Also, the mistake in this verse is the word “forelock.” its a very foolish of themselves to make it a scientific miracle. Maybe you don’t know what I mean yet. In all Islamic translations of the Qur’an they are using the same word, forelock, so it must be that they all agree about the meaning of the word. They are out of their minds. Why?
Forelock means the following from all dictionaries:
(n. A lock of hair that grows from or falls on the forehead, especially the part of a horse's mane that falls forward between the ears.)
It's so dumb to say that hair is where our brain is. What science is talking about is the front of the brain, not the hair!!!
-----------------------------------------------------
Muslims’ claim
Heart Massage- Miracles of the Qur’an
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_102.html
One of the verses that may be referring to the future is verse 73 of Surat al-Baqara: Remember when you killed someone and violently accused each other of it, and Allah brought out what you were hiding. We said, ‘Hit him with part of it!’ In that way Allah gives life to the dead and He shows you His Signs so that hopefully you will understand. (Surat al-Baqara, 72-73)
Among the meanings of the Arabic term “biba’diha,” translated as “with part of it” in the above verse, is “someone or some people.” In the context of that meaning, the verse may be a reference to heart massage, striking the chest from above, which makes it possible to restart the heart if it has stopped beating. (Allah knows the truth.)
--------------------------------------------
My answer
I cannot believe how some people lie with no shame! This verse, in a miraculous way, became about a heart massage!
This is Harun's translation:
“Remember when you killed someone and violently accused each other...” 1. Notice that he claimed "the verse may be a reference to heart massage." Why would someone say “maybe” if he is certain? But it's very clear he used “maybe” because he has no proof, so he has to mix between science and a maybe.
2. The verse is talking about a dead man, “Remember when you killed someone and violently” and not someone who’s had a heart attack and survived!
3. Violently mostly by a sharp weapon as sword or knife. 4. This story speaks about Moses. Allah told him to get a cow meat, beat the dead man with it, and he would come back to life. Then he (the dead man) was asked who killed him, so he live for few seconds and dies again. What does this have to do with heart massage?! Read the story in Ibn Kathir:
So, We said, unto them, strike him (the man who was killed) with a piece of it, the cow meat
http://tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=2&tid=2294 5. Do Muslims believe that if we beat a man with beef meat, the dead will come back to life?
6. Should we start teaching in our hospitals that if somebody dies violently as the verse in the Qur’an states, the medical recommendation is to beat that person with a peace of steak?
It's a very clear lie and totally different from what the verse is about. I wonder if this is real science. This would make the work of an FBI agent much much easier to find a murderer out…just hit the corpse with a steak and once it’s back to life, get the entire story!
There are many jokes in Harun's website that even kids would find it hard to accept. I can even find more the would be confusing for some but we better not waste our time with the silly ones.
-----------------------------------------------------
Muslims’ claim
LOCUSTS MOVING IN SWARMS
They will emerge from their graves with downcast eyes, like swarming locusts. (Qur’an, 54:7) This verse describes all people's situation in the Hereafter as one resembling swarming locusts. There is great wisdom in this simile.
A great deal of information was obtained about locusts in the twentieth century by conducting wide-ranging studies using micro-cameras. Locust swarms contain huge numbers of individual locusts that behave as a single body.
----------------------------------------------------
My answer I am not sure if the one who made this claim is in good shape or not. No one knows that the locusts come in huge groups except Allah? This is really funny. At the same time, the verse says locusts scattered, not swarming.
The fact is that the Bible says something amazing; that is locusts move by biological control and other means of non-chemical control, which means they have no leader or a king or queen, and this is something that has just been found recently. We read this in the Bible:
Proverbs 30:27
The locusts have no king, yet go they forth all of them by bands; The verse presents two facts. They move by bands or swarm which is not much of a secret and something anyone can notice. But without a king? Its in one of the bible books written between the tenth and sixth centuries B.C, This discovery took humans about 3,000 years to know?
