Red Capitalism: The Fragile Financial Foundation of China's Extraordinary Rise

Home > Other > Red Capitalism: The Fragile Financial Foundation of China's Extraordinary Rise > Page 23
Red Capitalism: The Fragile Financial Foundation of China's Extraordinary Rise Page 23

by Carl E. Walter; Fraser J. T. Howie


  IMPERIAL ORNAMENTS

  Against this background, the question has to be asked: why go to the trouble of building debt and stock markets when the banks stand behind everything? Why don’t the banks simply lend directly to the MOF or the CDB, just as they do to the local governments and their projects? What is the advantage of creating such a complex and difficult-to-manage financial system?

  The answer to such questions is complicated and has many aspects. These include that the system serves as: i) an important catalyst for corporate transformation; ii), a mechanism allowing money to flow among various groups; and iii) a familiar surface for local business and politics that attracts foreign support and admiration. First of all, in the late 1980s as it considered SOE and other economic reforms, the Party wanted to make use of the most advanced economic practice available. The Western financial model, involving shareholding and capital markets, seemed to offer this. With strong support from Deng Xiaoping, a consensus formed around the active pursuit of equity-capital markets and SOE IPOs as channeled by Western legal, accounting and regulatory practices. In just a few short years, experimentation with international listings led to the creation of perhaps the largest Chinese enterprises in history: the National Team began to form.

  This can only have been seen by the Party as a great success, but the National Team was also, in many ways, the gamechanger in China’s political economy. Endowed with great economic and political power, why should these huge state enterprises want a domestic (or international) regulator or any other government agency to have a significant influence over their operations? Would such corporations want China’s stock markets, including Hong Kong, to develop toward international best-practice standards? The answer at this point appears to be “No.” The National Champions have the clout to slow, if not halt, market development if it is not in their interest. This explains why China presents such a mixed picture to international observers. Its markets have all the trappings of Western finance: B-shares, H-shares, locally incorporated bank subsidiaries, local-currency derivatives, QFII, QDII, securities, mutual fund and commodities joint ventures—all have been tried, some with great success, but they remain small extensions to the vast grounds of the Forbidden City.

  There has been talk of an international board on the Shanghai Exchange since at least 1996 when Mercedes Benz sought a listing in Shanghai. In the debt markets, only the Asian Development Bank and the International Finance Corporation have been allowed to issue bonds, and only within the existing interest and investor framework and to fund state-approved projects. China’s lively and important non-state sector has been allowed access to the Shenzhen stock market since 2004, but of the 400 companies listed, only four have made it to China’s Top 100 by market capitalization and altogether they account for just 2.2 percent of total capitalization. In addition, the non-state companies are to be found in such areas as consumer, food, certain areas of hi-tech, pharmaceutical and other light industrial sectors in which the Party historically has had little stake. In short, the non-state sector, no matter how important to China’s exports and employment, has not been allowed to develop into a challenge to the National Team.

  The second aspect to answering this question is that it suits China’s powerful interest groups to have a complex yet primitive financial system in which money frequently changes hands. Multiple products, regulators, markets and rules all disguise the origin and destination of China’s massive cash flows. In this business environment, the National Champions, their family associates and other retainers plunder the country’s large domestic markets and amass huge profits. With nationwide monopolies or, at worst, oligopolies, these business groups do not want change, nor do they believe that foreign participation is needed. How can China use its Anti-Monopoly Law when the Party owns the monopolies? The addition of foreign participants simply makes things more complicated than a simple consideration of the possible value they might add; why share the wealth? If Zhu Rongji’s intention in signing China up to the World Trade Organization was to open it up to foreign competition and, therefore, economic change, after 2008, this goal seems to have faded from sight.

  Can it be fairly said that these business interests are, in fact, China’s government? Is it simply that, lacking a strong leader, the government presently cannot set its own agenda if it is in conflict with that of the National Team? The answer may well be “Yes.” As far as the financial sector goes, the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 undermined the influence of those in the Party who sought a policy of greater openness and international engagement. The global financial crisis eliminated the political consensus in support of the Western financial model that had been in place since 1992. This has allowed the pre-reform economic vision of an egalitarian socialist planned economy to re-emerge. There are many in the Party and the government who never supported Red Capitalism in the first place. Like the old cadre quoted at the start of Chapter 1, these people have always wondered what the revolution had been for if it simply meant a return to the pre-revolution era of the 1930s and 1940s, with all its excesses. They see today the re-emergence of the same issues that led to the revolution in the first place. What they misunderstand is that without Western finance and open markets, China would not have achieved the extraordinary rise of which they are so justly proud.

