Slavery by Another Name

Home > Other > Slavery by Another Name > Page 30
Slavery by Another Name Page 30

by Douglas A. Blackmon


  and any assertion that the peonage cases were part of a larger

  movement in the South to disenfranchise black men and reassert

  white dominance.

  Peonage was no worse than the treatment of workers in the

  factories, mines, and sweatshops of the North, the newspaper

  maintained.34 "These cases of ‘new slavery’ have nothing to do with

  the adoption of the new Constitution in Alabama. If there is any

  di erence, the mass of white people are more kindly disposed

  toward the negro now than before their disfranchise-ment. These

  peonage cases are simply a few here and there. There have not

  been tens of thousands of such cases. We doubt extremely whether

  there have been even hundreds of them in al the State in the past

  twenty years."35

  Nearly every Alabama leader contended the events in Tal apoosa

  County constituted a smal anomaly, easily stamped out by making

  examples of a few o enders. "Deputy U.S. Marshal Colquit seems

  to have taken up with this county," wrote the Dadevil e Spot Cash.

  "In fact three or four men of this community have been escorting

  him to Montgomery where he placed them under bond, charged

  with Peonage—that new word lately sprung on us which means the

  enslaving of a freeman against his wil , as we understand it. This is

  a pret y bad state of a airs in Alabama, but not so bad as the

  northern papers would make it. These conditions wil be

  thoroughly investigated and we hope every guilty party wil be

  punished so that the evil wil be stopped and the blot on our state

  and county removed."36

  Underscoring southerners’ sense that it was hypocritical for their

  region to be targeted for its racial misdeeds, residents in Bel evil e,

  Il inois, went on a rampage a day after the Dadevil e editorial

  appeared. A black schoolteacher named David Wyat and the town's

  white school superintendent had argued over the renewal of Wyat 's

  teaching certi cate. An altercation ensued. The superintendent was

  shot, but not seriously harmed. Wyat was arrested and taken to jail.

  By nightfal , at least two thousand whites were gathered in the

  town—including many women and children encouraged to at end

  the spectacle. A phalanx of two hundred men at acked the steel

  doors at the rear of the jail with sledgehammers, pounding it with

  thousands of hammer blows. The city's police did not voluntarily

  hand the prisoner over to the crowd, but also gave no meaningful

  resistance. Wyat , an educated and imposing man—standing six feet

  three inches tal —waited in his cel on the second oor of the jail,

  enveloped in the cacophony of the hammers pounding out his

  death beat. After half an hour, the doors splintered open. Wyat was

  seized from his cel and his head immediately smashed.

  Dragged into the street, the mob surged around him, kicking and

  stomping his body until it was mat ed in blood and dirt. A rope

  was secured to his neck and tossed to two men who had climbed a

  telegraph pole. Hoisted just a few feet o the ground, Wyat 's body

  whipped back and forth as members of the crowd gouged, stabbed,

  and sliced his torso, legs, and arms with knives. Others in the mob

  gathered pickets from nearby fences and roadside signs to build a

  crude pyre beneath his dangling corpse. Stil more went for

  gasoline and benzene. Soon Wyat 's body was engulfed in ame. By

  the time the earliest churchgoers left their homes on Sunday, June

  7, the grotesque form of Wyat 's carbonized remains lay amid a

  heap of ashes and smoldering wood on the street.

  "The mob knew that the negro's victim was alive and had a fair

  chance to recover," a correspondent for the New York Herald

  dutiful y noted. "The excuse given is that the lawless element

  among the negroes has been doing al sorts of deviltry, and that it

  among the negroes has been doing al sorts of deviltry, and that it

  was determined to teach the negroes a wholesome lesson."37

  Wyat 's lynching was unremarkable in many regards. His was the

  thirtieth African American lynched in 1903. There would be at least

  fty- ve more before the year ended. Yet few developments caused

  as much delight to leading southern whites than a gruesome racial

  atrocity commit ed in the North. Such incidents proved, in their

  reckoning, that northerners were just as inclined to crimes against

  African Americans as their southern cousins, and that the end result

  of greater racial equality like that in the North was simply more

  brazen criminality and chaos caused by blacks. Many white

  southerners were further grati ed when less than two weeks later a

  mob in Wilmington, Delaware, seized a black man named George

  White from his jail cel . White, accused of rape and murder, was

  tied to a stake, forced to confess the crimes, then shot repeatedly

  and final y burned.

  The Advertiser could hardly restrain its glee.

  In the North the negro is an alien, an exostosis on the body politic, as it

  were. They do not understand him and cannot do so. They talk

  sympathetically and humidly of his wrongs and his rights, shed some tears

  over his alleged cruel fate in the South, and then, if he aspires to be a

  laborer in the hive of industry, they turn on him and drive him out with

  curses and revilings. If he resists or falls back on the sacred laws of self-

  deference and self-preservation, he is either shot down or lynched. They

  love him— at a safe distance.

