by John Hamer
For what reason would the Windsors constantly show this film to a child who was a guest in their home? Diana told Andrew Morton, according to his book ‘Diana Her True Story’, “...the atmosphere was always very strange when we went there and I used to kick and fight anyone who tried to make us go”.
When Diana was thirteen years old, she moved from Norfolk to live at Althorp in Northamptonshire, the Spencer family’s ancestral home after her father married Raine, the daughter of the novelist Barbara Cartland. Diana had a deep loathing for Raine and was quoted as saying in the book ‘Diana: Her True Story’, that in September 1989 she had unleashed her years of frustration on Raine: “I told her what I thought about her and I’ve never known such anger in me. I remember really going for her gullet”.
I said “…if you only knew how much we all hated you for what you have done. You’ve ruined the house [Althorp], you spend all daddy’s money and for what?” This is a consequence of emotional distress and a result of the deep frustration she still felt from her childhood.
The Spencers are an Elite bloodline family. They are cousins of the Spencer-Churchills, related to the Marlborough family of Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshire, the birthplace of Winston Spencer-Churchill. Other forebears included the Duke of Marlborough and Sir Robert Walpole. The Spencer family inherited a considerable fortune from Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough and they also married into the Cavendish family, the Dukes of Devonshire at Chatsworth House in Derbyshire. This particular branch of the family became known as Spencer–Cavendish. Diana also shared common ancestors with Prince Charles through the third Duke of Devonshire and, most significantly, King James I, the first Stuart King of both England and Scotland and sponsor of Francis Bacon. Diana was also descended through several lines from the Stuart Kings, Charles II and James II, which connected her bloodline to the Carolingian bloodline in France, which regards itself as Merovingian.
Charles II had so many illegitimate children, that it is extremely difficult to guess how many ‘offshoots’ of the family exist today. However, one thing is for sure and that is that the Elite will know and monitor all of them. As Elite bloodlines go, the Spencer’s line is extremely important; Diana was related to countless aristocratic lines, including the Earls of Lucan. Moving further afield, the Spencers have blood-ties with many leading American families and are distantly related to the Rockefellers. The bloodline has a long history of serving the monarch and the tradition continued with Diana’s father. He was equerry to King George VI and to Queen Elizabeth II, herself. Diana’s sister, Jane, is married to Sir Robert Fellowes, the Queens private secretary at the time of Diana’s death. Both Diana’s grandmothers, the Countess Spencer and Ruth, Lady Fermoy, were inner circle members of the Queen Mothers Court, as were four of her great aunts.
The Spencers and the Queen Mother were extremely close and it was the Queen Mother and Lady Fermoy who manipulated Diana into her marriage with Prince Charles. The countdown to marriage began when Diana met Charles at Althorp whilst he was in a relationship with her sister Sarah, in 1977 and Diana was 16 and so it was not until three years later that the Windsors really made their move for her. Diana was invited to a party at Buckingham Palace to celebrate the 30th Birthday of Charles and then in July 1980, a friend of Charles, Philip de Pass, asked Diana to stay with them while the Prince was there. In Diana’s own words, “Charles was all over me and he leapt on me practically”.
He asked her to accompany him to Buckingham Palace the next day and an invitation followed to join the Windsors in the September at Balmoral, their residence in Scotland. Eventually Charles asked her to marry him and she accepted. “I love you so much” Diana said to him, “whatever love is” replied Charles and this reply speaks volumes about the mental state of the man who is destined to be king, but also says even more about the royal family and their coldness and calculatingly callous behaviour.
The Elite bloodlines have no real idea what love is, none of them ever receive it and thus cannot express it. Unfortunately, this is the sad reality for their children and certainly puts into perspective these people’s attitudes towards the rest of humanity.
