STRANGE SCIENCE FICTION AND FANTASY OMNIBUS
Page 1
Copywrite 2014 Benson Lee Grayson
STRANGE SCIENCE FICTION AND FANTASY OMNIBUS
By
Benson Lee Grayson
Table of Contents
1. The Second Renaissance
2. The Washington Spring
3. Putin’s Flea
4. The Mouse Who Traveled Trough Time
5. Speak Of The Devil
6. That Thing In The Cellar
7. The Man On The Moon
8. The Enemies Machine
9. Mission To Earth
10. Monkey Business
11. You Are What You Eat
12. Rocks
13. Putin For President
14. Erskine’s Law
15. Snafu
16. The Cat’s Meow
17. Homo Superior
18. The Perfect Drug
19. Limbo
20. Precepts Of Statesmanship
21. Civilized?
22. Admiralty Affairs
23. Double Jeopardy
24. Bancroft’s Time Machine
25. The Enemies Machine
26. Eat Up No More
27. The Devil You Know
28. The Vulcan Project
29. Obesity
30. The Seers
31. The Sterling Prize
32. Mad Scientist
33. Avoid The Fire
34. Follow The Rats
35. The Probe
36. School Reform
37. The Submersible
38. Halloween
THE SECOND RENAISSANCE
The rebirth of knowledge of the ancients, known as the Second Renaissance, originated in Washington, D.C. in the middle of the Twenty-First Century. Its geographic location was associated with the fact that the Library of Congress, in the nation’s capital, had become the largest single repository of copies of the works of the ancients. This status had been conveyed upon it by the fact that the original documents had been destroyed during the ravaging of the libraries of Europe in the first and second world wars.
The immediate cause of the Second Renaissance was the decision of the Library of Congress to copy all of its extensive holdings into a newly installed cloud computing system. The intention was to help preserve them from deterioration, and to enhance the Library’s capability to make the contents readily available to users around the country. During the work of preparing the holdings for uploading to the computers, some of the library staff happened to look at the documents, and were intrigued by what they found. They were astounded to learn that the commonly-held belief that the earth is round, and that it orbits the sun were relatively recent, and that for the greater part of man’s existence, it was understood that a flat earth is orbited each day by the sun.
It was impossible to contain the news. Word of the discovery traveled rapidly among the library staff, and subsequently to outsiders. It became a hot topic of discussion in Washington political circles and along Embassy Row. Some prominent scientists, unwilling to see their scholarly reputations unravel, dismissed the new findings as an absurd superstition. They might conceivably have been successful, if they had not been publicly challenged by a few of the more progressive graduate assistants, and junior professors.
A re-examination of the “proof” that the earth is round revealed that most of the claims to have circumnavigated the earth were due to navigational blunders. The apparent evidence that the earth is not flat, offered by individuals clinging to that obsolete theory, was shown to be pure fable when it was explained that a slight elevation in the center of the flat earth, which gives it the shape of an upturned saucer, accounted for the appearance of the masts of a ship before the entire vessel comes into view. Further proof became available when the U.S. Navy radio station in Guam found, in its files, a copy of the last radio transmission of the lost aviator, Amelia Earhart, on July 2, 1937, stating that she “had reached the end, and that her plane was falling into the void,” a clear reference to having flown off the rim of the world.
A crucial event aiding the spread of the new learning, came when the Massachusetts legislature voted to require textbooks used in the state public schools to include material drawn from the ancient texts. Other states quickly followed suit, with only a few holdouts in the Deep South.
The most rapid changes, as a result of the Second Renaissance, came in the areas of politics and government. The ancients had clearly shown the inefficiency of the democratic system. When carefully examined by the unbiased mind, it was clear that giving every person the right to vote, regardless of their intelligence, interest, or ability would produce results far less efficient than a limited franchise. Systems of weighted voting, or limiting the ballots to those over forty-five, were tried and found wanting. So too, was rule by an oligarchy. Eventually, by general consensus, it was decided to appoint a king for life.
Initially, there were some attempts to limit the power of the King. These were successfully rebuffed, by citing the frequent references in the ancient documents to the divine right of Kings. Obviously, when the Almighty himself selected the proper individual to be king, it was feckless for ordinary mortals to challenge his wisdom.
A logical byproduct of the adoption of an absolute monarchy was the establishment of a state church. It was correctly observed, that it made little sense to suffer the disputes among various denominations, over the technical points of doctrine. Only one religion was correct, and who better to decide on religious dogma, and head the church, than the king himself?
From the political and religious sectors, the new doctrines spread to include economics. Capitalism and the free market, all economists had to agree, led to widespread waste and inefficiency. New firms kept on being established, taking on heavy infusions of cash, only to go bankrupt in the inevitable cycle of boom and bust. The obvious solution was to go back to the wisdom of the ancients, combining as many firms as possible into giant monopolies. The success of this new policy was proven, when all of the competing telephone companies were re-combined into a giant American Telephone and Telegraph Company, which was given a permanent monopoly position over the nation’s telephone sector. Millions of Americans cheered, when the restored telephone monopoly reinstated the long-valued abilities of subscribers, to learn the time and weather, via a simple phone call.
