Dedication
To Rob
Epigraph
“This has become the archaeologist’s grandiose task: to make dried-up wellsprings bubble forth again, to make the forgotten known again, the dead alive, and to cause to flow once more that historic stream in which we are all encompassed. . . .”
C. W. CERAM,
Gods, Graves, and Scholars: The Story of Archaeology
Contents
Dedication
Epigraph
DOWN AND DIRTY
Studying people who study people
Boot Camp
FIELD SCHOOL
Context is everything
THE SURVIVALIST’S GUIDE TO ARCHAEOLOGY
Our ancestors were geniuses
EXTREME BEVERAGES
Taking beer seriously
PIG DRAGONS
How to pick up an archaeologist
MY LIFE IS IN RUINS
Jobs and other problems
ROAD TRIP THROUGH TIME
Our partner, heartbreak
UNDERWATER MYSTERIES
Slow archaeology, deep archaeology
The Classics
EXPLORERS CLUBS
Classics of the ancient world and Hollywood
FIELD SCHOOL REDUX
The earth-whisperers
Archaeology and War
THE BODIES
Who owns history?
EVIDENCE OF HARM
Bearing witness
ARCHAEOLOGY IN A DANGEROUS WORLD
A historic alliance
AVOIDANCE TARGETS
Mission: respect
Heritage
BUCKETS OF ARCHAEOLOGISTS
If archaeologists tried to save the world
Acknowledgments
Select Bibliography
Index
About the Author
Also by Marilyn Johnson
Credits
Copyright
About the Publisher
DOWN AND DIRTY
Studying the people who study people
NO DINOSAURS appear in these pages. If you are looking for scientists who study dinosaurs, you want to pick up a book about paleontologists. This book is about archaeologists, people who study people and the things that they leave behind—their bones, their trash, and their ruins.
The archaeologists in this book work with humble stuff, from stone tools and broken pots to dirt. They are expert in the way things fall apart and acute observers of context; the placement and surroundings of an object can make the difference between junk and intellectual gold. To the archaeologist, treasure is something that was buried that has been brought to light, a pebble of information around which the narrative of history now needs to bend. I think of the archaeologist I saw on a loop of video, a young woman up to her hips in a muddy tunnel that would soon be a subway station in New York City, her eyes sparkling under a construction hat: “We found a coin with a date on it!”
There is no better time than now to follow archaeologists; new finds and scientific advances keep revising what we know. The bones of a British king turn up in a parking lot. Bronze Age shoes and Viking mittens pop up in ice melts. Lidar, an aerial mapping tool, reveals a vast and ancient city beneath Angkor Wat. Recurring headlines read: (PICK A PLACE) OCCUPIED (EONS) EARLIER THAN PREVIOUSLY BELIEVED. Technological advances account for some of archaeology’s boom, but war, commercial development, violent weather, and warming temperatures—change and destruction—are doing their part to lay bare the layers of the past. The world is mutating faster than archaeologists can keep up.
Yet, as their sites multiply and their profession expands, archaeologists find themselves in the same predicament as other cultural memory workers: with too little support for the hard work of salvaging and making sense of our past. How much progress can they hope to make when their goal is to capture history before it disappears forever? We think we know what archaeologists do, but, like librarians, they toil behind an obscuring stereotype. The Hollywood image of the dashing adventurer bears little resemblance to the real people who, armed with not much more than a trowel and a sense of humor, try to tease one true thing from the rot and rubble of the past.
I assumed that everyone in the sandbox wanted to grow up to become an archaeologist. I spent my childhood digging with garden tools, hypnotically absorbed in the hunt for fossils; part of the appeal in researching this book was the prospect of returning to the ground and learning to sift and scrutinize with fresh eyes. I really wanted to see the earth through archaeologists’ eyes. What do they observe in a pile of ruins? How does a shard of pottery or an ancient tooth help them piece together the past? How can they help us recapture and preserve our history?
