Although a Republican, the former Governor has a sincere regard for President Roosevelt and his politics. He referred to the “Jewish ancestry” of the President, explaining how he is a descendent of the Rossocampo family expelled from Spain in 1620. Seeking safety in Germany, Holland and other countries, members of the family, he said, changed their name to Rosenberg, Rosenbaum, Rosenblum, Rosenvelt and Rosenthal. The Rosenvelts in North Holland finally became Roosevelt, soon becoming apostates with the first generation and other following suit until, in the fourth generation, a little storekeeper by the name of Jacobus Roosevelt was the only one who remained true to his Jewish Faith. (Chase S. Osborn, 1934, at St. Petersburg, Florida, The Times Newspaper)
It followed that both were keen to do what they were bid and to manoeuvre their countries into war. Apart from the furtherance of the primary intention to destroy the old order, there was so much money to be made from loans to all those involved that the individual populations which, of course, were against war, had to be incited to participate. This meant provoking events like the sinking of the Lusitania (May 1915), or the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour (December 1941). With the aid of such propaganda, the enemy could be identified to U.S. citizens and the U.S. was eventually able to enter WWI (April 1917) and WWII (December 1941), the international oil companies could make profits, and Britain, China and Russia could be indebted by means of Lend-Lease programmes. Briefly put, 76 million people had to die so that various already hugely successful companies could make even more money, the U.S.’s greatest European competitors could be put out of business and the Jewish plan for world domination could take two giant strides forward. What was left of British imperial power, wealth and prestige after WWI was drained after WWII; what was left of Germany’s industry after thousands of patents had been confiscated by the U.S. following WWII severely curtailed its commercial competitiveness.
A reported 1,500 tons of German patents and research papers was stolen through the infamous “Operation Paperclip,” after the war. A US government employee is quoted as claiming the material was “the greatest single source of this type of material in the world, the first orderly exploitation of an entire country’s brain power.” (C. Lester Walker, “War Secrets by the Thousands,” Harper’s Magazine October, 1946, p. 329)
The war wasn’t only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn’t want to. Winston Churchill to Truman (Fulton, USA, March 1946)
***
This war is not against Hitler or National Socialism but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest. (Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill, His Career in War and Peace, Exposition Press, 1955, p. 145)
***
We didn’t go to war in 1939 to save Germany from Hitler...or the continent from fascism. Like in 1914, we went to war for the not less noble cause that we couldn’t accept a German hegemony over Europe. (Vansittart, Sunday Correspondent, London, September 17,1989)
***
Played golf with Joe Kennedy (U.S. Ambassador to Britain). He says that Chamberlain stated that America and world Jewry forced England into World War II. (James Forrestal, Secretary of the Navy, later Secretary of Defence, The Forrestal Diaries, Viking Press, New York, 1951, entry December 27th, 1945.)
***
Had lunch with Mr. B. M. Baruch. After lunch raised the same question with him. He took the line of advising me not to be active in this particular matter, and that I was already identified, to a degree that was not in my own interest, with opposition to the United Nations policy on Palestine. (ibid. 3rd February, 1948, p.364) Forrestal died in May, 1949, as a result of a fall from a 16th floor window.
IV
FINAL STAGE: COMMUNIST VASSALAGE
The only winners of the World Wars were the politicians and bankers who instigated them. The politicians were not representatives of their peoples but traitors; the bankers by their trade were cosmopolites. It followed that the benefits of these conflagrations were so significant that they eclipsed the importance of the estimated 76 million who left their lives while fighting in them. Since finance backed both sides in a “managed conflict,” the citizens of both sides were left to foot the bill. In the interval between the first and second acts, the Versailles Treaty, with its impossible demands, was imposed, in order to ensure that the looting could continue. “Britain is the slave of an international financial bloc.” (British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, June 20, 1934) “Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency: their sole object is gain.” (Napoleon)
Thus ensued what has been called a second Thirty Years War. When one considers the advantages of peaceful coexistence, with its predictable expectations and routines, over the fundamental upheavals caused by war, one realizes how great were the forces required to unleash such carnage and how great the potential rewards. The consequences for all sides were not only unpredictable in their magnitude and outcome, but also enormously costly for the citizenry.
The First World War marked a turning point in history, not only an end for the ruling dynasties but for the received conventions of society in their entirety. What had been taken for granted until then and had contributed to stability within individual nations, their cultures and customs, had been swept away by November 1918. The gates were now wide open to further chaos, to the Second World War and further decomposition of all hitherto accepted and expected conditions. To be sure, after each war, in their relief at assumed “peace,” the citizenry tried to right the ship, to rebuild their lives and their ruined cities, but there was no continuity. Even the soulless post-WWII architecture betrayed the sterile gestation of its creators. The only other comparable extremity in modern times was the fraudulent New York tower incident of 2001 (likely a Gladio B operation), which opened the way for the “War on (invented) Terror” and its multiple useful adjuncts. These global breakdowns have left the populations of developed nations floundering in turbulent and uncharted waters, at the mercy of lawless governments.
