Curious Republic Of Gondour, And Other Curious Whimsical Sketches

Home > Literature > Curious Republic Of Gondour, And Other Curious Whimsical Sketches > Page 5
Curious Republic Of Gondour, And Other Curious Whimsical Sketches Page 5

by Mark Twain


  Imparting committee of the city of New York, and have nothing to do but

  sit on the platform, solemn and imposing, along with Peter Cooper, Horace

  Greeley, etc., etc., and shed momentary fame at second hand on obscure

  lecturers, draw public attention to lectures which would otherwise clack

  eloquently to sounding emptiness, and subdue audiences into respectful

  hearing of all sorts of unpopular and outlandish dogmas and isms. That

  is what I desire for the cheer and gratification of my gray hairs. Let

  me but sit up there with those fine relics of the Old Red Sandstone

  Period and give Tone to an intellectual entertainment twice a week, and

  be so reported, and my happiness will be complete. Those men have been

  my envy for long, long time. And no memories of my life are so pleasant

  as my reminiscence of their long and honorable career in the Tone-

  imparting service. I can recollect that first time I ever saw them on

  the platforms just as well as I can remember the events of yesterday.

  Horace Greeley sat on the right, Peter Cooper on the left, and Thomas

  Jefferson, Red Jacket, Benjamin Franklin, and John Hancock sat between

  them. This was on the 22d of December, 1799, on the occasion of the

  state' funeral of George Washington in New York. It was a great day,

  that--a great day, and a very, very sad one. I remember that Broadway

  was one mass of black crape from Castle Garden nearly up to where the

  City Hall now stands. The next time I saw these gentlemen officiate was

  at a ball given for the purpose of procuring money and medicines for the

  sick and wounded soldiers and sailors. Horace Greeley occupied one side

  of the platform on which the musicians were exalted, and Peter Cooper the

  other. There were other Tone-imparters attendant upon the two chiefs,

  but I have forgotten their names now. Horace Greeley, gray-haired and

  beaming, was in sailor costume--white duck pants, blue shirt, open at the

  breast, large neckerchief, loose as an ox-bow, and tied with a jaunty

  sailor knot, broad turnover collar with star in the corner, shiny black

  little tarpaulin hat roosting daintily far back on head, and flying two

  gallant long ribbons. Slippers on ample feet, round spectacles on

  benignant nose, and pitchfork in hand, completed Mr. Greeley, and made

  him, in my boyish admiration, every inch a sailor, and worthy to be the

  honored great-grandfather of the Neptune he was so ingeniously

  representing. I shall never forget him. Mr. Cooper was dressed as a

  general of militia, and was dismally and oppressively warlike. I

  neglected to remark, in the proper place, that the soldiers and sailors

  in whose aid the ball was given had just been sent in from Boston--this

  was during the war of 1812. At the grand national reception of

  Lafayette, in 1824, Horace Greeley sat on the right and Peter Cooper to

  the left. The other Tone-imparters of the day are sleeping the sleep of

  the just now. I was in the audience when Horace Greeley Peter Cooper,

  and other chief citizens imparted tone to the great meetings in favor of

  French liberty, in 1848. Then I never saw them any more until here

  lately; but now that I am living tolerably near the city, I run down

  every time I see it announced that "Horace Greeley, Peter Cooper, and

  several other distinguished citizens will occupy seats on the platform;"

  and next morning, when I read in the first paragraph of the phonographic

  report that "Horace Greeley, Peter Cooper, and several other

  distinguished citizens occupied seats on the platform," I say to myself,

  "Thank God, I was present." Thus I have been enabled to see these

  substantial old friends of mine sit on the platform and give tone to

  lectures on anatomy, and lectures on agriculture, and lectures on

  stirpiculture, and lectures on astronomy, on chemistry, on miscegenation,

  on "Is Man Descended from the Kangaroo?" on, veterinary matters, on all

  kinds of religion, and several kinds of politics; and have seen them give

  tone and grandeur to the Four-legged Girl, the Siamese Twins, the Great

  Egyptian Sword Swallower, and the Old Original Jacobs. Whenever somebody

  is to lecture on a subject not of general interest, I know that my

  venerated Remains of the Old Red Sandstone Period will be on the

  platform; whenever a lecturer is to appear whom nobody has heard of

  before, nor will be likely to seek to see, I know that the real

  benevolence of my old friends will be taken advantage of, and that they

  will be on the platform (and in the bills) as an advertisement; and

  whenever any new and obnoxious deviltry in philosophy, morals, or

  politics is to be sprung upon the people, I know perfectly well that

  these intrepid old heroes will be on the platform too, in the interest

  of full and free discussion, and to crush down all narrower and less

  generous souls with the solid dead weight of their awful respectability.

  And let us all remember that while these inveterate and imperishable

  presiders (if you please) appear on the platform every night in the year

  as regularly as the volunteered piano from Steinway's or Chickering's,

  and have bolstered up and given tone to a deal of questionable merit and

  obscure emptiness in their time, they have also diversified this

  inconsequential service by occasional powerful uplifting and upholding of

  great progressive ideas which smaller men feared to meddle with or

  countenance.

