The Boy in the River: A Shocking True Story of Ritual Murder and Sacrifice in the Heart of London

Home > Other > The Boy in the River: A Shocking True Story of Ritual Murder and Sacrifice in the Heart of London > Page 1
The Boy in the River: A Shocking True Story of Ritual Murder and Sacrifice in the Heart of London Page 1

by Richard Hoskins




  First published 2012 by Pan Books

  This electronic edition published 2012 by Pan Books

  an imprint of Pan Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

  Pan Macmillan, 20 New Wharf Road, London N1 9RR

  Basingstoke and Oxford

  Associated companies throughout the world

  www.panmacmillan.com

  ISBN 978-1-4472-0791-7 ePUB

  Copyright © Richard Hoskins 2012

  The right of Richard Hoskins to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

  You may not copy, store, distribute, transmit, reproduce or otherwise make available this publication (or any part of it) in any form, or by any means (electronic, digital, optical, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of the publisher. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages.

  A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

  Visit www.panmacmillan.com to read more about all our books and to buy them. You will also find features, author interviews and news of any author events, and you can sign up for e-newsletters so that you’re always first to hear about our new releases.

  In memory of both Edwards.

  Desperately missed.

  The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

  The best lack all conviction, while the worst

  Are full of passionate intensity . . .

  And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,

  Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

  ‘The Second Coming’ W. B. Yeats

  Table of Contents

  Title page

  Copyright page

  Dedication page

  Contents Prologue

  1 Bath, January 2002

  2 Kinshasa, April 1986

  3 Bath, February 2002

  4 Kinshasa, April 1986

  5 Bath, February 2002

  6 Bolobo, April 1986

  7 Bolobo, April and May 1986

  8 Bath and London, February 2002

  9 Bolobo, June 1986–1987

  10 Bath, February 2002

  11 Bolobo, February 1988

  12 Bath, March 2002

  13 Bolobo, 1988-1989

  14 London, April 2002

  15 Bolobo, Oxford and Bath, 1989–1999

  16 Lower Congo, April 2002

  17 Bath and The Hague, May 2002

  18 London and Bath, May 2002

  19 Bath and London, June 2002

  20 Catford and Bath, June 2002

  21 Devon, July 2002

  22 Royal Holloway College, July 2002

  23 Glasgow and London, July 2002

  24 Devon, August to September 2002

  25 London, September 2002

  26 Royal Holloway College and London, October 2002

  27 London, December 2002

  28 London, December 2002

  29 London and Nigeria, January–April 2003

  30 Dublin and London, June 2003

  31 London and Dalkeith, July–September 2003

  32 London, October 2003–January 2004

  33 London, February 2004

  34 Kinshasa, February 2004

  35 London, April–July 2004

  36 London, September 2004–June 2005

  37 London, July–October 2005

  38 Kinshasa, August 2005

  39 Kinshasa, August 2005

  40 Devon and Sheffield, August 2005–2007

  41 Devon, 2007–January 2011

  42 Devon, February 2011

  43 London, March 2011

  44 London and Devon, April–May 2011

  45 Kinshasa, August 2011

  46 London, October–December 2011

  47 London, January–February 2012

  48 London, March 2012

  Epilogue

  Acknowledgements

  Author’s Note

  Author biography

  Prologue

  London, a little after 4 p.m. on 21 September 2001.

  As thirty-two-year-old IT consultant Aidan Minter left the office he was, like many people, thinking about the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center ten days earlier. He climbed the steps to Tower Bridge and began crossing to the south bank. Lost in thought, he glanced idly over the parapet at the river below. In that instant he caught sight of something floating in the water. He stopped. Even from the bridge it looked strange – a dummy, perhaps, with what seemed to be a red cloth attached to it. But he couldn’t be sure.

  Minter walked quickly on and ran down the steps on to the south side of the river. Filled now with a need to be certain, he stepped closer to the water’s edge. As he stood there his curiosity turned to horror. He was staring at a body. Or what was left of one. He pulled out his mobile and dialled 999.

  Within minutes a launch crewed by officers of the Thames Marine Police Unit was searching the area around Tower Bridge. At first they found nothing. They turned up river with the incoming tide. Then, as they drew level with the Globe Theatre, they too saw a flash of colour against the bank. The boat swung across the current and a moment later a police officer hauled the mutilated torso of a little boy from the water.

  The child had no name, so the police called him Adam.

  1

  Bath, January 2002

  I was at my desk when they called.

  I shared the tiny, gloriously cluttered university office with my colleague Mahinda Deegalle, a Buddhist monk from Sri Lanka. A prayer wheel and a terracotta fertility figurine from Syria fought for space among the filing cabinets, computers and shelves of books and binders. Stuck to the walls were yellow Post-it notes, family photos and postcards from colleagues in Nepal, Namibia, Nauru and everywhere in between.

  Our room was in a temporary building – though the arrangement had already lasted for years – not far from the fine Georgian mansion at the centre of the main Bath Spa University campus. Our window gave out over fields, part of the estate’s park which had been landscaped by Capability Brown. Dry stone walls and clumps of ash and oak trees stood in the winter light.