Still, we do not see Christians making books about this scientific discovery in the Bible. We do not need science to prove God for he does not need their approval.
At the same time, maybe Mr. Harun can make a book about how LOCUSTS fly and are made of gold.
Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 55, Hadith 604 Allah’s Messenger said at the same time as Job was naked from taking a shower, a swarm of gold LOCUSTS fell on him, and he began collecting them in his dress. His Lord called him, 'O Job! Have I not made you rich enough to need what you see? He said, 'Yes, O Lord! However, I cannot discharge with your benefit
To read more visit this site:
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080508132545.htm
------------------------------------------------------
Histry Mistake and False Prophecy
Muslims’ claim
1The Word "Haman" in the Qur’an
http://www.harunyahya.com/articles/50_the_word_haman.php Haman is a character whose name is mentioned in the Qur’an, along with the Pharaoh. He is recorded in six different places of the Qur’an as one of the closest men to the Pharaoh.
Before these discoveries, the writings and inscriptions of ancient Egypt could not be understood. The language of ancient Egypt was hieroglyphic, which survived through the ages. However, with the spread of Christianity and other cultural influences in the 2nd and 3rd
Through the decoding of hieroglyph, an important piece of knowledge was revealed: the name "Haman" was indeed
---------------------------------------------------
My answer
And that's exactly the same with the book referenced by Mr. Harun which he named the New Kingdom Period (Fig. 4).
[Walter Wreszinski, Aegyptische Inschriften aus dem K.K. Hof Museum in Wien] Let us assume that Mr. Harun is correct and that the name “Haman” is in the ancient Egyptian scripture. Still, that does not make him the high minister of the pharaoh. From the claim of Mr. Harun we take this quotation: “In the dictionary of "People in the New Kingdom.” It was prepared based on the entire collection of inscriptions. Haman is said to be “the head of stone quarry workers.” So he agreed that the name is talking about a simple employee not a government minister as mentioned in all the Islamic books’ interpretations, and from Ibn Kathir, p. 471 we quote:
The interpretation of Qur’an 40:36 “Allah Almighty said,: reporting the arrogance and and unfairness of Pharaoh against Moses peace be upon him, he ordered his minister Haman to build a high building”.
Will we find these books in Islamic websites only (just as names), but not in the book itself? 1. If we read the verse itself, it will expose the mistake. As you see, the Pharaoh is asking to build a tower to reach God.
2. Where in the world is this famous tower which a king built to reach to God called ziggurats?
So the corruption of Muhammad made him move the story, which happened in Iraq and the Babylonians’ land, all the way to Egypt.
It's very clear that Muhammad took this story about making a brick from clay to build a tower from the Bible, as we see in:
Genesis 11:1-4 - KJV
1And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
2And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
3And they said, one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter. 4And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
3. At the same time, the verse in the Quran is saying that the Pharaoh thinks he is god but why did he want to go up to God?
Here is the verse translated by Mr. Harun himself: "Pharaoh said, 'Council, I do not know of any other god for you apart from Me. Haman, kindle a fire for me over the clay and build me a lofty tower so that perhaps I may be able to climb up to Moses' god! I consider him a blatant liar.'" (Surat al-Kasas, 38)
Here it is in the Bible, book of: Esther 3:1 - KJV
After these things did king Ahasuerus promote Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, and advanced him, and set his seat above all the princes that were with him.
It's so clear that Muhammad mixed two stories together and made them one. Each of these are one is totally different and both are in entirely separate times too. The story itself is showing the crazy mixed up knowledge of Muhammad’s god, or let us say Muhammad himself. I challenge Mr. Harun to show us the tower reaching to God that the Pharaoh built!
---------------------------------------------Muslims’ claim
Titles of Egyptian Rulers in the Qur’an
http://www.harunyahya.com/musa12.php
In contrast, the ruler at Moses' time is referred to as the "Pharaoh":
"We gave Moses nine Clear Signs. Ask the tribe of Israel about when he came to them and Pharaoh said, to him, 'Moses, I think you are bewitched.'"
