Elephant Sense and Sensibility

Home > Other > Elephant Sense and Sensibility > Page 15
Elephant Sense and Sensibility Page 15

by Michael Garstang


  point what may now be unconscious was consolidated through the conscious

  and through learning.

  Scientists generally agree that for humans, language and communication

  involve a high degree of teaching and learning. Yet there is a reluctance among

  ethologists to accept that nonhuman animals transfer information through com-

  munication. Dawkins and Krebs (1978, p. 308), quoted in Seyfarth et al. (2010),

  claim that “it is probably better to abandon the concept of information transfer

  altogether,” apparently agreeing with Owings and Morton (1997, 1998) that to

  do so is both anthropomorphic and inaccurate. Seyfarth et al. conclude that ani-

  mal calls do contain information that affects the receiver’s responses and can

  illicit more than one response and that “animal signals encode a surprisingly

  rich amount of information” (p. 7). They arrive at these conclusions without

  discussing any of the findings on elephant communication and with no recogni-

  tion that much of that communication is in the infrasonic range, not audible to

  humans, and in the broader sense poorly observed and understood.

  Caro and Hauser (1992), together with Thornton and Raihani (2008), be-

  lieve that teaching must be explicit, although not dependent upon, one teacher

  and one learner and must result in the pupil acquiring new skills or competence.

  While acknowledging the role of mothers and social learning, they do not con-

  sider this to be a true form of teaching. Surprisingly, they include no discussion

  of play as a form of teaching or learning. Teaching, however, should result in

  learning a new skill or acquiring new knowledge. Teaching should result in

  changes in behavior and the acquisition of new skills.

  Much of elephant learning must be through observing group members, with

  individuals spending an entire lifetime within a single group continuously fol-

  lowing older more knowledgeable relatives. The nearly 2 years that a calf nurses

  followed by 8–10 years of close contact with the mother and attention paid

  Elephant Sense and Sensibility. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802217-7.00012-0

  Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

  91

  92 Elephant Sense and Sensibility

  by allomothers to the calf provide an extended period of learning at a critical

  time of development for the calf. Almost uniquely among mammals, female

  elephants remain within a closely knit family unit for the rest of their lives.

  Behavior learned within this group consists not only of the crucial knowledge

  needed for survival but equally important knowledge involving social skills and

  interactions with their family and a much wider population that may number

  well over 100 individuals.

  In contrast, males leave the herd at puberty and show distinctly different

  upbringing when compared to females. For example, crop-raiding is a high-

  risk, high-reward exercise that is carried out mostly by male elephants. Energy

  requirements of males rise at the age of first reproduction (25–30 years old).

  At their reproductive peak (45–50 years), males’ nutritional demands are at the

  highest level. Moss and her colleagues (Chiyo et al., 2011) have shown that

  males at their prime take more risks than younger males or females. Females in

  the Amboseli herds, although exposed to crops, do not take the risks entailed in

  crop-raiding. Younger males, however, join with experienced older males, sug-

  gesting that they have found that social learning is better than solitary learning,

  especially when the cost of exploratory learning may be high.

  Failure to observe teaching in the case of elephants may be a function of

  the lack of opportunity to observe such a process rather than the conclusion

  that teaching among elephants does not exist. A more reasonable conclusion

  may be that explicit teaching is not a frequent function in elephant society and

  as such rarely observed. A potentially explicit case of teaching by an elephant

  mother of its calf was observed in a dry riverbed in the Kruger National Park by

  the author (Figure 12.1). The mature female, possibly the matriarch of a small herd, had successfully dug for water in the sand of a dry riverbed. Her calf, perhaps 4–5 years old, was obviously interested in the water at the bottom of a 1 m

  (3 ft) deep hole. However, it neither knew how to drink using its trunk nor how

  to reach the water at the bottom of the hole. The mother took up a quantity of

  water in her trunk. She wound her trunk around that of her calf such that the tip

  of her trunk was immediately below the tip of her calf’s trunk. She then allowed

  the water in her trunk to flow out such that it welled up into the tip of the calf’s

  trunk. It seemed obvious to the observer that she was trying to get the calf to

  take up the water in its trunk. The calf spluttered and struggled but failed to get

  the idea. The mother tried repeatedly to get the calf to respond but after about

  four or five tries gave up, took a trunk full of water and pumped it directly into

  the calf’s mouth. From the sequence of actions taken by the mother it seemed

  that she had the clear intent of getting the calf to use its trunk as a means to

  drink. She clearly knew that the calf had to take up the water in the lower end

  of its trunk and transfer this water to its mouth. She did everything she knew to

  show the calf how to do this. When this failed she knew that the transfer process

  from the trunk to the mouth by the calf was not going to work and that she had

  no option but to execute this part of the operation herself. Teaching may thus be

  an uncertain process that needs to be repeated many times before the lesson is

  Learning and Teaching Chapter | 12 93

  FIGURE 12.1 Mother repeatedly tried to get the calf to take water she had drawn from a hole dug in the river bed too deep for the calf to reach. (Pen and ink drawing by the author.)

  learned. It is possible that elephants perform such repetitive instruction teaching

  young by multiple subtle demonstrations.