  With us here in the South it is di erent. We received the negro by

  inheritance. He came to us through the generations of slavery.

  Emancipation left him stranded on the shores of a new world, for which

  he had no preparation and no tness. The Southern people, remembering

  the negro of the olden time, when he was the faithful servant, the willing

  worker and the protector of the family of his master—with all this in their

  minds our people have borne with him, have helped him and have tried to

  fit him for some of the duties of citizenship. We recognize in him a part of

  our population a necessary worker on the farm, in the shop and in the

  home, but not in any way an equal.

  And for all this because the negroes have come down to us from the

  good days of old; because they are at home with us, and must perhaps

  forever be in some degree our wards, we owe them justice, fair treatment,

  and protection in all their civil rights. Now that they have practically lost

  the right of su rage, we more than ever owe them our watch care and

  should throw over and around them the shield of law and justice. The fact

  that they are lynched in the North, or driven out like dangerous wild

  beasts is no reason that our people should do the same. Let us not follow

  the evil example set by those Pharisees who preach what they do not

  practice and who condemn in others the deeds which they practice among

  themselves. In short, let us steadfastly refuse to follow the evil examples

  set by our brethren of the North and the West.38

  South Carolina senator Ben Til man summed up the sentiment

  more succinctly to a northern audience: "I see you are learning
how

  to kil and burn ‘niggers.’ That's right. Let the good work go on.

  Keep it up. You are get ing some sense."39

  Roosevelt had to be astonished. Only a day before Wyat 's murder

  in Bel evil e, he had been in the same state, visiting Spring eld,

  barely a hundred miles away, praising black soldiers and promising

  his "square deal" for African Americans. At the same time, the

  Justice Department was tel ing him that slaves were stil being held

  down south. There was nothing the president could do about

  Wyat 's death; murder was clearly outside the jurisdiction of federal

  o cials. But surely slavery, of al things, was di erent. He told

  At orney General Knox he was personal y concerned about the

  Alabama al egations and asked for a ful report. Roosevelt was

  assured that "vigorous and uncompromising prosecutions" were

  under way40

  In Montgomery, U.S. At orney Reese was growing more troubled

  by the scale of the crimes coming to light in the grand jury room.

  On June 10, he sent an alarmed report to At orney General Knox.

  "The conditions of the ‘black belt’ in this district are more

  deplorable as the investigations of this grand jury proceed. It is now

  deplorable as the investigations of this grand jury proceed. It is now

  being revealed that hundreds of negroes are held in peonage and

  involuntary servitude of the most vicious character," Reese wrote.

  "Men and women are arrested on the imsiest charges …they are

  brutal y whipped, worked and locked up without let or hindrance.

  The tortures in icted are severe and sometimes result in total

  disability or death. Some counties in this district are honey combed

  with these slave trade practices."41 Worried that his report might

  sound like hyperbole—and recognizing the potential y explosive

  reaction to the case that was bound to soon develop local y—Reese

  asked for an urgent meeting with of icials in Washington.

  The stoutly bourgeois Knox, hardly two months removed from his

  lavish Pit sburgh law o ces and now ensconced in the presidential

  cabinet, was perplexed by Reese's let er. He had to take it seriously.

  President Roosevelt had expressed concern, and the inquiry grew

  from charges rst lodged by a federal judge—one of Roosevelt's

  earliest appointees. Reverberations were stil rippling across the

  country from the president's "square deal" speech less than a week

  earlier.

  But Knox couldn't avoid a measure of incredulity. How could so

  dramatic a state of a airs come to pass, without chal enge, in

  twentieth-century America, even in uncivilized reaches so far from

  his rare ed world? Moreover, the prosecutor in Montgomery was

  entirely unknown to Knox, who knew that among the scores of U.S.

  at orneys named in provincial centers around the nation, many

  were less-than-extraordinary political operators— holding their

  positions purely as patronage to local presidential al ies or financial

  backers. Two days later, on the last workday of the week, Knox told

  an aide to telegraph Reese for a more complete report on the

  details of the investigation. For the moment, he ignored Reese's

  request for a personal audience.

  The telegraph from Washington arrived at the drafty o ces of the

  U.S. at orney above the Montgomery post o ce as Friday's work

  hours came to a close. Reese no doubt shared it with the two other

  hours came to a close. Reese no doubt shared it with the two other

  lawyers who assisted him in government cases, Julius Sternfeld and

  James K. Judkins, and the o ce secretary—his cousin Mildred

  Elmore. Sit ing near the transomed door to the hal way, she

  managed his correspondence and appointments and at ended to the

  two modern luxuries of the o ce—a single Remington typewriter

  and one telephone.42

  Reese knew he faced the most consequential mat er of the ve

  years since his rst appointment to o ce. In the balance of the

  report requested by the at orney general hung al of the family

  prestige and political support—perhaps even al of the aspirations

  of eventual Republican power in his state—that had been so

  dramatical y re ected in the ood of supportive let ers that paved

  the way for his selection by President McKinley.

