by Lee McIntyre
Mirowski, Philip. More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Mnookin, Seth. The Panic Virus: The True Story Behind the Vaccine-Autism Controversy. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2011.
Moser, Laura. “Another Year, Another Anti-Evolution Bill in Oklahoma.” Slate.com (blog), Jan. 25, 2016, http://www.slate.com/blogs/schooled/2016/01/25/oklahoma_evolution_controversy_two_new_bills_present_alternatives_to_evolution.html.
Muntersbjorn, Madeline. “Francis Bacon’s Philosophy of Science: Machina Intellectus and Forma Indita.” Philosophy of Science 70, no. 5 (Dec. 2003): 1137–1148.
Nagel, Ernest. The Structure of Science. New York: Routledge, 1961.
Nahigyan, Pierce. “Global Warming Never Stopped.” Huffington Post, Dec. 3, 2015.
Nickles, Thomas. “The Problem of Demarcation: History and Future.” In The Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, ed. Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 101–120. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Nosek, Brian. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349, no. 6251 (Aug. 28, 2015): aac4716.
Novella, Steven. “P-Hacking and Other Statistical Sins.” Neurologica, Feb. 13, 2014, http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/p-hacking-and-other-statistical-sins/.
Novella, Steven. “Publishing False Positives.” Neurologica, Jan. 5, 2012, http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/publishing-false-positives/.
NPR News. “Scientific Evidence Doesn’t Support Global Warming, Sen. Ted Cruz Says.” Dec. 9, 2015, http://www.npr.org/2015/12/09/459026242/scientific-evidence-doesn-t-support-global-warming-sen-ted-cruz-says.
Nuccitelli, Dana. “Here’s What Happens When You Try to Replicate Climate Contrarian Papers.” Guardian, Aug. 25, 2015.
Nuijten, M., C. H. Hartgerink, M. A. van Assen, S. Epskamp, and J. M. Wicherts. “The Prevalence of Statistical Reporting Errors in Psychology (1985–2013).” Behavioral Research 48, no. 4 (Oct. 23, 2015), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26497820.
Nutt, Amy. “Errors Riddled 2015 Study Showing Replication Crisis in Psychology Research, Scientists Say.” Washington Post, March 3, 2016.
Nuzzo, Regina. “Scientific Method: Statistical Errors.” Nature 506, no. 7487 (Feb. 12, 2014), http://www.nature.com/news/scientific-method-statistical-errors-1.14700.
Nyhan, Brendan, and Jason Reifler. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32 (2010): 303–330.
Okasha, Samir. Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik Conway. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2010.
Pappas, Stephanie. “Climate Change Disbelief Rises in America.” LiveScience, Jan. 16, 2014, http://www.livescience.com/42633-climate-change-disbelief-rises.html.
Park, Robert. Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
Park, Robert. Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Passmore, John. Science and Its Critics. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1978.
Peirce, Charles. “The Scientific Attitude and Fallibilism.” In The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, vol. 1, Principles of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931.
Pigliucci, Massimo. “The Demaration Problem: A (Belated) Response to Laudan.” In The Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, ed. Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 9–28. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Pigliucci, Massimo. Denying Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 2002.
Pigliucci, Massimo. Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
Pigliucci, Massimo. “Scientism and Pseudoscience: In Defense of Demarcation Projects.” In Science Unlimited. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
Pigliucci, Massimo, and Maarten Boudry. “Introduction: Why the Demarcation Problem Matters.” In The Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, ed. Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 1–6. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Pigliucci, Massimo, and Maarten Boudry, eds. The Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Plait, Phil. “Scientists Explain Why Ted Cruz Is Wrong about the Climate.” Mother Jones, Jan. 19, 2016, https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/01/ted-cruz-satellite-date-climate-change/.
Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge, 1959.
Popper, Karl. “Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind.” Dialectica 32, nos. 3–4 (1978): 339–355.
Popper, Karl. “Normal Science and Its Dangers.” In Problems in the Philosophy of Science, ed. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 51–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Popper, Karl. “On the Non-Existence of Scientific Method.” In Realism and the Aim of Science. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1983.
Popper, Karl. The Open Universe. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Popper, Karl. “Prediction and Prophecy in the Social Sciences.” In Conjectures and Refutations, 336–346. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1965.
Popper, Karl. “Remarks on the Problems of Demarcation and of Rationality.” In Problems in the Philosophy of Science, ed. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 88–102. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1968.
Popper, Karl. “Replies to My Critics.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. P. A. Schilpp. LaSalle: Open Court, 1974.
Popper, Karl. “Science: Conjectures and Refutations.” In Conjectures and Refutations, 33–65. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1965.
Popper, Karl. Unended Quest. LaSalle: Open Court, 1982.
Porter, Roy. The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity. New York: Norton, 1997.
Prothero, Donald. Reality Check: How Science Deniers Threaten Our Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.
Putnam, Hilary. “The ‘Corroboration’ of Theories.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. P. A. Schilpp, 221–240. LaSalle: Open Court, 1974.
Putnam, Hilary. Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge, 1978.
Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 60 (1951): 20–43.
