Financial instruments: Recognition and initial measurement 3663
   is called the ‘settlement date’. [IFRS 9.B3.1.5, B3.1.6]. One effect of this mechanism is
   that, while legal title to the assets that are the subject of the transaction passes only
   on or after settlement date, the buyer is effectively exposed to the risks and rewards
   of ownership of the assets from trade date.
   Absent any special provisions, the accounting analysis for regular way transactions under
   IFRS 9 would therefore be that, between trade date and settlement date, an entity has a
   forward contract to purchase an asset (see 2.1.3 above) which, in common with all derivatives,
   should be recorded at fair value, with all changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss
   (see Chapter 46 at 2.4), unless the special rules for hedge accounting apply (see Chapter 49).
   This would not only be somewhat onerous but would also have the effect that changes in a
   financial asset’s fair value between trade date and settlement date would be recognised in
   profit or loss, even though the asset itself is not measured at fair value through profit or loss.
   To avoid this, IFRS 9 permits assets subject to regular way transactions to be recognised,
   or derecognised, either as at the trade date (‘trade date accounting’) or as at the
   settlement date (‘settlement date accounting’). [IFRS 9.B3.1.2, B3.1.3, B3.1.5, B3.1.6]. This
   accounting policy choice can be made separately for each of the main categories of
   financial asset identified by IFRS 9, i.e. debt instruments measured at amortised cost, at
   fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI), financial assets mandatorily
   measured at fair value through profit or loss, those designated as measured at fair value
   through profit or loss and equity investments designated as measured at FVOCI (see
   Chapter 44). Once chosen, the accounting policy needs to be applied consistently and
   symmetrically (i.e. to acquisitions and disposals) to each category. [IFRS 9.B3.1.3].
   IFRS 9 provides additional guidance for determining whether a transaction meets the
   definition of ‘regular way’ which is further discussed below.
   2.2.1.A
   No established market
   The definition of ‘regular way’ transactions refers to terms that require delivery of the
   asset within the time frame established generally by regulation or convention in the
   marketplace concerned. Marketplace in this context is not limited to a formal stock
   exchange or organised over-the-counter market. Rather, it means the environment in
   which the financial asset is customarily exchanged. An acceptable time frame would be
   the period reasonably and customarily required for the parties to complete the
   transaction and prepare and execute closing documents. For example, a market for
   private issue financial instruments can be a marketplace. [IFRS 9.B.28].
   2.2.1.B
   Contracts not settled according to marketplace convention: derivatives
   The contract must be accounted for as a derivative when it is not settled in the way
   established by regulation or convention in the marketplace concerned.
   Example 45.1: Regular way transactions – Forward contract
   Entity A enters into a forward contract to purchase 1 million of B’s ordinary shares in two months for £10 per
   share. The contract is with an individual and is not an exchange-traded contract. The contract requires A to take
   physical delivery of the shares and pay the counterparty £10 million in cash. B’s shares trade in an active public
   market at an average of 100,000 shares a day. Regular way delivery is three days. In these circumstances, the
   forward contract cannot be regarded as a regular way contract and must be accounted for as a derivative because
   it is not settled in the way established by regulation or convention in the marketplace concerned. [IFRS 9.B.29].
   3664 Chapter 45
   2.2.1.C
   Multiple active markets: settlement provisions
   If an entity’s financial instruments trade in more than one active market, and the
   settlement provisions differ in the various active markets, the provisions that apply are
   those in the market in which the purchase actually takes place.
   For instance, an entity purchasing shares of a public company listed on a US stock
   exchange through a broker, where the settlement date of the contract is six business
   days later, could not apply the regular way trade exemption since trades for equity
   shares on US exchanges customarily settle in three business days. However, if the entity
   did the same transaction on an exchange outside the US that has a customary settlement
   period of six business days, the contract would meet the exemption for a regular way
   trade. [IFRS 9IG.B.30].
   2.2.1.D
   Exercise of a derivative
   The settlement of an option is governed by regulation or convention in the marketplace
   for options and, therefore, upon exercise of the option it is no longer accounted for as
   a derivative when the exercise is settled according to the provisions of the market place.
   In such case, the settlement of an option by delivery of the shares is a regular way
   transaction.
