Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews

Home > Other > Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews > Page 57
Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews Page 57

by Peter Longerich


  quickly as possible that Jews employed in the German armaments business be

  replaced by foreign workers’. 25 In view of the transport moratorium imposed in mid-June, the RSHA initially deported mainly elderly Jews to Theresienstadt, but

  in September 1942 Hitler was to stress once again, at a conference on armaments,

  that ‘withdrawing the Jews from the armaments factories in the Reich’ was of

  prime importance. 26

  But it was not only the concentration camp system that was restructured

  through the policy of ‘extermination through work’ between autumn 1941 and

  spring 1942. The impact of the new policy may also be observed in occupied

  Poland, both in annexed Upper Silesia and in the General Government.

  We have already described how in the camps of the Schmelt Organization in

  Upper Silesia, which held 30,000 to 40,000 Jewish forced labourers in spring 1942,

  Extermination on a European Scale, 1942

  319

  selections had been carried out since November 1941, sporadically at first, but soon

  systematically, and those no longer fit for work were brought to Auschwitz, where

  they were murdered. 27

  In the ghettos and labour camps of the General Government there had also

  been high mortality rates before, but that had been part of the German policy of

  general decimation of the Jewish population, in which the ‘Final Solution’ had

  been deferred until the post-war period. Initially from autumn 1941, but more

  intensively from spring 1942, the system of ‘extermination through work’, along-

  side the gas chambers, executions, and deportations, became a leading element in

  the systematic murder of the Jews of the General Government.

  In autumn 1941 in the district of Galicia, the SS launched what was probably

  the largest forced labour project in which a Jewish labour-force was deployed:

  the expansion of the strategically important road connection from Lemberg

  (Lvov) towards the Donets basin, known as Durchgangsstrasse (transit road)

  IV (DG IV). 28 In October 1941 Fritz Katzmann, the SSPF of the district of Galicia, had thousands of Jews put in concentration camps to work on road

  construction under the most severe conditions. Katzmann’s verbal instruction to

  the director of the camp was to shoot any Jews who were unfit for work or who

  tried to escape, and to kill hostages for any escapees who were not caught; the

  number of victims was a matter of indifference. Early in 1942 Himmler trans-

  ferred to a series of SSPFs responsibility for the extension of further sections of

  DG IV in the Ukraine, and on 7 February he transferred the overall running of

  the project to the HSSPF of Ukraine and southern Russia, Prützmann. An order

  issued by the Führer on 19 February placed extremely high priority on the

  expansion of major communications, including the DG IV.

  Using key German workers, members of the OT, about 50,000 Ukrainian

  forced labourers, as many prisoners of war, and some 10,000 Jews were deployed

  on DG IV in 1942. The existence of some thirty camps for Jewish workers in the

  construction sector has been demonstrated, and some twenty more on the

  Ukrainian part of the road. 29 The running of the extremely primitive camps, in which disastrous conditions prevailed, was placed in the hands of members of the

  SS and the police; in some cases it was also exercised by OT staff, and the camps

  were guarded by police and local guard units. After all those new prisoners who

  arrived in the camp who were ‘not fit for work’ (old people, children, the sick) had

  been singled out and murdered, camp inmates were constantly being shot for

  inadequate levels of work, minor infringements of camp regulations, or purely on

  a whim. When the work came to an end late in 1943/early in 1944, other large-scale

  shootings occurred. Eighty-four shootings have been identified, in which some

  25,000 Jews were murdered. 30

  The forced labour project for the expansion of DG IV can be seen as a

  pilot project for the takeover of all the forced labour in the General Government

  by the SS and police leaders in spring/summer 1942. As we will show, 31

  320

  Extermination of the European Jew, 1942–1945

  the ‘deployment’ of Jewish workers did not, from the point of view of

  the SS leadership, contradict the extermination policy, but formed an integral

  part of it.

  Deportations from Central and Western Europe

  The deportations which resumed on a large scale in 1942 were preceded in January

  and February 1942 by a series of public declarations by Hitler, in which he

  unambiguously recalled his ‘prophecy’ of January 1939, that in the event of a new

  ‘world war’ the Jews would be ‘exterminated’. Pertinent passages appear both in his

  New Year proclamation, 32 his speech in the Sportpalast on the anniversary of the

  ‘seizure of power’, 33 and in his declaration on the occasion of the celebration of the twenty-second anniversary of the Party’s Foundation on 24 February 1942.34 The fact that with America’s entry into the war National Socialist Germany was

  actually waging a world war, Hitler’s constant habit of dating his prophecy to

  the day of the outbreak of war, and the fact that he now no longer spoke of

  ‘destroying’ (vernichten), but of ‘exterminating’ (ausrotten), gave his threat a

  particular emphasis.