Reardon, Sara. “Uneven Response to Scientific Fraud.” Nature 523 (July 9, 2015): 138–139.
Resnick, Brian. “Study: Elite Scientists Can Hold Back Science.” Vox, Dec. 15, 2015, http://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2015/12/15/10219330/elite-scientists-hold-back-progress.
Resnick, Brian. “A Bot Crawled Thousands of Studies Looking for Simple Math Errors: The Results Are Concerning.” Vox, Sept. 30, 2016, http://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2016/9/30/13077658/statcheck-psychology-replication.
Reuell, Peter. “Study That Undercut Psych Research Got It Wrong.” Harvard Gazette, March 2, 2016, http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2016/03/study-that-undercut-psych-research-got-it-wrong/.
Rosenberg, Alex. The Atheist’s Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life without Illusions. New York: Norton, 2011.
Rouse, Joseph, How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
Ruse, Michael, ed. But Is It Science? Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1996.
Ruse, Michael. “Evolution: From Pseudoscience to Popular Science, from Popular Science to Professional Science.” In The Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, ed. Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 225–244. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Ruse, Michael. “Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Biology.” In But Is It Science? ed. Michael Ruse. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1996.
Rutkow, Ira. Seeking the Cure: A History of Medicine in America. New York: Sc
ribner, 2010.
Sagan, Carl. The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York: Random House, 1995.
Salmon Wesley. “Hans Reichenbach’s Vindication of Induction.” Erkenntnis 35, no. 1 (1991): 99–122.
Sargent, Rose-Mary. “Virtues and the Scientific Revolution.” In Scientific Values and Civic Virtues, ed. N. Koertge, 71–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Scerri, Eric. A Tale of Seven Scientists and a New Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Scerri, Eric. “Has Chemistry Been at Least Approximately Reduced to Quantum Mechanics?” In PSA 1994, vol. 1, ed. D. Hull, M. Forbes, and R. Burian, 160–170. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 1994.
Scerri, Eric, and Lee McIntyre. “The Case for the Philosophy of Chemistry.” Synthese 111, no. 3 (1997): 213–232.
Schilpp, Paul, ed. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. LaSalle: Open Court, 1974.
Settle, Thomas. “The Rationality of Science versus the Rationality of Magic.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1 (1971): 173–194.
Shapin, Steven. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
Shapin, Steven. “Trust, Honesty, and the Authority of Science.” In Society’s Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine, ed. R. Bulger, E. Bobby, and H. Fineberg, 388–408. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.
Shepphard, Kate. “Ted Cruz: ‘Global Warming Alarmists Are the Equivalent of the Flat-Earthers.’ ” Huffington Post, March 25, 2015.
Shermer, Michael. The Believing Brain. New York: Times Books, 2011.
Shermer, Michael. “Science and Pseudoscience.” In The Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, ed. Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 203–223. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Siegel, Ethan. “Why String Theory Is Not a Scientific Theory.” Forbes, Dec. 23, 2015.
Simmons, Joseph, Leif Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn. “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science 22, no. 11 (2011): 1359–1366.
Smolin, Lee. The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next. New York: Mariner Books, 2007.
Soennichsen, John. Bretz’s Flood: The Remarkable Story of a Rebel Geologist and the World’s Greatest Flood. Seattle: Sasquatch Books, 2008.
Soennichsen, John. “Legacy: J Harlen Bretz (1882–1981).” University of Chicago Magazine, http://magazine.uchicago.edu/0912/features/legacy.shtml.
Solomon, Miriam. Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
Sosa, Ernest. “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1980): 3–25.
Specter, Michael. Denialism. New York: Penguin, 2009.
Stanford, Kyle. Exceeding Our Grasp. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Starr, Paul. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
Steinhauser, Jennifer. “Rising Public Health Risk Seen as More Parents Reject Vaccines.” New York Times, March 21, 2008.
Stemwedel, Janet. “Drawing the Line between Science and Pseudo-Science.” Scientific American, Oct. 4, 2011, https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/doing-good-science/drawing-the-line-between-science-and-pseudo-science/.
Sullivan, Gail, and Richard Feinn. “Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education 4, no. 3 (Sept. 2012), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444174/.
Sunstein, Cass. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Taubes, Gary. Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion. New York: Random House, 1993.
Thaler, Richard, and Cass Sunstein. Nudge. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.
Thomas, Lewis. The Youngest Science: Notes of a Medicine Watcher. New York: Viking, 1983.
Timmer, John. “This Year’s First Batch of Anti-Science Education Bills Surface in Oklahoma.” Arts Technica, Jan. 24, 2016, https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/01/this-years-first-batch-of-anti-science-education-bills-surface-in-oklahoma/.
Trivers, Robert. The Folly of Fools: the Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life. New York: Basic Books, 2011.
Trivers, Robert. “Fraud, Disclosure, and Degrees of Freedom in Science.” Psychology Today, May 10, 2012, https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-folly-fools/201205/fraud-disclosure-and-degrees-freedom-in-science.
