Tucker's connections to the Bay Area go back to the early 1950s when he and a crime partner, Richard Bernard Bellew, were arrested for a half-dozen East Bay banks robberies.
At the time of his arrest for the Bay Area robberies, Tucker already had a rap sheet going back to a 1936 bicycle theft. There were also two other convictions, including a Florida bust in which he had escaped from the jail ward of a South Dade County hospital by picking the lock on his leg irons.
After being convicted for the East Bay holdups. Tucker was sent to Alcatraz to serve his term. During a medical visit to Los Angeles General Hospital in 1956, he escaped and managed to get as far as Bakersfield before he was captured by the California Highway Patrol.
He was later transferred to San Quentin, where he engineered his greatest escape.
Over the next few years, Tucker was identified by law enforcement agencies as a member of a group of elderly criminals in Massachusetts called the "Over the Hill Gang," which robbed supermarkets in Boston and its suburbs. He was suspected in 17 armed robberies over the years, most recently in a series of bank robberies in the part of southeastern Florida known as the Gold Coast.
Tucker's 20 years as a California fugitive came to an ignominious end against a palm tree last week. Deputies who searched the vehicle after the crash said they found burglary tools, weapons, police scanners and a large amount of cash.
He is scheduled for a court appearance later this week.
(c)1999 San Francisco Chronicle Page A1
You'll notice, there's a lot of usable stuff I did not mark this time around. I concentrated on four.
The first mark deals with Tucker's capture. I think you've got to use it, though I'm not sure where it comes in the picture. Here's how it might work as an opening.
FADE IN
A POLICE VEHICLE, motor straining as it rockets down a two-lane road, motor screaming. As it roars along--
CUT TO
ANOTHER POLICE CAR, and there are TWO COPS in the front seat and THE DRIVER's gunning the car like crazy and THE SECOND COP is getting a rifle ready to fire, and the siren on this car is even louder and now, holy shit--
CUT TO
A THIRD POLICE CAR, passing the first two like they were standing still and the noise is getting painful now as we
PULL BACK TO REVEAL
HALF A DOZEN POLICE CARS, all of them racing along this road, all of them with rifles ready, sirens screaming and whoever they're after stands zero chance of survival, not with this bunch after him, but he must be something, whoever he is, he must be a modern-day Capone, and now, as THE POLICE CARS begin to bunch together for the kill--
CUT TO
This crummy heap they're chasing, and it's old and it was never meant to go as fast as it's going, and the strain on the car is terrible, it's a miracle it's not falling apart, but you just know if it keeps on at this pace, it will, and now
CUT TO
FORREST TUCKER at the wheel, and maybe no one else alive could do more with the pile of junk he's piloting, and this is our guy, folks, so get used to having him around, not an ounce of fat on him, not an ounce of fear inside, and what makes him unusual is this: TUCKER is eighty years old.
Not a bad beginning. At least it's not one of those ho-hum octogenarian car chases we're all so used to.
It could also be the ending. What if Tucker's finally, after a lifetime of crime and punishment, got enough to leave the world he's inhabited all those decades, what if he's on his way to pick up his lady fair and off they will go to live their final years somewhere glorious--
--and a cop spots him. And the chase. And the attempt to get away, ending so forlornly for an eighty-year-old in a schoolyard.
Not so terrible that way, either.
I think if I thought about it I could come up with a way to tuck it into the middle, but I don't want to do that. You can already see why I marked those lines in the paper, I can use this stuff.
Okay. My second mark is the obvious one, the San Quentin jail break. Tucker was sixty at the time and what a grand gesture for a guy that age stuck in the slammer again.
A kayak?
Fabulous.
That, boys and girls, is the crucial set piece in the film. Fifteen minutes, maybe more, exciting and funny and full of hope and the possibility of disaster never more than a second away.
My third mark involved his being freed by the judge in Boston when not only would the Marin County people not press charges out of humiliation, but Tucker also scoots to freedom because of the goof-up in correspondence between the two states involved.
