Why We Elect Narcissists and Sociopaths- And How We Can Stop!

Home > Other > Why We Elect Narcissists and Sociopaths- And How We Can Stop! > Page 9
Why We Elect Narcissists and Sociopaths- And How We Can Stop! Page 9

by Bill Eddy


  approaches .

  You are able to manage your fear and anger and

  Fear and anger are all- consuming and can only be

  recognize that these emotions can interfere with

  relieved by reacting quickly, decisively, and per-

  making wise decisions .

  haps overwhelmingly .

  The way our brains are hardwired, only one of these approaches is dom-

  inant at any given time. We literally can’t access both approaches at once;

  that is how and why high- conflict politicians often trick us and bend us to

  their will.

  Nuances of the Fantasy Crisis Triad

  Most high- conflict politicians either invent a crisis or take a real problem

  that needs to be solved and blow it out of proportion into something far

  more threatening; people then confuse this conflated problem with a crisis

  that requires them to blindly follow the leader.

  And that’s why it’s so important to scrutinize their ostensible villain

  and hero.

  If the villain is clearly and simply defined—that is, Mexicans, Jews, Repub-

  licans, Democrats, gays and lesbians, China, Communists, corporations, fat

  cats, Muslims, fascists, political correctness, capitalists, or straight white

  men—consider this to be a huge red flag. The candidate doing the finger

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 54

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  5: The Fantasy Crisis Triad 55

  pointing is very likely an HCP. Remember their character trait of all- or-

  nothing thinking.

  Another reliable sign of a Fantasy Crisis Triad is if the candidate discour-

  ages any real analysis, debate, or examination of the facts. That’s what Hitler

  did in the earlier example to get so many Germans to blindly follow him. He

  was able to distract the German people from thinking—about the absurdity

  that Jews were the evil and powerful villains he said they were—so they just

  believed him.

  The biggest and clearest giveaway, though, is the third part of the triad:

  I and only I can solve the problem. The Wannabe King rarely talks about

  analyzing the problem and addressing it through cooperation, strategic alli-

  ances, or any other joint effort. Instead, they insist that no one else running

  for the office—perhaps no one else on the planet—has the wondrous ability

  to make everything better. They and only they do. Either vote for them or

  face certain doom.

  In actuality, the Wannabe King usually has no clue about how to solve the

  problem, because it’s a fantasy crisis. They may never have thought about it.

  To them, that’s fine. Because they don’t actually care about the problem—the

  very problem they insist is ruining your life and putting the country in peril.

  All they care about is winning and gaining power. We will look at several

  real- life examples of this in Part II of this book.

  Choosing Targets of Blame

  After the crisis is identified, the HCP chooses a villain—just the right target.

  Then, they publicly and relentlessly hammer that target with derision. A

  malignant narcissist—an HCP who is both a narcissist and a sociopath—has

  just the right combination of character traits to do this: a complete lack of

  empathy, ethics, and remorse; an overwhelming desire to dominate other

  people and be seen as extremely superior; a preoccupation with blaming

  others; and a sadistic pleasure in destroying their Targets of Blame.

  Most of us don’t strategically select our enemies; most of the time, Wan-

  nabe Kings do. Some do it quite consciously and deliberately; others do it

  reflexively and intuitively. But they always seem to use the same criteria.

  A Wannabe King’s villainous group needs to be

  Somewhat familiar to voters so that the villains require no introduction

  or explanation.

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 55

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  56 Part I: How Narcissists and Sociopaths Get Elected

  Relatively few in number, or living elsewhere, or otherwise not part of

  most voters’ daily lives, ensuring that most voters have little first- hand

  contact with members of the villainous group. They won’t really know

  the reality of most group members’ benign behavior.

  Easy to define in a word or two, for example, Muslims, Jews, infidels,

  welfare queens, rich pigs, and so on. It makes no difference that it may

  be impossible to identify members of this villainous group on sight—or

  even after repeated contact.

  Widely viewed as extremely powerful, when they are really weak, vulner-

  able, and a very small part of the population (typically only 1 to 3 per-

  cent) so that voters can hate them without much fear of retribution.

  Already the target of some resentment, so that voters don’t need too much

  training to hate them intensely.

  If possible, resented because of their recent progress or achievement, which

  makes it possible for the Wannabe King to blame the fantasy crisis not

  just on the villains, but on those villains’ success. This encourages voters

  to feel envious and angry as well as resentful.

  Connected to money, finance, land, secret power or entertainment in

  some way, so the villainous group can be made to seem powerful and

  influential. If this connection can’t be made, the Wannabe King typically

  cooks up a conspiracy theory that declares the group to be secretly ultra-

  powerful, despite their outward appearance as a vulnerable group.