  There has been a great cost to China as a result of the Party’s support for the National Team but the entire intention of creating National Champions should be understood against the backdrop of the globalization of industries taking place in the late 1990s.4 In almost every industrial sector, China was beginning to face international competitors of a scale, expertise and economic clout that its own companies simply did not possess. The success of the US$4.5 billion China Mobile IPO in 1997 showed a way forward. The goal of placing companies on the Fortune 500 list for Zhu Rongji became the equivalent of America’s Apollo moon program. Ironically, however, the new National Champions were born with too much political power—the Party should never have allowed their chairmen and CEOs to remain on the nomenklatura and enjoy such great political influence. As a result, these companies grew fat, wealthy and untouchable as they developed China’s own domestic markets and always with the unquestioning support of a complaisant financial system.

  Since they are so comfortable in a domestic market closed to meaningful foreign competition, the National Team faces great difficulties developing into an International Team. If China’s banks are the strongest in the world, where were they when Western commercial and investment banks were on the ropes, ready to be bought for a song? It is entirely disingenuous to say, as a major Chinese banker has said, that the developed markets do not present significant profit opportunities for China. Rather, the government appears to be far happier working in weak economies, where its mix of economics and politics is quite effective. But this still demands the question: where is China’s International Team?

  There is a third aspect to China’s mixed financial scene and involves a picture that outside observers, whether political, business or academic, feel comfortable with since it makes China resemble other emerging markets. In this regard, the infrastructure is the thing. Over the past 18 years, China has developed stock and debt-capital markets, a mutual-funds industry, pension funds, sovereign-wealth funds, currency markets, foreign participation, an internationalist central bank, home loans and credit cards, a burgeoning car industry and a handful of brilliant cities. As it looks like the West, international investors easily accept what they see; they are excited by it because it is at once so familiar and so unexpected. There is the feeling that all can be understood, measured and valued. They would not feel this way if China explicitly relied on a Soviet-inspired financial system even though, in truth, this is largely what China remains.

  The Chinese commonly explain the complexity of their system saying: “Our economy is different from the West, so our markets work differently than those in the West.” It turns out that this is a simple statement of the t
ruth. China is an economy that, from the outside, appears as a huge growth story; one extraordinary boom that has continued over the last 10 years. This is just the surface. China has been a series of booms and busts within its overall growth story; it deserves and repays far closer scrutiny from all sides including the Chinese themselves, but especially from those in the West. One cannot simply assume that words such as “stocks” or “bonds” or “capital” or “yield curves” or “markets” have the same meaning in China’s economic and political context. To do so reflects a lack of curiosity and seriousness that can rapidly lead to misunderstanding and wasted opportunity. It is a luxury that neither China nor its foreign partners can afford. The prolonged efforts of the Party and government to mix Western capital markets with state planning have produced spectacular change in a short period. This has obscured the fact that all able bodies are desperately engaged in “the primitive accumulation of capital” in an unprecedented social experiment. If Karl Marx were alive today, he would without doubt find plenty of material for a new version of his masterpiece which he might call Das Kapital with Chinese characteristics.

  ENDNOTES

  1 This is derived as follows: 2009, RMB9.56 trillion actual; 2010, RMB10 trillion based on annualized 1Q 2010 actual lending.

  2 Bond issues are accounted for as revenue in China’s budget accounting. Since 2000, interest expense has been included in expenditure budgets, but repayment of maturing bond debt is not included as an expenditure item.

  3 Since 2008, the government has adopted the old 2001 policy of paying 10 percent of the shares of listing companies into the National Social Security Fund. Even so, the fund continues to be seriously underfunded.

  4 See Nolan 2001 for an extensive discussion of SOE reform in the context of the global consolidation of industry.

  Appendix

  Central Government Organization of Major Financial System Participants

  Ministry of Finance Off-Balance Sheet Debt Obligations in Co-managed Accounts

  Typical Local Government Financing-related Entities

  Select Bibliography

  Newspapers and periodicals

  21st Century Business Herald 21

  Caijing

  Financial Times

  The Economic Observer

  Wall Street Journal

  Websites and Information Systems

  Bloomberg

  Caixin www.caing.com

  China Bond www.chinabond.com.cn

  NAFMII www.nafmii.org.cn

  People’s Bank of China www.pbc.gov.cn

  US-China Business Council www.uschina.org

  Wind Information www.wind.com.cn

  Publications

  Yearbooks or annuals

  Agricultural Bank of China, annual reports, 2007–2008

  Agricultural Bank of China, H-share prospectus, 2010

  Bank of China, annual reports, 2003–2009

  China Development Bank, Prospectus, US$600 million notes due 2014

  Construction Bank of China, annual reports, 2003–2009

  Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, annual reports, 2003–2008

  State Statistical Bureau, China Statistical Yearbook , various years (Beijing: China Statistics Press )

