Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet?

Home > Christian > Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet? > Page 39
Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet? Page 39

by A. James Kolar


  For the sake of brevity, BPD refers to the Boulder Police Department; BCSO refers to the Boulder County Sheriff’s Department; Boulder D.A. refers to the Boulder District Attorney’s Office; BAU / CASKU refers to the Federal Bureau of Investigation Behavioral Analysis Unit / Child Abduction Serial Killer Unit.

  Steve Ainsworth – BCSO investigator

  Al Alvarado – BPD computer expert

  Kimberly Archuleta – Communications dispatcher that took the 911 call

  Mike Archuleta – John Ramsey’s private pilot

  Ellis Armistead – Ramsey private investigator

  Linda Arndt – BPD investigator

  Sue Barklow – BPD CSI

  Joe and Betty Barnhill – Ramsey neighbors in Boulder

  Mark Beckner – BPD Police Chief, successor to Tom Koby

  Tom Bennett – Retired Arvada PD investigator, hired by Mary Keenan (Lacy) to lead JonBenét’s murder investigation for the DA’s office

  Suzanne Bernhard (Pinto) – Child Psychologist, second person to interview Burke Ramsey

  Dr. Francesco Beuf – JonBenét’s pediatrician

  Patrick Burke – Patsy Ramsey’s attorney

  Michael Bynum – Ramsey friend and attorney

  Dan Caplis – BPD Dream Team organizer

  Laurence “Trip” DeMuth – Boulder County Deputy D.A.

  Jackie Dilson – Former girlfriend of Chris Wolf

  Michael Doberson – Arapahoe County Coroner, involved in stun gun investigation of Gerald Boggs

  John Douglas – Retired FBI BAU profiler hired by Ramsey attorneys

  John Eller – BPD Detective Division Commander

  Jay Elowski “Pasta Jay” – Ramsey friend and owner of Pasta Jay’s restaurant

  Mike Everett – BPD detective and crime scene investigator

  Barbara and John Fernie – Ramsey friends, summoned to home on December 26, 1996

  James R. Fitzgerald – FBI Supervisory Special Agent, Forensic Linguist

  Donald Foster – Vassar University professor and linguistic sleuth

  Rick French – First BPD officer to arrive on the scene on December 26, 1996

  Stan Garnett – Boulder County District Attorney, succeeded Mary Keenan (Lacy)

  Ron Gosage – BPD investigator

  Hal Haddon – Ramsey attorney

  Bill Hagmaier – FBI Special Agent, CASKU

  Tom Haney – Retired Denver Police Homicide Division Commander involved in Ramsey interviews

  Jane Harmer – BPD investigator

  Melissa Hickman – BPD investigator

  Shelly Hisey – BPD Criminalist

  Dan Hoffman – BPD Dream Team attorney

  Linda Hoffmann-Pugh – Ramsey housekeeper, named as first suspect by Ramsey family

  Pete Hoffstrom – Boulder County Deputy District Attorney and chief of the felony trial division

  Alex Hunter – Boulder County District Attorney, succeeded by Mary Keenan (Lacy)

  Greg Idler – BPD investigator

  Jim Jenkins – Ramsey attorney in Atlanta

  Lucinda Johnson – First wife of John Ramsey, mother of Beth, Melinda, and John Andrew Ramsey

  Mary Ann Kaempfer – Mother of Burke Ramsey’s childhood friend

  Mike Kane – Special Prosecutor, Boulder Grand Jury

  John Mark Karr – Arrested by Boulder District Attorney’s Office and extradited from Thailand

