International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Home > Other > International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards > Page 725
International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 725

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  Financial instruments: Recognition and initial measurement 3663

  is called the ‘settlement date’. [IFRS 9.B3.1.5, B3.1.6]. One effect of this mechanism is

  that, while legal title to the assets that are the subject of the transaction passes only

  on or after settlement date, the buyer is effectively exposed to the risks and rewards

  of ownership of the assets from trade date.

  Absent any special provisions, the accounting analysis for regular way transactions under

  IFRS 9 would therefore be that, between trade date and settlement date, an entity has a

  forward contract to purchase an asset (see 2.1.3 above) which, in common with all derivatives,

  should be recorded at fair value, with all changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss

  (see Chapter 46 at 2.4), unless the special rules for hedge accounting apply (see Chapter 49).

  This would not only be somewhat onerous but would also have the effect that changes in a

  financial asset’s fair value between trade date and settlement date would be recognised in

  profit or loss, even though the asset itself is not measured at fair value through profit or loss.

  To avoid this, IFRS 9 permits assets subject to regular way transactions to be recognised,

  or derecognised, either as at the trade date (‘trade date accounting’) or as at the

  settlement date (‘settlement date accounting’). [IFRS 9.B3.1.2, B3.1.3, B3.1.5, B3.1.6]. This

  accounting policy choice can be made separately for each of the main categories of

  financial asset identified by IFRS 9, i.e. debt instruments measured at amortised cost, at

  fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI), financial assets mandatorily

  measured at fair value through profit or loss, those designated as measured at fair value

  through profit or loss and equity investments designated as measured at FVOCI (see

  Chapter 44). Once chosen, the accounting policy needs to be applied consistently and

  symmetrically (i.e. to acquisitions and disposals) to each category. [IFRS 9.B3.1.3].

  IFRS 9 provides additional guidance for determining whether a transaction meets the

  definition of ‘regular way’ which is further discussed below.

  2.2.1.A

  No established market

  The definition of ‘regular way’ transactions refers to terms that require delivery of the

  asset within the time frame established generally by regulation or convention in the

  marketplace concerned. Marketplace in this context is not limited to a formal stock

  exchange or organised over-the-counter market. Rather, it means the environment in

  which the financial asset is customarily exchanged. An acceptable time frame would be

  the period reasonably and customarily required for the parties to complete the

  transaction and prepare and execute closing documents. For example, a market for

  private issue financial instruments can be a marketplace. [IFRS 9.B.28].

  2.2.1.B

  Contracts not settled according to marketplace convention: derivatives

  The contract must be accounted for as a derivative when it is not settled in the way

  established by regulation or convention in the marketplace concerned.

  Example 45.1: Regular way transactions – Forward contract

  Entity A enters into a forward contract to purchase 1 million of B’s ordinary shares in two months for £10 per

  share. The contract is with an individual and is not an exchange-traded contract. The contract requires A to take

  physical delivery of the shares and pay the counterparty £10 million in cash. B’s shares trade in an active public

  market at an average of 100,000 shares a day. Regular way delivery is three days. In these circumstances, the

  forward contract cannot be regarded as a regular way contract and must be accounted for as a derivative because

  it is not settled in the way established by regulation or convention in the marketplace concerned. [IFRS 9.B.29].

  3664 Chapter 45

  2.2.1.C

  Multiple active markets: settlement provisions

  If an entity’s financial instruments trade in more than one active market, and the

  settlement provisions differ in the various active markets, the provisions that apply are

  those in the market in which the purchase actually takes place.

  For instance, an entity purchasing shares of a public company listed on a US stock

  exchange through a broker, where the settlement date of the contract is six business

  days later, could not apply the regular way trade exemption since trades for equity

  shares on US exchanges customarily settle in three business days. However, if the entity

  did the same transaction on an exchange outside the US that has a customary settlement

  period of six business days, the contract would meet the exemption for a regular way

  trade. [IFRS 9IG.B.30].

  2.2.1.D

  Exercise of a derivative

  The settlement of an option is governed by regulation or convention in the marketplace

  for options and, therefore, upon exercise of the option it is no longer accounted for as

  a derivative when the exercise is settled according to the provisions of the market place.

  In such case, the settlement of an option by delivery of the shares is a regular way

  transaction.

