Since the neighborhood was quiet and the dog well behaved, Miss Eisenberg usually unleashed him when she walked him at night, for he never strayed far. “One night—I’d last seen him sniffing around in the dark a few doors down—I called to him and he didn’t come back. And he never did; I never saw him again.
“Now our street is a solid wall of brownstone buildings on both sides with locked doors and no areaways. He couldn’t have disappeared like that, he just couldn’t. But he did.”
Miss Eisenberg hunted for her dog for many days afterward, inquired of neighbors, put ads in the papers, but she never found him. “Then one night I was getting ready for bed, I happened to glance out the front window down at the street, and suddenly I remembered something I’d forgotten all about. I remembered the dog I’d chased away over two years before.” Miss Eisenberg looked at me for a moment, then she said flatly, “It was the same dog. If you own a dog you know him, you can’t be mistaken, and I tell you it was the same dog. Whether it makes sense or not, my dog was lost—I chased him away—two years before he was born.”
She began to cry silently, the tears running down her face. “Maybe you think I’m crazy, or a little lonely and overly sentimental about a dog. But you’re wrong.” She brushed at her tears with a handkerchief. “I’m a well-balanced person, as much as anyone is these days, at least, and I tell you I know what happened.”
It was at that moment, sitting in Miss Eisenberg’s neat, shabby living room, that I realized fully that the consequences of these odd little incidents could be something more than merely intriguing; that they might, quite possibly, be tragic. It was in that moment that I began to be afraid.
I have spent the last eleven months discovering and tracking down these strange occurrences, and I am astonished and frightened at how many there are. I am astonished and frightened at how much more frequently they are happening now, and—I hardly know how to express this—at their increasing power to tear human lives tragically apart. This is an example, selected almost at random, of the increasing strength of—whatever it is that is happening in the world.
Case 34. Paul V. Kerch, accountant, the Bronx, age thirty-one.
On a bright clear Sunday afternoon, I met an unsmiling family of three at their Bronx apartment: Mr. Kerch, a chunky, darkly good-looking young man; his wife, a pleasant-faced dark-haired woman in her late twenties, whose attractiveness was marred by circles under her eyes; and their son, a nice-looking boy of six or seven. After introductions, the boy was sent to his room at the back of the house to play.
“All right,” Mr. Kerch said wearily then and walked toward a bookcase, “let’s get at it. You said on the phone that you know the story in general.” It was half a question, half a statement.
‘‘Yes,” I said.
He took a book from the top shelf and removed some photographs from it. “There are the pictures.” He sat down on the davenport beside me with the photographs in his hand. “I own a pretty good camera. I’m a fair amateur photographer, and I have a darkroom setup in the kitchen; do my own developing. Two weeks ago we went down to Central Park.” His voice was a tired monotone, as though this was a story he’d repeated many times, aloud and in his own mind. “It was nice, like today, and the kid’s grandmothers have been pestering us for pictures, so I took a whole roll of films, pictures of all of us. My camera can be set up and focused and it will snap the picture automatically a few seconds later, giving me time to get around in front of it and get in the picture myself.”
There was a tired, hopeless look in his eyes as he handed me all but one of the photographs. “These are the first ones I took,” he said. The photographs were all fairly large, perhaps seven by three and a half inches, and I examined them closely.
They were ordinary enough, very sharp and detailed, and each showed the family of three in various smiling poses. Mr. Kerch wore a light business suit, his wife had on a dark dress and a cloth coat and the boy wore a dark suit with knee-length pants. In the background stood a tree with bare branches. I glanced up at Mr. Kerch, signifying that I had finished my study of the photographs.
“The last picture,” he said, holding it in his hand ready to give to me, “I took exactly like the others. We agreed on the pose, I set the camera, walked around in front, and joined my family. Monday night I developed the whole roll. This is what came out on the last negative.” He handed me the photograph.