  Bob Keatley – BPD in-house attorney

  Mary Keenan (Lacy) – Boulder County District Attorney, succeeded by Stan Garnett

  Jeff Kithcart – BPD forgery investigator, discovered practice ransom note

  Marc Klass – Father of slain daughter, Polly Klass

  Pat Korten – Ramsey public relations specialist

  Barbara Kostanik – mother of JonBenét’s childhood friend

  Greg Laberge – Denver Police Crime Lab Supervisor

  Dr. Henry Lee – Renowned criminalist and forensic scientist

  Stewart Long – Boyfriend / fiancé of Melinda Ramsey

  Larry Mason - BPD Detective Sergeant

  Gregg McCrary – Retired FBI Special Agent, Criminal Profiler

  Carol McKinley – KOA Radio / News reporter

  Bill McReynolds – Played Santa Claus at Ramsey Christmas parties

  Janet McReynolds- Wife of Bill McReynolds

  Glen Meyer – Basement tenant of Joe and Betty Barnhill

  Dr. John Meyer – Boulder County coroner

  Bob Miller – BPD Dream Team attorney

  Bryan Morgan – John Ramsey’s attorney

  Bill Owens – Governor of Colorado, succeeded by John Hickenlooper

  Bill Palmer – BPD investigator, overheard John Ramsey planning to leave state after discovering JonBenét’s body

  Fred Patterson – BPD investigator, first detective to interview Burke Ramsey

  Don Paugh – Father of Patsy Ramsey, grandfather to JonBenét

  Nedra Paugh – Mother of Patsy Ramsey, grandmother to JonBenét

  Pam Paugh – Sister of Patsy Ramsey, former Miss West Virginia

  Polly Paugh (Davis) – Youngest sister of Patsy Ramsey

  Anthony Pecchio – Classmate, friend of Burke Ramsey, accompanied Ramsey family to Atlanta for funeral services

  Burke Ramsey – Older brother to JonBenét, 9 years-old at time of her death

  Elizabeth “Beth” Ramsey – half-sister of JonBenét, eldest child of John Ramsey and former wife Lucinda. Died in traffic accident in 1992

  Jeff Ramsey – Brother of John Ramsey

  John Ramsey – Father of JonBenét, husband of Patsy Ramsey

  John Andrew Ramsey – Older half-brother of JonBenét, third child from John Ramsey’s marriage to Lucinda

  JonBenét Ramsey – Six-year-old victim

  Lucinda Ramsey – See Lucinda Johnson

  Melinda Ramsey – Older half-sister of JonBenét, second child from John Ramsey’s marriage to Lucinda

  Patsy Ramsey – JonBenét’s mother, wife of John Ramsey

  Paul Reichenbach - BPD Patrol Sergeant, second officer to arrive on scene December 26, 1996

  Dr. Lucy Rorke – Neuro-pathologist, Philadelphia Children’s Hospital

  Christine Sandoval – Telluride Marshal’s Department officer

  Suzanne Savage – Former Ramsey nanny

  Barry Scheck – DNA expert and prominent defense attorney

  Lou Smit – Retired Colorado Springs investigator, hired by Alex Hunter as DA investigator

  Dr. Werner Spitz – Forensics Expert, outlined sequence of injuries sustained by JonBenét

  Norman Squier – Telluride Marshal’s Department Sergeant

  Melody Stanton – Ramsey neighbor who reported hearing a scream

  Susan Stine – Ramsey friend

  Harry Stephens – Telluride Marshal’s Department Sergeant, discovered train track

  Kim Stewart – BPD investigator

  Steve Thomas – Former BPD investigator, author of JonBenét: Inside the Murder Investigation

  Michael Tracey - Professor at University of Colorado, instigated John Mark Karr investigation

  Tom Trujillo – BPD investigator

  Chet Ubowski – Colorado Bureau of Investigation document examiner and handwriting expert

  John Van Tassel – Royal Canadian Mounted Police, knot expert

  Geraldine Vodicka – Ramsey housekeeper / nanny

  Barry Weiss – BPD Crime Scene Investigator

  Rod Westmoreland – John Ramsey’s best friend and financial advisor

  Fleet and Priscilla White – Ramsey friends, summoned to home on December 26, 1996.

  Bob Whitson – BPD Sergeant

  Tom Wickman – BPD Detective Sergeant

  Bill Wise – Boulder County first Assistant District Attorney

  Chris Wolf – Boyfriend of Jackie Dilson

  L. Lin Wood – Ramsey civil attorney

  Appendix

  Floor plans of the Ramsey Home

  755 15th Street Boulder, Co
lorado

  Professor Donald Foster’s Letter to Patsy Ramsey

  June 18, 1997

  Detective Steve Thomas’ Letter of Resignation

  August 6, 1998

  Chief Beckner,

  On June 22, I submitted a letter to Chief Koby, requesting a leave of absence from the Boulder Police Department. In response to persistent speculation as to why I chose to leave the Ramsey investigation, this letter explains more fully those reasons. Although my concerns were well known for some time, I tried to be gracious in my departure, addressing only health concerns. However, after a month of soul searching and reflection, I feel I must now set the record straight.

