I was surprised that, knowing Peary was trying, with however little chance of success, for the pole, Dr. Cook could be so sanguine, so complacent about it. Meanwhile, here he was in Brooklyn, merely making plans for future expeditions for which he had yet to raise the money—nebulous expeditions for which no dates had yet been set.
“Aren’t you worried that he’ll reach the pole?” I said.
“You don’t understand,” he said. “It’s not that, by now, Peary’s chances of success are small. They are non-existent. They were from the start. He and his crew are stranded somewhere. The expedition was eighteen months old when they were last heard from, and that was months ago. They were still on the southernmost coast of Greenland, but were planning to head north when the snow returned. By the time it does, the expedition will be more than two years old. By then, Peary’s only real ambition will be to make it back alive. How long it will be before he admits defeat is the only question. There was word before he left that this was to be his last try. He is forty-five years old, will be at least forty-six before he gets back, if he gets back. These are not surmises. These are certainties. There will be no surprise headlines in the paper. Only the gullible are still waiting for word from Peary that he has reached the pole. Peary knows it. Every explorer in the world knows it. Some members of the Peary Arctic Club know it and are trying desperately to keep it from the press—and from the other members, the ones who skip the meetings of the PAC but put up all the money. I will not say this publicly, of course. I do not want to give a bad impression of a fellow explorer to people who, one or two years from now, will, I hope, be backing my attempt to reach the pole.”
He told me not to concern myself about Peary, sneering as he spoke the name, and reminded me that the success of any expedition depended on how well one prepared for it. “Better to make one good try for the pole,” he said, “than to make five from which nothing more will come than new material for lectures.”
Peary, he said, had been to Greenland several times since 1892, and each time he brought back with him something to impress the members of the club and draw attention away from his having failed yet again to reach the pole. He had brought back three meteorites, which he called star stones, and lent them to the American Museum of Natural History, whose president, Morris Jesup, was also the president of the Peary Arctic Club. He also brought back with him six Eskimos, four of whom, while under his care, perished of tuberculosis.
Dr. Cook waved one hand as if to dismiss all thoughts of Peary from both our minds.
• CHAPTER FOURTEEN •
HE WAS KNOWN TO EVERYONE IN BROOKLYN. I WENT OUT walking with him on Bushwick one Saturday afternoon. He carried his jacket on his left arm and in his right hand held his hat, lifting the latter in greeting to the doorman of a small hotel, who tipped his own hat in reply.
He raised his hat again, this time to a jeweller who stood in the doorway of his shop and then, when Dr. Cook had passed, went back inside, as if he had come out expressly to greet him.
He spoke briefly to people in the waiting rooms of the el trains on the Myrtle Line—people, I realized, who recognized him, but whom he did not know.
People were drawn to him by more than just his fame. He seemed to find no one uninteresting, no one less than fascinating, which flattered people, and which he managed to convey by listening intently while others spoke. He was not outgoing, but he projected such absolute self-assurance that when he smiled at people in that forthright way of his, they looked as if they had won the approval of a man who was uncommonly perceptive. It was as if each person’s life, each person’s job, was difficult or rewarding in some way that only he and they were able to appreciate.
In Brooklyn, when we were not walking or travelling by train, we drove about in the Franklin, which was greeted by the people of Bushwick like a one-vehicle parade, everyone waving as we passed, teasing him good-naturedly about his “horseless carriage,” which by chance bore the name of a famously doomed Arctic expedition. Most of the teasing was about the unlikelihood of the Franklin taking him to the North Pole and back.
“You should have kept the Eskimos,” one man shouted from his horse as we sped by.
I was surprised when Dr. Cook explained that this was a reference to the dozen Eskimos he had brought back to Brooklyn with him from Labrador one year, housing them in two large tents that he set up in his own backyard. “I treated them better than Peary treated his,” he said, as if he had noticed my surprise. He said they had lived as much like Eskimos as it was possible to do in Brooklyn, all the while being gaped at by the locals through knotholes in the fence. In the winter, on the weekends, he and they drove about Bushwick on sleds drawn by teams of dogs, the huskies barking wildly as hundreds of astonished Brooklynites tried to keep up with the sleds on foot. He had complied with the Eskimos’ request to be returned to Labrador when, in spite of all his ministrations, one of their number died.
