(although the IASB now plans no further work on this project until the Post-
   implementation Review of IFRS 11 is undertaken).7 Nevertheless, the IASB has continued
   to allow early application of the September 2014 amendment as it did not wish to prohibit
   the application of better financial reporting. [IFRS 10.BC190O].8 This issue is discussed further
   in Chapter 7 at 3.3.2, Chapter 11 at 7.6.5.C and in Chapter 12 at 8.2.3.
   (b) Vendor retains control
   If the asset is not jointly controlled in the subsequent arrangement, the vendor might
   retain control over the asset. The vendor will recognise revenue or it will be a financing
   arrangement. If it is the former, then the issue is the period and pattern over which
   revenue is recognised.
   If the vendor retains control, then it will not meet the requirements in IFRS 15 for
   treating the transaction as a sale, i.e. recognising revenue on entering into the
   arrangement. IFRS 15 requires that revenue (and a gain or loss on disposal of a non-
   current asset not in the ordinary course of business) be recognised upon satisfaction of
   performance obligation by transferring control (see Chapter 28 at 8).
   The arrangement could be akin to a lease, especially if the disposal is for a period of
   time. However, arrangements are only within the scope of IFRS 16 if they relate to a
   specified asset. Generally, a portion of a larger asset that is not physically distinct is not
   considered to be a specified asset. The related detailed requirements of IFRS 16 are
   discussed in Chapter 24 at 3.1.2.
   If it is not a lease and the vendor continues to control the asset, the arrangement might
   be best characterised as a performance obligation for services to be spread over the
   Property, plant and equipment 1343
   term of the arrangement. That is, the initial receipt would be a liability and recognised
   in profit and loss over time.
   Alternatively, it could be a financing-type arrangement, in which case the proceeds would
   be classified as a financial liability. In effect, the vendor is trading a share of any revenue to
   which it is entitled in exchange for funding by the purchaser of one or more activities
   relating to the asset. The purchaser receives a return that is comparable to a lender’s rate of
   return out of the proceeds of production. This could be by receiving a disproportionate
   share of output until it has recovered its costs (the financing it has provided) as well as the
   agreed rate of return for the funding. These arrangements are found in the extractive sector,
   e.g. carried interests and farm-outs (Chapter 39 at 6). In the development stage of a project,
   the asset in question will be classified as PP&E or as an intangible asset under IAS 38. Under
   a carried interest arrangement the carried party transfers a portion of the risks and rewards
   of a property, in exchange for a funding commitment from the carrying party.
   (c) Partial
   disposal
   In some circumstances it is argued that the rights transferred by the vendor are such that
   it neither controls nor jointly controls the whole of the original asset and the question
   arises as to whether there is a part disposal of the asset. The arrangement cannot be
   accounted for as a joint operation as there is no joint control. Classification as a joint
   operation would allow a part disposal of an item of PP&E. It is noted that a party that
   participates in a joint operation but does not have joint control records its interests in
   the same way as a participant in a joint operation, accounting for its own assets and
   liabilities. [IFRS 11.23]. This is unaffected by the fact that the asset in question may be an
   interest in an undivided asset; it will still classify its interest in the asset as an item of
   PP&E. In those sectors where these arrangements are common and where an entity will
   be simultaneously vendor and acquirer in different arrangements, it is argued that the
   transactions should be treated symmetrically, i.e. as a part disposal of the undivided
   asset and an acquisition of an interest in PP&E. However, this interpretation depends
   entirely on the vendor ceding control of part of its rights and applying IAS 16 principles
   to obtain symmetry of accounting between acquisitions and disposals.
   8
   IAS 16 DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
   The main disclosure requirements of IAS 16 are set out below, but it should be noted
   that the related disclosure requirements in other standards such as IFRS 13, IAS 1 –
   Presentation of Financial Statements – and IAS 36 may also be relevant. See
   Chapters 14, 3 and 20, respectively.
