Movies and Meaning- Pearson New International Edition

Home > Other > Movies and Meaning- Pearson New International Edition > Page 53
Movies and Meaning- Pearson New International Edition Page 53

by Stephen Prince


  SHARP, 2004)

  Filmmaker Morgan Spurlock

  used himself as the guinea pig

  in this documentary about the

  health effects of eating fast

  food. Spurlock spent a month

  eating three meals a day at

  McDonald’s and turned the

  camera on himself, filming

  the physical and psychological

  changes that resulted. Made

  for $65,000, the film grossed

  nearly $30 million, and its pop-

  ular impact led to McDonald’s

  discontinuing its Super Size

  portions. Frame enlargement.

  344

  Modes of Screen Reality

  OUTFOXED: RUPERT

  MURDOCH’S WAR ON

  JOURNALISM (MOVEON.

  ORG, 2004)

  Distribution and sales of DVD

  via the Internet enable film-

  makers to take their work

  directly to an audience,

  bypassing traditional the-

  atrical distribution. Robert

  Greenwald used the Internet

  and political lobbying group

  MoveOn.org as primary

  delivery systems for this cri-

  tique of news reporting on

  the Fox television network.

  Nontraditional approaches to

  production and distribution

  hold great promise for docu-

  mentary filmmakers today.

  Frame enlargement.

  MOCKUMENTARIES S uppose that a filmmaker deliberately uses a style of documentary filmmaking but in a wholly fictitious context. To the extent that documentary is a film practice —specifying a method of working as well as stylistic designs that are permissible and those that are not—there is nothing to prevent a filmmaker from imitating this practice, that is, from making a fake documentary, or mockumentary , such as The Blair Witch Project. Rob Reiner’s This Is Spinal Tap (1984) is a well-known example of a fake documentary. In the film, director Reiner plays fictitious director Marty DiBergi who is making a documentary film about British rock group Spinal Tap. No such group exists, of course, except in the pretend world of this film parody, which accurately skewers many of the conventions of rock documentaries.

  The film opens with Reiner, as DiBergi, seated by a camera and lighting equipment as he tells viewers about his first meeting with Spinal Tap in 1966 and explains the genesis of what he calls a rockumentary, that is, a documentary about rock.

  DiBergi talks directly into the camera with cinema equipment prominently displayed behind him. Because viewers think documentaries are more real than fiction films, shrewd filmmakers can emphasize this impression by displaying the cinema equipment used to create the images on screen. Such an on-screen display of camera equipment is unthinkable in the mode of ordinary fictional realism, but within documentary realism, it serves to authenticate the special nonfiction status of the film by communicating to the audience that the filmmaker is not trying to “fool” viewers into mistaking the film’s images for reality itself.

  Other codes of rock documentaries that the film employs include people-on-the-street interviews with fans talking about what Tap means to them. These interviews are intercut with faked concert footage and faked behind-the-scenes glimpses of backstage preparation for concerts. Other faked documentary codes include a series of interviews with the band members (all of whom, of course, are actors) and even faked black-and-white kinescope 345

  Modes of Screen Reality

  THIS IS SPINAL TAP (EMBASSY PICTURES, 1984)

  This Is Spinal Tap applies documentary techniques to completely fictitious events and characters. The film looks like a documentary but is really an elaborate hoax.

  Representational reality may be unreliable or ironic. In the case of This Is Spinal Tap , the filmmaker expects the audience to recognize the irony. Frame enlargement.

  footage, supposedly from 1965, dramatizing an early television appearance by Tap (like the Beatles on Ed Sullivan).

  The popularity of This Is Spinal Tap has led to other films in the fake documentary mode. Among the best are three by Christopher Guest— Waiting for Guffman (1997), about a small-town theater troupe putting on a show; Best in Show (2000), about the nutty contestants in a prestigious dog show; and A Mighty Wind (2003), about competing styles of folk music. Like Spinal Tap , these films imitate many of the rules of documentary filmmaking, but much of their humor depends on the viewer getting the ironies and appreciating the elaborate fakery.