For an instant it seemed to me like merely one more photograph in the group; then I saw the difference. Mr. Kerch looked much the same, bareheaded and grinning broadly, but he wore an entirely different suit. The boy, standing beside him, wore long pants, was a good three inches taller, obviously older, but equally obviously the same boy. The woman was an entirely different person. Dressed smartly, her light hair catching the sun, she was very pretty and attractive. She was smiling into the camera and holding Mr. Kerch’s hand.
I looked up at him. “Who is this?”
Wearily, Mr. Kerch shook his head. “I don’t know,” he said suddenly, then exploded: “I don’t know! I’ve never seen her in my life!” He turned to look at his wife, but she would not return his glance, and he turned back to me, shrugging. “Well, there you have it,” he said. “The whole story.” And he stood up, thrusting both hands into his trouser pockets and began to pace about the room, glancing often at his wife, talking to her actually, though he addressed his words to me. “So who is she? How could the camera have snapped that picture? I’ve never seen that woman in my life!”
I glanced at the photograph again, then bent closer. “The trees here are in full bloom,” I said. Behind the solemn-faced boy, the grinning man and smiling woman, the trees of Central Park were in full summer leaf.
Mr. Kerch nodded. “I know,” he said bitterly. “And you know what she says?” he burst out, glaring at his wife. “She says that is my wife in the photograph, my new wife a couple of years from now! God!” He snapped both hands down on his head. “The ideas a woman can get!”
“What do you mean?” I glanced at Mrs. Kerch, but she ignored me, remaining silent, her lips tight.
Kerch shrugged hopelessly. “She says that photograph shows how things will be a couple of years from now. She’ll be dead or”—he hesitated, then said the word bitterly—“divorced, and I’ll have our son and be married to the woman in the picture.”
We both looked at Mrs. Kerch, waiting until she was obliged to speak.
“Well, if it isn’t so,” she said, shrugging a shoulder, “then tell me what that picture does mean.”
Neither of us could answer that, and a few minutes later I left. There was nothing much I could say to the Kerches; certainly I couldn’t mention my conviction that, whatever the explanation of the last photograph their married life was over? . . .
Case 72. Lieutenant Alfred Eichler, New York Police Department, age thirty-three.
In the late evening of January 9, 1951, two policemen found a revolver lying just off a gravel path near an East Side entrance to Central Park. The gun was examined for fingerprints at the police laboratory and several were found. One bullet had been fired from the revolver and the police fired another which was studied and classified by a ballistics expert. The fingerprints were checked and found in police files; they were those of a minor hoodlum with a record of assault.
A routine order to pick him up was sent out. A detective called at the rooming house where he was known to live, but he was out, and since no unsolved shootings had occurred recently, no intensive search for him was made that night.
The following evening a man was shot and killed in Central Park with the same gun. This was proved ballistically past all question of error. It was soon learned that the murdered man had been quarreling with a friend in a nearby tavern. The two men, both drunk, had left the tavern together. And the second man was the hoodlum whose gun had been found the previous night and which was still locked in a police safe.
As Lieutenant Eichler said to me, “It’s impossible that the
dead man was killed with that same gun, but he was. Don’t ask me how, though, and if anybody thinks we’d go into court with a case like that, they’re crazy.”
Case 111. Captain Hubert V. Rihm, New York Police Department, retired, aged sixty-six.
I met Captain Rihm by appointment one morning in Stuyvesant Park, a patch of greenery, wood benches and asphalt surrounded by the city on lower Second Avenue. “You want to hear about the Fentz case, do you?” he said, after we had introduced ourselves and found an empty bench. “All right, I’ll tell you. I don’t like to talk about it—it bothers me—but I’d like to see what you think.” He was a big, rather heavy man with a red, tough face, and he wore an old police jacket and uniform cap with the insignia removed.
“1 was up at City Mortuary,” he began as I took out my notebook and pencil, “at Bellevue about twelve one night, drinking coffee with one of the interns. This was in June of 1950, just before I retired, and I was in Missing Persons. They brought this guy in and he was a funny-looking character. Had a beard. A young guy, maybe thirty, but he wore regular muttonchop whiskers, and his clothes were funny-looking. Now I was thirty years on the force and I’ve seen a lot of queer guys killed on the streets. We found an Arab once in full regalia, and it took us a week to find out who he was. So it wasn’t just the way the guy looked that bothered me; it was the stuff we found in his pockets.”