  The Third and Fourth Wave of Deportation from the

  Greater German Reich

  The further deportations from the Reich, which began in substantial numbers in

  the spring of 1942, were announced in a dispatch from Eichmann to the Gestapo

  regional and district headquarters dated 31 January 1942.35 In it he wrote that the

  ‘recent evacuation of Jews to the East carried out in individual areas’ represented

  ‘the beginning of the final solution of the Jewish question in the Old Reich, the

  Ostmark, and the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia’. However, at that point,

  ‘only some state police [Gestapo] headquarters could be involved in view of

  limited reception possibilities in the East and difficulties with transport’. But

  ‘new reception possibilities [would be] worked on with the aim of deporting

  further contingents of Jews’.

  The dispatch also identified those groups of people who were not yet to be

  deported: Jews living in ‘mixed marriages’, Jews of foreign citizenship (excluding

  stateless Jews as well as those of former Polish and Luxembourg citizenship); ‘Jews

  in closed strategic work programmes’ as well as the elderly and the frail. The

  separation of married couples as well as the separation from their families of

  children up to the age of 14 years was to be avoided.

  On 6 March 1942 Eichmann held a meeting with the representatives of the

  Gestapo headquarters or Gestapo offices which were entrusted with the task of

  Extermination on a European Scale, 1942

  321

  carrying out the deportations. Here it became clear that by this time a further

  Reich-wide deportation programme had been established. 36 Eichmann announced that at first 55,000 Jews would be deported from the Reich territory including the

  ‘Ostmark’ and the Protectorate: 20,000 Jews were to be evacuated from Prague,

  18,000 from Vienna. ‘The size of the other transports conforms proportionally to

  the numbers
of Jews still present in each State Police office/headquarters precinct.’

  Individually, the transports could not be assigned a precise time. All that was

  available were ‘empty “Russian trains”/worker transports to the Old Reich, which

  were going back empty to the General Government and will now be used by the

  RSHA with the agreement of the OKH’.

  Eichmann also announced that it was intended that most of the Jews left in

  the Old Reich would in all likelihood be deported to Theresienstadt in the course

  of the summer or the autumn. Theresienstadt was being cleared at the time,

  and ‘15–20,000 Jews from the Protectorate could move there temporarily’. This

  would be done, Eichmann added, in order to ‘preserve outward appearances’—a

  reference to the fact that the RSHA had internally reached the conclusion that the

  pretext for the deportations, the supposed ‘work programme’ in the East, could be

  easily seen through if, as had happened previously, old people were also deported

  to the East European ghettos.

  The third wave of deportations from the Reich was in the end to last from

  mid-March to mid-June, and there are at least forty-three transports that are

  individually known about; it may, however, have been over sixty, so that, if we

  assume an average of 1,000 people per transport, a figure on the scale cited by

  Eichmann of 55,000 deportees would probably have been reached. 37

  The identifiable transports came primarily from the areas of the Old Reich that

  were considered to be in danger from air raids (twenty-three trains) and from the

  Protectorate (fourteen trains from Theresienstadt as well as one from Prague).

  They were destined for a series of ghettos in the district of Lublin (particularly

  Izbica, Piaski, Zamozc), whose inhabitants had been murdered in Belzec a short

  time previously. Four transports ended in the Warsaw ghetto. 38 As a rule the deportation trains from the Reich stopped in Lublin, where men who were

  assessed as ‘fit for work’ were taken from the trains and brought to the Majdanek

  camp. 39

  Hence the pattern of deportations of the Central European Jews and the murder

  of the Jews of Eastern Europe corresponded to events already described that took

  place in Lodz, Riga, and Minsk. The living conditions in the ghettos of the General

  Government led to the miserable death of by far the majority of deportees within a

  few months. Those who did not die in the ghettos were generally deported to the

  extermination camps in the General Government.

  The surviving documents of the German administration in the district of Lublin

  indicate that here—under the designation ‘Judenaustausch’ (exchange of Jews)—the

  322

  Extermination of the European Jew, 1942–1945

  indigenous Jews were ‘taken out’ of the individual communities (i.e. sent to Belzec),

  and replaced by ‘Reich Jews’. 40

  The ‘Judenreferent’ (expert on Jewish affairs) of the SSPF Lublin and coordin-

  ator of the deportation and extermination programme in the district, Hans Höfle,

  asked the district administration on 16 March, in other words immediately before

  the arrival of the first transports, ‘whether 60,000 Jews could be unloaded on the

  stretch between Lublin and Trawniki’. 41 As surprising as this announcement was, over the next few months the district administration was only informed at short

  notice about the arriving trains, whose inmates it then distributed summarily, and

  in agreement with the SSPF (Höfle), to the Jewish residential quarters, which he

  had recently ‘cleared’. 42 Through this improvised procedure and the chaotic conditions that prevailed as a result of it, the district administration was placed

  under the pressure of artificially created ‘factual constraints’; the deportations of

  the indigenous Jews, who had to make way for the impending arrival of the ‘Reich

  Jews’, thus appeared as the inevitable consequence of a decision that had been

  made outside their own sphere of responsibility.