  Earlier we described a lone female African forest elephant who seldom if

  ever vocalized except when apparently hearing distant low-frequency sounds

  generated by the wake vortices from a 747 Boeing aircraft taking off from the

  Lahore airport. While there is no evidence that this elephant mimics the sounds

  she heard, more recent observations have documented that elephants can learn

  to imitate the sounds of truck engines (Poole et al., 2006). Stoeger et al. (2012)

  has documented that male African elephants living with two female Asian ele-

  phants have learned to mimic the chirping sounds made by the Asian elephants.

  Stoeger also documents an Asian elephant mimicking human speech.

  Vocal learning not only means that elephants are aware of sounds made by

  other animals and nonanimal sources but that they have the potential of devel-

  oping an open communication system that potentially could include humans.

  Byrne and Bates (2009, p. 72) suggest that there seems to be some teaching

  94 Elephant Sense and Sensibility

  behavior inherent in the attention paid by older females to a young female when

  she first comes into estrous.

  de Waal ( The Bonoko and the Atheist, 2013, pp. 114–115) describes an ex-

  perime
nt conducted at the Washington National Zoo by Preston Foerder and

  Deana Reiss. Kandula, a young elephant bull, was presented with bunches of

  fruit being suspended out of reach from the roof of the enclosure. Several ob-

  jects, including sticks, a sturdy box, and several thick cutting boards, were first

  distributed around the enclosure. Kandula ignored the sticks but after a while

  moved the box with his foot in a straight line until it was under a bunch of fruit.

  He then stood with his front feet on the box, reaching up to the fruit with his

  trunk. Foerder and Reiss then moved the box outside and out of sight from the

  enclosure. Without hesitation, Kandula retrieved the box, from apparently con-

  siderable distance, bringing it once again to a position below a bunch of fruit.

  They then further complicated the experiment by removing the box entirely,

  leaving the sticks and wooden boards. Again Kandula ignored the sticks, picked

  up the wooden boards, and stacked them on top of each other to serve as a plat-

  form to reach the fruit.

  While elephants commonly use their trunks to reach high into trees for fruit

  and other edible plant material, and will make use of terrain, roots, and other

  small elevated surfaces to add to their reach, they have not been observed in the

  wild to move objects to stand on (Figures 12.2 and 12.3). In the Washington Zoo case, Kandula showed not only deductive reasoning but a learning process

  that he could recall, repeat, and substitute even when the means (tools) were no

  longer visible or available. While this experiment was conducted under artificial

  conditions, it had elements based on natural conditions that utilized both the

  FIGURE 12.2 Foreign objects are readily recognized for what they are: a potential source of clean water if broken into, which they often are.

  Learning and Teaching Chapter | 12 95

  FIGURE 12.3 Reaching for objects perhaps as high as 8 m (25 ft) above the ground. (Pen and ink drawing by the author.)

  neural and physical assets of the elephant. Being able to either observe behavior

  in the natural world or effectively transfer natural simulations to artificial envi-

  ronments is essential in trying to assess the intelligence of animals.

  Sitting behind a desk is a dangerous place from which to view the world

  (John le Carré quote; http://www.goodreads.com).

  Chapter 13

  The Sensory Environment

  of Elephants

  Sensory signals are transmitted in multiple ways, consciously and uncon-

  sciously, by individuals and through group responses. Individuals transmit

  signals through the five sensory systems. Conscious signals are frequently ob-

  vious. My nephew, Richard Garstang, and I demonstrated the latter when be-

  ing harassed by a young, fairly aggressive bull elephant in the Kruger National

  Park. The young male had repeatedly mock-charged our Volkswagen “Combie.”

  After about the third episode we waited for another frontal threat, then as the

  youngster came toward us we simultaneously swung open the front doors of

  the Combie in a realistic imitation of the flaring of the ears at an adversary. The

  feisty youngster skidded to a halt, turned, and abandoned his game in immediate

  response to a well-understood threat from a larger opponent.

  Unconscious signals are less obvious, more subtle, and not under the con-

  scious control of the animal. Pheromone emitted signaling fear or aggression

  are not controlled. Other subtle signals in tone and body language may not be

  consciously generated (Figures 13.1–13.4).

  Collective signals may be generated by groups and large assemblies.

