The War Against Boys

Home > Other > The War Against Boys > Page 29
The War Against Boys Page 29

by Christina Hoff Sommers


  resocialization of, see resocialization movement

  rise in initiatives and publications focusing on struggles of, 18–19, 199–200, 201–3

  self-esteem of, 101, 128, 129, 152, 232n

  single-sex education of, 1, 2, 4–5, 81, 83, 85, 86, 88, 152–54, 171

  specialized curricula and pedagogy geared to, 1, 4, 81, 88, 153, 154–56, 159, 171

  “spread” phenomenon and, 15–16, 25, 168–69

  “superpredator myth” of, 2, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53

  suspension and expulsion rates of, 42, 47

  violent behavior of, see violence vocational schooling of, 7–11, 33, 159

  zero-tolerance policies as harmful to, 2, 46, 47, 48, 61, 62, 174, 190, 198

  see also sex differences

  Boys’ Achievement, Progress, Motivation and Participation (NFER report), 153–54

  Boys & Girls Club of America, 191

  Boys & Girls: Superheroes in the Doll Corner (Paley), 89–90

  Boy Scouts of America, 64, 87

  Boys: Getting It Right (Australian government report), 155

  Boys Initiative, 199–200

  Boys’ Reading Commission (Great Britain), 2, 154, 171

  “Boys Will Be Boys” (Broude), 231n

  Bradbury, Ray, 153

  brain anatomy, sex differences in, 80–81

  Brandeis University, 18, 22

  Brawer, Barney, 121, 122, 134

  Broca, Paul, 80–81

  Brookings Institution, 30, 31, 33, 35, 120

  Brooks, David, 159

  Broude, Gwen, 231n

  Brozo, William, 34

  Bryant, Anne, 100, 102

  Buddhists, 143

  bullying, 55, 63, 188, 191, 194, 202

  Bully Society, The (Klein), 59, 60

  Burke, Edmund, 187

  Burroway, Janet, 202

  Burroway, Tim, 202

  Bushman, Brad, 145

  Bybee, Jane, 142

  California, University of, 19

  at Los Angeles (UCLA), 49, 157

  at San Francisco (UCSF), 53

  California Postsecondary Education Commission, 19–20, 35

  “call-out” gap, 102, 210n, 227n

  Canadian Council on Learning, 2

  Can Boys Do Better? (British report), 152, 153

  Capon, Paul, 2–3

  Career Training Education (CTE), 160, 163, 164

  see also vocational schools

  Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act, 163–64, 166, 171

  Ceasefire (Young), 220n

  Census Bureau, US, 23, 32, 120

  Center for Gender Equity, 53

  Center on Education Policy, 151

  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US, 45, 58, 60, 211n

  Central High School, 40

  Chapman, Steve, 214n

  Character Counts Coalition, 190, 191

  character education, 48, 63, 146, 173–74, 180, 182, 183–85, 188, 189, 200, 205, 238n, 240n

  criticism of, 186–87, 195–96, 238n

  mixed-results of, 192, 198

  revival of, 190–98

  see also morality, moral reasoning

  Charalambous, Deno, 9, 10

  Chicago, University of, 47, 48, 89, 138, 151, 240n

  “child-centered” education model, 2, 149–50, 153, 182, 183, 184–85, 186

  Child Development, 109, 142

  Chira, Susan, 101

  Chodorow, Nancy, 116–18, 129, 130

  Christianity, 143–44

  Christie, Zachary, 46, 47

  Circle of Friends, 56

  Civilization and Its Discontents (Freud), 232n–33n

  Clackmannanshire, Scotland, 154–55

  Clara Barton High School, 9

  Claremont Academy, 82, 83, 84

  Clark Atlanta University, 24

  Cleveland Avenue Grammar School, 44

  Clinton, Hillary, 82

  “cognitive moral development,” 183

  Cohen, Bruce, 132–33

  Cole, Nancy, 15

  college, 21, 48, 85, 166, 176

  gender enrollment gaps in, 13, 14, 16–17, 17, 18, 22–23, 23, 24, 27–28, 29–30, 30, 31, 34, 35, 104, 213n

  gender imbalances in, 18, 213n

  College Board, 15, 24

  Columbia Teachers College, 158

  Columbine (Cullen), 188

  Columbine High School massacre, 50, 127, 128, 133, 135, 187, 188–90, 238n

  Comer, James, 47

  competition, competitiveness, 3, 39, 62, 70, 118, 120, 123, 124

  as absent in progressive models of education, 149, 150, 201–2

  benefits and educational value of, 4, 44, 62, 81, 122, 150, 159, 171

  movement to eliminate games of, 2, 40–41, 44, 55–56, 63, 201–2

  conduct disorders, 63, 173, 184–85, 197

  Confucianism, 143

  congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), 67

  Congress, US, 11, 16, 25, 29, 33, 56, 156

  Congressional Quarterly Researcher, 50

  cooperative learning, 41, 55–56, 150, 152, 157, 159

  Cornell, Dewey, 50, 52

  Cornwell, Christopher, 37–38

  Creating Sex-Fair Family Day Care (Raines), 67–68, 222n

  criminal behavior, 51, 136, 173, 176, 177, 179, 181, 238n

  conduct disorders as risk factor in, 63, 173

  in girls, 135

  lack of moral education and discipline tied to, 173–74, 176, 177, 178, 179–80, 184–85, 187, 189, 240n