  The heavy humid heat of early summer in Alabama was already

  seeping into the hal ways of the post o ce building. Fixed at his

  desk that afternoon, he perspired as the temperature approached

  90 degrees, sunlight shafting through the wide sash of rippled glass

  in his window. Past the arched doorways opening from the dark

  interior of the federal building onto crowded Dexter Street, Reese

  could have seen and heard the noisy throngs of pedestrians

  crowding the cobblestone street on either side of the clanging

  electric trol ey line running through the heart of Montgomery. Lines

  of carriages and horsemen pushed slowly through the crowd. Open

  wagons pul ed by mules driven by muddy black teamsters waited to

  cross from side streets lit ered with manure and the debris of

  commerce.

  Four blocks to the east, just beyond the eld of view from Reese's

  window perch, the domed Alabama state capitol peered regal y

  across a city that had become, more than any other, a royal capital

  of the New South— col ecting the tribute of both the region's

  reengineered cot on empire and its smoke-belching new industrial

  expansion.

  The trol ey line ran in an asymmetric loop the length of Dexter

  Street, then passed out of his view by the old slave auction fountain

  Street, then passed out of his view by the old slave auction fountain

  in Court Square across from the Exchange Hotel. Here, buyers from

  textile makers and cot on exporters encamped from hundreds and

  thousands of miles away to bid and contract for delivery six months

  later of mil ions of dol ars’ worth of cot on from plants only just

  beginning to peek from the deep black soil of the South's richest

  cot on region.

  If Reese climbed into the ve-story-high tower rising atop the

  post o ce, he could have fol owed the line as it threaded through

  the crowds, drays, buckboards, and early automobiles chugging

  down Commerce Street toward Union Station. The streetcars

  crossed Bibb, Coosa, and Tal-lapoosa streets, as they rol ed past the

  long row of cot on warehouses that, by early fal , would be packed

  with the bulk of southern Alabama's economic output. The cot on

  compress on the same street packed bil ions of pounds of lint into

  ve-hundred-pound bales ready to be loaded on railcars or the

  perpetual line of steamboats waiting a few hundred yards beyond,

  at the edge of the Alabama River. On the docks there, scores of

  black men stacked cot on bales atop loads of pig iron taken in

  Birmingham the day before from the furnaces of Sloss-She eld and

  Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad.

  Montgomery luxuriated in the wealth of this surge of cot on—stil

  unmolested by the scourge of the bol weevil and other new insects

  and diseases that would ravage the crop beginning in a lit le more
<
br />   than a decade— and the rich new windfal pouring into the state

  capital from the sale of convicts into the coal and ore mines in

  Birmingham.

  Cot on, steel, and timber were by far the state's largest sources of

  wealth and livelihood. Alabama produced more than 1.1 mil ion

  bales of the white lint in 1900—surpassing the pre-Civil War output

  for the rst time and almost tripling the state's production during

  the rst years fol owing the war.43 Vast tracts of forest were under

  the saw. Yet mineral production and the iron and steel industry

  surpassed al other economic activity. In 1905, the state's mines,

  anchored by the slave camps near Birmingham, generated nearly

  twelve mil ion tons of coal and almost four mil ion tons of iron ore

  twelve mil ion tons of coal and almost four mil ion tons of iron ore

  — making Alabama one of the foremost producers of iron, steel,

  and coal in the world.

  Early in the testimony before the grand jury in May of 1903,

  Warren Reese shared the conventional assumption that the stories of

  John Pace's abuses in Tal apoosa County were anachronistic relics—

  isolated redneck antics, certain to be the subject of scorn once

  exposed. But by the beginning of June, Reese realized how

  signi cantly the new slavery underpinned Alabama's cot on, timber,

  and steel paradise. He knew he was on the verge of an at ack on its

  heart. He could not know how the ght would end, or whether he

  would survive it.

  At noon on June 10, the grand jury led into the courtroom to

  report seventeen additional indictments. Then, foreman Judah T.

  Moses, a wealthy sel er of real estate and insurance, gave Judge

  Jones a writ en request for advice on the constitutionality of the

  Alabama statute making it a crime for a worker to break a farm

  labor contract—which was punishable by a ne of up to $50 or six

  months of hard labor.

  In the note, the jury asked whether the act violated the Thirteenth

  and Fourteenth amendments of the Constitution. Judge Jones

  replied that he had devoted "much thought" to this question and

  would give them an answer later. One juror also inquired whether

  a justice of the peace who gave a sentence in excess of his authority

  was guilty of peonage. The judge said that the justice of the peace

  would not be guilty if the sentence had simply been an honest

 

‹ Prev