Captain Rihm turned on the bench to see if he’d caught my interest, then continued. “There was about a dollar in change in the dead guy’s pocket, and one of the boys picked up a nickel and showed it to me. Now you’ve seen plenty of nickels, the new ones with Jefferson’s picture, the buffalo nickels they made before that, and once in a while you still even see the old Liberty-head nickels; they quit making them before the first world war. But this one was even older than that. It had a shield on the front, a United States shield, and a big five on the back; I used to see that kind when I was a boy. And the funny thing was, that old nickel looked new; what coin dealers call ‘mint condition,’ like it was made the day before yesterday. The date on that nickel was 1876, and there wasn’t a coin in his pocket dated any later.”
Captain Rihm looked at me questioningly. “Well,” I said, glancing up from my notebook, “that could happen.”
“Sure it could,” he answered in a satisfied tone, “but all the pennies he had were Indian-head pennies. Now when did you see one of them last? There was even a silver three-cent piece; looked like an old-style dime, only smaller. And the bills in his wallet, every one of them, were old-time bills, the big kind.”
Captain Rihm leaned forward and spat on the patch, a needle jet of tobacco juice and an expression of a policeman’s annoyed contempt for anything deviating from an orderly norm.
“Over seventy bucks in cash, and not a federal reserve note in the lot. There were two yellow-back tens. Remember them? They were payable in gold. The rest were old national-bank notes; you remember them too. Issued direct by local banks, personally signed by the bank president; that kind used to be counterfeited a lot.
“Well,” Captain Rihm continued, leaning back on the bench and crossing his knees, “there was a bill in his pocket from a livery stable on Lexington Avenue; three dollars for feeding and stabling his horse and washing a carriage. There was a brass slug in his pocket good for a five-cent beer at some saloon. There was a letter postmarked Philadelphia, June 1876, with an old-style two-cent stamp and a bunch of cards in his wallet. The cards had his name and address on them, and so did the letter.”
“Oh,” I said, a little surprised, “you identified him right away, then?”
“Sure. Rudolph Fentz, some address on Fifth Avenue—I forget the exact number—in New York City. No problem at all.” Captain Rihm leaned forward and spat again. “Only that address wasn’t a residence. It’s a store, and it had been for years, and nobody there ever heard of any Rudolph Fentz, and there’s no such name in the phone book either. Nobody ever called or made any inquiries about the guy, and Washington didn’t have his prints. There was a tailor’s name in his coat, a lower Broadway address, but nobody there ever heard of this tailor.”
“What was so strange about his clothes?”
The captain said, “Well, did you ever know anyone who wore a pair of pants with big black-and-white checks, cut very narrow, no cuffs, and pressed without a crease?”
I had to think for a moment. “Yes,” I said then, “my father, when he was a very young man, before he was married; I’ve seen old photographs.”
“Sure,” said Captain Rihm, “and he probably wore a short sort of cutaway coat with two cloth-covered buttons at the back, a vest with lapels, a tall silk hat, a big, black oversized bow tie on a turned-up stiff collar and button shoes.”
“That’s how this man was dressed?”
“Like seventy-five years ago! And him no more than thirty years old. There was a label in his hat, a Twenty-third Street hat store that went out of business around the turn of the century. Now what do you make out of a thing like that?”
“Well,” I said carefully, “there’s nothing much you can make of it. Apparently someone went to a lot of trouble to dress up in an antique style—the coins and bills I assume he could buy at a coin dealer’s—and then he got himself killed in a traffic accident.”
“Got himself killed is right. Eleven-fifteen at night in Times Square—the theaters letting out, busiest time and place in the world—and this guy shows up in the middle of the street, gawking and looking around at the cars and up at the signs like he’d never seen them before. The cop on duty noticed him, so you can see how he must have been acting. The lights change, the traffic starts up, with him in the middle of the street, and instead of waiting, the damn fool, he turns and tries to make it back to the sidewalk. A cab got him and he was dead when he hit.”