Cannot help but be fun and exciting, that stuff.
My fourth and final mark involved the 1936 bicycle theft he was busted for. My calculations make Tucker about fifteen at the time and I don't know why I want that, maybe as a credit sequence.
The reason I'm not sure why I want that is a symptom of my problem with the movie at this moment: I'm not sure what it is.
Is it a Butch Cassidy-type story, fun and games but darkening as time goes on (and on)? Is it a gangster flick, where my guy, Tucker, gets more desperate and drained as nothing works out for him? It is a comedy about a goofball?
I think the material could encompass any of those attacks.
And I hope it's clear to you by now: this could be a terrific flick, assuming we write a terrific screenplay. The material, I am saying, will hold. I care for this guy.
The question remaining for me to answer is this: Do I want to write it? Or:
Can I make it play?
I have confidence in certain kinds of material that I feel are in my wheelhouse. If you'll look at what I've written, you'll get a good idea of what I have confidence in. But I know where panic would bring me down. I cannot write a comedy. I can write stuff with comic elements, but a flat-out comedy, no. I cannot write a special-effects film. I could doctor one, but to be present at the creation, no. I do not like them that much and I do not understand them. I could not write a Sylvester Stallone bloodbath action film. I find them moronic and would have no confidence in myself. I could not write most science-fiction films, especially the kind where there is all that lunatic "Captain, the frammis on the right engine is flummaging"-type dialogue.
But we are talking about The Old Guy now, and yes, I think I could pull this baby off.
So, now that the answer to that first, most important question is out of the way, let's look at others.
What's the reality?
Meaning this--thinking in my mind is different from seeing with my eyes--and before you go "Duh," an explanation. Maybe Carl Hiassen's best novel was Strip Tease. For me, the best character in that book is an absolutely glorious creation with the name Urbana Sprawl. She is a stripper who rides a motorcycle to work and she is funny and wise and whenever she pops up on a page, are you ever happy.
Well, when the movie was made, the part was played by a lovely young woman named Pandora Peaks. And she had the huge boobs mentioned in the book. If you go on the Internet, you can look her up, see her picture, and buy her used bras for $150, not counting shipping and handling. (It should be clear to you by now that this book will spare no effort in its unceasing pursuit of accuracy.)
Anyway, in the movie, Pandora acted well enough and her face was pretty enough and her breasts were, like the book said, gigantic--
--but they weren't real.
And in the novel, that is never a problem, you are guided by the wit of Hiassen, and you care for this lady. But in the movie all you could see was the surgery. And you never thought of the character and her warmth and funny mouth, all you could look at were these marvels of the medical profession, and wonder how much did it hurt to walk around?
In other words, the reality hurt the movie.
Well, Forrest Tucker is eighty years old.
How does that reality look on film? He's not Clint Eastwood or Sean Connery, he is those guys ten years from now. He is Paul Newman five years down the line. And they won't look like they do now. (Sorry, guys.)
Take a walk outside, check out any octogenarians you see.
I promise you this: they're a lot more likely to be pushed in a wheelchair than they are prepping for a marathon. And in our movie, the same kinds of thoughts are going to intrude as they did with Pandora. How many times does he get up to pee at night? Does his dick still work, and under what conditions? How much do his knees ache when he has to do stairs?
Remember, this guy is our hero. He can't snooze in a sofa during this story, he has to do stuff. Two questions just to mind.
Will you believe it when you see him being physical?
Will you want to see him being physical?
You must be thinking this question at this point: Well, does he have to be that old? Why couldn't he be the great Eastwood now, pushing seventy?
He could be.
He could be Arnold, fifty.
He could be Leonardo DiCaprio, all of eleven.
Except for one small point: those guys destroy the picture.
A Riff About Age
I recently doctored a flick from a novel by Stephen Hunter, Point of Impact. It deals with the strange, fascinating world of long distance riflemen, snipers, if you will.