(The Qur’an, 17:101)}
The rulers of the old dynasty did not use the title. The use of the word pharaoh as the title of the ruler did not start until the "New Kingdom" era of Egyptian history. This period started with the 18th dynasty (1539-1292 BC), and by the 20th dynasty (945-730 BC) the word "pharaoh" was adopted as title of respect.
------------------------------------------------
My answer The point he is saying here is how Allah knew that the one who ruled at the time of Moses had the title of Pharaoh and the one who ruled at the time of Joseph had the title of King!
1. Muhammad copied the story from the Bible. The word king in the time of Joseph is mentioned in the Bible.
Genesis 39:20 And Joseph’s master took him, and put him into the prison, a place where the king's prisoners were bound: and he was there in the prison.
2. The word Pharaoh was used in the time of Joseph and even 300 to 400 years before the time of Joseph. The claim that the word Pharaoh was not used until the 20thdynasty (945-730 BC) is not true. You can search yourself for The pharaohs of Dynasty XVIII who ruled for about 250 years (him and 1550-1298 BC)
3. Muslims themselves believe that Yusuf (Joseph) lived between 1610 BC - 1500 BC. Mr. Harun Yahya said in his writing that “This period started with the 18th dynasty (1539-1292 BC)”, which are false dates. Even that is enough to prove that his claim is false.
4. What's funny is that Muslims think he lived between 1610 to 1500 BC which would mean Joseph lived under the rule of more than one king and was living at the time of the pharaohs as the dates are displayed in Harun Yahya's claim.
5. Pharaoh is a word that originally meant the great house. Let’s just say that the one who lived in it had the name as owner of the house.
6. Also, in the new kingdom of Egypt, by the year 1479-1425 BC, it became a title and/or name for whoever was the king, but in general that means the name became more adopted in this way. The fact is that even the word Pharaoh was used long before that for the kings, but it was not used often. Later it turned into a custom.
7. This can be proven from many books. As an example, the King Amenhotep IV ruled for 17 years and was called Pharaoh as a title. That was in the years of 1352-1336 B.C. 18th dynasty, during his lifetime.
References
Kuhrt 1995: 186
Christopher Bronk Ramsey et al., Radiocarbon-Based Chronology for Dynastic Egypt, Science 18 June 2010: Vol. 328. no. 5985, pp. 1554-1557.
Aidan Dodson, Dyan Hilton: The Complete Royal Families of Ancient Egypt. The American University in Cairo Press, London 2004.
8. All this being said, we have enough proof concerning the false claims made by the Muslims. 9. To make my final point, I will show something that Muhammad said which proves that Islam and the Qur’an consider the Pharaoh as a name of a man and not a title based on the coming hadith.
1Islam and the Qur’an consider the Pharaoh as a name of a man, not a title.
Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 57, Hadith 113; (in Arabic: Hadith 3558). Narrated Abu Musa AL Ash'ari: Allah’s Prophet said, “Many amongst men reached perfection but amongst women none reached the perfection except Mary, the daughter of 'Mran and Asiah (Asieya), the woman of Pharaoh. And the superiority of 'Aisha to other women is like flavoring the meat over other dishes.
10. Notice here that Muhammad is using the name of Asieya, wife of Pharaoh, not of The Pharaoh! This is clear evidence that according to Muhammad and Allah, Pharaoh is a name of a man, not a title.this is why it shows in the Qur'an 74 time but no name of that king or the word king for the Pharaoh appear.