For a moment Captain Rihm sat chewing his tobacco and staring angrily at a young woman pushing a baby carriage, though I’m sure he didn’t see her. The young mother looked at him in surprise as she passed, and the captain continued:
“Nothing you can make out of a thing like that. We found out nothing. I started checking through our file of old phone books, just as routine, but without much hope because they only go back so far. But in the 1939 summer edition I found a Rudolph Fentz, Jr., somewhere on East Fifty-second Street. He’d moved away in ’forty-two, though, the building super told me, and was a man in his sixties besides, retired from business; used to work in a bank a few blocks away, the super thought. I found the bank where he’d worked and they told me he’d retired in ’forty, and had been dead for five years; his widow was living in Florida with a sister.
“I wrote to the widow, but there was only one thing she could tell us, and that was no good. I never even reported it, not officially, anyway. Her husband’s father had disappeared when her husband was a boy maybe two years old. He went out for a walk around ten one night—his wife thought cigar smoke smelled up the curtains, so he used to take a little stroll before he went to bed and smoke a cigar—and he didn’t come back and was never seen or heard of again. The family spent a good deal of money trying to locate him, but they never did. This was in the middle 1870s some time; the old lady wasn’t sure of the exact date. Her husband hadn’t ever said too much about it.
“And that’s all,” said Captain Rihm. “Once I put in one of my afternoons of hunting through a bunch of old police records. And I finally found the missing persons file for 1876, and Rudolph Fentz was listed, all right. There wasn’t much of a description, and no fingerprints, of course. I’d give a year of my life, even now, and maybe sleep better nights, if they’d had his fingerprints. He was listed as twenty-nine years old, wearing full muttonchop whiskers, a tall silk hat, dark coat and checked pants. That’s about all it said. Didn’t say what kind of tie or vest or if his shoes were the button kind. His name was Rudolph Fentz and he lived at this address on Fifth Avenue; it must have been a residence then. Final disposition of case: not located.
�
�Now, I hate that case,” Captain Rihm said quietly. “I hate it and I wish I’d never heard of it. What do you think?” he demanded suddenly, angrily. “You think this guy walked off into thin air in 1876 and showed up again in 1950?”
I shrugged noncommittally, and the captain took it to mean no.
“No, of course not,” he said. “Of course not—but give me some other explanation.”
I could go on. I could give you several hundred such cases. A sixteen-year-old girl walked out of her bedroom one morning, carrying her clothes in her hand because they were too big for her and she was quite obviously eleven years old again. And there are other occurrences too horrible for print. All of them have happened in the New York City area alone, all within the last few years; and I suspect thousands more have occurred and are occurring, all over the world. I could go on, but the point is this: What is happening, and why? I believe that I know.
Haven’t you noticed, too, on the part of nearly everyone you know, a growing rebellion against the present? And an increasing longing for the past? I have. Never before in all my long life have I heard so many people wish that they lived “at the turn of the century” or “when life was simpler” or “worth living” or “when you could bring children into the world and count on the future” or simply “in the good old days.” People didn’t talk that way when I was young! The present was a glorious time! But they talk that way now.
For the first time in man’s history, man is desperate to escape the present. Our newsstands are jammed with escape literature, the very name of which is significant. Entire magazines are devoted to fantastic stories of escape—to other times, past and future, to other worlds and planets—escape to anywhere but here and now. Even our larger magazines, book publishers and Hollywood are beginning to meet the rising demand for this kind of escape. Yes, there is a craving in the world like a thirst, a terrible mass pressure that you can almost feel, of millions of minds struggling against the barriers of time. I am utterly convinced that this terrible mass pressure of millions of minds is already, slightly but definitely, affecting time itself. In the moments when this happens—when the almost universal longing is greatest—my incidents occur. Man is disturbing the clock of time, and I am afraid it will break. When it does, I leave to your imagination the last few hours of madness that will be left to us; all the countless moments that now make up our lives suddenly ripped apart and chaotically tangled in time.
Harry Turtledove Page 9