In the novel, the main character, Swagger, was a legendary figure in the Vietnam War, and when things went badly, and after hospitalization, he has spent his years alone in the Blue Ridge Mountains.
The government gets wind of an assassination attempt on the President. To be done by one of these long-distance whizzes. And they need help to try and figure out how to protect him. A sniper can attack from as much as a mile away, the President is out on the open with a bunch of other heads of state, in New Orleans.
The government comes to Swagger for help, he leaves the mountains for New Orleans, helps them. But things go badly for him, again, he is wounded terribly, again, and for the remainder of the picture, tries, against terrible odds, to clear his name.
Okay. The Vietnam stuff, which sets up his character, is a short section in the beginning of the book. But that was thirty years ago and Swagger could not have been in swaddling clothes, since he was drafted. Has to be mid-fifties at least.
I wrote it for Eastwood. He said no. Redford said no. Harrison Ford said no.
The movie is in development hell, but there is now interest from a star--Keanu Reeves.
Gasp.
And you know what--it's a terrific idea.
By now you probably want to strangle me for being so stupid as to say that Eastwood, at seventy, will destroy a picture about an eighty-year-old, while Keanu baby is just fine as a fifty-five-year-old Vietnam vet.
Here's the deal: in Point of Impact, the age of the sniper has nothing to do with the heart of the flick--a greatly gifted man is hired to do a job dealing with his speciality, gets double-crossed, and seeks revenge. You don't need the Vietnam sequence. But the core of The Old Guy is Tucker's age.
If I had read the identical article about Tucker, only he was seventy, big fucking deal, I'm sixty-seven. But I cannot imagine what it must be like to wake up every morning at eighty and think, "Christ, I hope today's bank robbery goes okay."
Now, obviously, any studio head would fire me instantly if I screwed up his shot at Eastwood or Connery or Redford or Ford. (Or Leo.)
The movie they made might work, might be a hit. Maybe you'd write a wonderful script and the movie would work. But I don't care about what you write, this is about me here.
And I could not write that movie. (End of riff about age.)
Okay, precious one, you might be thinking, he's got to be eighty.
How do you cast it?
Huge problem. The only famous actor I can come up with is Gregory Peck and Peck is such a gent, I have problems envisioning him as a lifer. So you have to go with an unknown. If you even think about that, this flashes like a "Price Is Right" answer: If he's a good enough actor to play the vehicle part in a movie, how come he's been unknown for eighty fucking years, Bill?
I have no answer for the casting problem. And I think if I go ahead and write this, this is what will bring me down. Either the studio will say, "are you nuts?" or they will replace me when a younger actor is given the role.
But I cannot think that way now. I may well be fired, have been many times, will be again.
But if I love Tucker's story enough, what I must do is this: put a blanket over my head and write it for Old Glory.
What about time?
As big a problem, in its way, as casting.
Movies do not handle the passage of time well. Most old-age makeup sucks. It tries, but what we think is, "What is Meryl doing looking that way?" In Butch Cassidy, I remember talking to George Roy Hill about the fact that the guys were in South America for eight years. Hill replied that he wasn't going to fuck with makeup, he'd tell them to act old, which he did, and which worked out--for me, anyway--just fine.
But this is, depending on how we write it, a very long lifetime.
If we include the bicycle stealing at fifteen, no problem, obviously, different actor. If we deal with Tucker's bank robberies when he was in his twenties, a different actor again. And probably you could use the same actor from the San Quentin escape at sixty for the car chase at eighty.
You could keep using different actors, and that might work, but I worry that what it would do is take away from what I think makes the story memorable: accumulation. A lifetime of misbegotten events, all of them heading toward the capture in the playground.
Clearly, time and casting and all these things mitigate against my writing this story. And the truth is this: I would not write this story. But the reason is not included above and is personal with me. Here it is:
Because the people are alive.