“I am famous in Brooklyn,” Dr. Cook said, “yet all but unknown in Manhattan.”
He said it was too much bother to take the Franklin into Manhattan, where the streets were so narrow and congested that cars and horses came too near each other for the horses’ liking.
The first time we made the crossing of the bridge together, I saw a horseless carriage send a dozen horses rearing up on their hind legs, spilling drivers, passengers and goods from their vehicles, their scissoring forelegs menacing pedestrians, who screamed at the driver of the car to “get a horse.”
Several times a week, we took the el train across the Brooklyn Bridge into Manhattan. If our destination was a part of the borough where the el trains did not run, we took his horse and carriage. He much preferred this to hiring cabs, he said, because cab drivers were notorious eavesdroppers and gossips.
He said it was so that I could see and get to know Manhattan that we made these excursions. And it did seem sometimes that I was being tutored in the layout and makeup of the city, which he said I would need to know as well as I knew St. John’s in order to do my job properly.
“The avenues run vertically from north to south, the streets horizontally from east to west. The avenues are longer and farther apart from each other than the streets, which are more numerous. The streets are numbered, the avenues, in some cases, named and numbered …” But long after he stopped speaking, he went on driving, driving for hours as if he was scouring the city in search of something he had lost. It seemed that I was only there to keep him company.
We drove at a never-less-than-frenetic pace from east to west, west to east, all the while going north block by block, generally skirting the edge of Central Park unless we could use one of its roads as a shortcut. I wondered if it had been his habit before my arrival to spend his spare time like this. Perhaps, in spite of his urging me to be patient, it was a symptom of explorer’s restlessness. He was at home, not on an expedition as he would have liked, so he could not sit still.
Once, when I went by the study prior to yet another evening excursion, Mrs. Cook, wrapped, though it was still September, in a bundle of sweaters and blankets, was just leaving. Though I had been living in her house for weeks, I had yet to meet her for a second time. Dr. Cook referred to her only occasionally, usually to pass on her regrets that her “condition” prevented her from spending time with me.
I said hello and she muttered some reply, sounding exasperated with me, as if she thought it was at my instigation that her husband was neglecting her so much.
I had yet to address him as “Dr. Cook” when we were alone. I could not bring myself to do it, though I saw the sense of not addressing him as “Father.” To call him “Dr. Cook,” for us to maintain that pretence in private, did not seem right to me. I called him “you,” which was awkward, especially as he used my name so frequently. He said it differently when we were alone than when we were not, though it was hard to put that difference into words.
He spoke of Manhattan as if it had been built not for the people who lived there, but for th
ose who came to visit. We might have been making our way through a vast museum called Manhattan, in which all the peoples and cultures of the world were on display—a live exhibit showing all levels and sub-levels of society; the latest advancements in technology; all known occupations, modes of dress, forms of art and entertainment; all known languages. I half expected him to point out two men in a carriage, one middle-aged, one young, two representative visitors from Brooklyn, the older of whom would be pointing directly back at us.
I put it down at first to Brooklynite defensiveness, the aloof, dismissive pose that all residents of the supposedly lesser of the cross-river rivals seemed to feel the need to affect while in Manhattan. But there was more to it than that. Scepticism. Ambivalence. It was as though he was assessing the city for some purpose he was not sure it could serve. Chronically unsure. At the end of each journey, as we returned to Brooklyn by way of the bridge, he fell silent and took on a look of wistful dissatisfaction.
We went to vaudeville shows, and though he would smile at the onstage antics, he spent as much time observing the audience as he did the performers, wearing the same evaluative look no matter where his attention lay.