Medical science similarly benefited, aided by the discovery that the so-called “germ theory” had been concocted by the Fenwick Pharmaceutical Company in 1897, in an effort to promote the declining sales of their products. As Dr. Amadeus Foster asked, when he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize for Medicine, “How can people possibly believe in a germ, which they can’t see with their own eyes?” Most scholars today credit the advances made in modern medicine, to the precept taught in scientific classes at all levels, primary, secondary and university, that no matter what the theory states, if you can’t see it, it doesn’t exist.
It is hard for many of us living today to believe that our ancestors clung so foolishly to superstition, and ignored the advanced knowledge of the past. Probably the most important thing we can teach our children, is to avoid the error of discarding past beliefs for whatever fad achieves temporary popularity.
THE WASHINGTON SPRING
It all began in Washington, D.C., in the capitol of what was once the most powerful nation on the globe. As with so many important movements in history, the incident causing it was quite trivial. Jonathan Smith, a twenty-seven year old “yuppie”, working as a deputy assistant to a section chief at the Treasury Department, returned home to his efficiency apartment, in the prestigious northwest area of Washington, and found a letter from the Civil Service Office stuck in among the ad
vertisements in his letter box.
Opening the envelope, Smith found it contained a notification that his monthly paycheck had been increased by twenty-three percent,; three percent as his annual in-grade step increase, seven percent for a merit pay bonus, and thirteen percent to cover an increase in the annual rate of inflation; the official figures having been carefully adjusted to disguise the fact that the real rate of inflation was more than double that. This good news, regrettably, was more than counter-balanced by a fort-seven percent reduction in his net pay. This depressing result, according to the Civil Service Office, stemmed from a ten percent increase in the annual tax rate, a twenty-three percent increase in his cost for mandatory life insurance, and fourteen percent surtax to cover the medical insurance made available to individuals who could not otherwise pay for it.
Smith gulped as he read the notice. This was the fourth year in a row that his net salary had actually gone down from the year before. As an intelligent man, he reached the logical conclusion. His life would only become worse. There was only one possible solution - suicide. Turning to the conventional methods of doing away with oneself, Smith carefully considered poison, hanging, and slitting his wrists. None of these seemed attractive. All were distinctly unpleasant.
Having an inventive mind, Smith found the perfect solution. The next morning, he visited four of the public health clinics in Washington that dispensed heroine in small doses to addicts, under a plan to gently wean them off the drug. By slightly disguising his appearance at each clinic, he was successful in obtaining doses at all four clinics. He then returned to his apartment, and settled down to expire. As he had never before used the narcotic, or any dangerous drug, the result was foregone.
What would otherwise have resulted in no more than a brief notice on the obituary page, was drastically altered by Smith’s careful preparations before the deed. Not only did he mail letters to all major newspapers in the northeast describing his dilemma and his solution, but he also prepared a movie for you tube, in which he discussed his situation at length. All four of the TV networks immediately seized the opportunity for a human interest story in their nightly news shows, three of them going so far as to omit coverage of the ongoing civil war in Syria, so as to expand their coverage of Smith’s tragic suicide.
Nationwide, the popular response to the story of Smith’s fate was immediate. Many individuals tied yellow ribbons on their fence posts, and letter boxes as memorials. Men wore yellow ties, women yellow scarves. Some yuppies, identifying themselves with Smith, likewise committed suicide. A few, however, recognizing that suicide was a permanent step, elected instead to resort to looting. This was not only better at relieving their inner tensions, but also could be monetarily advantageous.
Being yuppies, most of the looters were selective in what they chose to loot. Few stores had imported bottled water in their windows, and imported handbags were of little use if the color was not right. Therefore, they began to think of a more satisfactory method of displaying their outrage at the way American culture had declined in recent decades, and hopefully, of effecting a change.
The defining moment came in early April. George Burrows, a youngish economist at the Commerce Department, walked to Lafayette Square Park, just across from the White House, climbed on to a park bench, and began speaking. Other government staffers, also crossing the park on their way homeward, saw him and began to listen to his words. Burrows excoriated the U.S. government for the widespread favoritism, corruption, and duplicity. But his harshest words were directed at the way of life of the average American. He called upon men to shave off their beards, to cut their hair only in the crew cut style familiar to Marine Corps, and to dress only in three-piece suits, with starched white shirts, and striped ties. Women, he demanded, should raise the hem of their skirts to a minimum of six inches above the knee.
Burrows’ revolutionary message spread across the country, and many heeded him. Hundreds of his followers camped permanently in Lafayette Square, living in tents and parading along Pennsylvania Avenue with signs, calling upon the government to resign. All of this was widely covered by television, which helped the movement to spread. Social media and the internet fostered the revolution abroad, first in Canada, and Great Britain, but subsequently in places as distant as Tibet and Bulgaria. Burrows’ followers, of course, could always be identified by their revolutionary style of dress, as prescribed by Burrows.
