contract cost assets alongside this disclosure.
   Extract 28.15: Ford Motor Company (2017) (US GAAP)
   NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS [Extract]
   NOTE 4. REVENUE [Extract]
   Automotive Segment [Extract]
   Extended Service Contracts. We sell separately-priced service contracts that extend mechanical and maintenance
   coverages beyond our base warranty agreements to vehicle owners. The separately priced service contracts range from
   12 to 120 months. We receive payment at the inception of the contract and recognize revenue over the term of the
   agreement in proportion to the costs expected to be incurred in satisfying the obligations under the contract. At
   January 1, 2017, $3.5 billion of unearned revenue associated with outstanding contracts was reported in Other
   Liabilities and deferred revenue, $1 billion of this was recognized as revenue during the year ended December 31,
   2017. At December 31, 2017, the unearned amount was $3.8 billion. We expect to recognize approximately
   $1.1 billion of the unearned amount in 2018, $1 billion in 2019, and $1.7 billion thereafter. We record a premium
   deficiency reserve to the extent we estimate the future costs associated with these contracts exceed the unrecognized
   revenue. Amounts paid to dealers to obtain these contracts are deferred and recorded as Other assets. These costs are
   amortized to expense consistent with how the related revenue is recognized. We had a balance of $232 million in
   deferred costs as of December 31, 2017, and recognized $63 million of amortization during the year ended
   December 31, 2017.
   The Board also provided a practical expedient under which an entity can decide not to
   disclose the amount of the remaining performance obligations for contracts with an
   original expected duration of less than one year or those that meet the requirements of
   the right to invoice practical expedient in paragraph B16 IFRS 15 (see paragraph 121 of
   IFRS 15). As explained in 8.2.1.A above, the right to invoice practical expedient permits
   an entity that is recognising revenue over time to recognise revenue as invoiced if the
   entity’s right to payment is an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the
   2312 Chapter 28
   customer of the entity’s performance to date. [IFRS 15.121]. For example, an entity is not
   required to make the disclosure for a three-year service contract under which it has a
   right to invoice the customer a fixed amount for each hour of service provided. If an
   entity uses this disclosure practical expedient, it is required to qualitatively disclose that
   fact. [IFRS 15.122].
   Disclosing revenue recognised from performance obligations satisfied in previous
   periods is likely to be a change in practice for most entities. Entities need to make sure
   they have appropriate systems, policies and procedures and internal controls in place
   to collect and disclose the required information.
   ASC 606 contains optional exemptions that are consistent with the optional practical
   expedients included in paragraph 121 of IFRS 15. However, ASC 606 includes additional
   optional exemptions (that IFRS 15 does not) to allow entities not to make quantitative
   disclosures about remaining performance obligations in certain cases and require
   entities that use any of the new or existing optional exemptions (previously referred to
   as practical expedients) to expand their qualitative disclosures.
   The standard provides the following examples of these required disclosures.
   [IFRS 15.IE212-IE219].
   Example 28.100: Disclosure of the transaction price allocated to the remaining
   performance obligations
   On 30 June 20X7, an entity enters into three contracts (Contracts A, B and C) with separate customers to
   provide services. Each contract has a two-year non-cancellable term. The entity considers the requirements
   in paragraphs 120-122 of IFRS 15 in determining the information in each contract to be included in the
   disclosure of the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations at 31 December 20X7.
   Contract A
   Cleaning services are to be provided over the next two years typically at least once per month. For services
   provided, the customer pays an hourly rate of £25.
   Because the entity bills a fixed amount for each hour of service provided, the entity has a right to invoice the
   customer in the amount that corresponds directly with the value of the entity’s performance completed to date
   in accordance with paragraph B16 of IFRS 15. Consequently, no disclosure is necessary if the entity elects to
   apply the practical expedient in paragraph 121(b) of IFRS 15.
   Contract B
   Cleaning services and lawn maintenance services are to be provided as and when needed with a maximum of
   four visits per month over the next two years. The customer pays a fixed price of £400 per month for both
   services. The entity measures its progress towards complete satisfaction of the performance obligation using
   a time-based measure.
   Revenue
   2313
   The entity discloses the amount of the transaction price that has not yet been recognised as revenue in a table
   with quantitative time bands that illustrates when the entity expects to recognise the amount as revenue. The
   information for Contract B included in the overall disclosure is as follows:
   20X8
   20X9
   Total
   £
   £
   £
   Revenue expected to be recognised on
   this contract as at 31 December 20X7
   4,800(a)
   2,400(b)
   7,200
   (a) £4,800 = £400 × 12 months.
