International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Home > Other > International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards > Page 265
International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 265

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  (although the IASB now plans no further work on this project until the Post-

  implementation Review of IFRS 11 is undertaken).7 Nevertheless, the IASB has continued

  to allow early application of the September 2014 amendment as it did not wish to prohibit

  the application of better financial reporting. [IFRS 10.BC190O].8 This issue is discussed further

  in Chapter 7 at 3.3.2, Chapter 11 at 7.6.5.C and in Chapter 12 at 8.2.3.

  (b) Vendor retains control

  If the asset is not jointly controlled in the subsequent arrangement, the vendor might

  retain control over the asset. The vendor will recognise revenue or it will be a financing

  arrangement. If it is the former, then the issue is the period and pattern over which

  revenue is recognised.

  If the vendor retains control, then it will not meet the requirements in IFRS 15 for

  treating the transaction as a sale, i.e. recognising revenue on entering into the

  arrangement. IFRS 15 requires that revenue (and a gain or loss on disposal of a non-

  current asset not in the ordinary course of business) be recognised upon satisfaction of

  performance obligation by transferring control (see Chapter 28 at 8).

  The arrangement could be akin to a lease, especially if the disposal is for a period of

  time. However, arrangements are only within the scope of IFRS 16 if they relate to a

  specified asset. Generally, a portion of a larger asset that is not physically distinct is not

  considered to be a specified asset. The related detailed requirements of IFRS 16 are

  discussed in Chapter 24 at 3.1.2.

  If it is not a lease and the vendor continues to control the asset, the arrangement might

  be best characterised as a performance obligation for services to be spread over the

  Property, plant and equipment 1343

  term of the arrangement. That is, the initial receipt would be a liability and recognised

  in profit and loss over time.

  Alternatively, it could be a financing-type arrangement, in which case the proceeds would

  be classified as a financial liability. In effect, the vendor is trading a share of any revenue to

  which it is entitled in exchange for funding by the purchaser of one or more activities

  relating to the asset. The purchaser receives a return that is comparable to a lender’s rate of

  return out of the proceeds of production. This could be by receiving a disproportionate

  share of output until it has recovered its costs (the financing it has provided) as well as the

  agreed rate of return for the funding. These arrangements are found in the extractive sector,

  e.g. carried interests and farm-outs (Chapter 39 at 6). In the development stage of a project,

  the asset in question will be classified as PP&E or as an intangible asset under IAS 38. Under

  a carried interest arrangement the carried party transfers a portion of the risks and rewards

  of a property, in exchange for a funding commitment from the carrying party.

  (c) Partial

  disposal

  In some circumstances it is argued that the rights transferred by the vendor are such that

  it neither controls nor jointly controls the whole of the original asset and the question

  arises as to whether there is a part disposal of the asset. The arrangement cannot be

  accounted for as a joint operation as there is no joint control. Classification as a joint

  operation would allow a part disposal of an item of PP&E. It is noted that a party that

  participates in a joint operation but does not have joint control records its interests in

  the same way as a participant in a joint operation, accounting for its own assets and

  liabilities. [IFRS 11.23]. This is unaffected by the fact that the asset in question may be an

  interest in an undivided asset; it will still classify its interest in the asset as an item of

  PP&E. In those sectors where these arrangements are common and where an entity will

  be simultaneously vendor and acquirer in different arrangements, it is argued that the

  transactions should be treated symmetrically, i.e. as a part disposal of the undivided

  asset and an acquisition of an interest in PP&E. However, this interpretation depends

  entirely on the vendor ceding control of part of its rights and applying IAS 16 principles

  to obtain symmetry of accounting between acquisitions and disposals.

  8

  IAS 16 DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

  The main disclosure requirements of IAS 16 are set out below, but it should be noted

  that the related disclosure requirements in other standards such as IFRS 13, IAS 1 –

  Presentation of Financial Statements – and IAS 36 may also be relevant. See

  Chapters 14, 3 and 20, respectively.