  OUR PRECIOUS LUNATIC

  [From the Buffalo Express, Saturday, May 14, 1870.]

  New YORK, May 10.

  The Richardson-McFarland jury had been out one hour and fifty minutes.

  A breathless silence brooded over court and auditory--a silence and a

  stillness so absolute, notwithstanding the vast multitude of human beings

  packed together there, that when some one far away among the throng under

  the northeast balcony cleared his throat with a smothered little cough it

  startled everybody uncomfortably, so distinctly did it grate upon the

  pulseless air. At that imposing moment the bang of a door was heard,

  then the shuffle of approaching feet, and then a sort of surging and

  swaying disorder among the heads at the entrance from the jury-room told

  them that the Twelve were coming. Presently all was silent again, and

  the foreman of the jury rose and said:

  "Your Honor and Gentleman: We, the jury charged with the duty of

  determining whether the prisoner at the bar, Daniel McFarland, has been

  guilty of murder, in taking by surprise an unarmed man and shooting him

  to death, or whether the prisoner is afflicted with a sad but

  irresponsible insanity which at times can be cheered only by violent

  entertainment with firearms, do find as follows, namely:

  That the prisoner, Daniel McFarland, is insane as above described.

  Because:

  1. His great grandfather's stepfather was tainted with insanity, and

  frequently killed people who were distasteful to him. Hence, insanity is

  hereditary in the family.

  2. For nine years the prisoner at the bar did not adequately support his

  family. Strong circumstantial evidence of insanity.

  3. For nine years he made of his home, as a general thin
g, a poor-house;

  sometimes (but very rarely) a cheery, happy habitation; frequently the

  den of a beery, drivelling, stupefied animal; but never, as far as

  ascertained, the abiding place of a gentleman. These be evidences of

  insanity.

  4. He once took his young unmarried sister-in-law to the museum; while

  there his hereditary insanity came upon him to such a degree that he

  hiccupped and staggered; and afterward, on the way home, even made love

  to the young girl he was protecting. These are the acts of a person not

  in his right mind.

  5. For a good while his sufferings were so great that he had to submit

  to the inconvenience of having his wife give public readings for the

  family support; and at times, when he handed these shameful earnings to

  the barkeeper, his haughty soul was so torn with anguish that he could

  hardly stand without leaning against something. At such times he has

  been known to shed tears into his sustenance till it diluted to utter

  inefficiency. Inattention of this nature is not the act of a Democrat

  unafflicted in mind.

  6. He never spared expense in making his wife comfortable during her

  occasional confinements. Her father is able to testify to this. There

  was always an element of unsoundness about the prisoner's generosities

  that is very suggestive at this time and before this court.

  7. Two years ago the prisoner came fearlessly up behind Richardson in

  the dark, and shot him in the leg. The prisoner's brave and protracted

  defiance of an adversity that for years had left him little to depend

  upon for support but a wife who sometimes earned scarcely anything for

  weeks at a time, is evidence that he would have appeared in front of

  Richardson and shot him in the stomach if he had not been insane at the

  time of the shooting.

  8. Fourteen months ago the prisoner told Archibald Smith that he was

  going to kill Richardson. This is insanity.

  9. Twelve months ago he told Marshall P. Jones that he was going to kill

  Richardson. Insanity.

  10. Nine months ago he was lurking about Richardson's home in New

  Jersey, and said he was going to kill Richardson. Insanity.

  11. Seven months ago he showed a pistol to Seth Brown and said that that

  was for Richardson. He said Brown testified that at that time it seemed

  plain that something was the matter with McFarland, for he crossed the

  street diagonally nine times in fifty yards, apparently without any

  settled reason for doing so, and finally fell in the gutter and went to

  sleep. He remarked at the time that McFarland acted strange--believed he

  was insane. Upon hearing Brown's evidence, John W. Galen, M.D., affirmed

  at once that McFarland was insane.

  12. Five months ago, McFarland showed his customary pistol, in his

  customary way, to his bed-fellow, Charles A. Dana, and told him he was

  going to kill Richardson the first time an opportunity offered. Evidence

  of insanity.

  13. Five months and two weeks ago McFarland asked John Morgan the time

  of day, and turned and walked rapidly away without waiting for an answer.

  Almost indubitable evidence of insanity. And--

  14. It is remarkable that exactly one week after this circumstance, the

  prisoner, Daniel McFarland, confronted Albert D. Richardson suddenly and

  without warning, and shot him dead. This is manifest insanity.

  Everything we know of the prisoner goes to show that if he had been sane

  at the time, he would have shot his victim from behind.