Late one afternoon, he came by the library, where I was reading Moby Dick, which he had recommended to me as a book that might help me understand the “nature of his quest”
“I have to get out of this house,” he said, scratching the back of one hand, his fingernails rasping on his skin.
We took his hansom across the bridge. We went to the Lower East Side, to Hester Street, which was home to throngs of Jews and the site of pushcart markets that even at this time of the afternoon were so crowded I could not tell the vendors from the customers. A mass of dark-haired, dark-eyed, dark-bearded men in felt hats and heavy overcoats broke ranks to let us through, their eyes blank, as if they did not so much see as sense the obstacles in front of them.
“They are all Jews,” Dr. Cook said. “But they are not all from the same country. They speak different languages. That is why they must learn English.”
“Schleppers,” he said, pointing as though at a species of tree that did not grow in Newfoundland. Men, women and children toting heaps of unfinished garments from one sweatshop to another struggled by, bent double by their loads. It seemed that everything was being rebuilt in the aftermath of some disaster, people working at this pace for what they knew would be a finite length of time. “But it never ends,” said Dr. Cook. A woman wearing a shawl tied in a bow beneath her chin staggered by beneath a massive mound of men’s garters bound up with string. Another carried above her head a huge wooden box that Dr. Cook assured me was empty and would be used for kindling.
Only a few blocks away began Little Italy, Mulberry Bend. There were Italians now from Broadway to the Bowery, said Dr. Cook.
Above Fifty-ninth, on both the east and west sides, lived the Irish, and with them, he told me, most of the Newfoundlanders who had forsaken their massive, empty island for this crammed and tiny one. I told him I would rather not tour the Irish neighbourhoods, for fear of being recognized by someone from St. John’s. He nodded as if he knew exactly what I meant, knew what Aunt Daphne would do if she found out where I was.
We took the long way round to San Juan Hill, to Amsterdam Avenue between Sixtieth and Sixty-fourth streets, to Seventh Avenue near the future site of Pennsylvania Station. In these areas lived the city’s small black population. Conveyanceville, Dr. Cook called it, because all the employed black men conveyed either people or goods throughout the city. They were draymen, hackmen, teamsters, porters, packers, messengers.
He pointed out to me groups of children he said were “street arabs.” Born in tenements from which they had been crowded out when their parents could not pay the rent, they now lived on the streets. They looked as if they had just emerged from coal mines, their faces and clothing were so filthy.
He said he had thought of childhood as a stage of life when everyone was disposed to hopefulness no matter what their circumstances, until he set eyes on these boys and girls. “I would look at them and think of you,” he said.
They were not children, he said. They could not remain children in this city and survive. So it was as if some whole new stage of life had been invented for them, by them. Only by night did they look like children, when they lay down in the doorways and the stairwells, three or four of them huddled so closely together, so entwined, you could not tell whose feet were whose, whose arms and legs were whose. Sometimes all you saw were bundles of coats and caps and shoes.
“But I should warn you,” he said. “You will encounter them as you go about your job. They will see that you are new here, and if they sense that you feel sorry for them, they will take advantage of you. They smell pity the way dogs smell fear. They will tell you that their mother or father or sister needs help, that no one but you has been kind enough to listen to them. Once they have convinced you of how much they value kindness and how exceptional you are, they will lead you down a side street, where the hoodlums they work for will be waiting for you.”
We went to the Upper East Side, drove from Murray Hill at Thirty-fourth Street to Ninety-first Street, past mansions that made Mrs. Cook’s look like a guest house. Even close up, they looked more like hotels or banks than homes, sprawling over entire city blocks. They had no yardage, front or back or on the sides.
“There is no room in this part of Manhattan for yards,” he said. “Not if you want to have houses the size of these. But they have other houses, in the country or at the seashore, as large or larger than these, surrounded by acres of land.”
He pointed out the Vanderbilt residence at Fifth Avenue and Fifty-second Street, the Astor residence at Fifth Avenue and Sixty-fifth Street, the Carnegies’ at Fifth and Ninety-first.