  Humans, for example, believe that in sports events crowd energy can be trans-

  ferred to players. This may well be achieved in a number of ways by sound,

  smell, and collective body language. These responses have evolved over evo-

  lutionary time, particularly in social and herd animals, and may be far more

  prevalent in animals than in humans. Ecologists and behavioral biologists have

  focused on conspecific communication and some interspecies communication

  but paid scant attention to overall environmental acoustic, olfactory, visual, tac-

  tile, and gustatory input.

  Of the sensory input, the auditory component may be the most transform-

  ing and may be far more pervasive than has been previously considered. The

  sensory surroundings of an elephant consist initially of its mother’s womb and

  ultimately of its total environment. Detectable initially by touch and smell and

  subsequently by sound, taste, and sight, it ultimately involves all five senses,

  which serve to identify the elephant’s place in its world.

  Elephant Sense and Sensibility. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802217-7.00013-2

  Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

  97

  98 Elephant Sense and Sensibility

  FIGURE 13.1 Awareness and tolerance of others is exhibited by clear body language from mild curiosity to explicit warning signs.

  FIGURE 13.2 Awareness and mild curiosity with no threat.

  The Sensory Environment of Elephants Chapter | 13 99

  FIGURE 13.3 Awareness with some fear and potential flight.

  FIGURE 13.4 Awareness coupled with mild flight.

  The sensory systems of mammals (auditory, olfactory, visual, tactile, and

  gustatory) provide parallel and continuous input from the environment to the

  brain. Neural systems must function to interpret the signals and assign meaning

  to the integrated input. Interpretation must trigger memory and response to a

  large range of situations and images that are recalled. Many such memories are

  of responses upon which survival may have depended.

  100 Elephant Sense and Sensibility

  The acoustic fields in the natural environment may represent signals that

  travel over the longest distances and that constitute the basis for mammals such

  as elephants to recognize spatial and other characteristics of their surroundings.

  There is ample evidence that suggests that elephants can travel over large

  distances (hundreds of kilometers) to reach specific locations at specific times.

  There is further evidence that animals who have been translocated over similar

  long distances (in closed vehicles) are subsequently able to return on foot to

  their place of origin. Orphan elephants at the David Shepherd Wildlife Trust

  are taken by road in closed vehicles after as much as 10 years in the Trust to

  be released in the Tsavo National Park approximately 150 km (93 mile) away.

  Female released elephants have successfully integrated into the wild herds of

  Tsavo, some of them ultimately producing calves of their own. In a number of

  instances mothers have brought these calves over a distance of at least 150 km

  (93 mile) back to the Trust. Quite apart from any attempt to understand the mo-

  tivation of the mother to bring their calf back to the Trust, no plausible explana-

  tion can be offered to explain how the mother knew where the Trust was relative

  to Tsavo and how she was able to get there. Seeking a rational explanation one

  is forced to call upon more than one sophisticated use of navigation, memory,

  and neural competence.

  In the case of Lawrence Anthony’s death, described in Chapter 7, the pos-

  tulated response of the herds is to t
he behavior or, perhaps, more importantly is

  to the changed behavior of another species. Not only might the elephants have

  detected this change in behavior but they may have correctly interpreted it as

  displaying grief.

  It is likely that individual elephants have a total neural memory of the

  sensory environment of their home territory. A significant part of this neural

  memory consists of auditory sounds stemming from other than conspecifics

  including humans. Abiotic sounds add to the input. This wide range of sounds

  includes frequencies and levels that are inaudible to humans. As such, these

  sounds have been poorly recorded and inadequately studied. While the acoustic

  environment may extend over the greatest area, it remains a part of the total

  sensory environment that defines the animal’s home territory. This total sensory

  environment is made up of all of the sounds, smells, sights, and tactile and taste

  sensations that have been recorded and consolidated within the animal’s brain

  over the time spent in its territory. The sum total of this sensory input serves to

  provide the basis for the animal not only to instantaneously recognize its home

  territory but to be conscious of any changes or inconsistencies in the environ-

  ment of that territory.

  The embedded memory consisting of integrated multiple sensory inputs

  serves as a basis to recognize familiar territory such as the component parts of

  the home range. It also serves as a neural framework against which changes or

  unusual circumstances can be recognized.

  Recognizing that elephants have such capabilities presents the challenge of

  interpretation by humans of such a complex synthesis of input but will also have

  The Sensory Environment of Elephants Chapter | 13 101

  important implications to management and conservation. Inherent in the propo-

  sition is the concept that the neural connection to a given environment, which is

  far more complex than simply a connection to the biota of that environment, is

  fundamental to these animals. Changes such as translocations represent in these

  terms fundamental dislocation.

  Chapter 14

 

‹ Prev