most recent financial years. Although the SEC does not prohibit entities from including
   selected financial data based on previous GAAP in their annual reports, side-by-side
   presentation of data prepared under IFRSs and data prepared under previous GAAP is
   prohibited. In addition, inclusion of previous GAAP selected financial data will trigger the
   requirement for the corresponding reconciled US GAAP selected financial data.10
   Where a narrative discussion of its financial condition is provided, the accommodation
   requires management to focus on the financial statements prepared under IFRSs as
   issued by the IASB for the past two financial years.
   IFRS 1 requires a first-time adopter to present reconciliations from its previous GAAP
   to IFRSs in the notes to its financial statements and allows certain exceptions from full
   retrospective application of IFRSs in deriving the relevant data. Under the SEC’s
   accommodation, any issuer relying on any of the elective or mandatory exceptions from
   IFRSs that are contained within IFRS 1 will have to disclose additional information
   which includes:
   • to the extent the primary financial statements reflect the use of exceptions
   permitted or required by IFRS 1:
   • detailed information for each exception used, including:
   • an indication of the items or class of items to which the exception was
   applied; and
   • a description of what accounting principle was used and how it was
   applied; and
   • where material, qualitative disclosure of the impact on financial condition,
   changes in financial condition and results of operations that the treatment
   specified by IFRSs would have had absent the election to rely on the exception.
   First-time
   adoption
   351
   8.1.2 IPTF
   guidance
   In November 2008, the Center for Audit Quality SEC Regulations Committee’s
   International Practices Task Force (‘IPTF’) provided guidance as to the reconciliation
   requirements of an SEC foreign private issuer the first time it presents IFRS financial
   statements in its Form 20-F, when that issuer previously used US GAAP for its primary
   financial statements filed with the SEC.11 Among others, the IPTF guidance addresses
   the concern that the reconciliations called for by IFRS 1, which are prepared using the
   issuer’s local GAAP rather than US GAAP, would not have sufficient information to help
   US investors to bridge from the prior US GAAP financial statements filed with the SEC
   to IFRSs. Accordingly, the IPTF guidance requires additional detailed reconciliations in
   these circumstances from US GAAP to IFRSs either in a one step or a two-step format
   (see below).
   The reconciliation requirements for each of the scenarios are described below:
   • SEC Foreign Private Issuers who currently report under their local GAAP and
   provide a reconciliation from their local GAAP to US GAAP – In the year of
   adoption of IFRSs, these entities will be allowed to file two years rather than three
   years of profit or loss statements, shareholders’ equity and cash flows prepared in
   accordance with IFRSs. As part of the IFRS transition, these entities will provide
   the disclosures and reconciliations required under IFRS 1 including:
   • an equity reconciliation as at the date of the transition and as at the
   comparative year-end;
   • a comprehensive income (or statement of profit or loss, if presented)
   reconciliation for the comparative year; and
   • an explanation of material adjustments to the statement of cash flows for the
   comparative year.
   If the IFRS 1 disclosures and reconciliations are prepared using the local GAAP as
   the issuer’s previous GAAP rather than US GAAP, no additional US GAAP to IFRSs
   or US GAAP to local GAAP reconciliations will be required.
   • SEC foreign private issuers that currently report under US GAAP only – Some SEC
   foreign private issuers currently use US GAAP as their primary GAAP in both their
   home jurisdiction and the United States without reconciliation. These registrants
   would also be eligible to file two years rather than three years of statements of
   profit or loss and other comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash
   flows in their first set of IFRS financial statements. In the year of adoption of IFRSs,
   these entities will be required to provide the IFRS 1 disclosures and reconciliations
   described above. Such disclosures will be prepared using US GAAP as the issuer’s
   previous GAAP.
   • SEC foreign private issuers that currently report under local GAAP for local
   reporting and under US GAAP in their SEC Form 20-F filings (assuming these
   issuers adopt IFRSs in the current period for both local and SEC reporting
   purposes) – These registrants would also be eligible to file two years rather than
   three years of statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income,
   shareholders’ equity and cash flows in their first set of IFRS financial statements.