  Example 45.2: Regular way transactions – Share purchase by call option

  Entity A purchases a call option in a public market permitting it to purchase 100 shares of Entity X at any

  time over the next three months at a price of £100 per share. If Entity A exercises its option, it has 14 days to

  settle the transaction according to regulation or convention in the options market. X shares are traded in an

  active public market that requires three-day settlement.

  In this case, the purchase of shares by exercising the option is a regular way purchase of shares because

  settlement by delivery of the shares within 14 days is a regular way transaction. [IFRS 9.B.31]. This is the case

  even though if the shares had been acquired directly in the market the market convention for settlement would

  have been three days.

  2.2.2 Financial

  liabilities

  The above requirements apply only to transactions in financial assets. IFRS 9 does not

  contain any specific requirements about trade date accounting and settlement date

  accounting for transactions in financial instruments that are classified as financial

  liabilities. Therefore, the general recognition and derecognition requirements for

  financial liabilities in IFRS 9 normally apply. [IFRS 9.B.32]. Consequently, financial

  liabilities are normally recognised on the date the entity ‘becomes a party to the

  contractual provisions of the instrument’ (see 2.1 above) and are derecognised only

  when they are extinguished, i.e. when the obligation specified in the contract is

  discharged, cancelled or expires (see Chapter 48 at 6).

  In January 2007, the IFRS Interpretations Committee addressed the accounting for short

  sales of securities when the transaction terms require delivery of the securities within

  the time frame established generally by regulation or convention in the marketplace

  concerned. Constituents explained that in practice, many entities apply trade date

  accounting to such transactions. Specifically, industry practice recognised the short

  sales as financial liabilities at fair value with changes in fair value recognised in profit or

  loss. Profit or loss would be the same as if short sales were a
ccounted for as derivatives,

  Financial instruments: Recognition and initial measurement 3665

  but the securities would be presented differently on the statement of financial position.

  Those constituents argued that a short sale is created by a transaction in a financial asset

  and hence the implementation guidance noted in the previous paragraph is not relevant.

  The Committee acknowledged that requiring entities to account for short positions as

  derivatives may create considerable practical problems for their accounting systems and

  controls with little, if any, improvement to the quality of financial information

  presented. For these reasons, and because there was little diversity in practice, the

  Committee decided not to take the issue onto its agenda and thus industry practice

  remains prevalent.2

  2.2.3

  Trade date accounting

  As noted above, the trade date is the date on which an entity commits itself to purchase

  or sell an asset. Trade date accounting requires:

  (a) in respect of an asset to be bought: recognition on the trade date of the asset and

  the liability to pay for it, which means that during the period between trade date

  and settlement date, the entity accounts for the asset as if it already owned it; and

  (b) in respect of an asset to be sold: derecognition on the trade date of the asset,

  together with recognition of any gain or loss on disposal and the recognition of a

  receivable from the buyer for payment.

  IFRS 9 notes that, generally, interest does not start to accrue on the asset and

  corresponding liability until the settlement date when title passes. [IFRS 9.B3.1.5].

  2.2.4

  Settlement date accounting

  As noted above, the settlement date is the date that an asset is delivered to or by an

  entity. Settlement date accounting requires:

  (a) in respect of an asset to be bought: the recognition of the asset on the settlement

  date (i.e. the date it is received by the entity). Any change in the fair value of the

  asset to be received during the period between the trade date and the settlement

  date is accounted for in the same way as the acquired asset. In other words:

  [IFRS 9.5.7.4, IFRS 9.B3.1.6]

  • for assets carried at cost or amortised cost, the change in fair value is not

  recognised (other than impairment losses);

  • for assets classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, the

  change in fair value is recognised in profit or loss; and

  • for financial assets measured at FVOCI, the change in fair value is recognised

  in other comprehensive income.

  (b) in respect of an asset to be sold: derecognition of the asset, recognition of any gain

  or loss on disposal and the recognition of a receivable from the buyer for payment

  on the settlement date (i.e. the date it is delivered by the entity). [IFRS 9.B3.1.6]. A

  change in the fair value of the asset between trade date and settlement date is not

  recorded in the financial statements because the seller’s right to changes in the fair

  value ceases on the trade date. [IFRS 9.D.2.2].

