Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America

Home > Other > Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America > Page 10
Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America Page 10

by P. David Gaubatz


  The smoking-gun evidence is contained in a six-page confidential report generated by a senior CAIR official, who on the third anniversary of 9/11 helped a prominent Muslim figure under FBI inquiry to obstruct a line of questioning by agents.

  In September 2004, a pair of agents arranged an interview with the Muslim leader of a Maryland mosque that the FBI was investigating for suspicious activity. The mosque leader alerted CAIR, and CAIR sent Shama Farooq, then the civil rights director for its Maryland chapter, to coach him through the interview.

  Farooq wrote a detailed plan covering what Dr. Sayeed Ahmed, president of the Islamic Society of Western Maryland, should and shouldn’t say. The predominantly Pakistani mosque is controlled by ISNA and the Muslim Brotherhood.

  “Oftentimes, these meetings are used to get information about other community members,” she warned in the plan she devised. “It is important, first of all, not to talk about anyone else at all” (emphasis in the original).29

  ‘DO NOT ADDRESS QUESTIONS RELATING TO TERRORISM’

  Also, “If the agent wants contact information for anyone else, you should not give any numbers or addresses out—let him find the people the same [way] he found you,” she advised (emphasis in original).

  Farooq also insisted Ahmed turn his cell phone off, and keep it out of the sight and reach of the agents during the interview.

  Finally, she advised, “You are not required to tell them which Islamic centers you attend, how many times a day you pray, who you give charity to, and which organizations you are associated with.”

  “Definitely,” she stressed, “do not address any questions relating to terrorism or violence and their place in Islam.”30

  That was step number one. Then Farooq and Ahmed went to lunch the day of the scheduled interview with the FBI—September 1, 2004—to review her ground rules, the secret CAIR memo details. They agreed she would sit in on the meeting.

  Following lunch, they went back to his office and continued to “discuss strategies,” including introducing her to the agents only as “a sister in Islam,” while not identifying her position with CAIR up front. And she again specifically advised Ahmed not to answer any questions regarding information he may know about terrorism or violence.

  The agents arrived at Ahmed’s office on time, and over the course of their interview, Farooq stepped in to stop Ahmed from answering several questions she felt could “incriminate” him, even though she was not his attorney.

  As a result, Ahmed withheld critical information from the FBI. For example:

  Agents inquired about his recent travels abroad, and he mentioned only Canada, while neglecting to inform them that he’d also traveled to Saudi Arabia;

  Agents asked him about his charitable donations, and he withheld the fact that his wife had given cash to the Holy Land Foundation, which he knew at the time was designated a terrorist organization by the U.S.;

  Agents inquired what he knew about the Islamic Center of Morgantown, West Virginia, and he failed to tell them that one of his sons is a vice president there who’s contributed more than $10,000 to its coffers.

  The FBI agents, who were attached to the bureau’s Pittsburgh field office and led by agent Terry Grzadzielewski, left the meeting unaware they were denied information relevant to their investigation—thanks to CAIR’s operative running interference on behalf of the subject of their inquiry that day.

  Farooq reported details of the FBI meeting, including Ahmed’s omissions, to CAIR-Maryland/Virginia chapter executive director Rizwan Mowlana, who had assigned her to spy on the FBI. A copy of the confidential memo—which is marked DO NOT RELEASE OUTSIDE CAIR—was obtained from CAIR’s internal files.31

  At the end of her report, Farooq recommended CAIR gather local Muslims who worship at Ahmed’s mosque in Hagerstown, Maryland, to formally train them in similar deception and obstruction tactics.

  “Since the Hagerstown community seems to be a center of attention for several FBI agents,” she wrote, “I recommend CAIR conduct a know-your-rights lecture at the location with some recommendations [on] how to respond to FBI agents when approached by them.”32

  At the same time, Farooq recommended mailing the FBI’s Pittsburgh field office a copy of CAIR’s “Law Enforcement Official’s Guide to the Muslim Community,” followed by “sensitivity training” for all its agents.

