I Never Metaphor I Didn't Like

Home > Other > I Never Metaphor I Didn't Like > Page 1
I Never Metaphor I Didn't Like Page 1

by Mardy Grothe




  I Never Metaphor I Didn’t Like

  A Comprehensive Compilation of History’s Greatest Analogies, Metaphors, and Similes

  Dr. Mardy Grothe

  To my very special grandson

  Ryan Matthew Wood,

  who at the age of eight

  already knows about chiasmus and oxymoronica

  and will soon be learning about

  analogies, metaphors, and similes

  Contents

  Introduction

  Chapter 1: An Ice-Axe for the Frozen Sea Within

  (Life-Altering Metaphors)

  Chapter 2: Reserved Seats at a Banquet of Consequences

  (The Human Condition)

  Chapter 3: Humor Is the Shock Absorber of Life

  (Wit & Humor)

  Chapter 4: The Lights May Be on, but Nobody’s Home

  (Insults & Criticism)

  Chapter 5: Enclosing Wild Ideas Within a Wall of Words

  (Definitive Metaphors)

  Chapter 6: Life Is the Art of Drawing Without an Eraser

  (Life)

  Chapter 7: A Relationship Is Like a Shark

  (Relationships)

  Chapter 8: Love Is an Exploding Cigar We Willingly Smoke

  (Love)

  Chapter 9: Marriage Is a Souvenir of Love

  (Marriage, Home & Family Life)

  Chapter 10: Sex Is an Emotion in Motion

  (Sex)

  Chapter 11: Old & Young, We Are All on Our Last Cruise

  (Ages & Stages of Life)

  Chapter 12: An Actor Is a God in Captivity

  (Stage & Screen)

  Chapter 13: Washington, D.C., Is to Lying What Wisconsin Is to Cheese

  (Politics)

  Chapter 14: Sports Is the Toy Department of Life

  (Sports)

  Chapter 15: Writing Is the Manual Labor of the Mind

  (The Literary Life)

  Acknowledgments

  Searchable Terms

  About the Author

  Other Books by Dr. Mardy Grothe

  Credits

  Copyright

  About the Publisher

  introduction

  The sentence you are reading at this very moment is an example of prose (the word comes from the Latin prosa, meaning “straightforward”). Prose is the language people generally use to transmit information and express ideas. Closely resembling the patterns of everyday speech, prose is the kind of writing typically found in books, newspapers, and magazines. These are examples:

  Prose and poetry are two methods

  people can use to express ideas.

  A committee is a questionable mechanism

  for making decisions or solving problems.

  Adolescence is a time of great turmoil.

  Every now and then, though, prose is spiced up and becomes more fanciful:

  Prose is to poetry as walking is to dancing.

  PAUL VALÉRY

  A committee is a cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled.

  BARNETT COCKS

  Adolescence is a kind of emotional seasickness.

  ARTHUR KOESTLER

  In the first set of observations, the prose is straightforward but prosaic, meaning it lacks imagination and even borders on dull. In the second set, the prose is enhanced by analogies, metaphors, and similes, a trio of extremely valuable tools at the disposal of writers, orators, and poets. With the assistance of these three stylistic devices, ordinary language is elevated, often to an extraordinary degree. This is undoubtedly what the nineteenth-century American journalist and poet William Cullen Bryant had in mind when he wrote:

  Eloquence is the poetry of prose.

  This book will celebrate history’s most spectacular examples of poetic prose—all constructed by the use of analogies, metaphors, and similes. Let’s begin by meeting the key players.

  ANALOGY

  From the dawn of civilization, human beings have tried to understand one thing by relating it to something else. This approach—called analogical thinking—has been extremely helpful as people try to make sense out of a world that can often seem confusing or even incomprehensible.

  Formally, an analogy is an attempt to state a relationship between two things that don’t initially appear to have much in common (the word derives from the Greek word analogia, formally meaning a “proportionate” relationship between two pairs of things). In what may be the oldest analogy ever recorded, from around 1350 B.C., the Egyptian pharaoh Akhenaton was said to have observed:

  As the moon retains her nature,

  though darkness spread itself before her face as a curtain,

  so the Soul remains perfect

  even in the bosom of the fool.

  In this ancient observation, the pharaoh was drawing an analogy between the moon hidden behind a curtain of darkness and a soul hidden behind a curtain of foolishness. Both continue to exist, he maintains, even when they cannot be seen. For many centuries, analogies have been used to instruct people and to dispense moral lessons. In this case, the ethical principle embedded in the analogy might be expressed this way: don’t be too quick to shun or reject people, for behind all foolish or inappropriate actions there exists a perfect soul within.