  Mahinda would drift in from time to time in his orange robes to dispense some snippet of wisdom, or – more surprisingly – to chat about the property market. But often I had the room to myself, and would sit there for long, quiet hours, wrapped up in my research or preparing lectures. I had grown to treasure the calm of the English countryside beyond that window, and I was very much at peace there.

  Until the phone rang.

  ‘Dr Hoskins, I’m Detective Inspector Will O’Reilly from Scotland Yard’s Serious Crime Group,’ the caller said. I’d commented on the Adam case on BBC radio a couple of days earlier. I was often consulted by the media about African religions and related topics. ‘What do you make of this mutilated body they’ve found in the Thames?’ the journalist had asked. ‘People I’ve spoken to in London are saying that it’s a voodoo killing. Apparently a South African expert has told police that it’s to do with the practice of muti. That’s taking body parts for magic, right? What do you think?’

  I knew quite a lot about muti, so I’d talked about that for a few minutes. The journalist must have contacted Scotland Yard after the interview and now DI O’Reilly wanted to pay me a visit. I was immediately worried that he would want me to come up with definitive answers to questio
ns he didn’t even know how to ask, on what were likely to be extremely complex issues. Perhaps I also had the first inkling that the comfortable world I had built up around me might be under threat.

  I was a senior lecturer in African religions at the University of Bath Spa in the West of England and had become one of very few academics in the UK who specialized in this field.

  My first marriage had ended, but it had given me two wonderful children, David and Elspeth, now twelve and ten, and my relationship with Sue, their mother, remained warm. While at Bath, I’d met Faith Warner and we’d become good friends. Faith was studying psychology, specializing in cognition among African primates, and while on a research expedition to the Congo one summer we had fallen for each other.

  By the time DI O’Reilly called me, Faith and I had just moved in together. Now in my mid-thirties, I was very close to being a contented man.

  I reported the imminent police visit to the university director. We booked a shiny new lecture room in one of the university’s impersonal modern blocks and ordered deli sandwiches and soft drinks.

  The director and I waited outside the main building as the unmarked silver car drew up.

  Big, capable, serious types, painfully polite, but with a hardness in their eyes, I couldn’t imagine Detective Inspector Will O’Reilly and Detective Constable Barry Costello ever going undercover. DC Costello was young, tall and wary. He spent most of his time watching me, as if he suspected I was about to make off with something. But DI Will O’Reilly was clearly the man in charge. A powerful figure in his mid-forties, he had the air of an ex-rugby player. He had dark hair and some serious stubble, which only partially camouflaged his pale complexion and the beginnings of a double chin. His voice was slightly gruff and his eyes were both keen and kind.

  I opened the door to the conference room and showed them in. I was suddenly struck by how cold it was. Cold, bright and clinical. I began to wish that I was back in my own comfortably cluttered office with Mahinda calmly getting on with his work at the neighbouring desk. Will O’Reilly produced a large brown manila envelope, laid it on the table and spread eight A5 colour prints of brutally high quality in front of me. A brown torso lay on a post-mortem slab. There were several shots of the body, most showing it dressed in orange-red shorts, and close-ups of the cuts that had severed the head, arms and legs.

  I had seen some pretty tough things during my time in Africa, but for a second I felt sick. O’Reilly cleared his throat. He’d seen the expression on my face. ‘Obviously we all find this . . . distressing . . .’ he said. ‘We have next to nothing to go on, Dr Hoskins. We don’t know who the child is, or where he comes from. We’re guessing that he’s of African or Caribbean extraction. We don’t know exactly what happened to him. According to our home office pathologist, Dr Mike Heath, the cut to the neck is very precise. He thinks it was made from back to front, and that his body was drained of its blood – though you must keep that information completely confidential. We haven’t released it to the press.’

  As I continued to stare at the pictures, DI O’Reilly told me that the pathologist estimated the child to have been between five and ten years old. He thought the torso had been in the water for up to ten days, but not longer or the skin would have turned white. Nothing was found in the stomach except traces of what might be a cough medicine. There was no sign of sexual interference. Dr Heath also thought the shorts were placed on the corpse up to a day after death, because there were no traces of body fluids on the material.

  ‘That’s it,’ he said. ‘That’s all we have at the moment.’

  ‘I hear you think it’s a muti killing,’ I said. ‘Linked to South Africa in some way.’

  ‘I’ll be honest with you, Dr Hoskins, I’d never even heard of this muti stuff. None of us had. Dr Heath thought that the injuries looked ritualistic. We took a gamble that the child might be of African origin, and flew in a South African pathologist to give us a second post-mortem. It was this gentleman,’ he consulted his notebook, ‘a Dr Hendrick Scholtz, who told us that in South Africa there have been cases of people being murdered and dismembered for muti.’

