by James Brady
I’d lost Alix to the city, to her responsibilities amid the stepped-up frenzy of book publishing in autumn’s change of seasons. Having brought in Hannah Cutting’s book made Alix something of a heroine and Harry Evans even approved an expense account for her time in East Hampton that consisted mainly of gas for the Jag, one night at the Mauve House, and any number of purchases from the clothing boutiques. I missed her a lot, even missed the poodle growling at me in Alix’s bed, missed Alix in Alix’s bed. Where did you find women like Alix who drove like Richard Petty in Jags and traveled with borrowed poodles and brought you Dreesen’s doughnuts in bed and sent E-mail messages in cipher on Louis Vuitton laptops?
Walter Anderson liked the piece I did for Parade and especially that it would run months before Harry could get the book out. When both editors worked for the same company, things like that mattered. The weather turned crisp and we had frost on the lawn one morning. You could feel it on the wind, change coming, and no longer did I swim every day. The striped bass were running thin and the party boats came into port empty. A fresh film festival was cranking up and private jets landed hourly at the airport, disgorging men and women wearing black clothes and handsome folk sporting shades at night were seen in the streets. Le tout Hollywood had arrived. And I realized with a shudder I actually knew and had interviewed some of these people. It would be a relief to be moving into the City.
Into Manhattan, where nobody knew anyone; there were too many people there for that.
Look for Gin Lane—James Brady’s new novel of life in the Hamptons—on sale now in hardcover from St. Martin’s Press. An excerpt follows …
ONE
Men who were always gloriously broke but attached to the top girls …
To write about and understand Gin Lane in Southampton, New York, it is helpful to have lived nearby so that you have at least a passing acquaintance with that rich and famous road and the breed of people who live there. And how this past spring they confronted and coped with what they saw as a threat to their place and their quality of life. It’s a lively yarn, quite as colorful as anything in a fullblown and fleshed-out history of Gin Lane, and does credit to only a few of us. Since the cast of characters includes powerful folk who believe they pretty much run the country (and perhaps they do!), much of what happened there on Gin Lane in late May and June with the Southampton “Season” barely under way has been hushed up. No one really wanted it out and especially not the government, neither Southampton’s nor Washington’s. For most people the president’s problems began with the running of the White House interns. But along Gin Lane months earlier, we knew how near he’d come to stumbling into an entirely distinct scandal not of his making; we’d seen evidence of a presidential skittishness none of us yet understood. Probably you’ve heard rumors, the snippets of truth, those partial explanations, the outright gossip: about how the president of the United States failed Tom and Daisy Buchanan and, for all he knew, might have broken their daughter’s heart. And why the earl of Bute never got to dance at his son’s wedding, depriving the old gent of “having a gallop about the hardwood with a bridesmaid!” And grounds on which a celebrated fashion designer was arrested. And who very nearly got shot at Cowboy Dils’s house and how A. J. Foyt was asked to save the Bridgehampton raceway and where Mandy Buchanan danced on tables and how the forty thousand honeybees died and why “Nipper” Gascoigne chided his boyhood chum “Fruity” Metcalfe and how Señorita de Playa’s splendid pecs were deprived of kayaking on the Nile and why Wyseman Clagett was warning against El Niño and attempting to eat his own ear and just who it was sent the Marines ashore. As well as the role played by the Shinnecock Indians and those Argentino polo players and what it was got Women’s Wear Daily on the case and why people were squashing lemons into their hair and wearing watches on the wrong wrists and how Nurse Cavell rescued the Dalai Lama’s ambassador-without-portfolio and the future of the shellfish hatchery and bad feelings over Magistrate Hobbes’s unfortunate seizure and who borrowed Captain Bly’s industrial-strength sunblock and why an apparently innocent tango ignited fistfights with the RAF and whether the Eel Lady predicted an early spring.
I realize all this sounds pretty complicated. Maybe I better just tell you how my own good intentions foolishly got me pulled into those and related events along Gin Lane and who was involved and what really did go on this past spring in Southampton. As best I can remember …
* * *
Further Lane, where my father and I live in East Hampton, is fourteen miles east of Southampton’s famous Gin Lane.