  8.1 General

  disclosures

  For each class of PP&E the following should be disclosed in the financial statements:

  (a) the measurement bases used for determining the gross carrying amount (e.g. cost or

  revaluation). [IAS 16.73(a)]. When more than one basis has been used, the gross carrying

  amount for that basis in each category may have to be disclosed (however the standard

  requires that if revaluation is adopted the entire class of PP&E must be revalued);

  (b) the depreciation methods used. Selection of the depreciation method adopted is a

  matter of judgement and its disclosure provides information that allows users of

  1344 Chapter 18

  financial statements to review the policies selected by management and enables

  them to compare with other entities. For similar reasons, it is necessary to disclose

  depreciation (in item (e)(vii) below), whether recognised in profit or loss or as a

  part of the cost of other assets, during a period; and accumulated depreciation at

  the end of the period (in item (d) below); [IAS 16.73(b), 75]

  (c) the useful lives or the depreciation rates used. Selection of the useful lives or

  depreciation rates used is a matter of judgement and its disclosure provides

  information that allows users of financial statements to review the policies selected

  by management and enables them to compare with other entities; [IAS 16.73(c), 75]

  (d) the gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation (aggregated with

  accumulated impairment losses) at the beginning and end of the period; [IAS 16.73(d)]

  and

  (e) a reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period showing:

  (i) additions;

  (ii) disposals, and assets classified as held for sale or included in a disposal group

  held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5;

  (iii) acquisitions through business combinations;

  (iv) increases or decreases resulting from revaluations and from impairment

  losses recognised or reversed directly in other comprehensive income under

  IAS 36;

  (v) impairment losses recognised in profit or loss during the period under IAS 36;

  (vi) impairment losses reversed in profit or loss during the period under IAS 36;

  (vii) depreciation;

  (viii) the net exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial

  statements from the functional currency into a different presentation

  currency, including the translation of a foreign operation into the

  presentation currency of the reporting entity; and

  (ix) other

  changes.

  [IAS 16.73(e)].

  Extract 18.9 below illustrates an accounting policy on PP&E together with the

&nb
sp; movement and reconciliation note (a comparative is provided in the financial

  statements but is not reproduced here).

  Extract 18.9: Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft (2017)

  Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements [extract]

  Accounting policies [extract]

  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT [extract]

  Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost less depreciation and – where necessary – write-downs for

  impairment. Investment grants are generally deducted from cost. Cost is determined on the basis of the direct and

  indirect costs that are directly attributable. Special tools are reported under other equipment, operating and office

  equipment. Property, plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life.

  The useful lives of items of property, plant and equipment are reviewed on a regular basis and adjusted if required.

  Depreciation is based mainly on the following useful lives:

  Property, plant and equipment 1345

  Useful life

  Buildings

  20 to 50 years

  Site improvements

  10 to 20 years

  Technical equipment and machinery

  6 to 12 years

  Other equipment, operating and office equipment, including special tools

  3 to 15 years

  Balance sheet disclosures [extract]

  13.

  Property, plant and equipment [extract]

  CHANGES IN PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT IN THE PERIOD JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2017

  [extract]

  Land, land

  rights and

  buildings,

  Other

  including

  Technical

  equipment,

  Payments on

  buildings on

  equipment operating and

  account and

  third-party

  and

  office

  assets under

  € million

  land

  machinery

  equipment

  construction Total

  Cost

  Balance at Jan. 1, 2017

  33,534

  43,353

  64,595

  7,008

  148,490

  Foreign exchange differences

  –440

  –824

  –1,056

  –152

  –2,473

  Changes in consolidated Group

  –303

  –71

  –117

  –11

  –501

  Additions

  630 1,355 5,056 5,474

  12,516

  Transfers

  1,063 2,509 1,829 –5,411 –11

  Disposals 149

  873

  1,399

  31

  2,452

  Balance at Dec. 31, 2017

  34,335 45,450 68,909

  6,876

  155,569

  Depreciation and impairment

  Balance at Jan. 1, 2017

  13,887

  30,531

  49,999

  39

  94,456

  Foreign

  exchange

  differences

  –153 –560 –790

  –5

  –1,508

  Changes in consolidated Group

  –117

  –62

  –80

  –

  –259

  Additions to cumulative

  depreciation

  1,058 3,211 5,152

  –

  9,421

  Additions to cumulative

  impairment losses

  3

  –9

  254

  55

  303

  Transfers 14

  –16

  –1

  0

  –3

  Disposals 71

  807

  1,183

  7

  2,068

  Reversal of impairment losses

  0

  2

  0

  13

  15

  Balance at Dec. 31, 2017

  14,621

  32,286

  53,352

  69

  100,327

  Carrying amount at

  Dec. 31, 2017

  19,714

  13,164

  15,557

  6,807

  55,243

  of which assets leased under

  finance leases

  Carrying amount at Dec. 31, 2017

  286

  6

  46

  –

  339

  Options to purchase buildings and plant leased under the terms of finance leases exist in most cases, and are also

  expected to be exercised.