  I put on my glasses and forced myself to look more carefully at each of the pictures. The first showed the whole of the torso. The next, a close-up of the neck. I looked back at the first photograph. The cut was indeed extremely precise, and unusually low. It would have been covered by a T-shirt. The arm and leg wounds, by contrast, were a strange mixture: at skin level there was a similarly stark precision, but the bone looked as if it had been hacked away from the body. I picked up my pen and made some notes.

  I studied the photo of the boy’s front. It didn’t look as if any internal organs had been removed.

  ‘He’s still got his genitals,’ I said. ‘And he’s circumcised.’

  ‘Is that significant?’

  ‘It could be.’

  ‘How?’

  I hesitated. ‘Leaving his genitals intact wouldn’t seem to be typical of muti. Also, I’d expect his internal organs to be taken. But I guess we have to start somewhere, and if your South African specialist thinks that might be the way to go . . .’

  I moved to the next picture, of the boy’s back, and then through the remaining photographs. I was looking for tribal markings but could find none. I sat back down in my chair and took a deep breath. ‘I think I can help.’

  I didn’t have to say anything. The moment I got home Faith led me into the kitchen, poured a healthy quantity of gin into a couple of glasses and splashed in some tonic. It wasn’t Friday – Friday was our gin and tonic night – but to hell with it.

  I started to tell her about the photos as we walked through to the sitting room. When we sat down on the sofa I started to cry. There was nothing now to hold me back and the tears streamed down my face unchecked. She put her arms around me.

  After a while she said, ‘It’s not just this boy, is it? It’s not just Adam . . .’

  I shook my head.

  2

  Kinshasa, April 1986

  I walked as nonchalantly as I could to the Swissair check-in at London Heathrow’s Terminal 2. It wasn’t easy; my cabin bag contained a Land Rover driveshaft and it was as much as I could do just to pick it up.

  You needed this sort of thing in the Congo, or so I’d been told. The girl behind the desk wished us a pleasant flight and I hauled my burden away towards the lounge. I was wildly excited. I was breaking free. I was twenty-two years old. I was going to Africa with my new wife.

  The runway at Kinshasa was rumoured to be one of the longest in the world. Some said that it was necessary for the huge transport planes that allegedly smuggled vast quantities of goods out of the Congo – everything from gold and diamonds to ivory and bush meat. Others claimed that the architects had planned two criss-cross runways, but the local contractors had misread the drawings and put them end to end.

  There was little to see of N’djili Airport as we rolled to a halt, just one small building and a few lights flickering uncertainly in the kind of darkness you could reach out and touch. We stepped off the plane into a wall of lung-crushing heat.

  The Congo basin sits in a bowl astride the Equator. Unlike East Africa, it has nowhere high enough to enjoy relief from the constant tropical temperatures that sap the strength of everything that moves, and quite a few things that don’t. The rivers snake their way from the mountains in the east to the ocean in the west, and a vast tract of dank, steaming forest lies in between. That forest is all but impenetrable and rainstorms lash the land almost daily, sweeping away all attempts at road building in torrents of muddy floodwater. That, and the fact that the dictator Mobutu was bent on keeping the country in the Dark Ages, meant there was virtually no development outside Kinshasa. But I knew that place was going to change my life for ever.

  3

  Bath, February 2002

  I didn’t know much about police procedure, but even I could see that they were floundering.

  Will O’Reilly and his team couldn
’t even be sure whether Adam had set foot on British soil while he was alive. They had nowhere to start; no one they could question, no potential witnesses, no alibis to check, no addresses to visit, no deposition site to search. They had the child’s DNA but no one to link it with. They had no fingerprints. They didn’t even have a face. That meant no dental records, no database searches, no photofit pictures.

  And they had no motive. What could provoke someone to murder an innocent child, dress the mutilated torso in bright new clothes and throw it into the Thames?

  I could see how the muti theory had caught on. Against a backdrop of bafflement and confusion, somebody had pounced on a possible answer. The police didn’t know anything much about muti – they kept talking about voodoo – but a bizarre African cult killing could explain away a great deal. Just putting a name to the crime would be progress of a sort.

  But I was uneasy about it.

  In the following days I worked solidly on the Adam case, both at home and at the university. I didn’t have a heavy teaching schedule and had already prepared my lectures for some weeks ahead, so I was able to give it my full attention.

  African peoples are as different as their landscapes. In my travels I had encountered every sort of terrain, from barren desert to lush rainforest, from flat savannah to towering razor-backed mountains, and every variety of dwelling, from mud and palm thatch huts to gleaming city blocks of marble and glass. The sacred beliefs and practices of each ethnic group are every bit as diverse, and there are thousands and thousands of them. Now, somehow, I was supposed to try and unravel which of them might have been responsible for this atrocity, and why.

  In 2000 I had attended a big conference in South Africa at which almost everyone who was anyone in the world of African religious studies was present, and I combined it with a research trip around KwaZulu-Natal Province. Muti had figured significantly. I had interviewed traditional muti workers, had visited the muti market in Durban and had spent some time with Robert Papini, the anthropologist curator of Durban’s muti museum – the only one in the world.

 

‹ Prev