During some of the interviews after the break-up of the marriage, Diana stated that on reflection, she could see that Charles had never been genuine in his affection towards her and even before the wedding she had realised she would also be having a relationship with his one true love Camilla Parker-Bowles the ‘third person in the marriage’, which of course became more apparent as time passed. During the marriage, Charles and Camilla communicated with the codenames ‘Gladys and Fred’. Camilla like the Windsors, is close to the Rothschilds and on the first anniversary of Diana’s death, she was on the Ionian island of Corfu enjoying the hospitality of Lord Jacob Rothschild, who just happened to have spent £16 million leasing and restoring the Spencer’s 18th century mansion overlooking Green Park in London close to Buckingham Palace.
A week after her engagement to Charles, Diana’s bulimia began in earnest. This is an eating disorder which results in vomiting every time food is eaten and Diana was suffering this three or four times a day and eventually became desperately thin. This condition could well be a direct result of the satanic upbringing experienced by Diana and in this case was triggered when Charles put his hand on her waist and said, “Oh, a bit chubby here, aren’t we?” she stated. This may also be construed as yet another character assassination of Diana to ensure that by the time of her murder, she was seen as ‘the crazy woman’, to totally discredit her. Bulimia is of course a disease of the emotions, as most diseases are and Diana had been an emotional wreck since the break-up of her father and mother’s marriage in-line with the standard upbringing of bloodline offspring.
She described the attitude of Charles thus:
“He found the virgin, the sacrificial lamb and in a way he was obsessed with me. But it was hot and cold, hot and cold. You never knew what mood it was going to be, up and down, up and down… He was in awe of his mama, intimidated by his father and I was always the third person in the room.”
Just before the marriage to Charles, she met her sisters and told them she could not go through with the wedding, especially with Camilla still on the scene, but they said she had no choice because “your face is on the tea towels and you’re too late to chicken out”. Immediately before the wedding, Diana stayed at Clarence House, the London residence of the Queen Mother but when she arrived, no-one was there to welcome her. It was, she said, like going to a hotel. How typical.
And so, Diana and Charles were married in St Paul’s Cathedral on the 29th July 1981, the numbers here are very significant, but more importantly this just precedes the sacrificial ritual and feast of Lammas. That morning at Clarence House she said she felt calm, deathly calm: “I felt I was a sacrificial lamb to the slaughter. I knew it but I couldn’t do anything about it”. How prophetic these words would turn out to be.
They spent their first night of their honeymoon at the Mountbatten (Battenberg) family estate at Broadlands in Hampshire, before sailing around the Greek Islands in the Royal Yacht Britannia. The Bulimia got worse and she considered suicide, such was the scale of her unhappiness and this was just the start of the marriage. She said at one point… “My husband made me feel to inadequate in every possible way. Each time I came up for air he pushed me down again. I hated myself so much”.
One of Diana’s royal duties in 1982 was to represent the Queen at the funeral of Princess Grace of Monaco, herself a victim of murder by the Elite when the brakes on her car ‘failed’. Princess Grace, formerly the actress Grace Kelly, ran the Monaco branch of the secret society, the Order of the Solar Temple with Jean Louis Marsan, the close friend of her husband, Prince Rainier.
And so, the Windsors achieved their first objective upon the arrival of Prince William. Diana was informed that the birth had to be induced to fit in with Charles’ polo playing programme and William was duly born on the 21st June 1982, which just ‘happens’ to be the summer solstice. What kind
of people, portrayed by the media as role models for us all, would induce a child’s birth to fit in with the father’s polo-playing programme? I think we know the answer to that question, well enough. Of course, in reality the inducement was to ensure the birth occurred on the solstice in accordance with occult ritual with which the Elite are so obsessed to the exclusion of all else, but the fact that they would regard birth inducement to fit-in with social activity as ‘normal’, speaks volumes about the mind-set of these people. The summer solstice esoterically represents the height of the sun’s power in the northern hemisphere whilst it is at its highest point in the solar year and it is even possible to predict what colour outfits the Queen will wear each day such is their obsession with esoteric and occult principles.