  paternal absence and, 120–21

  in schools, 46, 48

  zero-tolerance policies in response to rising rates of, 46, 48–49, 50, 51

  see also juvenile delinquency; violence

  Crosby, Faye, 111

  Cub Scouts, 46, 47, 123

  Cullen, Dave, 188

  Daily Telegraph (London), 173–74

  Daley, Janet, 173–74

  Damon, William, 174, 191, 192

  Darwin, Charles, 113

  Dateline NBC, 127, 179

  Daugherty, Mrs., 148–49, 151, 171

  David Youree Elementary School, 46

  Davis, T. Cullen, 53

  Debold, Elizabeth, 70, 121

  DeFazio, Jackie, 77

  DeMott, Benjamin, 195, 197

  Denver, University of, 60, 105

  depression, 128, 129, 135, 138, 143, 232n

  Didion, Joan, 175, 179

  “difference feminists,” 108, 112

  DiIulio, John J., Jr., 49, 50, 52, 53

  discipline, 3, 8, 63, 146, 177–78, 182, 187, 189

  boys as benefiting from, 3, 63, 148–49, 152, 153, 154, 172, 173–74, 181, 193, 194–95, 197, 198

  “child-centered” learning and departure from, 149, 150, 185, 186, 187

  court decisions and, 185–86

  criminal behavior and absence of, 173–74, 176–77, 178, 179–80, 184–85, 189

  zero-tolerance policies and, 2, 8, 40, 45–49, 60–62, 174, 186, 190, 198

  divorce rates, 86

  dodgeball, 40, 44

  dolls, 64, 65, 66, 68–70, 72, 90

  domestic violence, 54, 220n

  Dowd, Maureen, 204

  Downes, Peter, 152

  Drexler, Melissa, 135

  drop out rates, 14, 160, 161, 211n

  DSM-IV, 131, 231n, 232n

  Duncan, Arne, 10, 163

  Economist, 152

  Edelman, Marian Wright, 191

  education, 126, 148–71

  anti-competition movement in, 2, 40–41, 44, 45, 149, 150

  antiharassment measures in, 55–56, 60–62, 203

  British and Australian “boy-friendly” initiatives in, 2, 150–56, 158, 159, 170–71

  “call-out” gap in, 102, 210n, 227n

  cooperative learning in, 41, 55–56, 150, 152, 157, 159

  discipline and structure as beneficial in, 148–49, 150, 152, 153, 154, 155, 171, 173–74, 181, 182, 191, 193, 194–95, 197

  gender-bias studies on, 11
, 12, 100, 101–3, 210n, 227n

  gender gap in, see gender gap

  gifted-and-talented programs in, 167, 168, 169–70

  girl-crisis movement in, 11–12, 16, 17–18, 29, 35, 37, 76, 78, 92, 101–3, 155, 157, 231n–32n

  male teachers in, 85, 153, 155, 223n

  male underachievement as ignored in, 2, 3, 16, 28–29, 34–35, 38, 126, 151, 155, 157, 159, 165–66

  moral, see morality, moral reasoning

  professional schools in, 19–20

  pro-girl legislative reforms in, 11, 29, 60, 92, 102–3, 106, 163–66, 170, 171

  progressive approaches in, see progressive education

  racial and social class inequities in, 21, 23–24

  resocialization of play behavior in, 44, 55–56, 63, 65–70, 201–2

  self-esteem movement in, 11, 12, 40–41, 76, 139–40, 145–46, 181, 184, 194, 231n, 232n

  single-sex schooling in, 1, 2, 4–5, 19, 81–88, 152–54, 171

  teachers’ assessments in, 36–38, 37

  testing gap in, 15–16, 17–18, 35–36

  vocational schools in, 1, 7–11, 27, 33, 38, 159, 160–67, 170, 171

  “women-centered” pedagogy in, 76–79, 156, 199

  zero-tolerance policies in, 2, 40, 45–49, 50, 51, 60–62, 63, 174, 186, 190, 198

  see also specific subjects and levels of schooling

  Educational Experience of Young Men of Color, The (College Board report), 24

  Education Department, Minnesota, 54–55

  Education Department, New York City, 8, 45, 46

  Education Department, US (DOE), 8, 14–15, 17, 17, 19, 24–25, 36, 56, 57, 65, 66, 67, 70, 85, 90, 156, 163, 165, 166, 167, 171, 192, 193, 213n, 222n