  People’s Bank of China, Financial Stability Report, 2005–2009, www.pbc.gov.cn

  Su Ning, Chief Editor, 1948–2005 China Financial Statistics , two volumes (Beijing: Zhongguo jinrong chubanshe , 2007)

  Books, articles and monographs

  Brodsgaard, Kjeld Erik, “Politics and business group formation in China,” unpublished manuscript, April 2010.

  Curry, Timothy, and Shibut, Lynn, “The cost of the savings and loan crisis: truth and consequences,” FDIC Banking Review 13(2), December 2000: 26–35.

  Demirguc-Kunt, Asli, and Levine, Ross, Financial Structure and Economic Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.

  Faure, David, China and Capitalism: a history of business enterprise in modern China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2006.

  Gao, Jian, China’s Debt Capital Markets. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.

  Gao, Jian, Zhongguo guozhai (China Bonds). Bejing: Economic Science Press , 1995.

  Nolan, Peter, China and the Global Economy. Palgrave: MacMillan, 2001.

  Shih, Victor, “Big Rock Candy Mountain,” China Economic Quarterly 14(2), June 2010.

  Walter, Carl E. and Howie, Fraser J.T., Privatizing China: inside China’s stock markets (2nd edition). Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.

  Wang, Nianyong, Fusu yu qibu: 1980–1991 nian Zhongguo zhengquan shichang jianshi : 1980–1991 (Recovery and Rise: a brief history of China’s securities markets from 1980–1991). Beijing: China Financial & Economic Publishing House , 2004.

  Wu, Jinglian, Zhongguo jingji 60 nian 60 (60 years of China’s economy), Caijing , September 28, 2009, p. 98 ff.

  Xing, Ziling, Qianqiu gongzui Mao Zedong (Mao Zedong: merits and crimes of the century). Hong Kong: Shuzuofang chubanshe , 2007.

  Yang, Kaisheng, “Wending woguo shangye yinhang ziben chongzu de jidian sikao ” (Several thoughts about stabilizing the capital adequacy levels of our commercial banks.). 21st Century Business Herald 21, April 13, 2010:10.

  Zhou, Xiaochuan, “Learn lessons from the past for the benefit of future endeavor,” Speech at the China Bond Market Development Summit, Beijing, October 20, 2005, www.pbc.gov.cn/english/detail.asp?col=6500&ID=82

  Index

  1998 Special Treasury Bond

  2007 Special Treasury Bond

  2009 economic stimulus package

  bank lending

  pressure on local governments

  A

  Agricultural Bank of China (ABC)

  IPO

  Ministry of Finance co-managed account

  Ministry of Finance IOU

  NPL spin-offs

  Agricultural Development of China

  AIG

  Aijian Bank and Trust Co.

  Air China

  Alibaba.com

  Aluminum Corporation of China (Chalco)

  Anben Steel Group

  Anhui

  Apollo moon program

  A-share initial public offerings (IPO)

  listing day price performance

  lottery process

  online and offline offerings

  pricing

  repo financing

  retail investors

  strategic investors

  Asian Development Bank

  Asian Financial Crisis (AFC)

  Asian Games

  asset-management company (AMC)

  AMC Bonds

  AMC Bonds, extension of tenor

  debt-to-equity swaps

  funding sources

  MOF support

  non-performing loan recovery rates

  operating performance

  Australia

  Aviation Industry Corporation of China

  B

  Bank of America (BOA)

  Bank of Beijing

  Bank of China (BOC)

  2003 recapitalization

  2010 refinancing plan

  capital-adequacy trend

  Bank of Communications

  Bank of Nanjing

  banks

  1998 recapitalization

  2009 lending binge

  2010 recapitalization plans

  as utilities

  capital-adequacy ratios

  cash dividends paid

  comparison by country income group

  composition of assets

  composition of deposits

  concentration of risk in

  control by Party

  deposit-reserve ratio

  dividend policy

  exposure to asset-management companies

  failure of reform

  foregone opportunities

 

‹ Prev