  Towards the end of the third wave of deportations, in June 1942, some trans-

  ports had been assembled that deviated from the previous pattern: on 10 June 1942,

  in ‘retaliation’ for the death of Heydrich, 1,000 Jews were deported from Prague

  to Majdanek and placed both there and in the camps in the surrounding area. 43

  Finally, from mid-June the last transports of the third wave were directed

  towards Sobibor extermination camp, where the majority of deportees were

  murdered in the gas chambers, after even smaller groups of people had been

  taken off the trains during a stop in Lublin. This is attested with certainty for a

  transport from Theresienstadt, one from Berlin and one from Vienna, which

  arrived in Sobibor between 15 and 19 June. It is possible that exactly the same

  fate befell the people on two further Theresienstadt transports which reached

  the district of Lublin on 15 and 16 June. 44 As early as 18 May, however, half of a group of around 800 people who had been deported from Theresienstadt to

  Siedliszcze, had been brought to Sobibor along with the indigenous Jews and

  murdered there. 45

  But the actual turning point in the deportation practice occurred only in the

  middle of June 1942: only from that point onwards were Jews on the trains from

  the Reich, after the selection of those ‘fit for work’ in Lublin, generally sent directly to the extermination camps.

  While the third wave continued, in May 1942 a fourth wave of deportations

  arrived from the Reich, destined for the occupied Eastern regions. As already

  described, the deportations to Minsk planned during the second wave were

  interrupted in November 1941, and only continued until February 1942 in the

  case of Riga. The transports to Minsk now resumed; between May and September,

  in at least seventeen transports, 46 some 16,000 people were deported from the territory of the ‘Greater German Reich’, interrupted only from mid-June to

  Extermination on a European Scale, 1942

  323

  mid-July by a military transport moratorium: now those deported to Minsk were

  no longer confined to the ghetto, and instead the trains were moved on to a stop

  near the estate of Maly Trostinets, where from 11 May 1942 almost all deportees

  were shot on the spot or murdered in gas vans. 47 In April 1942 Heydrich is supposed to have announced the resumption of deportations and the impending

  murders during a visit to Minsk. 48

  Thus, with the deportations to Minsk in May and the transports to Sobibor in

  mid-June, a new phase of the extermination policy began. Now the deportees were

  no longer accommodated temporarily in ghettos or labour camps, before perish-

  ing as a result of the disastrous living conditions, or being murdered in an

  extermination camp on the grounds that they were no longer ‘fit for work’; now

  the great majority of deportees were shot directly at the end of the journey or

  suffocated in gas vans. The previous pattern, according to which the indigenous

  Jews were deported to the extermination camps to ‘make room’ for the Jews

  arriving from the Reich had thus been abandoned. The murder machinery was

  thus completely freed from the context of ‘resettlement’, ‘expulsion’, and ‘work

  programme’; the goal, the death of the deportees, thus emerged with even greater


  clarity.

  As long as the murder machinery was contained within the old pattern, it was at

  least possible to maintain the fiction that the murders were the result of ‘factual

  constraints’ produced by ‘resettlement’ and the ‘work programme’: the ‘clearing’

  of the ghettos for the suddenly arriving deportees; execution of deportees from the

  Reich because there were no adequate reception facilities (as in Riga and Kovno

  (Kaunas) in late 1941); the selection of those no longer fit for work, as ‘room was

  needed’ again, and ‘no food was available’; ruthless deployment for forced labour

  in the service of the war economy; renewed selection. Because of the systematically

  excessive demands made upon them the local offices of the civil administration

  and the security police were placed in situations that spasmodically required more

  and more radical solutions, or which offered them a framework of action in which

  such radical solutions could be presented as ‘factually justified’.

  The transport moratorium introduced for the West–East railway in June saw

  the start of the deportations of those people from the Reich who, as Eichmann had

  announced in January, had for various reason been exempted from the ‘Eastern

  transports’; these were elderly and frail people, decorated veterans with their wives

  and children under the age of 14, and Jewish spouses from a ‘mixed marriage’ that

  no longer existed, who were freed from labelling regulations, as well as single ‘half-

  breeds’ who were ‘deemed’ to be Jews under the Nuremberg Laws. These deport-

  ations went to Theresienstadt, 49 which served not only as the ‘old people’s ghetto’

  for German Jews, but also above all as a transit camp for those deported from the

  Protectorate, who numbered around 74,000. 50

  In June and July 1942 a total of sixteen special trains each carrying about 1,000

  elderly people from the Reich set off for Theresienstadt; after a further timetable

  324

  Extermination of the European Jew, 1942–1945

  programme decided in early August, twenty-one further special trains followed

  between mid-August and early October. On top of this, because of the transport

 

‹ Prev