  Gender Equity in Education report of, 34–35, 38

  National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) of, 12, 13, 14, 17, 47

  Office for Civil Rights at, 34

  Office of Educational Research and Improvement at, 67

  Trends in Educational Equity report of, 11–14, 17–18, 20, 35, 105

  Education Week, 84, 101, 113, 121, 189

  elementary schools, 36, 100, 102, 156, 176

  antiharassment measures in, 55–56, 60–61

  character education in, 191, 194

  competitive and aggressive games discouraged in, 40–41, 44, 45, 55–56, 63

  decline of recess in, 2, 43–45

  resocialization of play behavior in, 66–70

  teachers’ assessments in, 36–38, 37

  Eliot, Lise, 72

  Embry Riddle Aeronautical, 167

  Emma Willard School, 92, 93

  emotional disengagement, 116, 139–44, 145

  Gilligan’s theory on, 117–20, 121, 122–23, 126, 139, 140

  potential benefits of, 142, 143

  “reconnection” efforts to reverse trend of, 139–40, 141–42, 143–44, 145, 146

  in religious teachings, 143–44

  England, see Great Britain

  Epictetus, 194

  Ethical Choices: Individual Voices (TV program), 180–81

  Eton, 84

  Everett Middle School, 77–79

  Explorer Scouts, 64

  expulsions, 42, 46, 61, 198

  extracurricular activities, 13, 14, 105

  Failing at Fairness (Sadker and Sadker), 68–69, 97

  Fallon Park Elementary School, 191

  Faludi, Susan, 137–38, 139, 175, 179

  Family Violence Prevention Fund, 54

  Fashion Industry High School, 27

  Fatherless America (Blankenhorn), 120–21

  fathers, absence of, 120–21, 122

  FBI, 58, 59, 220n

  Feiner, Susan, 27–28

  Feminine Mystique, The (Friedan), 28

  feminism, feminists, 3, 9, 33–34, 61, 75, 77, 86, 106–7, 113, 179

  as critical of research on sex differences, 80, 81

  “difference,” 108, 112

  distortion of facts by, 57–60, 86–87

  mothering sons as offering insights to, 201–3

  see also women’s lobbying groups

  First Amendment, 185

  Fisk University, 24, 213n

  Fogelman, Stephen, 60

  Fonda, Jane, 107, 228n

  Ford, Jack, 134–35

  Fortas, Abe, 185, 186

  Franklin Elementary School, 40

  Fraser, Alison, 162–63, 164

  Freud, Sigmund, 144, 232n–33n

  Friedan, Betty, 28, 175, 176, 178, 179

  Froebel, Friedrich, 158

  Galston, William, 120

  Galyan, Deborah, 201–2

  Galyan, Dylan, 201–2

  Geary, David, 74

  Gender, Race, and Student Achievement conference, 103–4

  gender-equity activists, 56–60, 199

  gender identity formation as viewed by, 65–68, 70–73

  legal action and lawsuits filed by, 9–11, 64, 82, 88, 90, 164

  questionable research methodologies and findings of, 86–87, 92, 93, 94, 95, 98, 101–2, 104, 105, 106–7, 108–13, 114, 115, 119, 123

  resocialization movement of, see resocialization movement

  traditional masculinity viewed as predatory by, 40, 53–54, 56–57, 58, 59, 60, 73, 175, 176, 203, 238n

  see also women’s lobbying groups

  Gender Equity for Educators, Parents, and Community (WEEA guide), 66–67

  Gender Equity for Girls and Boys: A Conference for K-12 Teachers and Administrators, 65–66

  Gender Equity in Education (DOE report), 34–35, 38

  Gender Equity in Education Act (1993), 11, 29, 103, 106

  gender gap, 1–2, 12–24, 35, 92, 102, 126, 156, 197, 211n

  in academic engagement, 14, 16, 34, 35, 105, 154, 159, 160

  in Advanced Placement courses, 13, 24, 35

  “boy-friendly” pedagogy in addressing of, 1, 4, 19, 33, 38, 81, 88, 150–56, 157, 159, 170–71

  as crossing racial and class lines, 24–25, 27, 36, 154

  in developmental assets, 104–5

  in extracurricular activities, 13, 14, 105

  in gifted-and-talented programs, 167, 168, 169–70

  in grade performance, 12, 13, 14, 36, 37–38, 105, 210n–11n

  in higher education, 13, 14, 16–17, 17, 18, 19–20, 22–23, 23, 24, 27–28, 29–30, 30, 31, 34, 35, 38, 104, 165, 213n

