International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Home > Other > International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards > Page 869
International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 869

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  1

  Total

  (4,384)

  2262

  The impact of interest rates on long-term business relates primarily to annuities in the UK (including any change in

  credit default and reinvestment risk provisions), where a decrease in the valuation interest rate, in response to

  decreasing risk-free rates and narrowing credit spreads, has increased liabilities. The overall impact on profit also

  depends on movements in the value of assets backing the liabilities, which is not included in this disclosure.

  In the UK, expense reserves have reduced and persistency reserves have increased following a review of recent

  experience. There has been a release of annuitant mortality reserves in the UK following a review of recent experience

  (including the exposure to anti-selection risk) and the adoption of CML_2015 mortality improvement assumptions,

  partially offset by a change in base mortality assumptions in response to revisions in the calculation of mortality exposure.

  Tax and other assumptions include the profit arising from a change in estimate related to the recoverability testing of

  the deferred acquisition cost assets (DAC) in the UK. The allowance for risk for non-participating investment

  contracts and the level of prudence for insurance contracts has been re-assessed, resulting in amortisation or

  impairment of DAC in prior reporting periods being reversed (subject to the original amortisation profile).

  The adverse change in discount rate assumptions on general insurance and health business of £242 million arises as

  a result of a decrease in the real interest rates used to discount claim reserves for periodic payment orders and latent

  claims. Market interest rates used to discount periodic payment orders and latent claims have reduced and the

  estimated future inflation rate used to value periodic payment orders has been increased to be consistent with market

  expectations. This has, in part, been offset by a change in estimate for the interest rate used to discount periodic

  payment orders to allow for the illiquid nature of these liabilities.

  Insurance contracts (IFRS 4) 4389

  11.1.6

  Reconciliations of changes in insurance assets and liabilities

  As noted at 11.1 above, IFRS 4 requires reconciliations of changes in insurance liabilities,

  reinsurance assets and, if any, related deferred acquisition costs, although it does not

  prescribe the line items that should appear in the reconciliations. [IFRS 4.37(e)].

  The changes need not be disaggregated into broad classes, but they might be if different

  forms of analysis are more relevant for different types of liability. For insurance

  liabilities the changes might include:

  (a) the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period;

  (b) additional insurance liabilities arising during the period;

  (c) cash

  paid;

  (d) income and expense included in profit or loss;

  (e) liabilities acquired from, or transferred to, other insurers; and

  (f) net exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial statements into

  a different presentation currency, and on the translation of a foreign operation into

  the presentation currency of the reporting entity. [IFRS 4.IG37].

  This reconciliation is also required for each period for which comparative information

  is presented. [IFRS 4.IG38].

  The reconciliations given by CNP Assurances for life insurance, non-life insurance and

  financial instruments with a DPF are shown below.

  4390 Chapter 51

  In the tables the amounts are shown before and after the impact of reinsurance.

  Extract 51.23: CNP Assurances (2016)

  ASSETS, EQUITY AND LIABILITIES [extract]

  Note 10. Analyses of insurance and financial liabilities [extract]

  10.2 Change in technical reserves [extract]

  This note presents changes in technical reserves by category, such as those arising from changes in the assumptions

  applied to measure insurance liabilities. Each change with a material impact on the consolidated financial statements

  is shown separately. Movements are presented before and after reinsurance.

  10.2.1.1 Changes in mathematical reserves – life insurance – at 31 December 2016 [extract]

  Before

  Net of

  (in € millions)

  reinsurance

  reinsurance Reinsurance

  Mathematical reserves at the beginning of the period

  293,987.3

  284,559.5

  9,427.7

  Premiums 27,029.7

  13,657.2

  13,372.5

  Extinguished liabilities (benefit payments) (26,483.8)

  (24,387.0) (2,096.8)

  Locked-in gains

  6,903.8

  6,412.8

  491.0

  Change in value of linked portfolios

  409.1

  409.1

  0.0

  Changes in scope (acquisitions/divestments) 685.9

  687.1

  (1.2)

  Outstanding fees

  (1,763.6)

  (1,686.1)

  (77.5)

  Surpluses/deficits (2.4)

  (2.4)

  0.0

  Currency effect

  2,014.7

  2,014.7

  0.0

  Changes in assumptions

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Newly-consolidated companies