I chased the real thing for this book, up to the summit of Machu Picchu and down to the chilly waters of Newport, Rhode Island. I became a keen collector of archaeologists and a connoisseur of their skills. I sought experts on different eras who specialize in a variety of artifacts. I hunted for archaeologists in places that don’t ordinarily attract archaeological attention: the Caribbean and the weedy edge of Fishkill, New York, where archaeologists piece together history, post-Columbus, from plantations and graves. I found my way to a classical-era excavation in the Mediterranean with a group of “earth-whisperers,” and got a taste of Old World archaeology from the Bronze Age to the fall of Rome. I studied ancient humans and followed an archaeologist whose passion is the Ice Age. I followed archaeologists who work with the military, with homicide cops, and with brewers. I met archaeologists from Peru, Japan, Australia, the U.K., Germany, the Netherlands, Israel, and Zimbabwe. I found as many female sources as male ones in this once male-dominated field.
I sweated and excavated alongside my guides; they tossed out most of what I found. In turn, I exercised my own prerogative as a writer and tossed out all the chaff, jargon, measurements, calibrated radiocarbon dates, and theories that seemed too needlessly technical for nonscientists, or that failed to illuminate the essential character of The Archaeologist. What does it take to spend your life scratching into the surface of this planet? Why does it matter—and, by the way, how much beer is involved? Such is the nature of my quest.
One graduate student told me, “When the Apocalypse comes, you want to know an archaeologist, because we know how to make fire, catch food, and create hill forts,” and I promptly added her to my address book. Knows how to make hill forts—who can say when that will come in handy? “Of course,” she continued, referring to the long-term employment prospects for her and her classmates, “we will end up living in cardboard boxes, just as our parents fear.” Archaeological fieldwork is messy, usually short-term work for hire assessing land for imminent development, to certify that this skyscraper or that pipeline or strip mall won’t destroy an ancient village or a sacred burial ground. Those who persevere in the profession fight like cats to get these jobs and work like dogs to keep them. And for all their expertise, competence, breadth of experience, and even cockiness, they are continually humbled by their subject. For people who know so much, there is so much they can never know. One archaeologist said, with a shrug, “Someone will find most of my first book all wrong”; and another said of his students, “What they’ll know in ten years will put us to shame.” I was drawn to those with experience, long-term perspective, scars, and stories—the toughest I could find.
FOUR YEARS AGO I stood in the National Museum of Ireland—Archaeology in Dublin, contemplating vast quantities of ancient gold objects churned up by the bogs of Ireland: hammered collars, big gold balls, gold diadems and bracelets and things to stick in your ears (they think). At the time, the Irish economy was tanking. Dublin was running, as far as I could tell, on what spilled out of the pockets of Brits during their bachelor par
ties. And yet here was all this gold, artifacts floating in display cases like jewelry from Brobdingnag.
Behind the main room of the museum, tucked out of sight and discreetly concealed from casual view, was another sort of archaeological bounty surrendered by the bogs: a cache of human bodies, hundreds and sometimes thousands of years old, strangely preserved by the oxygen-deprived bog waters: Instead of the flesh decaying to leave skeletons, the bones of these bog bodies dissolved, leaving behind flesh, organs, and even hair—natural mummies. A snip of the soundtrack from a looping video was audible. “We can look into the face of an Iron Age man!” the voice exulted. “He still has eyelashes!” Each bog body was displayed in a separate chamber that you walked into as if entering the giant shell of a snail; the bodies rested inside the carpeted walls, where a dignified hush prevailed. I stopped to stare at Clonycavan Man, a little skinny guy with a wispy goatee and a face shriveled to dark leather. His hair was piled atop his head like a prom queen’s, pomaded with an ointment made from ingredients produced by a tree that grew only near the Mediterranean, more than a thousand miles away from where he lived and died.