English men and women are constantly asking themselves how it comes about that a twist is so frequently given to British policy that is clearly not in accordance with British interests. There is usually somebody in a position, at the psychological moment, to deflect our Government, whatever party be in power, into some line of action that is unintelligible at the time and is fraught with disastrous consequences...It is as though some hostile influence were steadily throwing grit into the machine. In every financial arrangement we fare badly, and the whole story of Reparations and War Debts (N.B. First World War debts) is humiliating in the extreme and calculated to make us the world’s laughing stock as well as the world’s milch cow. It is in this connection that such a book as Colonel Lane has written...throws a timely searchlight. It is in the higher ranks of society that the alien menace is formidable through the influence exercised in Government Departments, in Downing Street and High Finance by gentry of unmistakable foreign origin. Leo Maxse in The National Review. (Quoted in The Alien Menace by Colonel Lane, 1934, Boswell Publishing Company Ltd.)
Substitute “German” for “English” and you have a fitting description of today’s Germany.
So it’s ostensibly all about money, but actually about control and power; domination and repression. “For the love of money is the root of all evil” (Timothy 6:10), and “Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist.” (Karl Marx, On the Jewish Question, 1890) Money is directed to compliant parties by the financial centres of the world, which stand to gain the most, in order to make more money. They persuade their puppet politicians to start wars. Those same people who know the pecuniary price of everything and the intrinsic value of nothing thus control these initiatives and always did. The conclusive summary must therefore read: 76 million people and counting have died since 1914
, only to further Jewish goals.
Thanks to the terrible power of the international bankers, we have plunged the Christians into innumerable wars. Wars have a special value for Jews, as Christians kill each other and thus make place for Jews. Wars are the harvest of Jews, Jewish bankers earn well from the Christian wars. Over 100 million of them were removed from the planet through wars and the end is not in sight. (Rabbi Reichhorn—that inconvenient rabbi again-- at the burial of the Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-ludah, Prague, 1869)
***
There is scarcely an event in modern history that cannot be traced to the Jews. Take the Great War (World War I)...the Jews have made this war!...We (Jews) who have posed as the saviours of the world...we Jews, today, are nothing else but the world’s seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners...We have finally succeeded in landing you into a new hell. (Jewish Writer, Oscar Levy, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution; The International Jew, Vol. III (1921), pp. 184-87).
New wars are often justified by the identification of “New Hitlers” who could cause “another holocaust,” but whose purpose is, as usual, to destroy any country which seeks to pursue an economic program outside Jewish control. (Hillary Clinton called Putin Hitler. John Kerry called Assad Hitler. John McCain called Castro Hitler. George Bush called Saddam Hussein Hitler. Donald Rumsfeld called Chavez Hitler. The following have also been tarred with the “Hitler” brush: Allende (Chile), Noriega (Panama), Ortega (Nicaragua), Milosevic (Serbia), Arafat (Palestine), Gaddafi (Libya), Ahmadinejad (Iran), and Kim (North Korea). Only in America could such poverty of imagination and ignorance of history serve as propaganda.
It is worth mentioning, in passing, that not very much has changed. Iraq and Afghanistan, Mali and Somalia are all receiving the attentions of NATO because the U.S. is eager to corner these countries’ natural resources and to prevent China from doing so. The resultant military presence in the region is also intended to complete the encirclement of China and Russia. Both China and Russia are threatened externally by U.S./NATO and internally by equally familiar entities: “Rothschild’s long-standing presence in China dates back to 1838, and we were one of the first business institutions from the Western world to re-establish relations after 1953” (www.rothschild.com). The U.S. maintains around 1,000 military bases around the world. True adversaries of the system, as such, are non-existent.
The Rothschilds, and that class of money-lenders of whom they are the representatives and agents -- men who never think of lending a shilling to their next-door neighbours, for purposes of honest industry, unless upon the most ample security, and at the highest rate of interest -- stand ready, at all times, to lend money in unlimited amounts to those robbers and murderers, who call themselves governments, to be expended in shooting down those who do not submit quietly to being robbed and enslaved. (Lysander Spooner, political theorist, activist, abolitionist, 1870)
Gutle Schnapper, wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild, was allegedly quoted as saying, “If my sons did not want war, there would be none,” or more precisely, in 1830: “There won’t be war; my sons won’t give any money for it.” (Edith Dörken, Berühmte Frankfurter Frauen, p.48)
The political leaders of the time were advised, or had indeed been placed in power, by those in favour of war. According to testimony given by Norman Dodd, former Director of the Committee to Investigate Tax Exempt Foundations, U.S. House of Representatives, the following is to be found in the minute books of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:
The trustees of the Carnegie Endowment bring up a single question, namely if it is desirable to alter the life of an entire people, is there any means more efficient than war to getting that end and they discussed this question at a very high academic and scholarly level for a year and they came up with an answer. There is no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people. That leads them to the question. How do we involve the United States in war? This was in 1909. (Transcript of Public Hearing - Joint Committee on Regional Government - September 26, 1978, Edwardsville, Illinois, Norman Dodd - pgs 51-61 [pg 51])
The question remains why the life of an entire people, peaceful and profitable, had to be altered in the first place. Presumably, because nothing generates debt like war. War also fulfilled the post-war ambitions of reshaping entire populations’ impressions of their own histories and thus controlling them, and advanced by a few million deaths the plan for the wholesale removal of Christian “useless eaters” (H. Kissinger, The Final Days).