So, the new-born was ‘christened’ William, for the bloodline of William the Conqueror, Arthur, for the sun god symbol, King Arthur, Philip, for the Duke of Edinburgh and Louis, for Lord Louis Mountbatten, Prince Charles’ mentor. Two years later in 1984, Prince Harry was born and thus Diana’s royal role was concluded, as she related to Andrew Morton:
“Then suddenly as Harry was born it just went bang, our marriage, the whole thing went down the drain”.
Diana and Charles separated in 1992, divorced on the 28th August 1996 and then, just over one year later, she was dead. The cycle was complete.
The media onslaught against Diana commenced in earnest in 1992, shortly after the official separation. A tape of an intimate telephone conversation between Diana and the car dealer, James Gilbey, was released through the media at this time and in the tape Diana said that Charles was a real torturer. She told Gilbey:
“I’ll go out and conquer the world, do my bit in the way I know how and leave him behind”.
The irony of her character assassination by the Windsor’s via the compliant press was that it actually worked in her favour and her popularity grew. Imagine the frustrations of the establishment as in their desperation they tried harder and harder to defame her and yet her star just seemed to continue rising. Of course this is a pertinent demonstration of the fact that the Elite have no idea what love is, as Charles himself stated and the fact that they find it difficult to combat what they cannot understand. The heady combination of Diana’s enormous heart, her global public profile, her down-to-earth woman-of-the-people charisma and her intense desire to prove the Windsors to be the cold, heartless brutes they most certainly are, threatened the very survival of royalty in all its forms.
It is now, this gang of criminals and multi-generational genocidal murderers and their ancient practices and rituals, upon which we will focus. A necessary step, if we are to truly understand their motives and raisons d’etre.
Diana’s natural compassion and empathy with people thoroughly exposed the Windsors and their ilk as irrelevant in the eyes of the people. The shy and gullible child, whom the Windsors calculatingly enticed into their ‘world of pain’ to act as a ‘brood-mare’, became a woman of great mental strength who realised her true power and was not afraid to use it. This then was the beginning of her downfall. She brought the issue of landmines from obscurity into the open and thus to the minds of the masses and thus became a serious danger to the forces of evil and their profits. Diana also knew many intimate secrets within the establishment and was prepared to expose them to get what she wanted – her rights as a Princess and more importantly, a mother. Was there an element of vindictiveness behind it all? Probably, but who among us would blame her after the way she had been used and then discarded and had her life publicly devastated and torn apart?
In March 1997, a few months before she died, Diana made a phone call to someone who was amazed when she told him she was the Princess of Wales. Totally astounded, he first of all professed disbelief, especially when she told him she was calling from a ‘supermarket phone’ in England. Diana herself stated openly that she often made calls from public telephones, particularly from a certain department store in Kensington [Mohammed Fayed’s Harrods], when she wanted to be certain the conversation would not be taped.
Diana admired the man she had called, who shall remain nameless, for his wisdom and knowledge and she told him she had something to reveal that would shake the world and asked for his advice on how best to go about it. He has never revealed exactly what she told him, yet one researcher called the man and asked him if it was her awareness of the Windsor’s widespread connection to drug trafficking that was the issue. His reply was “Oh no, it was much worse than that”. So to lower initiates or outer-circle operatives, the fact that she was about to reveal something thoroughly incriminating, would be their understanding of why she was killed, but there is a yet more compelling reason for her untimely death – one which would have been planned long, long before.
Diana because of the ‘quality of her soul’ and into which bloodline she specifically chose to be born, was the reason she was chosen as the incubator and breeding partner for the House of Windsor to create a more acceptable genetic ‘cloak’. With these genes, this ancient, royal bloodline could continue to thrive, thus rejuvenating the tired, old genes which had been re-cycled for generations resulting in in-breeding on an industrial scale and the health problems inherent with that particular philosophy (see the section on ‘Jack the Ripper’ regarding Prince Eddy, for example).