  15. There is an absolutely overwhelming mass of testimony to show that

  an hour before the shooting, McFarland was ANXIOUS AND UNEASY, and that

  five minutes after it he was EXCITED. Thus the accumulating conjectures

  and evidences of insanity culminate in this sublime and unimpeachable

  proof of it. Therefore--

  Your Honor and Gentlemen--We the jury pronounce the said Daniel McFarland

  INNOCENT OF MURDER, BUT CALAMITOUSLY INSANE.

  The scene that ensued almost defies description. Hats, handkerchiefs and

  bonnets were frantically waved above the massed heads in the courtroom,

  and three tremendous cheers and a tiger told where the sympathies of the

  court and people were. Then a hundred pursed lips were advanced to kiss

  the liberated prisoner, and many a hand thrust out to give him a

  congratulatory shake--but presto! with a maniac's own quickness and a

  maniac's own fury the lunatic assassin of Richardson fell upon his

  friends with teeth and nails, boots and office furniture, and the amazing

  rapidity with which he broke heads and limbs, and rent and sundered

  bodies, till nearly a hundred citizens were reduced to mere quivering

  heaps of fleshy odds and ends and crimson rags, was like nothing in this

  world but the exultant frenzy of a plunging, tearing, roaring devil of a

  steam machine when it snatches a human being and spins him and whirls him

  till he shreds away to nothingness like a "Four o'clock" before the

  breath of a child.

  The destruction was awful. It is said that within the space of eight

  minutes McFarland killed and crippled some six score persons and tore

  down a large portion of the City Hall building, carrying away and casting

  into Broadway six or seven marble columns fifty-four feet long and

  weighing nearly two tons each. But he was finally captured and sent in

  chains to the lunatic asylum for life.

  (By late telegrams it appears that this is a mistake.--Editor Express.)

  But the really curious part of this whole matter is yet to be told. And

  that is, that McFarland's most intimate friends believe that the very

  next time that it ever occurred to him that the insanity plea was not a

  mere politic pretense, was when the verdict came in. They think that the

  startling thought burst upon him then, that if twelve good and true men,

  able to comprehend all the baseness of perjury, proclaimed under oath

  that he was a lunatic, there was no gainsaying such evidence and that he

  UNQUESTIONABLY WAS INSANE!

  Possibly that was really the way of it. It is dreadful to think that

  maybe the most awful calamity that can befall a man, namely, loss of

  reason, was precipitated upon this poor prisoner's head by a jury that

  could have hanged him instead, and so done him a mercy and his country a

  service.

  POSTSCRIPT-LATER

  May 11--I do not expect anybody to believe so astounding a thing, and yet

  it is the solemn truth that instead of instantly sending the dangerous

  lunatic to the insane asylum (which I naturally supposed they would do,

  and so I prematurely said they had) the court has actually SET HIM AT

  LIBERTY. Comment is unnecessary. M. T.

  THE EUROPEAN WARS --[From the Buffalo Express, July 25, 1870.]

  First Day

  THE EUROPEAN WAR!!!

  NO BATTLE YET!!!

  HOSTILITIES IMMINENT!!!

  TREMENDOUS EXCITEMENT.

  AUSTRIA ARMING!

  BERLIN, Tuesday.

  No battle has been fought yet. But hostilities may burst forth any week.

  There is tremendous excitement here over news from the front that two

  companies of French soldiers are assembling there.

&n
bsp; It is rumoured that Austria is arming--what with, is not known.

  .......................

  Second Day

  THE EUROPEAN WAR

  NO BATTLE YET!

  FIGHTING IMMINENT.

  AWFUL EXCITEMENT.

  RUSSIA SIDES WITH PRUSSIA!

  ENGLAND NEUTRAL!!

  AUSTRIA NOT ARMING.

  BERLIN, Wednesday.

  No battle has been fought yet. However, all thoughtful men feel that the

  land may be drenched with blood before the Summer is over.

  There is an awful excitement here over the rumour that two companies of

  Prussian troops have concentrated on the border. German confidence

  remains unshaken!!

  There is news to the effect that Russia espouses the cause of Prussia and

  will bring 4,000,000 men to the field.

  England proclaims strict neutrality.

  The report that Austria is arming needs confirmation.

  .........................

  Third Day

  THE EUROPEAN WAR

  NO BATTLE YET!

  BLOODSHED IMMINENT!!

  ENORMOUS EXCITEMENT!!

  INVASION OF PRUSSIA!!

  INVASION OF FRANCE!!

  RUSSIA SIDES WITH FRANCE.

  ENGLAND STILL NEUTRAL!

  FIRING HEARD!

  THE EMPEROR TO TAKE COMMAND.

  PARIS, Thursday.

  No battle has been fought yet. But Field Marshal McMahon telegraphs thus

  to the Emperor:

  "If the Frinch army survoives until Christmas there'll be throuble.

  Forninst this fact it would be sagacious if the divil wint the rounds of

  his establishment to prepare for the occasion, and tuk the precaution to

  warrum up the Prussian depairtment a bit agin the day.

  MIKE."

  There is an enormous state of excitement here over news from the front to

 

‹ Prev