  BEST IN SHOW (WARNER

  BROS., 2000)

  Filmmaker Christopher

  Guest has specialized in fake

  documentaries. This one is

  a hilarious comedy about a

  group of oddballs who’ve

  entered their dogs in a pres-

  tigious show. Fake interviews

  and apparently impromptu

  situations abound. Frame

  enlargement.

  346

  Modes of Screen Reality

  EXPRESSIONISM

  Expressionism is an extremely stylized mode of screen reality in which filmmakers use visual distortion to suggest emotional, social, or psychological disturbances or abnormalities. The distortions may be subtle, but most often they are manifest and explicit.

  In this regard, expressionism is an antirealist mode that aims to move far from naturalism, emphasizing instead strange or bizarrely poetic designs using lighting, color, lenses, camera position, and set design. Expressionism in its pure form, as it characterized German cinema in the 1920s, is distinct from expressionism as it survives in contemporary cinema.

  Classic German Expressionism

  The expressionist mode in its purest form is found in 1920s German cinema.

  Expressionism began in German painting and theater in 1908 and, by the 1920s, had spread to the cinema, where it characterized a series of classic films including The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920), Nosferatu (1922), an early version of Dracula, and the science fiction classic Metropolis (1926).

  In these and other films of the early German cinema, the expressionist style was overtly opposed to realism; it emphasized elaborate distortions in the mise-en-scène.

  Lighting designs employed a prevalence of shadows and violent visual contrast. Decor and set design used aberrant architectural forms to create dwellings whose off-kilter, skewed designs embodied decentered, anxiety-ridden screen worlds. Normal, rectilinear architectural forms (dwellings where walls, floor, and ceiling are at right angles to each other and in parallel planes) were replaced with skewed structures built with diagonals and nonparallel planes.

  These filmmakers integrated the actors’ physical appearance and move-

  ments with the architectural forms. In the accompanying illustration from F. W.

  Murnau’s Nosferatu , the vampire’s thin, elongated body is linked at a visual level NOSFERATU (1922)

  Expressionistic integration of

  character and decor in Nosferatu .

  Expressionist distortions included

  architectural design as well as

  the human figure. Note how the

  vampire’s elongated body fits

  within the arched doorway. The

  expressionist style linked people

  and settings to form a uniquely

  stylized screen reality. Frame

  enlargement.

  347

  Modes of Screen Reality

  with the arched door frame in which he lingers before pouncing on his victim.

  Expressionist acting frequently employed a distorted physical appearance, and as the image from Nosferatu illustrates, these strange body types functioned as expressive forms and were integrated seamlessly with the shapes and textures of the set design.

  Expressionist filmmakers often used odd camera angles to enhance the decentering of the screen world. The camera’s positioni
ng, the lighting design, and the decor all work together to achieve maximum distortion in expressionist mise-en-scène. These distortions often were correlated with a particular kind of subject matter. Characters might be grotesques, as in the vampires of Nosferatu or the mad doctor in Metropolis.

  They inhabited fantasy realms of myth, as in Fritz Lang’s Seigfried , or futuristic worlds, as in Lang’s Metropolis. Correlated with these extrahuman or subhuman characters were their extreme and sometimes deranged emotional states. The terror of the victim of the sleepwalking killer in The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari and the killer’s own anxiety-laden flight across the rooftops are expressively conveyed in the wild decor pictured on the next page illustration.

  German expressionism entered the United States via a wave of émigré German

  filmmakers working in Hollywood, and the style was popularized in the series of horror films produced in the 1930s at Universal Studios. James Whale’s 1931 production of Frankenstein features the grotesque characters and diagonal visual forms that link it closely with the German horror and fantasy films that flourished in the 1920s. In the opening scene, Dr. Frankenstein and his evil assistant Fritz hide in a graveyard, waiting until the gravediggers have finished burying a body. They plan to dig it up and steal the corpse for use in their gruesome medical experiments. Visual designs emphasizing extreme antirealism and distortion effectively convey the film’s horror content.