To the higher initiates or fully illuminated operatives of the Elite, this ritual was the killing of the moon Goddess in the middle earth, Diana in her highest form. As with John F. Kennedy, to the unaware masses, the deed appeared to be done because of the policies he was pursuing, but to the highest initiates it was an ancient Merovingian ritual known as the ‘Killing of the King’.
The final sequence of events which led to her ritual murder involves as I state earlier in the chapter, at almost every turn, the man called Mohamed Fayed, the Egyptian former owner of Harrods. Many people in British high society see Fayed as an enemy of the establishment as proven by his long battle with the Lonrho tycoon and mass murderer in Africa, ‘Tiny’ Rowlands. This is a subtle ploy to ‘control the opposition’, a tactic used successfully in many covert Elite operations. The theory being that if you control both sides in a battle, you are bound to ‘win the war’. And as time passed, sure enough, Fayed was ultimately ‘defeated’ in his so-called quest for justice which symbolically and psychologically implants itself in the minds of the masses who eventually will begin to believe that he was wrong after all.
Fayed has also lied extensively about his background, claiming to be from a wealthy family, when he patently was not. He is also well-known to be a sexual ‘pervert’ and has escaped prosecution for a growing number of sexual assaults on female staff working at Harrods. One girl, Samantha-Jane Ramsey, said that when she complained to her supervisor that she had been groped by Fayed, the supervisor sighed, ‘not another one’. She was dismissed from her job for making the complaint which is the fate of all those who speak out about his molestation and ‘style’ of management. John Monks the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, stated that; “…there was a regime of fear and terror at Harrods”.
When Samantha-Jane took her complaint to the local Marylebone Police Station, she said that the officer told her; “You are not the first to come to us. We have files inches high on Mr Fayed, but no proof. It would be your word against his”.
This is utter nonsense and garbage. If Fayed was as anti-establishment as he is portrayed to be, then this would have been used as an excuse to ‘nail him’ and silence him forever. Had the accused been a Harrods employee, such as a mere departmental supervisor or manager then his name would have been on the sex-offenders register faster than you can say ‘police corruption’. This all sheds a completely different light on the man who was in total control of all security on the day and night of the 30th / 31st August 1997.
Fayed became close to the Spencer family through Diana’s father, Earl ‘Johnny’ Spencer, and her stepmother Raine. He helped Johnny through financial difficulties and said he consider
ed the Earl to be a brother and he had given Raine, whom Diana despised, a place on the Harrods board. Fayed sponsored prestigious royal events like the Royal Windsor Horse Show and polo competitions and he made absolutely sure that he always supported the charities and causes of the Princess.
Bob Loftus, the head of security at Harrods between 1987 and 1996, told the Channel 4 programme, ‘Dispatches’, in June 1998, that he was ordered to tell Fayed immediately if Diana came into the store. Fayed would then go to the department where she was shopping and ‘accidentally’ meet her. Every Christmas a green Harrods van would call at Diana’s home, Kensington Palace, with gifts for her and the boys from ‘uncle Mohammed’.
When the evidence is examined thoroughly, it is plainly apparent that he made it his business to court the friendship of Diana in every way possible and at every opportunity. On the 3rd June 1997, he invited her to join him for a summer holiday at his beach-side villa in St. Tropez in the south of France and on the 11th June, he got the breakthrough for which he had worked so hard; she accepted. The following day he completed the purchase of a £15 million yacht, the Jonikal, through his (or rather the Sultan of Brunei’s) Bermudan company, Mohafa Shipping and this was the boat upon which Diana and Dodi’s relationship would blossom. On the 11th July Diana arrived in St. Tropez with her sons, William and Harry, to stay in the eight-bedroomed luxury apartment on the ten acre Fayed estate on the exclusive Le Parc development whilst Dodi at this time was still at his apartment in Paris with his fiancée Kelly Fisher, the American model.