   Under IFRS 1, such entities might conclude their local GAAP is their previous
   352 Chapter
   5
   GAAP and their IFRS 1 disclosures and reconciliations would be prepared on that
   basis. As no reconciliation from their local GAAP to US GAAP was previously
   provided, the SEC will require additional disclosure in the Form 20-F to enable
   investors to understand material reconciling items between US GAAP and IFRSs
   in the year of adoption. Two possible forms of disclosure are acceptable:
   • One-Step Format – Registrants can provide an analysis of the differences
   between US GAAP and IFRSs in a tabular format (consistent with Item 17 of
   Form 20-F) for the same time period and dates that the IFRS 1 reconciliations
   are required. The registrant must provide this disclosure for equity as at the
   beginning and end of the most recent comparative period to the year of adoption
   and of comprehensive income (or profit or loss) for the most recent comparative
   year. A description of the differences between US GAAP and IFRSs for the
   statement of cash flows is not necessary because registrants are not required to
   reconcile IAS 7 statement of cash flows to those prepared under US GAAP.
   • Two-Step Format – Registrants can choose to disclose a two-step
   reconciliation which would include a quantitative analysis of the
   differences between US GAAP and their local GAAP and between their
   local GAAP to IFRSs. The registrant must provide these reconciliations for
   equity as of the beginning and end of the most recent comparative period
   to the year of adoption of IFRSs and for comprehensive income (or profit
   or loss) for the most recent comparative year. Registrants will also be
   required to provide an explanation of the material differences between
   the statement of cash flows under US GAAP and the statement of cash
   flows under their local GAAP for the most recent comparative period to
   the year of adoption of IFRSs.
   • SEC foreign private issuers that currently report under IFRSs for local reporting and
   under US GAAP in their SEC Form 20-F filings (assuming these issuers adopted IFRSs
   for local reporting in a period that preceded the earliest period for which audited
   financi
al statements are required in their SEC filing) – These registrants would not be
   eligible to file two years of statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive
   income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows the first time they file IFRS financial
   statements with the SEC, since they are not first-time adopters of IFRSs. Rather, they
   are required to present a complete set of IFRS financial statements for all periods
   required by the Form 20-F. In addition, these issuers will be required to present a
   reconciliation that enables US investors to bridge their previous US GAAP to IFRSs.
   Such a reconciliation will be similar to the One-Step Format described above, except
   that the periods presented will be for equity as of the most recent comparative period
   presented and for comprehensive income (or profit or loss) for the two most recent
   comparative periods. However, if the issuers are required to present a statement of
   financial position as of the end of the earliest comparative period, the reconciliation
   will also be required of the equity as of the end of that period.
   First-time
   adoption
   353
   8.2
   Disclosure of IFRS information in financial statements for
   periods prior to an entity’s first IFRS reporting period
   8.2.1 IFRS
   guidance
   Although IFRS 1 provides detailed rules on disclosures to be made in an entity’s first
   IFRS financial statements and in interim reports covering part of its first IFRS reporting
   period, it does not provide any guidance on presenting a reconciliation to IFRSs in
   financial reports before the start of the first IFRS reporting period. An entity wishing to
   disclose information on the impact of IFRSs in its last financial statements under its
   previous GAAP cannot claim that such information is prepared and presented in
   accordance with IFRSs because it does not disclose all information required in full IFRS
   financial statements and it does not disclose comparative information.
   As the extract below illustrates, in practice, some entities get around this problem by
   disclosing pro forma IFRS information and stating that the pro forma information does
   not comply with IFRSs.
   Extract 5.17: ARINSO International SA (2003)
   2003 IFRS Consolidated Financial Information [extract]
   1. OPENING BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2003 [extract]
   In 2003, ARINSO decided to anticipate the adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards (earlier
   called International Accounting Standards (IAS)). These standards will become mandatory in 2005 for the
   consolidated financial statements of all companies listed on stock exchanges within the European Union.
   As of 2004 ARINSO will publish quarterly reports in full compliance with IFRS. In order to have comparable
   figures as requested by IFRS, the 2003 financial statements were already prepared on an IFRS basis. In 2003, the
   impact of the IFRS conversion on the quarterly figures was published in our press releases.
   The main differences between Belgian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and IFRS as well as a
   reconciliation of the equity to IFRS at the date of conversion are presented hereunder.
   3. IFRS VALUATION RULES [extract]
   3.2 Adoption of the IFRS
   The IFRS standards will be adopted for the first time in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
   December 31, 2004. The standard for the first time application of the IFRS, published by the IASB in June 2003,
   was utilized in the pro forma consolidated IFRS balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement published
   for the year ended December 31, 2003.