Trivers, Robert. “Fraud in the Imputation of Fraud: The Mis-measure of Stephen Jay Gould.” Psychology Today, Oct. 4, 2012, https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-folly-fools/201210/fraud-in-the-imputation-fraud.
Turri, John, Mark Alfano, and John Greco. “Virtue Epistemology.”In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/epistemology-virtue/.
Union of Concerned Scientists, The. “The Climate Deception Dossiers.” July 2015, http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/07/The-Climate-Deception-Dossiers.pdf.
van Fraassen, Bas. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
Wade, Nicholas. “Harvard Finds Scientist Guilty of Misconduct.” New York Times, Aug. 20, 2010.
Waller, John. Fabulous Science: Fact and Fiction in the History of Scientific Discovery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Wicherts, Jelte, Marjan Bakker, and Dylan Moelnaar. “Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results.” PLOS ONE 6, no. 11 (Nov. 2011).
Wigner, Eugene. “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences.” Communication in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13, no. 1 (Feb. 1960).
Williams, Bernard. Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Williams, Richard, and Daniel Robinson, eds. Scientism: The New Orthodoxy. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.
Woit, Peter. “Is String Theory Even Wrong?” American Scientist, March–April 2002, http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/pub/is-string-theory-even-wrong/.
Woit, Peter. Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law. New York: Basic Books, 2007.
Woit, Peter. “String Theory and the Scientific Method.” May 14, 2013, http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=5880.
Wolchover, Natalie. “Physicists and Philosophers Hold Peace Talks.” Atlantic, Dec. 22, 2015, https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/12/physics-philosophy-string-theory/421569/.
Wray, K. Brad. Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Wray, K. Brad. “Kuhn’s Social Epistemology and the Sociology of Science.” In Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions—50 Years On, ed. W. Devlin and A. Bokulich, 167–183. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 311. New York: Springer, 2015.Index
Index
Academic freedom bills, 24, 176–178, 245n85
Achinstein, Peter, 50, 209n6, 218n7
Act 590 (1981), 16–17, 23, 175–176. See also Intelligent design theory (ID)
Adams, John Couch, 31
AIDS, 236n17, 239n3, 241n29
Anesthesia, 52–53, 115, 119–120, 123–124, 233n23
Asch, Solomon, 102, 239n5
Astrology, 12, 17, 22, 66–67, 69–70, 153, 174, 175, 210n15, 222n8
Astronomy, 31–32, 147–148, 218n11
Bacon, Francis, 59–61
Behavioral economics, 84, 85, 188
Bias
backfire effect and, 240n27
cognitive bias, 81–82, 84–85, 91, 112–113, 142, 150–152, 158, 163, 198–199, 226nn26–27
confirmation bias, 84–85, 102, 103, 104, 112–113, 152, 163, 219n23, 229n62,
231n97
selection bias, 144, 145, 248n23
social conformity and, 239n5
Biconditional relationship, 66–67, 135, 195, 221n2
Black swan example, 14–15, 30
Bloodletting, 116–119
Bode, Johann, 37–38, 39, 40, 74, 203, 214n16
Bode’s law, 37–38, 39, 40, 74, 203, 214n16
Boudry, Maarten
limits of science, 223nn18–19
nonscience, pseudoscience, unscience and, 26–27, 71, 213n45, 224n28, 224n32
normative issues, 26–27
on problem of demarcation, 24, 26–28, 208n7, 213n45, 224n28, 224n32
scientism and, 224n28
territorial problem, the, 26–27, 213n45, 224n28
Bretz, J Harlan, 166–173, 175, 243n62, 243nn52–53
Bright, Liam, 236n12
Bynum, William, 116–117, 122
Catastrophism, 166–168, 172
Certainty
fallibilism doctrine and, 42–43, 157, 216n30, 216n32
inductive reasoning and, 12
truth and, 29–34
Chain, Ernst, 128–129, 130
Cherry picking, 49, 82, 111, 153–154, 162–163, 173, 188, 218n5, 240n7
Childbed fever theory, 52–57, 120, 155, 169, 171, 191, 198, 224n34, 247n13
Choice, paradox of, 196, 197–198
Cioffi, Frank, 22
Climate change, 1–2, 5–6, 24, 156, 159–165, 177, 198–199, 241n31, 242n41, 242n43
Cognitive bias, 81–82, 84–85, 91, 112–113, 142, 150–152, 158, 163, 198–199, 226nn26–27
Cold fusion debacle, 56–57, 100–105, 111, 141, 229n62
Collectivity, 89–91
Confirmation
confirmation bias, 84–85, 102, 103, 104, 112–113, 152, 163, 219n23, 229n62, 231n97
verification vs., 33–34, 42, 163
Conspiracy theories. See also Denialism
climate change and, 159–165
denialism and, 151, 154–155, 158
Conway, Erik, 159, 241n31
Corroboration, 33, 42, 214nn8–9
Creationism, 16–17, 23–24, 73, 175–180, 222n14, 224n23, 244n69, 244n76. See also Intelligent design theory (ID)
Cruz, Ted, 1, 160–162, 165, 170
CSICOP (Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal; now Committee for Skeptical Inquiry), 153–154