11. We have very clear proof, if Pharaoh was a title in the Qur’an why he is counted with individual names as we read in; Qur'an29:32 And [We destroyed] Qarun and Pharaoh and Haman. And Moses had already come to them with clear evidences, and they were arrogant in the land, but they were not outrunners [of Our punishment].( Sahih International translation. 1) As we see he is counting names so if Pharaoh is a
title it shouldn't be there, if we replace the word Pharaoh with the meaning of it(King) then the verse will look funny which already is because that will give the true meaning of the verse, “And [We destroyed] Qarun and k i n g and Haman, And Moses”
2) obviously he is counting names of individuals, and the word king dose not fit there unless he thought its a name.
3) Qur'an 38:12 “ The people of Noah denied before them, and [the people of] 'Aad and Pharaoh, the owner of stakes”
Again Noah, 'Aad, Pharaoh, there are individuals especially if we notice that the other two names are not even kings.
12.
13. muhammad said;
“women none reached the perfection except Mary, the daughter of 'Mran and Asiah (Asieya), the woman of Pharaoh.” ,so we notice here:
1) Daughter of 'Mran.
2) Wife of Pharaoh.
3) To say that it can be fine, if this statement made in the time of Pharaoh, but to say the wife of Pharaoh thousands of years after many Pharaoh died already, how we will know which wife of which Pharaohs she was, the word Pharaoh makes reference to various pharaohs (kings of Egypt)?
4) Unless he thought Pharaoh is a name of a person, and there is only on Pharaoh, Qur'an (8:52) “Same as the custom of the people of Pharaoh and of those before them. They disbelieved in the signs of Allah” 5) Qur'an “And a believing man from the family of Pharaoh who concealed his faith said, "Do you kill a man “ so he is from the Family of Pharaoh? Family of a king? Which king!
I think the answer is clear, that the word Pharaoh in the Qur'an used as a name of a person not as a king which is an error not the opposite.
---------------------------------------------
Muhammad prophecy’s about the The Victory of Byzantium
Muslims’ claim
THE VICTORY OF BYZANTIUM
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/predictions_01.html Alif, Lam, Mim. The Romans have been defeated in the lowest land, but after their defeat they will be victorious within three to nine years. The affair is Allah's from beginning to end. On that day, the believers will rejoice. (Qur�
�an, 30:1-4)
These verses were revealed around 620, almost 7 years after the idolatrous Persians had severely defeated Christian Byzantium in 613-14. …........... The loss of Jerusalem in 614 was particularly traumatic for the Byzantines, for the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was destroyed and the Persians seized the "True Cross," the symbol of Christianity. 174 In addition, the Avars, Slavs, …..
The Dead Sea basin where Byzantium was defeated by Persians. Above is a satellite photograph of the region. The Lake of Lut region, which is the lowest region of the world, is 395 meter below the sea level.
Like all the other predictions in the Qur’an, however, this one also came true. In 622, Heraclius gained a number of victories over the Persians and conquered Armenia.177 In December 627,
The Byzantine victory was completed when Emperor Heraclius defeated the Persian ruler Khosrow II in 630, recaptured Jerusalem, and regained the "True Cross" for the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.179 In the end, "the victory of the Romans" proclaimed by Allah in the Qur’an miraculously came true within the verses' stated "three to nine years" time frame.
Another miracle revealed in these verses is the announcement of a geographical fact that could not have been known by anyone at that time: that the Romans had been defeated in the lowest region of earth. This Arabic expression adna al-Ard is interpreted as "a nearby place" in many translations. However, this is not the literal meaning, but rather a figurative interpretation. The word adna, derived from the word dani (low), means “the lowest”. The word ard means “the world.” Therefore, adna al-ard means "the lowest place on earth."
Some interpreters of the Qur’an, considering the closeness of the region in question to the Arabs, prefer the "closest" meaning of the word. However, the actual meaning indicates a very important geological fact: The Dead Sea, one of the regions in which the Byzantines were defeated in 613-14, is the lowest region on Earth.180
Qur'an And Science in Depth_This book go in deep study about the Qur'an and Science investigating the truthful of facts or claims. Page 30