   (b) £2,400 = £400 × 6 months.
   Contract C
   Cleaning services are to be provided as and when needed over the next two years. The customer pays fixed
   consideration of £100 per month plus a one-time variable consideration payment ranging from £0-£1,000
   corresponding to a one-time regulatory review and certification of the customer’s facility (i.e. a performance
   bonus). The entity estimates that it will be entitled to £750 of the variable consideration. On the basis of the
   entity’s assessment of the factors in paragraph 57 of IFRS 15, the entity includes its estimate of £750 of
   variable consideration in the transaction price because it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the
   amount of cumulative revenue recognised will not occur. The entity measures its progress towards complete
   satisfaction of the performance obligation using a time-based measure.
   The entity discloses the amount of the transaction price that has not yet been recognised as revenue in a table
   with quantitative time bands that illustrates when the entity expects to recognise the amount as revenue. The
   entity also includes a qualitative discussion about any significant variable consideration that is not included
   in the disclosure. The information for Contract C included in the overall disclosure is as follows:
   20X8
   20X9
   Total
   £
   £
   £
   Revenue expected to be recognised on
   1,575(a) 788(b) 2,363
   this contract as at 31 December 20X7
   (a) Transaction price = £3,150 (£100 × 24 months + £750 variable consideration) recognised evenly over
   24 months at £1,575 per year.
   (b) £1,575 ÷ 2 = £788 (i.e. for 6 months of the year)
.
   In addition, in accordance with paragraph 122 of IFRS 15, the entity discloses qualitatively that part of the
   performance bonus has been excluded from the disclosure because it was not included in the transaction price.
   That part of the performance bonus was excluded from the transaction price in accordance with the
   requirements for constraining estimates of variable consideration.
   The standard also provides an example of how an entity could make the disclosure
   required by paragraph 120(b) of IFRS 15 using qualitative information (instead of
   quantitatively, using time bands) as follows. [IFRS 15.IE220-IE221].
   2314 Chapter 28
   Example 28.101: Disclosure of the transaction price allocated to the remaining
   performance obligations – qualitative disclosure
   On 1 January 20X2, an entity enters into a contract with a customer to construct a commercial building for
   fixed consideration of €10 million. The construction of the building is a single performance obligation that
   the entity satisfies over time. As at 31 December 20X2, the entity has recognised €3.2 million of revenue.
   The entity estimates that construction will be completed in 20X3, but it is possible that the project will be
   completed in the first half of 20X4.
   At 31 December 20X2, the entity discloses the amount of the transaction price that has not yet been
   recognised as revenue in its disclosure of the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance
   obligations. The entity also discloses an explanation of when the entity expects to recognise that amount as
   revenue. The explanation can be disclosed either on a quantitative basis using time bands that are most
   appropriate for the duration of the remaining performance obligation or by providing a qualitative
   explanation. Because the entity is uncertain about the timing of revenue recognition, the entity discloses this
   information qualitatively as follows:
   ‘As at 31 December 20X2, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the remaining
   performance obligation is €6.8 million and the entity will recognise this revenue as the building is
   completed, which is expected to occur over the next 12-18 months.’
   11.4.1.D
   Use of the ‘backlog’ practical expedient when the criteria to use the
   ‘right to invoice’ practical expedient are not met
   If an entity determines that it has not met the criteria to use the ‘right to invoice’ practical
   expedient (e.g. because there is a substantive contractual minimum payment or a volume
   discount), can the entity still use the disclosure practical expedient under which an entity
   can decide not to disclose the amount of transaction price allocated to remaining
   performance obligations? The TRG considered this question at the July 2015 TRG meeting.
   The TRG members generally agreed that the standard is clear that an entity can only use
   the practical expedient to avoid disclosing the amount of the transaction price allocated
   to remaining performance obligations for contracts: (a) with an original expected duration
   of less than one year; or (b) that qualify for the ‘right to invoice’ practical expedient.
   [IFRS 15.121]. If a contract does not meet either of these criteria, an entity must disclose the
   information about remaining performance obligations that is required by Paragraph 120
   of IFRS 15. [IFRS 15.120]. However, under these requirements, an entity is able to
   qualitatively describe any consideration that is not included in the transaction price (e.g.
   any estimated amount of variable consideration that is constrained).