  DON’T TOUCH MUSLIM SUSPECTS

  We obtained a copy of CAIR’s largely unhelpful law enforcement guide, which for the most part dictates terms to police—the dos and don’ts (and mostly don’ts) of investigating Muslims. Here is a summary:

  Don’t demand eye contact from Muslim suspects.

  Don’t frisk them.

  Never use dogs to search Muslim homes.

  Remove shoes before entering homes and mosques.

  Don’t mishandle the Quran during searches.

  Don’t step on prayer rugs.

  “Keep a physical space when dealing with members of the Muslim community,” CAIR’s police guide mandates. “Some Muslims may be uncomfortable with gestures that include any touching.”33

  The booklet spends nine pages lecturing cops about Islamic tenets and how to respect them, and none offering cops cultural clues to help them identify extremists and jihadists in the Muslim community.

  Law enforcement officials say they are still waiting for the CAIR booklet entitled, “How Patriotic Muslims Can Help Law Enforcement Catch Terrorists.”

  Particularly galling, the expert whom CAIR tasked with lecturing cops has an extremist background himself. Mohamed Nimer, who wrote CAIR’s police guide, previously worked for the United Association for Studies and Research, a known Hamas terrorist front.

  The FBI would never actually respect any of CAIR’s churlish wishes, would it? It would never give in to such demands at the expense of an investigation, right? Think again.

  In 2004, for instance, the FBI raided an Islamic “cultural center” in a northern Virginia suburb on suspicions of terrorist activity. But before agents executed the search warrant, the FBI foolishly told CAIR that the raid was going to take place so that CAIR officials could be on site to monitor the conduct and sensitivity of agents.

  By the time agents showed up at the Saudi-controlled Institute for Islamic and Arabic Sciences in America in Merrifield, Virginia, the building was practically an “empty box,” as one investigator described it.

  “By the time we went in, the place was sterile. They’d cleaned it out,” adds the senior investigator, who works with the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force in Washington. “It was bad. It was really bad.”

  What happened? “They were warned by CAIR that we were coming to do a search warrant,” explains the law enforcement official, who helped execute the search warrant. “We were pissed. It was obvious to us they knew we were coming.”34

  Who got the courtesy call from the FBI that morning? The same CAIR official cited earlier—CAIR-MD/VA executive director Rizwan Mowlana—who’d assigned the “sister in Islam” to coach the Maryland mosque president and help obstruct the FBI’s questioning of him.35

  “Being well-networked among the interfaith, law enforcement, and political leadership in your area allows you to be informed of many events before they happen,” CAIR advises staff in training seminars.36 The outreach strategy has paid off royally for CAIR and its terrorist constituents.

  HUNT FOR EL-SHUKRIJUMAH

  Consider also the case of al-Qaida operative Adnan el-Shukrijumah, the Saudi-born son of a Florida mosque leader who’d once served as a translator for the Blind Sheik, Omar Abdel Rahman. After the FBI added el-Shukrijumah, aka Jaffar the Pilot, to the most-wanted terrorist list as potentially “another Mohamed Atta,” a national manhunt ensued.

  Fairfax County police were heavily involved in the hunt because some of el-Shukrijumah’s relatives—including a sister and a brother—lived in Herndon, Virginia, where CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood have a strong presence. Even though police suspected el-Shukrijumah, a natura
lized U.S. citizen, visited the area, they say the Muslim community there completely clammed up when they asked about his whereabouts.

  “We went around to their employers around Herndon and showed pictures of their brother who’s wanted, and miraculously, nobody ever saw him,” says the high-ranking Fairfax County police official. Oddly, his family members claimed they had no phone number or address for him, and they couldn’t explain why they kept no personal contact information for him.37

  One time, Fairfax County police found el-Shukrijumah’s father staying in Herndon. “We caught him back up here staying with the daughter when everybody was looking for his son,” the official says. “Wouldn’t you know he didn’t know where he was either.”38 The father, an imam who received regular stipends from the Saudi embassy before passing away in 2004, strenuously denied his son has terrorism ties.

