Einstein's Greatest Mistake

Home > Other > Einstein's Greatest Mistake > Page 27
Einstein's Greatest Mistake Page 27

by David Bodanis


  violin, 8, 9, 21, 57–58, 163, 217, 228–29

  W

  Weber, Heinrich, 8–9, 16, 220

  Weizmann, Chaim, 110

  Whitehead, Alfred North, 104

  Wien, Willy, 188–89

  Winteler, Marie, 8, 11, 14, 228

  Z

  Zangger, Heinrich, 56, 70, 235

  Zeitschrift für Physik, 127–28, 130, 134

  About the Author

  DAVID BODANIS studied mathematics, physics, and history at the University of Chicago and for many years taught the Intellectual Tool-Kit course at Oxford University. The author of many books, including the New York Times bestseller The Secret House and E=mc2, which was adapted as the PBS NOVA documentary Einstein’s Big Idea, Bodanis is also a futurist and business adviser. He lives in London.

  Learn more at www.davidbodanis.com

  Connect with HMH on Social Media

  Follow us for book news, reviews, author updates, exclusive content, giveaways, and more.

  Footnotes

  * The terms used by early scientists had subtly different meanings from what they have now. To Lavoisier and others in the late eighteenth century, it was natural to think in terms of matter, what we today would think of as the number of atoms in an object. Gradually that changed, and by the early twentieth century the concept was understood in terms of the conservation of mass. What’s the difference? “Mass” is most easily thought of as the measure of an object’s resistance to acceleration. A pen is easily accelerated, a big mountain isn’t, and so the latter has more mass. The twist is that the two different views are closely related: mountains are hard to accelerate not least because they have more atoms inside.

  [back]

  * * *

  * The appendix goes into this in more detail. In particular, we’ll see that it’s not just space that gets curved, but time as well.

  [back]

  * * *

 

 

 


‹ Prev