   Stakeholders had questioned whether an entity can still use this disclosure practical
   expedient if it determines that it has not met the criteria to use the right to invoice
   practical expedient (e.g. because there is a substantive contractual minimum payment
   or a volume discount).152
   11.4.2 Significant
   judgements
   The standard specifically requires disclosure of significant accounting estimates and
   judgements (and changes to those judgements) made in determining the transaction
   price, allocating the transaction price to performance obligations and determining when
   performance obligations are satisfied. [IFRS 15.123].
   Revenue
   2315
   IFRS currently has general requirements requiring disclosures about significant
   accounting estimates and judgements made by an entity. Because of the importance
   placed on revenue by users of financial statements, as noted in the Basis for Conclusions
   on IFRS 15, the Board decided to require specific disclosures about the estimates used
   and the judgements made in determining the amount and timing of revenue recognition.
   [IFRS 15.BC355]. These requirements exceed those in the general requirements for
   significant judgements and accounting estimates required by IAS 1 and discussed in
   more detail below. [IAS 1.122-133].
   11.4.2.A
   Determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations
   IFRS 15 requires entities to provide disclosures about the significant judgements
   made in determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations. The
   disclosure requirements for performance obligations that are satisfied over time
   differ from those satisfied at a point in time, but the objective is similar – to disclose
   the judgements made in determining the timing of revenue recognition. Entities must
   disclose: [IFRS 15.124]
   • the methods used to recognise revenue (e.g. a description of the output methods
   or input methods used and how those methods are applied); and
   • an explanation of why the methods used provide a faithful depiction of the transfer
   of goods or services.
   For performance obligations that are satisfied at a point in time, entities must disclose
   the significant judgements made in evaluating the point in time when the customer
   obtains control of the goods or services. [IFRS 15.125].
   When an entity has determined that a performance obligation is satisfied over time,
   IFRS 15 requires the entity to select a single revenue recognition method for each
   performance obligation that best depicts the entity’s performance in transferring the
   goods or services. Entities must disclose the method used to recognise revenue.
   For example, assume an entity enters into a contract to refurbish a multi-level building
   for a customer and the work is expected to take two years. The entity concludes that
   the promised refurbishment service is a single performance obligation satisfied over
   time and it decides to measure progress using a percentage of completion method, based
   on the costs incurred. The entity discloses the method used, how it has been applied to
   the contract and why the method selected provides a faithful depiction of the transfer
   of goods or services.
   When an entity has determined that a performance obligation is satisfied at a point in
   time, the standard requires the entity to disclose the significant judgements made in
   evaluating when the customer obtains control of the promised goods or services. For
   example, an entity needs to consider the indicators of the transfer of control listed in
   paragraph 38 of IFRS 15 to determine when control transfers and disclose the significant
   judgements made in reaching that conclusion.
   2316 Chapter 28<
br />
   In Extract 28.12 at 11.4.1.C above, Alphabet Inc. describes the methods used to
   recognise its advertising revenue over time and explains the relationship between
   the methods and the different types of advertising it provides. Ford Motor Company
   recognises revenue at a point in time in relation its vehicle, parts and accessories
   sales. Extract 28.11 at 11.4.1.C above provides a description of when control transfers
   to the customer for these sales. Raytheon Company provides qualitative information
   about the method it uses to recognise revenue over time. It explains the ‘Estimate at
   Completion (EAC)’ process in which management reviews progress and execution of
   performance obligations and discloses the impact on operating income, income from
   continuing operations and diluted earnings per share (EPS) based on this EAC
   assessment (i.e. changes in estimates). It also describes the judgement and complexity
   involved in Extract 28.16.
   Extract 28.16: Raytheon Company (2017) (US GAAP)
   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS [Extract]
   Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Extract]
   Revenue Recognition [Extract]
   We generally recognize revenue over time as we perform because of continuous transfer of control to the customer.
   For U.S. government contracts, this continuous transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in the
   contract that allow the customer to unilaterally terminate the contract for convenience, pay us for costs incurred plus
   a reasonable profit and take control of any work in process. Similarly, for non-U.S. government contracts, the customer
   typically controls the work in process as evidenced either by contractual termination clauses or by our rights to
   payment for work performed to date plus a reasonable profit to deliver products or services that do not have an
   alternative use to the Company.
   Because of control transferring over time, revenue is recognized based on the extent of progress towards completion
   of the performance obligation. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment
   and is based on the nature of the products or services to be provided. We generally use the cost-to-cost measure of
   
 
 International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 460