And along both of these brief and lovely oceanfront lanes people are forever debating just which of the two Hamptons is better, richer, a more desirable place to live and raise families and enjoy the good life. They also argue just which have been the truly great Seasons out here, the vintage summers no one who experienced them will ever forget.
From one celebrated Hampton to the other is but a twenty-minute drive, an easy hour’s bike ride along the Atlantic Ocean, and if you are fit, a half-day’s stroll in the sun. For places that are so close, the two Hamptons are quite different in style. Book publisher John Sargent, a sophisticated and witty man who long ran Doubleday for Nelson and the family, once attempted in a merry moment to explain about the two villages: “If you’re going to dinner in Southampton you wear a tie but no socks; and in East Hampton you wear socks and no tie.”
There may be something to that or no sense at all, but there are other, less superficial distinctions as well, I’m sure, and not being either a historian or a social scientist but simply a journalist, I will leave it there. Both Hamptons have their traditions, their accepted ways, their look, and the casual local snobberies that flourish with age along certain roads and at the more desirable addresses. That these snobberies are casual does not make them any less cruel and cutting. Gin and Further Lanes, behind their masking hedges and great, gated walls, possess a haunting beauty, each very lovely in its own distinctive way, and they are linked by a single, narrow road, by the ocean, by a strip of gorgeous beach.
And by money.
When you arrive there on Gin Lane, you find yourself on a narrow, somewhat claustrophobic road with one slim lane in each direction onto which hedges and walls and gates press close. And if you are fortunate, through the gates and thin places in the privet hedge and down the graveled drives, some of the drives so long and sinuous they are interrupted for safety by speed bumps, you may even glimpse the ocean. It is always there, just beyond the great houses and tennis courts and marble pools and rich, rolled and sloping, darkly grassy lawns. But in these precincts, an Atlantic view is exclusively purchased, and even the sand looks expensive. The people along Gin Lane are rich as well, always have been, I guess.
Through the years, and even today, it has been a gorgeous place. Though over cocktails or after golf or inhaling a surely unnecessary final midnight brandy, the subject comes up and the proposition debated by the modernists and those who insist on favoring “the old days”. Which really were Gin Lane’s best years? Which the best times? The top crowds? The prettiest women? The most lavish parties? The quintessential Southampton Season? Certain glorious years are nominated, specific moments are recalled, various men and women mentioned, this great house or that remembered and eulogized, a road race or a polo match or historic carouse described in exquisite if antique detail, a particularly splendid lawn party praised or champagne breakfast cited. And, inevitably, during these genial exchanges there will be someone who nominates Ten bis Gin Lane (the original Number Ten was washed away in the “great” hurricane of ’38, thus justifying the label “bis” on its successor), and others will nod and half smile in amiable memory, and Number Ten bis will get its share of votes as a Gin Lane address ever to be remembered.
I’m from an old Hamptons family (Beecher Stowe being a familiar name out here), but having been born in France, and for a time working as a foreign correspondent, I’m hardly the fellow to make such judgments, and prefer listening to
those who claim to know. Maybe, connoisseurs say, of all the good times there ever were along Gin Lane, some of the best came right after the war, from ’46 on; 1946 I mean, since in the Hamptons the good times have been going on for three centuries (of course, bad times occasionally punctuated the good, though these are rarely mentioned). But in 1946 and 1947 the world was at last out of uniform, back home, and at play. Then began the summers when Angier Duke and his brother Tony came home from the war to Gin Lane. Ever since, there’ve been Dukes at various places here and there along the lane, these days at Wyndcote Farm, but at that time they had their house at Ten bis Gin Lane that people, including the Dukes themselves, good-naturedly and with youthful, self-deprecating wit, labeled “the Duke Box.” From Memorial Day through Labor Day, what Southampton calls the Season, the house was never empty.