Though Clonycavan had a face, and even facial hair, I was drawn to Old Croghan Man, the big guy. Though at present he lacked head and legs, he would have been over six feet tall when he walked the Earth more than two thousand years ago. His torso, stained dark brown, looked almost maroon in the dim light. His hands were so perfectly cured that scientists had been able to lift fingerprints. Eight of his ten nails had been recovered. He had been beheaded. Big holes had been cut through the fleshy part of his upper arms and threaded with “withy,” a cord made of willow, so he could be anchored in the bog by his killers. Also, his nipples had been sliced off. It seems there was a custom in Ireland at this time of showing obeisance to your king by sucking his nipples. No nipples, you could not be a king.
The archaeologists and curators speculated that Old Croghan and Clonycavan had been former kings or chiefs, or potential rulers who threatened those in power, or highborn sacrifices who had been taken to the edge of the kingdom and put to death with such vehemence it seemed ritualistic. (I thought of one of my archaeology sources, laughing as she said, “Don’t know what it is? Call it ritualistic.”)
Clonycavan and Old Croghan were discovered by chance in 2003, within months and about twenty-five miles of each other, when both were dredged up and damaged by the peat-cutting machinery. The word went out—We’ve got tissue! Who answers such a call? Archaeologists, bioanthropologists, and experts on ancient hairdos came running to perform every manner of analysis on the bodies. Clonycavan and Old Croghan underwent postmortem torture to rival their mortem torture—digital and laser imaging of every sort, infrared, ultraviolet, and regular X-ray analysis, 3-D facial reconstruction, pollen analysis, and gut, stomach, dental, and dermatological workups. Someone figured out what kind of wood was used to make Clonycavan’s withy; another identified the species that had contributed the leather of Old Croghan’s cuff. Then specialists pickled the bodies, more or less, and sealed them in climate-controlled glass coffins for exhibit. It took dozens of experts to comb through the evidence of the past. Imagine getting to see them all in action. I wanted a team of archaeological experts!
The bog bodies, the ultimate artifacts, were riveting. “Some people will stand rooted for hours,” said Heather Gill-Frerking, the rare North American consultant who flies across the Atlantic when the peat machines unearth another body from the European wetlands. While still an undergraduate, she had seen a picture of the head of Tollund Man, whose remains had been found in a bog in Denmark. A 2,000-year-old man (or perhaps a bit older), Tollund Man, like other bog bodies, appeared in a state the reverse of most corpses: although his skeleton was dissolving, his body tissue remained, stained brown but otherwise in remarkable condition. You could see the stubble on his chin and his puckered forehead. His expression was peaceful, in spite of the braided leather rope around his neck. Something in those bogs acts as a preservative. What was it exactly? Nobody knows, Gill-Frerking was told. “Don’t say ‘Nobody knows’ to me,” she said, and designed an experiment for her thesis by burying dead piglets and pig trotters (feet) in a bog. She earned three degrees and a postgraduate certificate in forensic anthropology, wrote about mummies and bog bodies, and began an unusual archaeological career based mainly in Europe. She is currently the director of science and education for the traveling show “Mummies of the World” and a long-distance law school student at University College London, specializing in cultural heritage law.
Her Ph.D. thesis about the Iron Age bog bodies of Schleswig, Germany, resulted in the news that the body known as Windeby Girl (immortalized in a poem by Seamus Heaney) had in fact been a boy. Gill-Frerking told me this as if she was gossiping about a mutual friend—“You know Windeby Girl was a boy?” She was also eager to talk about a site in Florida where a pond with a peat bottom preserved numerous bodies—no tissue or organs, but skeletons and, surprisingly, intact brains. “There are only three hundred sixty-nine bog bodies.* That’s a very small pool of evidence,” she pointed out. Some are in private hands. “You’d be amazed how many people want a mummy.” Collectors who traffic in work snatched by thieves from historic sites are the bane of archaeology, and security is a big concern with the traveling mummy show.
I assumed there would be a lot of excavations in bogs, but Gill-Frerking disabused me of this. You’d have to drain the bogs to do a proper excavation—too expensive and too difficult. “These bog bodies are found by accident by the peat machines, which do a lot of damage,” she said. “Bogs are wonderful places to bury bodies, or for accidents to happen. A sheep falls in, and a shepherd goes after it and falls in too—it’s not officially quicksand, but it acts like it.”