   Example 45.2: Regular way transactions – Share purchase by call option
   Entity A purchases a call option in a public market permitting it to purchase 100 shares of Entity X at any
   time over the next three months at a price of £100 per share. If Entity A exercises its option, it has 14 days to
   settle the transaction according to regulation or convention in the options market. X shares are traded in an
   active public market that requires three-day settlement.
   In this case, the purchase of shares by exercising the option is a regular way purchase of shares because
   settlement by delivery of the shares within 14 days is a regular way transaction. [IFRS 9.B.31]. This is the case
   even though if the shares had been acquired directly in the market the market convention for settlement would
   have been three days.
   2.2.2 Financial
   liabilities
   The above requirements apply only to transactions in financial assets. IFRS 9 does not
   contain any specific requirements about trade date accounting and settlement date
   accounting for transactions in financial instruments that are classified as financial
   liabilities. Therefore, the general recognition and derecognition requirements for
   financial liabilities in IFRS 9 normally apply. [IFRS 9.B.32]. Consequently, financial
   liabilities are normally recognised on the date the entity ‘becomes a party to the
   contractual provisions of the instrument’ (see 2.1 above) and are derecognised only
   when they are extinguished, i.e. when the obligation specified in the contract is
   discharged, cancelled or expires (see Chapter 48 at 6).
   In January 2007, the IFRS Interpretations Committee addressed the accounting for short
   sales of securities when the transaction terms require delivery of the securities within
   the time frame established generally by regulation or convention in the marketplace
   concerned. Constituents explained that in practice, many entities apply trade date
   accounting to such transactions. Specifically, industry practice recognised the short
   sales as financial liabilities at fair value with changes in fair value recognised in profit or
   loss. Profit or loss would be the same as if short sales were a
ccounted for as derivatives,
   Financial instruments: Recognition and initial measurement 3665
   but the securities would be presented differently on the statement of financial position.
   Those constituents argued that a short sale is created by a transaction in a financial asset
   and hence the implementation guidance noted in the previous paragraph is not relevant.
   The Committee acknowledged that requiring entities to account for short positions as
   derivatives may create considerable practical problems for their accounting systems and
   controls with little, if any, improvement to the quality of financial information
   presented. For these reasons, and because there was little diversity in practice, the
   Committee decided not to take the issue onto its agenda and thus industry practice
   remains prevalent.2
   2.2.3
   Trade date accounting
   As noted above, the trade date is the date on which an entity commits itself to purchase
   or sell an asset. Trade date accounting requires:
   (a) in respect of an asset to be bought: recognition on the trade date of the asset and
   the liability to pay for it, which means that during the period between trade date
   and settlement date, the entity accounts for the asset as if it already owned it; and
   (b) in respect of an asset to be sold: derecognition on the trade date of the asset,
   together with recognition of any gain or loss on disposal and the recognition of a
   receivable from the buyer for payment.
   IFRS 9 notes that, generally, interest does not start to accrue on the asset and
   corresponding liability until the settlement date when title passes. [IFRS 9.B3.1.5].
   2.2.4
   Settlement date accounting
   As noted above, the settlement date is the date that an asset is delivered to or by an
   entity. Settlement date accounting requires:
   (a) in respect of an asset to be bought: the recognition of the asset on the settlement
   date (i.e. the date it is received by the entity). Any change in the fair value of the
   asset to be received during the period between the trade date and the settlement
   date is accounted for in the same way as the acquired asset. In other words:
   [IFRS 9.5.7.4, IFRS 9.B3.1.6]
   • for assets carried at cost or amortised cost, the change in fair value is not
   recognised (other than impairment losses);
   • for assets classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, the
   change in fair value is recognised in profit or loss; and
   • for financial assets measured at FVOCI, the change in fair value is recognised
   in other comprehensive income.
   (b) in respect of an asset to be sold: derecognition of the asset, recognition of any gain
   or loss on disposal and the recognition of a receivable from the buyer for payment
   on the settlement date (i.e. the date it is delivered by the entity). [IFRS 9.B3.1.6]. A
   change in the fair value of the asset between trade date and settlement date is not
   recorded in the financial statements because the seller’s right to changes in the fair
   value ceases on the trade date. [IFRS 9.D.2.2].