  While analogical thinking goes back to the oldest days of antiquity, people thinking about analogies these days are likely to recall those peculiar and often perplexing constructions that have long been a staple of intelligence tests and scholastic aptitude tests. The format will probably be familiar to you:

  illness : life :: (blank) : iron

  a. steel b. blade c. forge d. rust

  Following a convention going back to ancient times, the analogy is read this way:

  “Illness is to life as (blank) is to iron.”

  The task here is to figure out which one of the four multiple-choice options bears the same relationship to iron as illness does to life. After a moment’s thought, the answer is easily reasoned out. Just as illness can threaten or end a life, rust can threaten or destroy iron.

  In the fourth century B.C., the Greek philosopher Antisthenes found another aspect of the human experience that was analogous to iron and rust:

  As iron is eaten away by rust,

  so the envious are consumed by their own passion.

  Rather than simply assert that envy is a destructive passion, Antisthenes begins by taking a phenomenon that is well known—the damaging effect of rust on iron—and relates it to something not so familiar—the damaging effect of envy on people. By expressing his thought in an analogy, he made it very easy for people to forge a mental picture of the slow, corrosive process whereby one thing gradually eats away and eventually destroys something else.

  People who say “Let me offer an analogy” are trying to explain one thing by relating it to something else. The entry on analogy in The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms explains it this way:

  Illustration of an idea by means of a more familiar idea that is similar or parallel to it, and thus said to be analogous to it.

  Structurally, analogies are often constructed in the A is to B as C is to D format:

  Reading is to the mind,

  what exercise is to the body.

  JOSEPH ADDISON

  As cold waters to a thirsty soul,

  so is good news from a far country.

  THE BIBLE—PROVERBS 25:25

  As soap is to the body,

  tears are to the soul.

  YIDDISH PROVERB

  What garlic is to salad,

  insanity is to art.

  AUGUSTUS SAINT-GAUDENS

  Sometimes the format is varied slightly, and the intention shifts from the serious to the humorous:

&
nbsp; The murals in restaurants are

  on a par with the food in museums.

  PETER DE VRIES

  And sometimes an additional explanation is appended after the formal analogy, just to make sure the point is understood:

  Doing business without advertising is like winking at a girl in the dark.

  You know what you are doing, but nobody else does.

  STUART H. BRITT

  Al Capone was to crime what J. P. Morgan was to Wall Street,

  the first man to exert national influence over his trade.

  ANDREW SINCLAIR

  Analogies form the basis for much of the thinking people do about life. When we encounter something new and unfamiliar—or try to make sense out of something that is not well understood—we often benefit from relating it to something else we know well. Sigmund Freud expressed it nicely:

  Analogies, it is true, decide nothing,

  but they can make one feel more at home.

  In 2006, seventy-eight-year-old Harry Whittington was accidentally shot in the face by Vice President Dick Cheney in a celebrated hunting accident. When it became apparent that Whittington’s wounds were not life threatening—and that he was expected to fully recover—countless jokes from comedians and late-night talk-show hosts filled the airwaves. I’m sure you recall some of them.

  Whittington, it was soon learned, was an Austin attorney, a successful real-estate investor, and a long-time member of the Texas Republican party. Early in his career, when LBJ and the Democrats were in control of the Lone Star State, Whittington was the only Republican serving on the board of the Texas Department of Corrections. As he learned more about the grim reality of incarceration, he made an unsettling discovery. Yes, prisons get criminals off the street, but they do a miserable job of rehabilitation and, ironically, may even stimulate further criminal behavior. He began to express his view this way:

  Prisons are to crime what greenhouses are to plants.

  In his analogy between prison life and the world of horticulture, Whittington made a compelling point—as greenhouses foster the growth of budding plants, prisons are excellent breeding grounds for future criminal behavior.

  Whittington’s observation illustrates an important point about analogies—when they are well-crafted, they have a ring of truth to them. As a result, analogies have long been considered one of the best ways to communicate profound ideas. Henry David Thoreau was thinking along these lines when he wrote:

  All perception of truth is the perception of an analogy.

  Analogies have enjoyed a long and honored history in philosophical and political discourse, but they have also been favored by orators, writers, artists, actors, and humorists. When comedic actor Harvey Korman turned seventy-seven in 2004, he was asked if he was using the erectile dysfunction drug Viagra. He replied:

  The idea of using Viagra at my age is like erecting

  a brand-new flag pole in front of a condemned building.

  Similarly, out of all the complaints of bloated government spending and the questionable competence of our elected leaders, few can match the inspired analogy of P. J. O’Rourke in his 1991 classic, Parliament of Whores:

  Giving money and power to government

  is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.

  Analogical phrasing is only one tool available to people interested in more eloquently expressing their ideas. Another device—and a close cousin to the analogy—is the metaphor.