  METROPOLIS (1926)

  (UFA, 1926)

  Multiple in-camera expo-

  sures helped to produce this

  startling image of a crowd of

  excited spectators at a futur-

  istic nightclub. Expressionism

  favors optical distortions,

  dream-like imagery, and visual

  poetry instead of realist de-

  signs. Frame enlargement.

  348

  Modes of Screen Reality

  THE CABINET OF DR.

  CALIGARI (1919)

  Expressionist set design created

  a bizarre, strange, off-kilter world

  in the classic The Cabinet of Dr.

  Caligari , the first expressionist

  film. Note the disturbing diago-

  nal lines suggesting disorder and

  instability throughout the set in

  place of normal rectilinear archi-

  tecture. Frame enlargement.

  Contemporary Expressionism

  While the pure expressionism characterizing German cinema of the 1920s is rarely found in contemporary filmmaking, modern directors often employ the visual distortions of expressionist style.

  OTHER RECENT CASES More recent productions have drawn on the expressionist heritage. Spike Lee’s Crooklyn (1994) features a 20-minute sequence shot with uncorrected anamorphic perspective—making the characters and settings look thin and elongated—to visualize a city girl’s disorientation at living in the suburbs. One of the chief villains in Tim Burton’s Batman Returns (1992) is the industrialist

  FRANKENSTEIN (UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, 1931)

  Expressionist set design—note the sloping diagonals—in the Universal horror genre.

  Dr. Frankenstein (Colin Clive) digs up a fresh corpse for his experiments. Subsequently, his monster rages against confinement in a castle cell. Frame enlargements.

  349

  Modes of Screen Reality

  Case Study ALFRED HITCHCOCK

  Alfred Hitchcock was probably the best-known filmmaker

  lobster hands, dehumanizing him in a poetic manner

  to use expressionism as an ongoing feature of his work.

  (in the film’s first scene, he wears a vulgar, lobster-print

  In Psycho (1960), a striking low-angle shot of Norman

  necktie).

  Bates, the psychopathic killer, dehumanizes his face. By

  In Notorious (1946), about a woman who is coerced

  emphasizing the working of his gullet as he chews on

  into spying for the U.S. government, an early scene

  some candy, it transforms him visually into a birdlike

  shows her waking up with a hangover. She looks up and

  creature. This is appropriate because Norman is a taxider-

  sees a government agent hovering in the doorway of

  mist by hobby and keeps his office stuffed with birds of

  her bedroom. Hitchcock employs a subjective expres-

  prey, which he has mounted on the walls. Hitchcock said

  sionistic shot to represent her point of view and to make

  that these birds are perfect symbols of Norman himself.

  the agent seem very threatening and sinister. The agent

  They are birds of the night—predators—and he sees his

  appears as a silhouette. As he walks toward her and she

  own guilt mirrored in their eyes.

  turns her head to look up at him, tracking his move-

  In Strangers on a Train (1951), a demented fan of a

  ments, his figure pirouettes upside down across her field

  famous tennis player kills the athlete’s greedy and self-

  of vision.

  ish wife, believing that he is doing the celebrity a favor.