   3666 Chapter 45
   2.2.5 Illustrative
   examples
   Examples 45.3 and 45.4 below (which are based on those in the implementation
   guidance appended to IFRS 9) illustrate the application of trade date and settlement date
   accounting to the various categories of financial asset identified by IFRS 9.
   [IFRS 9.D.2.1, D.2.2]. For simplicity purposes, these examples do not address the accounting
   entries related to impairment charges. The accounting treatment for these categories of
   assets is discussed in more detail in Chapter 46 through to Chapter 50.
   Example 45.3: Trade date and settlement date accounting – regular way
   purchase
   On 29 December 2019 (trade date), an entity commits itself to purchase a financial asset for €1,000, which is
   its fair value on trade date. On 31 December 2019 (financial year-end) and on 4 January 2020 (settlement
   date) the fair value of the asset is €1,002 and €1,003, respectively. The accounting entries to be recorded for
   the transaction will depend on how it is classified and whether trade date or settlement date accounting is
   used, as shown in the tables below:
   A
   Financial asset accounted for at amortised cost
   Trade date accounting
   Settlement date accounting
   €
   €
   € €
   29 December 2019
   Financial
   asset 1,000
   Liability to counterparty 1,000
   To record purchase of asset and liability No accounting entries
   thereof
   31 December 2019
   No accounting entries
   No accounting entries
   4 January 2020
   Liability
   to
   1,000
   Financial asset
   1,000
   counterparty
   Cash
   1,000
   Cash
   1,000
   To record settlement of liability
   To record purchase of asset
   B
   Financial asset accounted for at fair value through profit or loss
   Trade date accounting
   Settlement date accounting
   €
   €
   € €
   29 December 2019
   Financial
   asset 1,000
   Liability to
   counterparty 1,000
   To record purchase of asset and
   liability thereof
   No accounting entries
   Financial instruments: Recognition and initial measurement 3667
   €
   €
   € €
   31 December 2019
   Financial
   Asset 2
   Receivable
   2
   Income
   statement 2
   Income
   statement
   2
   To record change in fair value of asset
   To record change in fair value of contract
   4 January 2020
   Liability to
   counterparty 1,000
   Financial
   asset
   1,003
   Cash
   1,000
   Cash
   1,000
   Financial
   asset 1
   Receivable
   2
   Income
   statement 1
   Income
   statement
   1
   To record settlement of liability and To record purchase of asset, change in fair
   change in fair value of asset
   value and settlement of contract
   C Financial
   asset measured at FVOCI *
   Trade date accounting
   Settlement date accounting
   €
   €
   € €
   29 December 2019
   Financial
   asset 1,000
   Liability
   to
   1,000
   counterparty
   To record purchase of asset and liability No accounting entries
   thereof
   31 December 2019
   Financial
   Asset 2
   Receivable
   2
   OCI
   2
   OCI
   2
   To record change in fair value of asset
   To record change in fair value of contract
 &n
bsp; 4 January 2020
   Liability
   to
   1,000
   Financial asset
   1,003
   counterparty
   Cash
   1,000
   Cash
   1,000
   Financial
   asset 1
   Receivable
   2
   OCI
   1
   OCI
   1
   To record settlement of liability and To record purchase of asset, change in fair
   change in fair value of asset
   value and settlement of contract
   *
   The same analysis applies whether the financial assets measured at FVOCI are debt instruments or equity instruments.
   As illustrated above, for a regular way purchase, the key difference between trade date
   and settlement date accounting is the timing of recognition of a financial asset. Regardless
   of the method used, the impact on profit or loss, OCI and net assets is the same.
   Example 45.4: Trade date and settlement date accounting – regular way sale
   On 29 December 2019 (trade date) an entity enters into a contract to sell a financial asset for its then current
   fair value of €1,010. The asset was acquired one year earlier for €1,000 and its amortised cost is €1,000. On
   31 December 2019 (financial year-end), the fair value of the asset is €1,012. On 4 January 2020 (settlement
   date), the fair value is €1,013. The accounting entries to be recorded for this transaction will depend on how
   the asset is classified and whether trade date or settlement date accounting is used as shown in the tables
   below (any interest that might have accrued on the asset is disregarded).
   
 
 International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 725