  1346 Chapter 18

  IAS 16 also requires the disclosure of the following information, which is useful to gain

  a fuller understanding of the entire position of the entity’s holdings of and its

  commitments to purchase property plant and equipment:

  (a) the existence and amounts of restrictions on title, and PP&E pledged as security

  for liabilities;

  (b) the amount of expenditures recognised in the carrying amount of an item of PP&E

  in the course of construction;

  (c) the amount of contractual commitments for the acquisition of PP&E; and

  (d) if it is not disclosed separately in the statement of comprehensive income, the

  amount of compensation from third parties for items of PP&E that were impaired,

  lost or given up that is included in profit or loss. [IAS 16.74].

  In addition there is a reminder in the standard that, in accordance with IAS 8, the nature

  and effect of any change in an accounting estimate (e.g. depreciation methods, useful

  lives, residual values, and the estimated cost of dismantling, removing or restoring items

  of PP&E) that has an effect on the current period or is expected to have an effect in

  future periods must be disclosed. [IAS 16.76].

  8.2

  Additional disclosures for revalued assets

  In addition to the disclosures required by IFRS 13, the disclosure requirements in IAS 16

  if the revaluation method is adopted are:

  (a) the effective date of the revaluation;

  (b) whether an independent valuer was involved;

  (c) for each revalued class of PP&E, the carrying amount that would have been

  recognised had the assets been carried under the cost model; and

  (d) the revaluation surplus, indicating the change for the period and any restrictions

  on the distribution of the balance to shareholders. [IAS 16.77].

  In particular the requirement under (c) is quite onerous for entities, as it entails their

  keeping asset register information in some detail in order to meet it.

  In May 2014, the Interpretations Committee received a request to clarify whether an

  entity is required to reflect the capitalisation of borrowing costs to meet the disclosure

  requirement of IAS 16 for assets stated at revalued amounts and for which borrowing

  costs are not capitalised. Since the capitalisation of borrowing costs for such assets is

  not required (see Chapter 21 at 3.2), the determination of the amount of borrowing costs

  that would have been capitalised under a cost model – solely to meet a disclosure

  requirement – might be considered burdensome.

  The Interpretations Committee noted that the requirements in paragraph 77(e) of IAS 16

  (i.e. item (c) above) are clear. This paragraph requires an entity to disclose the amount

  at which assets stated at revalued amounts wo
uld have been stated had those assets

  been carried under the cost model. The amount to be disclosed includes borrowing

  costs capitalised in accordance with IAS 23 (see Chapter 21).9

  Property, plant and equipment 1347

  IFRS 13 has a number of disclosure requirements for assets measured at fair value. Some of

  the significant disclosures under IFRS 13 which would apply to revalued PP&E are: [IFRS 13.93]

  • if the highest and best use differs from its current use, an entity must disclose that fact

  and why the asset is being used in a manner different from its highest and best use;

  • the fair value measurement’s categorisation within the fair value measurement

  hierarchy (i.e. Level 1, 2 or 3);

  • if categorised within Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy (which most revalued

  PP&E is likely to be):

  (i)

  a description of the valuation technique(s) used in the fair value measurement;

  (ii) the inputs used in the fair value measurement;

  (iii) if there has been a change in the valuation technique (e.g. changing from a

  market approach to an income approach or use of an additional technique):

  • the change; and

  • the reason(s) for making it;

  • quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair

  value measurement for those categorised within Level 3 of the fair value

  measurement hierarchy;

  • if categorised within Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy, a description

  of the valuation processes used by the entity (including, for example, how an entity

  decides its valuation policies and procedures and analyses changes in fair value

  measurements from period to period).

  In addition to these requirements, an entity must also provide the disclosures depending

  on whether the fair value measurement is recurring or non-recurring. Revalued PP&E are

  considered recurring fair value measurements and are subject to additional disclosure

 

‹ Prev