  3666 Chapter 45

  2.2.5 Illustrative

  examples

  Examples 45.3 and 45.4 below (which are based on those in the implementation

  guidance appended to IFRS 9) illustrate the application of trade date and settlement date

  accounting to the various categories of financial asset identified by IFRS 9.

  [IFRS 9.D.2.1, D.2.2]. For simplicity purposes, these examples do not address the accounting

  entries related to impairment charges. The accounting treatment for these categories of

  assets is discussed in more detail in Chapter 46 through to Chapter 50.

  Example 45.3: Trade date and settlement date accounting – regular way

  purchase

  On 29 December 2019 (trade date), an entity commits itself to purchase a financial asset for €1,000, which is

  its fair value on trade date. On 31 December 2019 (financial year-end) and on 4 January 2020 (settlement

  date) the fair value of the asset is €1,002 and €1,003, respectively. The accounting entries to be recorded for

  the transaction will depend on how it is classified and whether trade date or settlement date accounting is

  used, as shown in the tables below:

  A

  Financial asset accounted for at amortised cost

  Trade date accounting

  Settlement date accounting

  €

  €

  € €

  29 December 2019

  Financial

  asset 1,000

  Liability to counterparty 1,000

  To record purchase of asset and liability No accounting entries

  thereof

  31 December 2019

  No accounting entries

  No accounting entries

  4 January 2020

  Liability

  to

  1,000

  Financial asset

  1,000

  counterparty

  Cash

  1,000

  Cash

  1,000

  To record settlement of liability

  To record purchase of asset

  B

  Financial asset accounted for at fair value through profit or loss

  Trade date accounting

  Settlement date accounting

  €

  €

  € €

  29 December 2019

  Financial

  asset 1,000

  Liability to

  counterparty 1,000

  To record purchase of asset and

  liability thereof

  No accounting entries

  Financial instruments: Recognition and initial measurement 3667

  €

  €

  € €

  31 December 2019

  Financial

  Asset 2

  Receivable

  2

  Income

  statement 2

  Income

  statement

  2

  To record change in fair value of asset

  To record change in fair value of contract

  4 January 2020

  Liability to

  counterparty 1,000

  Financial

  asset

  1,003

  Cash

  1,000

  Cash

  1,000

  Financial

  asset 1

  Receivable

  2

  Income

  statement 1

  Income

  statement

  1

  To record settlement of liability and To record purchase of asset, change in fair

  change in fair value of asset

  value and settlement of contract

  C Financial

  asset measured at FVOCI *

  Trade date accounting

  Settlement date accounting

  €

  €

  € €

  29 December 2019

  Financial

  asset 1,000

  Liability

  to

  1,000

  counterparty

  To record purchase of asset and liability No accounting entries

  thereof

  31 December 2019

  Financial

  Asset 2

  Receivable

  2

  OCI

  2

  OCI

  2

  To record change in fair value of asset

  To record change in fair value of contract

&n
bsp; 4 January 2020

  Liability

  to

  1,000

  Financial asset

  1,003

  counterparty

  Cash

  1,000

  Cash

  1,000

  Financial

  asset 1

  Receivable

  2

  OCI

  1

  OCI

  1

  To record settlement of liability and To record purchase of asset, change in fair

  change in fair value of asset

  value and settlement of contract

  *

  The same analysis applies whether the financial assets measured at FVOCI are debt instruments or equity instruments.

  As illustrated above, for a regular way purchase, the key difference between trade date

  and settlement date accounting is the timing of recognition of a financial asset. Regardless

  of the method used, the impact on profit or loss, OCI and net assets is the same.

  Example 45.4: Trade date and settlement date accounting – regular way sale

  On 29 December 2019 (trade date) an entity enters into a contract to sell a financial asset for its then current

  fair value of €1,010. The asset was acquired one year earlier for €1,000 and its amortised cost is €1,000. On

  31 December 2019 (financial year-end), the fair value of the asset is €1,012. On 4 January 2020 (settlement

  date), the fair value is €1,013. The accounting entries to be recorded for this transaction will depend on how

  the asset is classified and whether trade date or settlement date accounting is used as shown in the tables

  below (any interest that might have accrued on the asset is disregarded).

 

‹ Prev