  Desperate, authorities turned to CAIR in Washington and Florida to help get the word out to the Muslim community about the search. CAIR complied, while also issuing press statements holding up the el-Shukrijumah family as a pillar of the community and praising it for its cooperation—even as the suspected al-Qaida terrorist’s mother and father made their own statements proclaiming their son’s innocence and suggesting he should remain in hiding. El-Shukrijumah’s parents even tipped him off that the FBI was asking questions about him when they spoke with him by phone.39

  CAIR at the same time pooh-poohed el-Shukrijumah’s connections to al-Qaida, suggesting the FBI had exaggerated the danger he poses.40

  THE GUYANA BUNCH

  In a related development, recently declassified U.S. Muslim Brotherhood documents reveal that the Brotherhood in America—which is led in part by CAIR’s founders—has established operations in, of all places, the South American country of Guyana.

  El-Shukrijumah happens to have been raised in Guyana, and some suspect he may be hiding there, if not in Pakistan.

  Brotherhood leaders over the past couple of decades have sent money to Guyana to support an unnamed imam and his mosque, and an unidentified “institute,” according to one document.

  They’ve also traveled to Guyana to visit the “Guyana brothers,” but it’s not immediately known if any of them had contacts with the el-Shukrijumahs while traveling there. Known among al-Qaida operatives as “the South American,” el-Shukrijumah has a Guyanese passport, as well as possibly a Trinidadian passport. His late father, Sheik Gulshair, was born in Guyana and worked there as a Muslim missionary, helping to establish a mosque with Saudi funding. He also has aunts and uncles who still live in the country.

  In that same, little-noticed Brotherhood document listing the 1991-1992 goals of its “South America Committee” (which includes the Caribbean), the final item on the list—goal No. 169—reads: “Organizing the Caribbean group in cooperation with Sh. New York.”41

  Sh. is a common abbreviation for sheik, and investigators believe the cryptic reference to “Sh. New York” may refer to the Blind Sheik, the convicted terrorist who at that time was in Brooklyn plotting to blow up the World Trade Center and other New York landmarks. Or possibly el-Shukrijumah’s father himself, who was assigned to the Blind Sheik’s mosque in Brooklyn to do translation work for him in the early ’90s. He was commonly known among the Brothers as “Sheikh Gulshair.”

  Also recall that CAIR founder Omar Ahmad embraced and hosted the Blind Sheik at his home during this same period in which he and the Brotherhood wrote their South American plan. And during a 2001 staffwide CAIR meeting, internal notes reveal that Ahmad suggested stepping up CAIR’s “Guyanese” outreach operations.42

  These connections beg the question: How close are CAIR’s leaders to the el-Shukrijumahs? And how much do they know about Adnan el-Shukrijumah’s travels and contacts? Have they disclosed all they know to authorities?

  These are critical questions because the U.S. government has fingered the street-smart el-Shukrijumah as the ultimate al-Qaida “sleeper agent,” and a cell leader potentially more dangerous than even 9/11 ringleader Atta. In fact, he’s said to have been handpicked by 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to carry out an encore plot to detonate nuclear devices in several U.S. cities simultaneously.

  El-Shukrijumah remains at large, however, thanks in part to a lack of cooperation from the Muslim community, investigators say.

  ‘UMMAH FIRST’

  The senior Fairfax County police official offers that while detectives have received help from Muslim leaders solving crimes such as bank robberies, terrorism is another story.

  “We have gone to them and said, ‘Hey, we want to know about the bad uncle from Baghdad. You know, tell us about that stuff,’” he says. “And they have cooperated with us.”

  “For instance,” he says, “we had an Egyptian bank robber, and they helped us find the bank robber and bring him in.”

  But he says when it comes to ratting out jihadists in their midst, forget it. The Muslim Brotherhood-controlled mosques brainwash adherents to think spying on a Muslim for a non-Muslim is nothing less than kufr—or betrayal—and that Allah, in turn, will betray them on Judgment Day.