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Deconsolidated companies

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Non-current liabilities related to assets held for sale and

  discontinued operations

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Other (770.9)

  (273.1)

  (497.8)

  Mathematical reserves at the end of the period

  302,009.7

  281,391.8

  20,618.0

  10.2.2.1 Changes in technical reserves – non-life insurance – at 31 December 2016 [extract]

  Before

  Net of

  (in € millions)

  reinsurance

  reinsurance Reinsurance

  Outstanding claims reserves at the beginning of the period

  5,911.7

  4,948.1

  963.6

  Claims expenses for the period

  2,210.3

  1,959.8

  250.5

  Prior period surpluses/deficits

  (0.0)

  (0.0)

  (0.0)

  Total claims expenses

  2,210.2

  1,959.8

  250.4

  Current period claims settled during the period

  (2,645.5)

  (2,508.8) (136.6)

  Prior period claims settled during the period

  (40.0)

  (37.4)

  (2.6)

  Total paid claims

  (2,685.5)

  (2,546.2)

  (139.3)

  Changes in scope (acquisitions/divestments) 0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Currency effect

  38.4

  32.4

  6.0

  Newly-consolidated companies

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Non-current liabilities related to assets held for sale and

  discontinued operations

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Other 0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Outstanding claims reserves at the end of the period

  5,474.9
/>
  4,394.1

  1,080.7

  Insurance contracts (IFRS 4) 4391

  10.2.3 Changes in mathematical reserves – financial instruments with DPF [extract]

  31.12.2016

  Before

  Net of

  (in € millions)

  reinsurance

  reinsurance Reinsurance

  Mathematical reserves at the beginning of the period

  4,793.4

  4,646.3

  147.1

  Premiums 451.8

  447.2

  4.6

  Extinguished liabilities (benefit payments) (885.2)

  (852.6) (32.6)

  Locked-in gains

  45.8

  45.8

  0.0

  Change in value of linked liabilities 386.1

  395.7

  (9.6)

  Changes in scope (acquisitions/divestments) (67.8)

  (67.8)

  0.0

  Currency effect

  151.4

  151.4

  0.0

  Newly-consolidated companies

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Deconsolidated companies

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Non-current liabilities related to assets held for sale and

  discontinued operations

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  Other (74.8)

  (297.5)

  222.8

  Mathematical reserves at the end of the period

  4,800.7

  4,468.5

  332.3

  A reconciliation of deferred acquisition costs might include:

  (a) the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period;

  (b) the amounts incurred during the period;

  (c) the amortisation for the period;

  (d) impairment

  losses recognised during the period; and

  (e) other changes categorised by cause and type. [IFRS 4.IG39].

  4392 Chapter 51

  Aviva’s reconciliation of deferred acquisition costs is illustrated below.

  Extract 51.24: Aviva plc (2016)

  Notes to the consolidated financial statements [extract]

  28 – Deferred acquisition costs, other assets, prepayments and accrued income [extract]

  (b) Deferred acquisition costs – movements in the year [extract]

  The movements in deferred acquisition costs (DAC) during the year were:

  2016

  Restated 2015

  Retail

  General

  General

  fund

  insurance

  insurance manage-

  Long-

  and

  Retail fund

  Long-term and health

  ment

  term

  health management

  business

  business

  business Total

  business

  business

  business Total

  £m £m £m £m £m £m £m

  £m

  Carrying amount

  at 1 January

  1,604

  812

  5

  2,421

  1,453

  852

  7

  2,312

  Acquisition costs

  deferred during

  the

  year

  283 2,264

  – 2,547 263 1,952

  – 2,215

  Amortisation

  (377) (2,118)

  (2) (2,497) (167) (1,950)

  (2) (2,119)

  Impact of

  assumption

  changes

  40 – – 40 73 – – 73

  Effect of portfolio

  transfers, acquisitions

  and disposals

  (29)

  (8)

  –

  (37)

  –

  –

  –

  –

  Foreign exchange

  rate movements

  53

  87

  –

  140

  (18)

  (42)

  –

  (60)

  Carrying amount

  at

  31

  December 1,574 1,037

  3 2,614 1,604 812

  5

  2,421

  The balance of deferred acquisition costs for long-term business decreased over 2016 mainly due to increased

  amortisation as a result of projected future profits being reduced in response to an adjustment to the allocation of fixed costs between product lines in our UK Life business. The balance of deferred acquisition costs for general insurance and

  health business increased over 2016 mainly due to a new partnership distribution deal and increased new business sales.