  Conclusion

  Fantasy Crisis Triads created by Wannabe Kings are effective at escalat-

  ing emotions so voters believe in their fantasy crises, which escalates their

  level of fear and emotional decision- making. Because of emotional repeti-

  tion from the HCP, voters who dislike the fantasy hero have absorbed that

  the fantasy villain (the opposing candidate) is also so bad that they come

  to think of both of them as equally objectionable. In that case, Moderates

  tend to vote for their usual party’s candidate, Resisters reject both oppos-

  ing candidates by throwing away their votes on third- party candidates, and

  Dropouts simply don’t vote.

  All of this is assisted by the high- emotion media, which tend to favor

  HCPs, because they are more entertaining and put more energy into

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 56

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  5: The Fantasy Crisis Triad 57

  building an emotional relationship with their viewers and listeners. The

  result is that the emotional warfare of HCPs is endlessly repeated and they

  are often elected.

  To counter this, we need to repeatedly ask ourselves—and encourage

  everyone we know to ask themselves—these three questions:

  Is this really a crisis?

  Is this really a villain?

  Is this really a hero?

  In Part II we will see how the development of increasingly viral forms

  of high- emotion media has enabled HCP Wannabe Kings to promote their

  Fantasy Crisis Triads worldwide.

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 57

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 58

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  Part

  II

  THE FANTASY CRISIS

  TRIAD WORLDWIDE

  The last one hundred years have been t
he most murderous in the

  history of humanity. I mentioned the top three perpetrators in

  Chapter 1: Hitler, Stalin, and Mao. However, many lesser Wannabe

  Kings have still destroyed their countries and killed hundreds of thou-

  sands of their countrymen. Although Hitler is often thought of as an

  exception, many of his strategies of extreme lying and conning appear

  to be templates for Wannabe Kings up to the present.

  Since the year 2000, we have seen several Wannabe Kings take

  power around the world, including in Russia, Hungary, the Philip-

  pines, Venezuela, and Italy, as I will discuss in this part. The list keeps

  growing, so these are only a sample. The United States also has a sub-

  stantial history of all sizes of Wannabe Kings, so I have chosen the

  three most dramatic examples: McCarthy, Nixon, and Trump.

  All of these personalities sought unlimited power and relied heav-

  ily on numerous Fantasy Crisis Triads with shocking success. We must

  learn this pattern or we will keep repeating it.

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 59

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 60

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  6

  HOW HITLER, STALIN,

  AND MAO TOOK OVER

  These three Wannabe Kings all took power in the 1920s and 1930s after

  the monarchies of one form or another in their respective countries were

  eliminated. You might think that strong leaders would naturally follow such

  circumstances because the people were used to centralized governments,

  but the Wannabe Kings in the early twentieth century were far different.

  They each took a quantum leap in the mass manipulation of their people (via

  mass high- emotion media), they all desired and acquired unlimited power

  (as HCPs), and each brought horrific destruction to their countries and the

  world.

  Adolf Hitler

  Germany became a democracy immediately after World War I (WWI).

  Prior to that, it had been a monarchy, but in 1918, as Germany lost the war,

  the Kaiser abdicated the throne, and by default, the Social Democrats, the

  majority in the Kaiser’s rubber- stamp Parliament, took power. The disarray

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 61

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  62 Part II: The Fantasy Crisis Triad Worldwide

  after the war left an opening for an authoritarian government, but no one

  predicted an Adolf Hitler.

  Hitler’s Early Years

  As described in Chapter 1, three basic factors influence how one’s person-

  ality develops:

  1. Genetic tendencies

  2. Early childhood

  3. Cultural environment

  Adolf Hitler was born in Austria in 1889 to the family of a minor cus-

  toms official on the border near Germany. On the surface, his childhood in

  Austria was not indicative of what he would become. Perhaps he was just

  born that way. We know he fought with his domineering father over his

  future career; his father wanted him to follow in his footsteps to become

  a civil servant, but young Hitler wanted to be a painter. When he was thir-

  teen, his father died and his mother (who was reported to have had a loving

  relationship with Adolf) supported him and his sister on a meager pension.

  A boyhood friend later remembered him as a pale, sickly, lanky youth

  who, though usually shy and reticent, was capable of sudden bursts of

  hysterical anger against those who disagreed with him.89

  He didn’t leave much of an impression on his teachers, although one of

  his teachers later wrote this:

  Hitler was certainly gifted, although only for particular subjects, but he

  lacked self- control and, to say the least, he was considered argumenta-

  tive, autocratic, self- opinionated and bad- tempered, and unable to submit

  to school discipline. Nor was he industrious; otherwise he would have

  achieved much better results, gifted as he was.90

  When Hitler dropped out of high school, his mother continued to sup-

  port him, although she encouraged him to get a career. Instead, he spent

  his time daydreaming, reading books, and becoming a young revolutionary.