Speaking of useless eaters, here is a picture of Henry Kissinger
Memo from today: “One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.” (Jewish psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard, The Book of Co-Creation, 1993, “futurist, author and public speaker. She is credited with the concepts of “The Synergy Engine” and the “birthing” of humanity.” (Wikipedia) Also a member and futurist/strategist of Task Force Delta; a United States Army think tank. The ravings of a Jewish psychologist can usefully be extended to serve the cause of depopulation. (See Spangler, p. 133)
Such a nice old lady, who wants to kill us all
So the “Carnegie Endowment for International Peace” asked themselves, “So how do we involve the United States in a war? We must control the State Department. We must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country (i.e. The Council on Foreign Relations).” -- Carnegie Foundation documented records, 1908.
***
World War I was the solution to the problem. In 1914, the Carnegie Foundation then asked, “How do we prevent a reversion or reversal of life to how people were before the war? We must control education in the United States and specifically the teaching of American history.” A three prong method was agreed upon. Whereas the Rockefeller Foundation would handle the educational challenge “domestically” in the United States, the Carnegie Endowment could then handle it internationally and the Guggenheim Foundation was in charge of finding doctorial candidates who would adhere to the curriculum of “The American Historical Association,” which followed the Prussian PH.D Education System. The purpose of this new educational system was summarized as, “The future of this country belongs to collectivism administered with characteristic American efficiency.” As told in the summary of the seven-volume book series. The Carnegie Endowment initially had three divisions: the Division of Economics and History to study the causes and impact of war, the Division of Intercourse and Education to promote international understanding and cooperation, and the Division of International Law to aid in the development of international law and dispute settlement.
Norman Dodd was the director of research for Congressman B. Carroll Reece, as part of the Reece Commission in 1954. He investigated tax exempt foundations. Congressman Reece asked Dodd, “Do you accept the premise that the United States is the victim of a conspiracy?” ”Yes,” said Dodd. ”Then,” said Congressman Reece, “you must conduct the investigation on that basis.”
Dodd sent his protégé Katherine Casey to review the “Minutes” of the Carnegie Endowment Foundation. Casey uncovered the plot to re-educate Americans so they would be compliant in the creation of a world government. The proof was found in the Minutes of their early meetings, and Dodd reported back to the Congress on the “un-American activities” of the foundation. Dodd defined un-American as “a determination to affect changes in the country by unconstitutional means.”
Dodd stated that, “The foundation world is a coordinated, well-directed system, the purpose of which is to ensure that the wealth of our country shall be used to divorce it from the ideas which brought it into being. The foundations are the biggest single influence in collectivism.” (Charlotte Iserbyt, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America, 1999)
***
Reece Committee Counsel Rene Wormser wrote of the investigation, “...leads one
to the conclusion that there was, indeed, something in the nature of an actual conspiracy among certain leading educators in the United States to bring about socialism through the use of our school systems...” They discovered that the Rockefeller foundation was the primary culprit behind the teaching of socialism in America’s schools and universities and also behind the NEA’s policies. Rene Wormser, Counsel for the Reece Committee reported, “A very powerful complex of foundations and allied organizations has developed over the years to exercise a high degree of control over education. Part of this complex, and ultimately responsible for it, are the Rockefeller and Carnegie groups of foundations.” This was the situation in the 1950s when the Reece Committee briefly investigated. The Rockefeller-Carnegie groups have continued basically unopposed for the next 40 years in controlling education. (www.theforbiddenknowledge.com)
***
Already 40 years ago, A.L. Rowse, historian, educator and prolific author wrote about UK education:
It reminds me of so many American universities where the professors can’t write and the students can’t even read. We should spend our money not on mushroom universities but on the schools, institutes of technology, colleges of education...which have a job to do and do it well. Your money ought not to be wasted ...on bogus subject like sociology—which is properly a research subject not appropriate for undergraduates, who should be learning the necessary grammar of different disciplines: mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology; in the humanities, languages (not literary criticism), the factual and concrete realities of history, geography, economics, not the bogus speculations of political theory and philosophy... Working people didn’t ask to support this top-heavy structure of humbug institutions, and have no respect for them...There are simply too many university students. (“Cut the humbug! Get back to education,” Daily Telegraph, July 4, 1974)
Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil Page 41