  “Most of our [terrorism] leads are generated, or they’re created. They’re not walk-ins,” the police official says. “They’re not walking in and going, ‘You know what? This isn’t right. I’m an American first, and these people at my mosque are up to no good.’”

  “No,” he adds, “it doesn’t happen.”

  He explains that Brotherhood leaders never let the faithful forget that their religion must trump any loyalty to country.

  “It’s the ummah first,” he says, referring to the Arabic term for the global nation, or brotherhood, of Muslims.

  Even when police get Muslim suspects in custody, it’s hard to get them to talk. “We have flipped people,” the official says, “but only after appealing to their darker angels” by threatening incarceration or deportation.

  “They come around, but it’s always kicking and screaming,” he adds. “Or it’s because they’re not quite believing that there’s seventy-two virgins waiting for them” in Paradise if they refuse to cooperate and rot as martyrs in prison.

  While it’s not impossible to develop sources in the Muslim community, the official cautions that “you have to make sure they’re not doubled, and that they’re not going to sell you out.”

  The high risk of Muslims double-crossing authorities makes recruiting good informants exceptionally difficult. And in lieu of trusted Muslim informants, they’ve had to resort to infiltrating mosques with undercover agents and non-Muslim informants posing as Muslims.

  This practice, of course, has sent Muslim groups like CAIR and ISNA into high dudgeon. In fact, ISNA claims to have met this spring with FBI officials to formally complain about the FBI planting a spy in the Islamic Center of Irvine, California.

  The spy helped the agency gather information about a brother-in-law of Osama bin Laden’s chief bodyguard, Ahmadullah Niazi. According to the Associated Press, that spy “recorded Niazi on multiple occasions talking about blowing up buildings, acquiring weapons, and sending money to the Afghan mujahideen.”

  Never mind that, harrumphs ISNA. Mosques are sacred ground—inviolable. “The mosques are our communities’ most valued assets,” ISNA asserts, “and we will work to protect them.”

  CAIR also huffed about the FBI sending in an “agent provocateur” to the Irvine mosque and others in the area, claiming the move has rekindled American Muslims’ “feelings of anger” and “mistrust” toward the FBI.

  “Infiltrating mainstream mosques the way FBI informants infiltrate white supremacist groups illustrates the FBI’s perception of American Muslims as a community that must be constantly monitored, instead of being treated as an equal partner in fighting crime and terrorism,” it said in a prepared statement.

  Once again, the Islamic supremacists at CAIR merely demonstrate they care more about protecting a mosque (that’s hardly “mainstream”) than helping the FBI prevent a massive attack on a shopp
ing mall by a known al-Qaida operative using that mosque as a terror sanctuary and recruiting ground. The Islamic Center of Irvine is partnered with the Islamic Center of Orange County, a Muslim Brotherhood mosque that groomed Adam Gadahn, the “American al-Qaida” who’s wanted by the FBI for treason.

  CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper warns that monitoring Muslims will only alienate “the very people whose help is necessary in the war on terrorism.”

  But such patriotic-sounding rhetoric has proved empty, and the FBI is no longer buying it.

  CAIR’S PROTECTION RACKET

  CAIR never fails to advertise how it’s tried to partner with the FBI to help agents combat terrorism. But behind the scenes, they train Muslims not to talk to the FBI and not to inform on fellow Muslims who may be involved in violent activities against the U.S. They’ve put up a protective shield around the entire Muslim community in America to keep law enforcement out—and terrorists operating in the shadows.

  “Why don’t they tell us where they’ve provided all this information that’s kept us safe, because it just hasn’t happened,” the senior FBI officer in Washington says. “It’s a total fabrication.”43

  In fact, it’s more likely CAIR has withheld information. CAIR’s internal records show its executives have personally received correspondence from Muslim extremists threatening violence, and kept mum about it.

  In 2007, for example, executive director Awad received a two-page fax marked “urgent” from an angry CAIR member threatening “to use force” against America and Israel to avenge what he called the “murder” of the Palestinian people by “those Zionist criminals.” He begged Awad and CAIR to demand an end to Israeli “crimes” “before I respond with force.”44

 

‹ Prev