   8.1 General
   disclosures
   For each class of PP&E the following should be disclosed in the financial statements:
   (a) the measurement bases used for determining the gross carrying amount (e.g. cost or
   revaluation). [IAS 16.73(a)]. When more than one basis has been used, the gross carrying
   amount for that basis in each category may have to be disclosed (however the standard
   requires that if revaluation is adopted the entire class of PP&E must be revalued);
   (b) the depreciation methods used. Selection of the depreciation method adopted is a
   matter of judgement and its disclosure provides information that allows users of
   1344 Chapter 18
   financial statements to review the policies selected by management and enables
   them to compare with other entities. For similar reasons, it is necessary to disclose
   depreciation (in item (e)(vii) below), whether recognised in profit or loss or as a
   part of the cost of other assets, during a period; and accumulated depreciation at
   the end of the period (in item (d) below); [IAS 16.73(b), 75]
   (c) the useful lives or the depreciation rates used. Selection of the useful lives or
   depreciation rates used is a matter of judgement and its disclosure provides
   information that allows users of financial statements to review the policies selected
   by management and enables them to compare with other entities; [IAS 16.73(c), 75]
   (d) the gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation (aggregated with
   accumulated impairment losses) at the beginning and end of the period; [IAS 16.73(d)]
   and
   (e) a reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period showing:
   (i) additions;
   (ii) disposals, and assets classified as held for sale or included in a disposal group
   held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5;
   (iii) acquisitions through business combinations;
   (iv) increases or decreases resulting from revaluations and from impairment
   losses recognised or reversed directly in other comprehensive income under
   IAS 36;
   (v) impairment losses recognised in profit or loss during the period under IAS 36;
   (vi) impairment losses reversed in profit or loss during the period under IAS 36;
   (vii) depreciation;
   (viii) the net exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial
   statements from the functional currency into a different presentation
   currency, including the translation of a foreign operation into the
   presentation currency of the reporting entity; and
   (ix) other
   changes.
   [IAS 16.73(e)].
   Extract 18.9 below illustrates an accounting policy on PP&E together with the
 &nb
sp; movement and reconciliation note (a comparative is provided in the financial
   statements but is not reproduced here).
   Extract 18.9: Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft (2017)
   Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements [extract]
   Accounting policies [extract]
   PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT [extract]
   Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost less depreciation and – where necessary – write-downs for
   impairment. Investment grants are generally deducted from cost. Cost is determined on the basis of the direct and
   indirect costs that are directly attributable. Special tools are reported under other equipment, operating and office
   equipment. Property, plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life.
   The useful lives of items of property, plant and equipment are reviewed on a regular basis and adjusted if required.
   Depreciation is based mainly on the following useful lives:
   Property, plant and equipment 1345
   Useful life
   Buildings
   20 to 50 years
   Site improvements
   10 to 20 years
   Technical equipment and machinery
   6 to 12 years
   Other equipment, operating and office equipment, including special tools
   3 to 15 years
   Balance sheet disclosures [extract]
   13.
   Property, plant and equipment [extract]
   CHANGES IN PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT IN THE PERIOD JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2017
   [extract]
   Land, land
   rights and
   buildings,
   Other
   including
   Technical
   equipment,
   Payments on
   buildings on
   equipment operating and
   account and
   third-party
   and
   office
   assets under
   € million
   land
   machinery
   equipment
   construction Total
   Cost
   Balance at Jan. 1, 2017
   33,534
   43,353
   64,595
   7,008
   148,490
   Foreign exchange differences
   –440
   –824
   –1,056
   –152
   –2,473
   Changes in consolidated Group
   –303
   –71
   –117
   –11
   –501
   Additions
   630 1,355 5,056 5,474
   12,516
   Transfers
   1,063 2,509 1,829 –5,411 –11
   Disposals 149
   873
   1,399
   31
   2,452
   Balance at Dec. 31, 2017
   34,335 45,450 68,909
   6,876
   155,569
   Depreciation and impairment
   Balance at Jan. 1, 2017
   13,887
   30,531
   49,999
   39
   94,456
   Foreign
   exchange
   differences
   –153 –560 –790
   –5
   –1,508
   Changes in consolidated Group
   –117
   –62
   –80
   –
   –259
   Additions to cumulative
   depreciation
   1,058 3,211 5,152
   –
   9,421
   Additions to cumulative
   impairment losses
   3
   –9
   254
   55
   303
   Transfers 14
   –16
   –1
   0
   –3
   Disposals 71
   807
   1,183
   7
   2,068
   Reversal of impairment losses
   0
   2
   0
   13
   15
   Balance at Dec. 31, 2017
   14,621
   32,286
   53,352
   69
   100,327
   Carrying amount at
   Dec. 31, 2017
   19,714
   13,164
   15,557
   6,807
   55,243
   of which assets leased under
   finance leases
   Carrying amount at Dec. 31, 2017
   286
   6
   46
   –
   339
   Options to purchase buildings and plant leased under the terms of finance leases exist in most cases, and are also
   expected to be exercised.