Gill-Frerking said that the experiment that got her started in the mummy world, which she published as “This Little Piggy Went to Cumbria; This Little Piggy Went to Wales,” involved no intentional killing of piglets, though one sow did die accidentally. She herself can’t bear violence or death; she makes her husband catch and release any spiders or flies she finds in their house in New Hampshire. They own a poodle named Ammut, Devourer of Souls, but she would rather talk about Fluffy, the sixteenth-century dog pulled from a German bog that she got to study and prepare for the mummy exhibit. The dog had a skeletal head, but lots of tissue and many organs and lovely brown hair—“the oldest surviving 3-D animal with soft tissue!” she claimed.
THOUGH ONE OF my sources had told me, reassuringly, that, after a while, arrowheads and points just “jump out at you,” I had no confidence that any such thing would happen for me. The afternoon I spent hunting for effigy mounds in Wisconsin persuaded me that I needed a guide. Effigy mounds are a great archaeological feature of the Midwest, piles of dirt shaped by early Indians to suggest animals and spirits. They are, according to the book I carried, world-class archaeological features, on par with monumental works like the Nazca Lines in Peru. Okay, but in the photos, those Nazca Lines—massive drawings of birds and geometric figures scraped into the surface of the desert—looked impressive, while the black-and-white pictures of the Wisconsin mounds, by contrast, did not. Still, I’m a child of the U.S.A., and this is my stuff.
In spite of a map, and a sign, and a viewing platform—a viewing platform meant a view, yes?—I could not see the feature in the landscape. Never mind the animal shape. Where was the mound? I was looking for something 359 feet high; alas, it turned out to be 359 feet long. I understood from the guidebook that the mounds had world significance, but I had missed the part where they were described as “characteristically low . . . following the natural contours of the land itself and blending seamlessly into the natural terrain.” For some of us, they are more or less invisible. The effigies resemble birds and snakes and panthers the way the Ursae, Major and Minor, resemble bears; in other words, it helps to know in advance what you’re looking for. And what about the mounds that are not effigies, not in the shapes of animals? Those look
like gentle round hills. Sometimes they contain burials, sometimes not. They are piles of dirt that humans shaped. They are mysteries.
The first archaeological excavation in the United States occurred around the time of the Revolutionary War, when Thomas Jefferson cut a trench through an Indian burial mound in Virginia and made a scientific report of the human bones and other artifacts he found there. I can only presume his mound had been easier to see.
Later I heard an archaeologist named Diana Greenlee enthuse about the Poverty Point mounds in Louisiana. She claimed that these mounds and ridges in Louisiana comprise a site significant enough to rank with our other UNESCO World Heritage sites, right up there with the Grand Canyon, Independence Hall, and the Statue of Liberty. The Grand Canyon and . . . Poverty Point? Greenlee explained that thousands of years ago, people from certain lower Mississippi Valley cultures took time from their hunting and gathering to transport vast amounts of earth by hand, basket by basket, from distant spots, and made their own hills, concentric ridges, and a massive plaza. We don’t know why. Poverty Point is particularly significant because (a) hunters and gatherers rarely built mounds, (b) they built this mound with great speed, and (c) the scale of this site is so enormous that, according to Greenlee, its 400 acres of mounds and other dirt constructions dwarf Stonehenge. The only created landscapes comparable in size to Poverty Point are Black Rock City at the Burning Man festival and an office complex in Florida, she declared, and by then, I felt humbled. And sure enough, when the next list of UNESCO World Heritage sites was announced this summer, Poverty Point topped the list.
Who knows this stuff? I want to shake the world and have all these experts fall out. Who can tell the difference between a human-made mound and an ordinary hill or hillock, a difference so subtle that someone with a map and a big sign can’t detect it? What sort of people choose to read bones and dirt for a living? If the Late Woodland Indians who built the panther mound that I couldn’t see and the more ancient Native Americans who built the massive and sadly named Poverty Point are intriguing, then the people who discover them and study them intrigue me even more. And how much do we miss without them?
Lives in Ruins Page 1