As an agreeable chum of Tony and Luly Duke (Luly is Tony’s wife, and you probably know the man I mean) remembers the house even now, half a century later: “It was always filled with pretty girls, out from Manhattan, and White Russians, dashing fellows who worked in PR or sold expensive fragrances to Saks and Bergdorf or were trying to get jobs with E. F. Hutton or Merrill Lynch, plus a few clever men like Serge Obolensky (a prince who had actually served and knew the tsar!) and his comrades Count Vava and one Sasha, a Guards officer whose last name none but Sasha could pronounce, and then but marginally, as well as other men who were always gloriously broke, but attached to the top girls in a time when the really top girls looked better than women ever had. Remember? There was Audrey the Conover Girl and Faye the Powers Girl and, in from Hollywood, a couple of Goldwyn Girls called Mona and Jill. A French lounge pianist named Jacques Frey, invariably addressed by the Goldwyn Girls as “Monsieur Pierre,” dropped by in June and stayed the summer, reminiscent of poor Gatsby’s “Mr. Klipspringer,” camping out there in the sunroom playing piano, the show tunes everyone could sing and to which anyone could dance, the tall windows opened to lawns and sprawling patios and dunes and the beach beyond and the ocean’s surf, so there was music everywhere, indoors and out, and the laughter and voices of the girls as well …
Tony and Angie Duke had enjoyed splendid wars, and so had many of their friends, including the Russians (they were OSS mostly and had been parachuted into dicey places where they did deadly things), and now all of them felt obliged thoroughly to enjoy the peace. Which they did from the end of May to early September, when, in the week following Labor Day, the Southampton house was tidied up and shuttered and they all, Russians and girls and Monsieur Pierre, plus Count Vava and Prince Obolensky, and various Duke boys, returned to Manhattan, simply moving the party from Gin Lane to El Morocco and the Stork.
It was that house, that “gentleman’s estate” (in the stuffy, pretentious phrasing of real estate advertisements), which Leicester (Cowboy) Dils bought for $12 million a year or two back and in which he briefly, and flamboyantly, lived until what happened this past spring, at the very start of yet another Southampton Season. Until then, Cowboy had been enjoying himself and delighting his friends, less elegantly but every bit as fully as the Dukes did so long ago, even while scoffed at by his “betters,” men who clucked at the very idea of their new neighbor. While the Duke boys’ parties inspired rhapsodies of memory half a century later, Dils’s contemporary gatherings invited privileged, local scorn.
“Cowboy Dils on Gin Lane? Preposterous.” And probably it was. Yet who was there to tell a wealthy American such as Dils that he couldn’t buy this piece of property or that and live wherever he chose? Even if he did entertain odd friends and loudly. And was forever threatening to “have a fistfight” with someone. How strangely soothing and old-fashioned the phrase “I want to have a fistfight with you!”
It occurred to the few of us who actually liked him that with Dils, even his hostilities were comfortable and homespun.
I mentioned the differences between East Hampton and Southampton, the distinctions between our Further Lane and their Gin Lane; mentioned as well the links they share: the narrow road, the lovely beach, the ocean on which both front, and the money.
Cowboy Dils understood the money part, I guess, but not much else about the Hamptons or the Season. He was a queer duck with all the usual tics and neuroses, but he had remained very much the westerner, and had a westerner’s open, easy, joshing ways. Where he came from, traditions began a few decades back and a hundred years was a long time; here in the East we counted by centuries. There are local people who can count back twelve generations of Hamptons residence, to the 1660s, when Connecticut still owned some of the Hamptons. And from the very moment he moved in, much of what Gin Lane was and stood for eluded Dils. Despite this, there were in Cowboy’s time glorious days and nights at his mansion at Ten bis. “Good Gawd A-mighty!” he cried in considerable if primitive exasperation, “I was only trying to make people happy.”
It was what Cowboy Dils didn’t understand about the place and its traditions that in the end drove him from Gin Lane and emptied that wonderful house which used to be filled with music and laughter and the top girls and dashing Russians, the place at Ten bis Gin Lane they once called the Duke Box.
TWO
What it is in spring that turns men and women reckless, no one could say.
In the good years—and despite our latitude, 41 degrees north, this promised to be one of them—spring comes early to the East End of Long Island, to what is known generically, and in the gossip columns, as the Hamptons. And with spring each year begins a new time we call “the Season.”