   1346 Chapter 18
   IAS 16 also requires the disclosure of the following information, which is useful to gain
   a fuller understanding of the entire position of the entity’s holdings of and its
   commitments to purchase property plant and equipment:
   (a) the existence and amounts of restrictions on title, and PP&E pledged as security
   for liabilities;
   (b) the amount of expenditures recognised in the carrying amount of an item of PP&E
   in the course of construction;
   (c) the amount of contractual commitments for the acquisition of PP&E; and
   (d) if it is not disclosed separately in the statement of comprehensive income, the
   amount of compensation from third parties for items of PP&E that were impaired,
   lost or given up that is included in profit or loss. [IAS 16.74].
   In addition there is a reminder in the standard that, in accordance with IAS 8, the nature
   and effect of any change in an accounting estimate (e.g. depreciation methods, useful
   lives, residual values, and the estimated cost of dismantling, removing or restoring items
   of PP&E) that has an effect on the current period or is expected to have an effect in
   future periods must be disclosed. [IAS 16.76].
   8.2
   Additional disclosures for revalued assets
   In addition to the disclosures required by IFRS 13, the disclosure requirements in IAS 16
   if the revaluation method is adopted are:
   (a) the effective date of the revaluation;
   (b) whether an independent valuer was involved;
   (c) for each revalued class of PP&E, the carrying amount that would have been
   recognised had the assets been carried under the cost model; and
   (d) the revaluation surplus, indicating the change for the period and any restrictions
   on the distribution of the balance to shareholders. [IAS 16.77].
   In particular the requirement under (c) is quite onerous for entities, as it entails their
   keeping asset register information in some detail in order to meet it.
   In May 2014, the Interpretations Committee received a request to clarify whether an
   entity is required to reflect the capitalisation of borrowing costs to meet the disclosure
   requirement of IAS 16 for assets stated at revalued amounts and for which borrowing
   costs are not capitalised. Since the capitalisation of borrowing costs for such assets is
   not required (see Chapter 21 at 3.2), the determination of the amount of borrowing costs
   that would have been capitalised under a cost model – solely to meet a disclosure
   requirement – might be considered burdensome.
   The Interpretations Committee noted that the requirements in paragraph 77(e) of IAS 16
   (i.e. item (c) above) are clear. This paragraph requires an entity to disclose the amount
   at which assets stated at revalued amounts wo
uld have been stated had those assets
   been carried under the cost model. The amount to be disclosed includes borrowing
   costs capitalised in accordance with IAS 23 (see Chapter 21).9
   Property, plant and equipment 1347
   IFRS 13 has a number of disclosure requirements for assets measured at fair value. Some of
   the significant disclosures under IFRS 13 which would apply to revalued PP&E are: [IFRS 13.93]
   • if the highest and best use differs from its current use, an entity must disclose that fact
   and why the asset is being used in a manner different from its highest and best use;
   • the fair value measurement’s categorisation within the fair value measurement
   hierarchy (i.e. Level 1, 2 or 3);
   • if categorised within Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy (which most revalued
   PP&E is likely to be):
   (i)
   a description of the valuation technique(s) used in the fair value measurement;
   (ii) the inputs used in the fair value measurement;
   (iii) if there has been a change in the valuation technique (e.g. changing from a
   market approach to an income approach or use of an additional technique):
   • the change; and
   • the reason(s) for making it;
   • quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair
   value measurement for those categorised within Level 3 of the fair value
   measurement hierarchy;
   • if categorised within Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy, a description
   of the valuation processes used by the entity (including, for example, how an entity
   decides its valuation policies and procedures and analyses changes in fair value
   measurements from period to period).
   In addition to these requirements, an entity must also provide the disclosures depending
   on whether the fair value measurement is recurring or non-recurring. Revalued PP&E are
   considered recurring fair value measurements and are subject to additional disclosure
   
 
 International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 265