  An insurer may have intangible assets related to insurance contracts acquired in a

  business combination or portfolio transfer. IFRS 4 does not require any disclosures for

  intangible assets in addition to those required by IAS 38 (see 9.2 above). [IFRS 4.IG40].

  11.2 Nature and extent of risks arising from insurance contracts

  The second key disclosure principle established by IFRS 4 is that information should be

  disclosed to enable the users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and

  extent of risks arising from insurance contracts. [IFRS 4.38].

  To comply with this principle, an insurer needs to disclose:

  (a) its objectives, policies and processes for managing risks arising from insurance

  contracts and the methods used to manage those risks;

  Insurance contracts (IFRS 4) 4393

  (b) information about insurance risk (both before and after risk mitigation by

  reinsurance), including information about:

  (i) sensitivity to insurance risk;

  (ii) concentrations of insurance risk, including a description of how management

  determines concentrations and a description of the shared characteristic that

  identifies each concentration (e.g. type of insured event, geographical area or

  currency); and

  (iii) actual claims compared with previous estimates (i.e. claims development).

  This disclosure has to go back to the period when the earliest material claim

  arose for which there is still uncertainty about the amount and timing of the

  claims payments, but need not go back more than ten years. Information

  about claims for which uncertainty about the amount and timing of claims

  payments is typically resolved within one year need not be disclosed;

  (c) information about credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk that would be required

  by IFRS 7 if insurance contracts were within the scope of that standard. However:

  (i) an insurer need not provide the maturity analyses required by IFRS 7 if it

  discloses information about the estimated timing of the net cash outflows

  resulting from recognised insurance liabilities instead. This may take the form

  of an analysis, by estimated timing, of the amounts recognised in the

  statement of financial position rather than gross undiscounted cash flows; and

  (ii) if an alternative method to manage sensitivity to market conditions, such as

  an embedded value analysis is used, an insurer may use that sensitivity

  analysis to meet the requirements of IFRS 7. However, disclosures are still

  required explaining the methods used in preparing that alternative analysis,

  its main parameters and assumptions, and an explanation of the objectives of

  the method and of its limitations; and

  (d) information about exposures to market risk arising from embedded derivatives


  contained in a host insurance contract if the insurer is not required to, and does

  not, measure the embedded derivatives at fair value. [IFRS 4.39].

  These disclosures are based on two foundations:

  (a) there should be a balance between quantitative and qualitative disclosures, enabling

  users to understand the nature of risk exposures and their potential impact; and

  (b) disclosures

  should

  be consistent with how management perceives its activities and

  risks, and the objectives, policies and processes that management uses to manage

  those risks so that they:

  (i) generate information that has more predictive value than information based

  on assumptions and methods that management does not use, for example, in

  considering the insurer’s ability to react to adverse situations; and

  (ii) are more effective in adapting to the continuing change in risk measurement

  and management techniques and developments in the external environment

  over time. [IFRS 4.IG41].

  In developing disclosures to satisfy the requirements, it might be useful to group insurance

  contracts into broad classes appropriate for the nature of the information to be disclosed,

  4394 Chapter 51

  taking into account matters such as the risks covered, the characteristics of the contracts

  and the measurement basis applied. These broad classes may correspond to classes

  established for legal or regulatory purposes, but IFRS 4 does not require this. [IFRS 4.IG42].

  Under IFRS 8 – Operating Segments – the identification of operating segments reflects

  the way in which management allocates resources and assesses performance. It might

  be useful to adopt a similar approach to identify broad classes of insurance contracts for

  disclosure purposes, although it might be appropriate to disaggregate disclosures down

  to the next level. For example, if life insurance is identified as an operating segment for

  IFRS 8, it might be appropriate to report separate information about, say, life insurance,

  annuities in the accumulation phase and annuities in the payout phase. [IFRS 4.IG43].

  In identifying broad classes for separate disclosure, it is useful to consider how best to

  indicate the level of uncertainty associated with the risks underwritten, so as to inform

  users whether outcomes are likely to be within a wider or a narrower range. For example,

  an insurer might disclose information about exposures where there are significant

 

‹ Prev