The aftermath of the events in Washington that Spring, was initially peaceful. Not all of those involved in the movement, however, shunned violence to accomplish their aims. Clandestine groups formed and began to obtain arms. They were not united under a central organization, but cooperated in working for a common purpose. Most of them adopted the umbrella name of United Servants of America, customarily abbreviated to USA, which evoked feelings of patriotic loyalty among its adherents.
Washington, and virtually all other governments around the world ignored the growing danger, regarding it as a temporary phenomenon. The potential threat of USA become apparent a few months later, when a private yacht approached the coast of Morocco, and brought a small force of USA’s. Most of the thirty odd revolutionaries were from the United States, but their number included volunteers from Canada, Great Britain, Norway, and Brazil. All the men were dressed in their uniforms, three piece suits, white dress shirts, and striped ties. The three women among them wore the short skirts demanded by their ideology.
The USA military campaign was brilliantly directed. The landing spot, just south of Morocco’s largest city, Casablanca, was not guarded by any government security forces, so that the invaders could debark unhindered. Unfurling their black banners, they then advanced northeast toward the Moroccan capitol of Rabat.
News of the invasion rapidly spread, and Moroccan troops were dispatched to stop it. Despite greatly superior numbers, the invaders had little difficulty in continuing their progress, aided by massive defections from the Moroccan Army. Many Moroccan soldiers shed their uniforms, donned the three piece suits of the invaders, and joined their ranks. This was true even more with regard to the Moroccan officer corps, many of whom had secretly been seduced from their loyalty to the King of Morocco. by the thought of being able to wear their hair in a crew cut style, and by a desire to see their wives and sweethearts in miniskirts.
Rabat fell to the invaders after the briefest skirmishing, the defenders melting away or joining the revolution. Around the world, USA groups, both overt and clandestine, hailed this success. In sudden, unexpected strikes, USA adherents seized power not only in Baltimore, Maryland but also in Manchester, England, and Halifax, Nova Scotia.
The fall of Baltimore to USA militants raised concerns in world capitals that the threat to existing order was potentially deadly. The manner of USA’s treatment of the population of Baltimore, the most important city yet under USA sway, was considered to be a litmus test of their intentions. Initially, USA ruled with a light hand. No sooner had the city, and its surrounding area been brought under full USA control, then the situation changed radically.
Males who refused to shave their beards, adopt the crew cut style haircut, and don three-piece suits, were summarily executed on the spot. Women fared no better. Crew cut USA warriors broke into private residences, and questioned all women they found as to why they were home, rather than working in an office. Any women whose skirts were deemed too long had the garments cut off far above the knee. As a clear signal to all who saw them that they had sinfully violated Burrows’ doctrines, their eyebrows were ruthlessly shaved off. Perhaps the greatest barbarity, was the case of some fifty odd females found at home, who were dragged out at gunpoint, loaded aboard packed vans, and carted to Harvard University, where they were obliged on pain of death to study for graduate degrees.
As news of these events flashed around the globe, the various world leaders reacted in characteristic fashion. In Washington, D.C., the President rejected suggestions that he add USA representatives to his Cabinet, instead ordering his
security forces to use fire hoses and tear gas to drive USA supporters that had been camped in Lafayette Square. A significant number of the government troops, revolted by this deed, shed their uniforms and deserted to the USA. USA troops slowly encircled the American capitol, raising fears in foreign quarters that Washington’s defenses would collapse.
British Prime Minister David Cameron, stung by the loss of Manchester to USA, charged that British security was being eroded by the influx of illegal immigrants, via the Common Market countries, and ordered the tightest controls on immigration since the end of World War II. The reaction was not limited to the Western nations. The Iranian President made an emergency trip to Israel, where he urged the Jewish State to forget its difficulties with Iran, and join in a common effort to combat the USA menace. which was threatening both nations. As an added inducement, he suggested the two nations should jointly cooperate in the development of nuclear weapons. Similarly, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, whose nations had been less troubled by USA attacks, due to concentration on other internal matters, flew together in Putin’s personal jet to Washington, where they unsuccessfully urged the American President to broaden his government.
If the loss of Baltimore, Manchester, and Rabat to the USA was unexpected, the USA takeover of New York City was even more so. The residents of that metropolis awakened one morning to see the black USA banner flying above all government buildings. Journalists who questioned the residents of New York City, about their reactions to the takeover, were told, only in private, that New Yorkers certainly did not agree with all USA ideology, but preferred it to that of the government in Washington.
As the world now waits apprehensively, to see if the USA will somehow be contained, or if it will grow to encompass the entire globe, it is too early to reach a definite conclusion. That will have to be the work of later generations of historians. All that can be concluded at this time about the events of the Washington Spring, is that the forces that shape the course of civilization are often determined by trivial events.