  The primary reason I chose to leave is my belief that the district attorney’s office continues to mishandle the Ramsey case. I had been troubled for many months with many aspects of the investigation. Albeit an uphill battle for a case to begin with, it became a nearly impossible investigation because of political alliances, philosophical differences, and professional egos that blocked progress in more ways, and on more occasions, than I can detail in this memorandum. I and others voiced these concerns repeatedly. In the interest of hoping justice would be served, we tolerated it, except for those closed door sessions when detectives protested in frustration, where fists hit the table, and where detectives demanded that the right things be done. The wrong things were done, and made it a matter of simple principle that I could not continue to participate as it stood with the district attorney’s office. As an organization, we remained silent, when we should have shouted.

  The Boulder Police Department took a handful of detectives days after the murder, and handed us the case. As one of those five primary detectives, we tackled it for a year a half. We conducted an exhaustive investigation, followed the evidence where it led us, and were faithfully and professionally committed to this case although not perfect, cases rarely are. During eighteen months on the Ramsey investigation, my colleagues and I worked the case night and day, in spite of tied hands. On June 1 -2, 1998, we crunched thirty thousand pages of investigation to its essence, and put our cards on the table, delivering the case in a formal presentation to the district attorney’s office. We stood confident in or work. Very shortly thereafter, though, the detectives who know the case better than anyone were advised by the district attorney’s office that we would not be participating as grand jury advisory witnesses.

  The very entity with whom we shared out investigative case file to see justice sought, I felt, was betraying this case. We were never afforded true prosecutorial support. There was never a consolidation of resources. All legal opportunities were not available. How were we expected to “solve” this case when the district attorney’s office was crippling us with their positions? I believe they were, literally, facilitating the escape of justice. During this investigation, consider the following:

  During the investigation detectives would discover, collect, and bring evidence to the district attorney’s office, only to have it summarily dismissed or rationalized as insignificant. The most elementary of investigative efforts, such as obtaining telephone and credit card records, were met without support, search warrants denied The significant opinions of national experts were casually dismissed or ignored by the district attorney’s office, even the experienced FBI were waived aside.

  Those who chose not to cooperate were never compelled before a grand jury early in this case, as detectives suggested only weeks after the murder, while information and memories were fresh.

  An informant, for reasons of his own, came to detectives about conduct occurring within the district attorney’s office, including allegations of a plan to destroy a man’s career. We carefully listened. With that knowledge, the department did nothing. Other than to alert the accused, and in the process burn the two detectives [who captured that exchange on an undercover wire, incidentally] who came forth with this information. One of the results of that internal whistleblowing was witnessing Detective Commander Eller, who also could not tolerate what was occurring, lose his career and reputation undeservedly; scapegoated in a manner which only heightened my concerns. It did not take much inferential reasoning to realize that any dissidents were readily silenced.

  In a departure from protocol, police reports, physical evidence, and investigative information was shared with Ramsey defense attorneys, all of this in the district attorney’s office “spirit of cooperation.” I served a search warrant, only to find later defense attorneys were simply given copies of the evidence it yielded.

  An FBI agent, whom I didn’t even know, quietly tipped me off about what the DA’s office was doing behind our back, conducting investigation the police department was wholly unaware of.

  I was not advised not to speak to certain witnesses, and all but dissuaded from pursuing particular investigative efforts. Polygraphs were acceptable for some subjects, but others seemed immune from such requests.

  Innocent people were not “cleared”, publically or otherwise, even when it was unmistakably the right thing to do, as reputations and lives were destroyed.

  Some in the district attorney’s office, to this day, pursue weak, defenseless, and innocent people in shameless tactics that one couldn’t believe more bizarre if it were made up.

  I was told by one in the district attorney’s office about being unable to “break” a particular police officer from his resolute account of events he had witnessed. In my opinion, this not trial preparation, this was an attempt to derail months of hard work.

