldiers seized a DC-9 cargo jet at the Ciudad del Carmen airport. Inside were 5.7 tons of cocaine in 128 identical briefcases. The cocaine was linked to the Sonora Cartel (which had since been absorbed by the Sinaloa Cartel), and the jet had been purchased by money that had been laundered by Wachovia and then deposited into accounts in North Carolina-based Bank of America.
“Wachovia's blatant disregard for our banking laws gave internat
ional cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations,” said the lead investigator, federal prosecutor Jeffrey Sloman. His team also uncovered more cartel deposits at Bank of America and London-based HSBC, and that Miami-based American Express Bank had paid a fine in 2007 for a smaller version of the same problem.
Later, an investigation of Arizona outlets of Colorado-based Western Union, the world's biggest money transfer firm, showed widespread corruption when it came to dealing with cartel cash. Undercover officers visiting more than 20 Western Union offices were allowed to use multiple names, pass fictitious identification and smudge their fingerprints on documents, investigators said in court records. “Their allegiance was to the smugglers,” said Arizona's assistant attorney general Cameron Holmes. “What they thought about during work was ‘How may I please my highest spending customers the most?’ In all the time we did undercover operations, we never once had a bribe turned down.”
As 2011 opened, there was little hope the war would end soon. Statistically, things were actually getting much worse. The death toll in 2010 was 15,273—a 59 percent increase over 2009 and an incredible 42 people killed per day.
But perhaps even a bigger toll was the widespread feeling that Mexico had drawn itself into a war without an end. “After the news of El Ponchis broke, the whole country just kind of got depressed,” said Jaime R, a former Juárez shop owner who now lives in El Paso. “It just seemed like the stories were all the same; you'd just see that the numbers and places had changed, but it was always the same.” Like many Mexicans, Jaime R checks Facebook and Twitter frequently to ensure that his family and friends are safe. “You can't trust the news,” he said. “So you have to trust your family.”
Not long after El Ponchis was arrested, the news was dominated by a huge gunfight in Apatzingán. It began on the morning of Thursday, December 9, 2010, when masked gunmen opened fire on Federales. The armed men then confiscated cars, used them to barricade all five road entrances into the city and set them on fire. While they were collecting the cars, they killed the teenage daughter of a former Apatzingán mayor and an eight-month-old baby who was riding in the back of a taxi with his mother.
Jerry Langton Three-Book Bundle Page 84