  In Vertigo (1958), to suggest the approaching

  Hitchcock films the killing from a memorably distorted

  despair and madness of the detective hero (James

  perspective, in an image refracted by the wife’s eye-

  Stewart), Hitchcock included a completely artificial

  glasses, which have fallen to the ground in her strug-

  sequence. The detective’s nightmare hallucination is

  gles with the killer. After she is dead, the killer reaches

  represented, in part, through animation. A bouquet

  for the glasses, and the refracted image gives him giant

  of flowers, held by a ghostly character in the film,

  PSYCHO (PARAMOUNT PICTURES, 1960)

  This strange, low-angle shot of Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins) in Psycho turns him into a bird. This adds a symbolic dimension to the narrative because Norman is a taxidermist specializing in stuffing predatory birds. The bizarre image suggests that Norman, too, is a predator, a creature of the night, like his birds. Hitchcock appreciated the special power of expressionistically distorted images to transform normal visual reality. Frame enlargement.

  ( continued)

  350

  Modes of Screen Reality

  STRANGERS ON A TRAIN (WARNER BROS.,1951)

  Hitchcock shows a murder as the distorted reflection in the lens of a pair of discarded eyeglasses. Having finished with his victim, the killer then reaches for the glasses, and the optical distortion turns his hand into a giant lobster claw. Frame enlargements.

  suddenly splits apart and the petals fly menacingly

  As these examples from Hitchcock’s cinema illus-

  toward the viewer. Hitchcock departs from realism

  trate, the director learned from the expressionists about

  here so thoroughly that it sometimes confuses mod-

  the power of a distorted visual image and employed

  ern viewers, uncertain whether they are seeing an

  such designs systematically throughout his career when

  example of inferior visual effects or a genuinely radical

  he needed to suggest intensified states of emotional

  visual design.

  disturbance. ■

  NOTORIOUS (RKO, 1946)

  In Notorious , Cary Grant, as an

  American government agent,

  appears in this bizarre, upside-

  down perspective. The angular

  distortion represents the anxious

  point of view of a character

  reclining on a bed. In this re-

  spect, the visually unstable point

  of view replicates the original

  aims of German expressionism,
/>
  which were to visually represent

  subjective states of mind. Frame

  enlargement.

  351

  Modes of Screen Reality

  NOTORIOUS (RKO, 1946)

  With a subtle expressionistic touch,

  Hitchcock designs this shot from

  Notorious so that the cup of poison (fore-

  ground) looms gigantically beside the

  woman who is being poisoned (Ingrid

  Bergman, background ). To get the shot,

  Hitchcock instructed his prop crew to

  construct an enormous cup and then

  placed the camera in this low-angle

  position to emphasize its size. Frame

  enlargement.

  Max Schreck (Christopher Walken). In name and appearance, he evokes the 1920s German classics. “Max Schreck” was the name of the actor who played the vampire in Nosferatu , and as the character appears in Burton’s film, he sports a flamboyant shock of white hair that makes him look like the mad scientist Rotwang in Fritz Lang’s Metropolis. In other respects as well, Burton’s film evokes classic expressionist mise-en-scène. The huge fireplace in Bruce Wayne’s mansion strongly resembles the giant fireplace used in Bride of Frankenstein (1935). These details of design and character are explicit homages to the German cinema, used to explicitly evoke some of its best-known stylistic features.

  Martin Scorsese’s Cape Fear (1992) employs a number of striking expressionistic motifs in the opening title design. The film deals with a vengeful psychopath, newly released from prison, who wreaks a terrible plan of destruction on the family of the lawyer he blames for his conviction. The film’s title is derived from the river in North Carolina where the climax occurs. The title also evokes, in a poetic and symbolic manner, the climate of terror and anxiety that is established in the story when the psychopath begins stalking and tormenting the lawyer’s family.

  During the opening credits, the waters of the Cape Fear River reflect several distorted expressionistic forms. A predatory bird swoops down near the surface of the water, its shadow extended and disturbed by the river’s rippling surface.

  Superimposed over the water is a terror-stricken eye, glancing about with extreme agitation. Later in the sequence, a screaming mouth appears, the teeth fearsomely exposed. Next looms a dark, ominous figure of a man, skewed on a diagonal. Finally, a drop of blood drips from the top to the bottom of the screen, bringing with it a wave of red color.

 

‹ Prev