We toured the Upper West Side, drove along Riverside Drive, where the newest mansions were, some of them still under construction, draped in canvas hung on scaffolding as if they were soon to be unveiled.
We went to the apartment building after which he had named the west side of his house, the Dakota Apartments at Central Park West and Seventy-second Street. Eight storeys high, with gabled columns topped by minarets like those of Ellis Island on its front façade and a sixth-floor railing on which were propped Zeuses and griffins made of marble, it was, he said, his favourite building in Manhattan.
“They say that looking north from the upper storeys, you can still see the fires of the shanty camps at night. See how it looms up out of nowhere, with nothing but the sky behind it? It is perfectly square, eleven rows of windows on each side. See. They haven’t even paved the streets here yet, seventeen years since the cornerstone was laid. The people who live here want them left unpaved. It discourages visitors, developers. Rich people rent here, those who make their money in the arts, publishers of books and music. Theodor Steinway used to live here. That was in the 1880s, when it was the last western outpost of the city. From its north-facing windows, all you could see then were trees and farms and shanty towns. They say that men shot small game from those upper windows. Imagine it: hunting without having to step outdoors or even go downstairs. When the shooting stopped, the shanties would come out of the woods and gather up the game, rabbits, foxes, and cook them over open fires.”
He said that the men who had lived on the lower floors rode the elevators with their rifles to the roof gardens. Elevators were new then, to ride one a novelty in itself. I could just see those men pouring like a posse from the elevators, rushing to the rail to get the best spots. I imagined people watching the Dakota from a distance, hearing the sounds of rifle shots, seeing the puffs of smoke from the upper storey, from the battlements, as if its residents were nightly required to defend this fortress from invaders.
It really did rear up from out of nowhere like a castle, as though it were all that remained of a city of which it once had been the centrepiece, a city razed to the ground, the land it once stood on now being claimed back by the wilderness. It was like a bulwark agains
t the northern horde. I thought of the tenants on the roof and at the windows of the floor below, sniping at the shanties as they readied to invade.
There was nothing homiletic in his tone of voice, though it seemed clear from what he said that to him the Dakota was a monumental point of demarcation between the old and the new, the wilderness and the city, the poor and the rich.
On the Uppers, as Dr. Cook called the most northerly settled parts of the island, lived the backers, the very men, the “hundred millionaires” of the Peary Arctic Club, who had backed Peary’s most recent bid to reach the pole, a bid they thought might still succeed. What would they think, he wondered, if they knew that all they were paying for was a pointlessly protracted, face-saving sojourn in Greenland?
“There are many kinds of wealth, just as there are many kinds of poverty,” said Dr. Cook. “The people in these houses, who are so looked down upon by the few aristocrats in England who have heard of them, do not associate with the beer barons of Bushwick, nor do the beer barons associate with the physicians, nor the physicians with the homeopaths. I tell Marie that it is because our ghost, the elusive Lipsius, is such a snob that he never shows himself. Some of our neighbours do not approve of the woman to whom the Lipsius family sold its house. They resent the presence among them of a widow whose first husband made his money selling quack remedies to hypochondriacs. They approve of explorers, but not so much that they boast about having one next door.”
He spoke as if these were the objective observations of a sociologist, in no way revealing of his own biases or character.
I saw, I had to see, the city through his eyes, for my own could make no sense of it. It was too far beyond anything I had ever seen before, too expansive, too diverse in both its plenitude and scarcity, extravagance and deprivation, to register on my perception as anything but chaos.
He agreed that it was stupefying, but there was also, he said, something naively futuristic about it, a sense of faddishness, as if all these so-called advancements might one day be abandoned, and those who had fallen for them, invested in them, would be laughed at. As if the city might be going through a phase that people in the future would recall with fond amusement. History might record turn-of-the-century Manhattan as no more than an exemplar of the excesses to which gullibility could lead.
The Navigator of New York Page 19