Along the beach paths and rural country roads of East Hampton and Southampton and Water Mill and Bridgehampton and Amagansett and Montauk, the old Puritan villages that have bordered the Atlantic since the 1640s, the long, chill winter just sort of vanished this year one warmish, sunny day in mid-April. On Gin Lane and Dune Road and Lily Pond Lane and along Bluff Road and the Old Montauk Highway and on Further Lane, you got those first deliciously teasing hints of a better time: the snow gone, the wind-driven sand no longer abrasive as emery and scouring bare limbs, the ice melted off the brackish ponds. The migratory birds were back and the first silly plants had come up, gaudy with optimistic color in a monochrome land, flirtatious and at risk, daring the last frost, imperiling themselves the way careless men and audacious women do, in passion, or in drink. Credit the ocean for our early spring, the moderating effect of sea-water and the Gulf Stream and the onshore breeze blowing across it toward the beaches and over the land. Or so I’m told by old-timers like The Eel Lady, a local seer who sells live baits and predicts weather. That’s what she claims warms the East End and propagates and excites our early growths, our premature greenery; what it is in spring that turns men and women reckless, no one can say. Not even The Eel Lady. The way we are, I suppose.
I didn’t come back to the Hamptons this year until May. And then, unexpectedly.
I’d been in California to interview an important actress. I won’t mention her name here. Not fair, since the interview never came off. But she was one of the biggies with the requisite Academy Award and all that. And good; her Oscar was no fluke. She was as big even as Streep and Close; younger, too. A little younger. A wonderful actress and beautiful woman, and I’d arranged, with her people, to do a piece for the magazine about her new film. And after all the arranging, with her people getting back to me and my getting back to her people (in California, people are always “getting back” to you), when I arrived she wouldn’t see me. Didn’t even hint she might be “getting back” to me. Just plain sent out word to go away. Something happened. Was she ill? I could understand illness. People got sick and they canceled. No, not that. Well, maybe she’d disliked the new movie’s final cut and didn’t choose to promote it. No, not that, either. In the end no one ever told me exactly what it was and I never got to see her. But the buzz suggested it was a young man, much younger. They’d been together here and in Europe, France, I believe, and then something happened and he went off. And the joy went out of her and she didn�
��t give a shit anymore and didn’t care to hype the film or talk to me or go on Letterman or do those other things actors do. Nor did I find out the young man’s name.
So I flew back to New York.
“These things happen,” Anderson said. He wasn’t happy about it but he said he understood. Anderson is the editor of Parade, the largest-circulation magazine in the world, and we were sitting in his corner office at 711 Third Avenue talking about what happened out there in L.A. and about what I might think about doing instead. I’m under contract to write eight pieces a year for Anderson and this was the first time I’d failed to deliver. “Not your fault, Beecher,” he said, and of course it wasn’t. But neither was Anderson much for trotted-out excuses and labored explanations; few serious editors are. While I was also a professional who took pride in getting the job done. It’s no great credit to me, just how Episcopalians and Harvard men were supposed to be, how my father is, how we were in my family. Professionals, who knew the work and did it. Anderson, who’d been a Marine, was that way himself, perhaps one of the reasons we get along.
My new book was out, the one I wrote on terrorism in Europe and the Middle East and North Africa (the king of Morocco having graciously provided a brief book jacket blurb), and doing well with both the reviewers and the Times best-seller list, sitting there at an encouraging number six for nonfiction, and until this failed assignment with the actress, I was feeling myself a pretty bright fellow indeed. Anderson was sensitive to mood and didn’t want his writers sulking, so to clear the air between us over my failure, he said why didn’t I get out of the city. Maybe go out to the Hamptons, now that the weather had turned, to do that piece on the Baymen I was forever talking about, about the last hardcore commercial fishermen we have in our overcivilized part of the world. After all, the Parade story I wrote about Hannah Cutting, and how Hannah got to Further Lane, finding fame and wealth, until in the end it all kind of ganged up and killed her, had turned into a pretty good yarn.…