Twenty-five years ago I was in Holland, where we were shooting A Bridge Too Far. I was leaving that day for America, ticket in my hot little hand, when a message came, suddenly: it was from General Frost and it wondered, could I stop off in London before I went home?
Only a yes answer was possible.
The Brits are so different from us, there are no words; but nowhere is the difference clearer than when it comes to war: we venerate victories, they adore disasters. So the greatest battle for them in World War II was Dunkirk.
Followed closely by the awful Battle of Arnhem, where so many died so unfairly. A Bridge Too Far was about that battle. It began with a mistake of the Allied high command--Germany was falling, and clearly our General Patton was the man to finish the job, roar straight into Berlin with his unstoppable tank corps and kill those motherfuckers. The Nazis were getting braced for Patton and they were terrified of him.
But the plan to end the war went to the insecure Brit, Montgomery. He and Patton detested each other but Montgomery won out here, and planned the greatest parachute drop in history.
It was a cavalry-to-the-rescue deal. Thirty-five thousand troops were to be dropped behind Nazi lines in Holland, where they were to take a series of bridges. At the same time, a huge tank corps was to roar into Holland and solidify the bridges as they came to them.
The last bridge was at Arnhem. Once it fell, the tanks were to wheel across it into the industrial heart of the enemy. And bring the boys home by Christmas.
That was the theory.
The reality was worse than any Keystone Kops two-reeler. Fuck-up followed fuck-up. I won't detail them here, but the paratroopers who landed to take Arnhem Bridge--a huge thing, think the George Washington or the Golden Gate--were eight miles from the bridge. (One mile for these troops with their light weapons would have been unacceptable.)
The Battle of Arnhem was a bloodbath for the Allies. But the man who kept it in at least some kind of order, the hero of the effort, was Captain (later General) John Frost, thirty-one at the time and played wonderfully in the movie by Tony Hopkins.
When I went to work on the story, I expected to find all this great stuff that Frost did. We've all seen phony Hollywood war stuff, we know a heroic act when we see one. (I still almost have to vomit when I thin
k of the last hour of Saving Private Ryan.)
Well, Frost didn't do much of that. In a totally different way, he was like Butch Cassidy, who people just, well, took to. Frost was a guy who people just, well, believed in. If Johnny Frost said it's going to be okay, you knew this: you weren't going to die. What he was was this quiet figure who in real life might have been unnoticed. But put him in a situation where a hero was needed, he was your guy.
Okay. In the middle of this massacre, a decent German general--they were allowed two--drove onto Arnhem Bridge, white flag flying, and said to the waiting British officers, "Surrender."
Pause. Then one of the British officers answered this: "You wish to surrender to us?" Then another pause. Followed by: "We don't have sufficient supplies to take you all prisoner. Sorry."
The next morning the slaughter began again.
I loved that moment. It happened, it was so insanely British, so nuttily brave. I had Frost say the line, though in real life it was another officer.
We are back now to me in Holland, with this strange urgent request. I changed my plane, flew to London, met the general at a civilized restaurant, chatted briefly, very briefly, about how the movie was going.
And during this time I was aware of only this: General John Frost, a man I revered, a brave man by any definition, a legend in his home country, was pale and he was frightened.
Finally he said this: "Your script will destroy me."
Not the kind of thing I hear a lot. I had no idea what I had done. I don't think I even answered. But I still remember the awful feeling in the pit of my stomach.
"That line," he went on. "That line."
I must have asked which.
"When you have me saying we couldn't take them prisoner. To accept their surrender."
I still hadn't caught on. "I didn't make it up."
"Yes, of course. But I didn't say it." Finally I understood as he went quietly on. "Don't you see? People will think I was trying to make too much of myself. Everywhere I go they will know I didn't say it, that a brave man did say it, and I was trying to take from him, trying to make too much of myself, make more of myself than I am. And they won't forgive me."
Which Lie Did I Tell?: More Adventures in the Screen Trade Page 27