  He had been inspired by one of his high school history teachers who was a

  fanatical German nationalist from southern Germany.91

  As a young adult, Hitler wandered around Vienna, Austria, getting odd jobs

  as a laborer and making some small paintings for pay. He continued to read a

  lot and developed a reputation for being a bookish vagrant.92 By twenty- four,

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 62

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  6: How Hitler, Stalin, and Mao Took Over 63

  he had no friends, no family, no job, and no home. However, he had “an

  unquenchable confidence in himself and a deep, burning sense of mission. ”93

  Despite his air of confidence, he received more attention than he expected

  when, immediately after WWI, he began giving talks as “citizenship training”

  for army troops, in which he espoused his self- taught ideas of history, anti-

  Semitism, and future greatness for the German people.

  Hitler’s skill and success were apparently a surprise even to him ... “I could

  speak!” he wrote, as though describing a Damascus Road experience.94

  High- Conflict Personality

  Hitler quickly adopted many people as his Targets of Blame. In his master

  text, Mein Kampf (which translates to My Struggle), he makes a lot out of a

  few negative encounters he had with Jews in Vienna as being the basis for his

  intense anti- Semitism. Some historians are skeptical about this, for example:

  In their view, Hitler’s elaborate description of his politicization during his

  Vienna period was fabricated to fit the invented image of a naïve young

  man reacting to real conditions, not the reality of an aimless war veteran

  looking for work as a politician. In this interpretation, Hitler only seized

  on anti- Semitism “as the winning horse in the existing political environ-

  ment,” notes historian Roman Toppel.95

  If he had a sociopathic personality, the roots of his anti- Semitism

  wouldn’t really matter. He would have had an innate drive to dominate other

  people, especially those who were in a weaker position. By early adulthood,

  it already seemed clear that he had narcissistic personality traits; even he

  admitted that he was extremely self- absorbed and confident—even as a

  child. And Erich Fromm identified him as a malignant narcissist as well, as

  described in Chapter 1.

  The Fantasy Crisis

  Hitler used several fantasy crises as he rose to power. He easily hijacked the

  issue of criticizing the government in Berlin in the 1920s. More than anyone

  else, he passionately blamed the “traitors” at home (the Social Democrats

  in Berlin) for the loss of WWI. He spread false stories of the government

  stopping the generals from winning the war, when in fact the generals told

  the government that it could not be won. In November 1918, the leader

  of the German army High Command and his superior, Field Marshall von

  Eddy_WhyWeElect.indd 63

  3/1/19 1:59 PM

  64 Part II: The Fantasy Crisis Triad Worldwide

  Hindenburg, told Kaiser Wilhelm II that they had militarily lost the war and

  neede
d to stop fighting.96

  In his speeches, Hitler promoted a new legend. The “November Crim-

  inals” (the Social Democrats signed the armistice in November), he cried,

  were responsible for the loss of the war, and the German army was “stabbed

  in the back.” After the war, while the government was fanning the flames of

  hatred for France, Hitler had a different strategy in mind.

  The French occupation of the Ruhr, though it brought a renewal of German

  hatred for the traditional enemy and thus revived the spirit of nationalism,

  complicated Hitler’s task. It began to unify the German people behind

  the republican government in Berlin which had chosen to defy France.

  This was the last thing Hitler wanted. His aim was to do away with the

  Republic. France could be taken care of after Germany had had its nation-

  alist revolution and established a dictatorship. Against a strong current

  of public opinion Hitler dared to take an unpopular line: “No—not down

  with France, but down with the traitors of the Fatherland, down with the

  November criminals! That must be our slogan. ”97

  By attacking targets within the country, he demonstrated this key char-

  acteristic of HCPs, which is to attack the people closest to you with emo-

  tional warfare in order to gain power over them.

  The Fantasy Villains

  Of course, Hitler more specifically blamed the defeat on the Jews, who he

  falsely claimed were in charge of the finance and production of the war. Soon,

  he began to blame everything that was wrong in Germany on the Jews, even

  though Jews made up less than 1 percent of the German population in the

  1920s and 1930s (about 500,000 in a country of 67 million people).98

  As Hitler began his rise to power, German Jews had only recently

  become accepted into mainstream society, and even then, they primarily

  lived in big cities such as Berlin. The great majority of Germans, especially

  in rural areas, did not know even one person who was Jewish. They readily

  believed whatever Hitler told them about Jews, since they knew no one who

  could verify or dispute Hitler’s claims—and the media (radio and movies)

  were totally under his control.

  This was, of course, an opportune time for Hitler to teach Germans to

  be intensely resentful of the Jews. After World War I, Germany struggled

  financially, and then the Great Depression started worldwide in 1929, at

 

‹ Prev