  in high school achievement, 13–14, 13, 14, 18, 25, 27, 35, 106

  in honors programs, 14, 24, 35

  in math and science, 12, 15, 16, 17–18, 35, 36, 37, 37, 74, 165, 223n

  progressive education models as contributing to, 150, 157, 158, 159

  in reading and writing, 13, 16, 24–25, 36, 37, 83, 105, 151, 153, 154, 157, 223n

  in self-esteem, 100, 101, 152

  single-sex schooling in addressing of, 85, 86, 88, 152–54, 171

  in teachers’ assessments, 36–38, 37

  in test scores, 15–16, 17–18, 35–36, 37

  in wages, 21, 25–27

  see also male underachievement

  Gender Gap in California Higher Education, The (California Postsecondary Education Commission), 19–20

  gender identity:

  biological role in, 66, 72, 117, 201

  early intervention efforts in reshaping of, 64–73

  resocialization of, see resocialization movement

  social origins argument and, 10, 65–68, 70–73, 116, 201

  see also masculine identity; sex differences

  gender quotas, 163–67

  gender schemas, 65–68, 70, 71, 76, 203

  gender stereotypes, 2, 80, 88, 89, 108, 123, 157

  boys viewed as victims of, 96, 114, 115–20, 121, 122–24, 128, 139

  early intervention approach in defeating of, 65, 66, 67–68, 70

  single-sex schooling as allegedly promoting, 82, 83, 84, 86–87

  vocational schools criticized for promoting, 10, 27, 162–63

  see also masculine identity

  Georgia, Unive
rsity of (UGA), 18, 36, 37

  Georgia Tech, 166

  gifted-and-talented programs, 167, 168, 169–70

  Gilligan, Carol, 12, 70, 91–97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 103, 109–14, 134, 142, 143, 228n, 233n

  adolescent “girl crisis” claimed by, 91–97, 98, 99, 101, 103, 106, 112, 114, 115, 126, 128, 129, 136, 138

  Chodorow’s influence on, 116–18

  critics of, 91, 108–13, 114

  on emotional disengagement of boys, 117–20, 121, 122–23, 126, 139, 140

  on masculine separation from mother, 117, 118, 119–20, 121–22, 123, 130, 175

  military culture criticized by, 124–25

  patriarchal social order criticized by, 108, 112, 114, 115–16, 117–20, 121–22, 123, 124

  on “relational crisis” of boys, 96, 114, 115, 118–20, 121–23

  research methods and data of, 92, 93, 94, 95, 98, 108–13, 114, 115, 119, 123, 129

  on resocialization of boys, 115–16, 118–19, 121–24, 126, 138

  on sex differences in moral psychology, 107–9, 112, 117, 126, 229n

  studies contradicting findings of, 100, 104, 105–7, 109

  women’s groups as inspired by, 96, 98, 99, 106, 107, 126

  girl-crisis movement, 11–12, 14, 16, 20, 33, 35, 37, 76, 91–107, 136

  AAUW-commissioned studies in, 99–103

  “boy-friendly” projects seen as backlash against advancements of, 1, 20, 21–22, 156

  boys overlooked in, 77, 92, 96, 114, 126, 155, 157, 165, 171, 197, 199, 231n–32n

  classroom gender bias alleged in, 11, 12, 74, 78, 79, 84, 100, 101–3, 210n, 227n

  controversial research as basis of, 12, 92–96, 98, 99, 101–3, 106–7, 112–13, 114, 126, 129, 210n, 227n

  federal policies and legislation in response to, 11, 29, 33, 102–3, 106, 114, 171

  media attention on, 18, 29, 33, 96–98, 101, 128

  self-esteem issues as focus of, 11, 12, 76, 98–103, 126, 147, 152, 157, 231n

  studies contradicting thesis of, 17–18, 97, 100, 105–7, 136–37

  Take Our Daughters to Work Day and, 11, 54, 98–99, 106

  “women-centered” pedagogy as result of, 76–79, 156, 199

  Girl Power!, 11, 29

  girls:

  adolescent developmental “crisis” of, 12, 76, 91–98, 99–100, 101, 103, 106, 107, 112, 114, 115, 128, 129, 136, 138–39, 147, 199, 204

  “call-out” gap and, 102, 210n, 227n

  criminal behavior of, 135

  cultural “silencing” of, 79, 91–97, 98, 99–101, 102, 103–4, 105–7, 108, 114, 119, 126, 129, 147, 199

  federal policies and legislation in favor of, 10–11, 29, 33, 60, 102–3, 106, 114, 163–66, 171

  moral insights of adolescent, 93–94

  nurturing propensities in, 64, 67, 70, 71, 72, 73, 116, 221n

  obesity rates in, 44, 45

  as outperforming boys academically, 12–15, 16–17, 18–19, 22, 23, 24–25, 29, 30, 35, 36, 83, 102, 104–5, 126, 152, 153, 165–66, 197, 210n–11n

 

‹ Prev