  I was repeatedly reminded by some in the district attorney’s office just how powerful and talented and resourceful particular defense attorneys were. How could decisions be made this way?

  There is evidence that was critical to the investigation, that to this day has never been collected, because neither search warrants or other means were supported to do so. Not to mention evidence which still sits today, untested in the laboratory, as differences continue about how to proceed.

  While investigative efforts were rebuffed, my search warrant affidavits and attempts to gather evidence in the murder investigation of a six year old child were met with refusals and, instead, the suggestion that we “ask the permission of the Ramseys” before proceeding. And just before conducting the Ramsey interviews, I thought it inconceivable I was being lectured on “building trust.”

  These are but a few of the many examples of why I chose to leave. Having to convince, to plead at times, to a district attorney’s office to assist us in the murder of a little girl, by way of the most basic investigative requests, was simply absurd.

  When my detective partner and I had to literally hand search tens of thousands of receipts, because we didn’t have a search warrant to assist us otherwise, we did so. But we lost tremendous opportunities to make progress, to seek justice, and to know the truth. Auspicious timing and strategy could have made a difference. When the might of the criminal justice system should have brought all it had to bear on this investigation, and didn’t, we remained silent. We were trying to deliver a murder case with hands tied behind our backs. It was difficult, and our frustrations understandable. It was an assignment without a chance of success. Politics seemed to trump justice.

  Even “outsiders” quickly assessed the situation, as the FBI politely noted early on: “the government isn’t in charge of this investigation.” As the nation watched, appropriately anticipating a fitting response to the murder of the most innocent of victims, I stood bothered as to what occurred behind the scenes. Those inside the case knew what was going on. Eighteen months gave us a unique perspective.

  We learned to ignore the campaign of misinformation in which we were said to be bumbling along, or else just pursuing one or two suspects in ruthless vendetta. Much of what appeared in the press was orchestrated by particular sources wishing to discredit the Boulder Police Department. We watched the media spin, while we were prohibited from exercising First Amendment rights. As disappointment and frustration pervaded, detectives would remark to o
ne another, “If it reaches a particular point, I’m walking away.”

  But we would always tolerate it “just one more time.” Last year, when we discovered hidden cameras in the Ramsey house, only to realize the detectives had been unwittingly videotaped, this should have rocked the police department off its foundation. Instead, we allowed that too, to pass without challenge.

  The detectives enthusiasm became simply resigned frustration, acquiescing to that which should never have been tolerated. In the media blitz, the pressure of the whole world watching, important decisions seemed to premised on “how it would play” publically.

  Among at least a few of the detectives, “there’s something wrong here” became a catch phrase. I witnessed others having to make decisions which impacted their lives and careers, watching the soul searching that occurred as the ultimate questions were pondered. As it goes, “evils that befall the world are not nearly so often caused by bad men, as they are by good men who are silent when an opinion must be voiced.” Although several good men in the police department shouted loudly behind closed doors, the organization stood deafeningly silent at what continued to occur unchallenged.

  Last Spring, you, too, seemed at a loss. I was taken aback when I was reminded of what happened to Commander Eller when he stuck his neck out. When reminded how politically powerful the DA was. When reminded of the hundreds of other cases the department had to file with the district attorney’s office, and that this was but one case. And finally, when I was asked, “what do you want done? The system burned down?’, it struck me dumb. But when you conceded that there were those inside the DA’s office we had to simply accept as “defense witnesses,” and when we were reduced to simply recording our objections for “documentation purposes” – I knew I was not going to participate in this much longer.

  I believe the district attorney’s office is thoroughly compromised. When we were told by one in the district attorney’s office, months before we had ever completed our investigation, that this case “is not prosecutable,” we shook our heads in disbelief. A lot could be forgiven, the lesser transgressions ignored, for the right things done. Instead, those in the district attorney’s office encouraged us to allow them to “work their magic.” (Which I never fully understood. Did that “magic” include sharing our case file information with the defense attorneys, dragging their feet in evidence collection, or believing that two decades of used-car-dealing-style-plea-bargaining was somehow going to solve this case?) Right and wrong is just that. Some of these issues were not shades of gray. Decisions should have been made as such. Whether a suspect is a penniless indigent with a public defender, or otherwise.

 

‹ Prev