  METAPHOR

  If an analogy can be formatted as A is to B as C is to D, a metaphor is the flat assertion that A is B. Even though analogies and metaphors are constructed slightly differently, they share one essential feature—they try to capture a key aspect of one thing by relating it to something else. In one of his many collections of aphorisms, the American writer Mason Cooley wrote:

  A skyscraper is a boast in glass and steel.

  Notice that Cooley does not suggest that a skyscraper is like a boast—which would make it a simile—he maintains that it is a boast, fulfilling the A is B requirement and making it a metaphor. To demonstrate the close relationship between metaphors and analogies, notice how easy it is to transform the observation into an analogy:

  A skyscraper is in architecture as a boast is in interpersonal relations.

  I came across Cooley’s observation some years ago, and now rarely visit a major American city without having it come to mind. This happens routinely with metaphors—the best ones take up permanent residence in our minds.

  There is one other thing about the Cooley metaphor that may not be apparent. A skyscraper is a building, not a boast, so the statement is not literally true. All metaphors are violations of logic in the sense that they assert that two different things are the same. In the fascinating world of human discourse, we make allowances for such flights of fancy by calling them figuratively true. Like leaps of faith in religion, when people believe things that cannot be proved, we make leaps of logic when we use metaphors—we say something is true, even when we know it is literally untrue or logically false. This shows up the following observations, which also—it should be noted—help us see familiar things in new ways:

  Worry is interest paid on trouble before it falls due.

  W. R. INGE

  Art is the sex of the imagination.

  GEORGE JEAN NATHAN

  America is an enormous frosted cupcake in the middle of millions of starving people.

  GLORIA STEINEM

  In some metaphorical observations, the formal metaphor is not obvious:

  Art washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life.

  PABLO PICASSO

  Here, the formal A is B assertion is not explicitly stated. But it is clearly suggested—art (is a liquid that) washes. The observation also illustrates the difference between literal and figurative truth. In real life, art cannot wash anything. And a soul doesn’t literally accumulate dust. But by imbuing art with the cleansing properties of water, Picasso offers a memorable metaphor. If you examine the observation closely, you can also discern the underlying analogy—as water is a cleanser for the body, art is a cleanser for the soul.

  All the observations we have just seen are examples of prose, but none are prosaic. Some even rise to the level of eloquence described earlier as the poetry of prose. And they all meet the definition of a metaphor, according to the American Heritage Dictionary:

  A figure of speech in which a word or phrase that ordinarily designates one thing is used to designate another, thus making an implicit comparison, as in “a sea of troubles” or “All the world’s a stage.”

  The word metaphor made its first appearance in English in 1533. It derives from two Greek roots: meta, meaning “over, beyond” and pheiren, meaning “to carry, transfer.” The root sense of the word is to carry a word over and beyond its original meaning by applying it to something else (Aristotle said a metaphor was giving a thing a name that belonged to something else). And that is exactly what Shakespeare does in his famous passage from As You Like It:

  All the world’s a stage,

  And all the men and women merely players.

  They have their exits and entrances,

  And one man in his time plays many parts….

  Shakespeare might have expressed the thought in a formal analogy (people are to the world as actors are to a stage), but he went with a metaphor instead. He goes on to describe people as actors and then—true to the root sense of the word—carried the metaphor further by referring to exits, entrances, and the many parts played in a lifetime. In the rest of the passage, he went on to describe the seven ages of man, but he could have pursued the metaphor in many other ways. He might have talked about people being well suited—or miscast—for their roles. He might have contrasted lead actors with those in supporting roles. He might have compared award-winning performances with forgettable ones. Once world is metaphorically transformed into stage, then all of the attributes of the target domain (stage) can be applied back to th
e original source domain (world). Notice how Richard Lederer leaps from one conceptual domain to another in this metaphorical gem from Get Thee to a Punnery (1988):

  Puns are a three-way circus of words:

  words clowning, words teetering on tightropes,

  words swinging from tent-tops,

  words thrusting their heads into the mouths of lions.

  A metaphor is a kind of magical mental changing room—where one thing, for a moment, becomes another, and in that moment is seen in a whole new way. It’s like watching a man imitating a woman. We often learn more about the man in the few moments he acts like a woman than we can after years of observing him behave as a man. As soon as something old is seen in a new way, it stimulates a torrent of new thoughts and associations, almost as if a mental floodgate has been lifted. Bernard Malamud put it this way:

  I love metaphor.

  It provides two loaves where there seems to be one.

  Sometimes it throws in a whole load of fish.

  Throughout history, certain rare individuals have demonstrated a special ability to discern a relationship between things that initially seem quite alien to each other. The talent was recognized nearly 2,500 years ago by Aristotle, who observed in Poetics:

 

‹ Prev