   The information related to accounting year 2003 was converted from Belgian GAAP to IFRS in view of the
   comparison of information next year. The 2004 annual report will include all necessary comparable information.
   Free translation of the Statutory Auditor’s Report submitted to the shareholders, originally prepared in Dutch, on
   the restatement of the consolidated balance sheet, the profit and loss account and cash flow statement from
   accounting principles generally accepted in Belgium into IFRS [extract]
   The financial statements provided, which do not include all notes to the financial statements in accordance with
   IFRS, have been prepared under the responsibility of the company’s management, and do not comply with IFRS.
   354 Chapter
   5
   8.2.2
   Disclosure of expected changes in accounting policies
   In certain countries, publicly listed companies are required by regulation to disclose the
   potential impact that recently issued accounting standards will have on their financial
   statements when such standards are adopted in the future. The Canadian Securities
   Administrators (the CSA) in their Management’s Discussion & Analysis (MD&A form)12
   require this disclosure for changes in accounting policies that registrants expect to make
   in the future. In connection with the transition to IFRSs, the CSA issued a Staff Notice13
   clarifying that ‘changes in an issuer’s accounting policies that an issuer expects to make
   on changeover to IFRSs are changes due to new accounting standards and therefore fall
   within the scope of the MD&A form.’ Among other matters, the CSA Staff Notice
   requires certain disclosures of companies that have developed an IFRS changeover
   plan, in interim and annual MD&A forms starting three years before the first IFRS
   financial statement date, including the following:
   • accounting policies, including choices among policies permitted under IFRSs, and
   implementation decisions such as whether certain changes will be applied on a
   retrospective or a prospective basis;
   • impact on information technology and data systems;
   • changes to internal control over financial reporting;
   • impact on disclosure controls and procedures, including investor relations and
   external communications plan;
   • enhancements to financial reporting expertise, including training requirements; and
   • changes in business activities, such as foreign currency and hedging activities, as
   well as matters that may be influenced by GAAP measures such as debt covenants,
   capital requirements and compensation arrangements.
   The CSA Staff Notice also specified requirements for update for periods up to the year
   of changeover, including discussion of the impact of transition for issuers that are well
   advanced in their plans.
   An entity that is planning to adopt IFRS should take note of the regulatory requirements
   in its jurisdiction or the exchange where it is listed to determine the form of
   communication that is required in advance of publishing its first IFRS financial statements.
   First-time
   adoption
   355
   References
   1 Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European
   6
   Annual Improvements to IFRSs
   2009-2011
   Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on
   Cycle, IASB, May 2012.
   the application of international accounting 7
   IFRIC Update, October 2004, p.3.
   standards, article 4 defines these companies as
   8 Release No. 33-8567, First-Time Application of
   follows: ‘For each financial year starting on or after
   International Financial Reporting Standards,
 />
   1 January 2005, companies governed by the law of
   Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
   a Member State shall prepare their consolidated
   12 April 2005.
   accounts in conformity with the international 9
   Release
   No.
   33-8879,
   Acceptance from Foreign
   accounting standards adopted in accordance with
   Private Issuers of Financial Statements
   the procedure laid down in Article 6(2) if, at their
   Prepared in Accordance with International
   balance sheet date, their securities are admitted to
   Financial Reporting Standards without
   trading on a regulated market of any Member State
   Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP, Securities and
   within the meaning of Article 1(13) of Council
   Exchange Commission, 4 March 2008.
   Directive 93/22/EEC of 10
   May 1993 on 10 24 November 2009 IPTF meeting minutes.
   investment services in the securities field.’
   11 25 November 2008 IPTF meeting minutes.
   2
   International Practices Task Force – 12
   Canadian Securities Administration Form
   November 25, 2008 – Highlights, Center for
   51-102F1, Management’s Discussion and
   Audit Quality Washington Office,
   Analysis.
   25 November 2008.
   13 Canadian CSA Staff Notice 52-320 – Disclosure
   3
   IFRIC Update, October 2004.
   of Expected Changes in Accounting Policies
   4
   IASB Update, October 2005.
   Relating to Changeover to International Financial
   5
   Amendments to IFRS
   10, IFRS
   11 and
   Reporting Standards, May 9, 2008.
   IFRS 12, June 2012.
   356 Chapter
   5
   357
   Chapter 6
   Consolidated
   financial statements
   1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 363
   1.1
   Background ............................................................................................................363
   1.2 Development
   of IFRS 10 .................................................................................... 364
   
 
 International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 71