by Gwyn, Peter
109 Scarisbrick, Henry VIII, p.267.
110 Scarisbrick, Bibl. d’Humanisme et Renaissance, xxiv, pp.211-5.
111 See pp.280-1.
112 For this important episode see Bernard, JEH, 37; Guy, EHR, xcvii, and Scarisbrick, Cambridge Historical Journal, xii, and his ‘Conservaive episcopate’, pp.114 ff. In the controversy between Bernard and Guy, I very much side with Bernard.
113 Guy, EHR, xcvii, pp.486-7; the discovery of these two was Guy’s.
114 Ibid, p.484.
115 Fuller, Islip, Melford and Sherburne.
116 Bernard, JEH, 37, p.285.
117 Chapuys was in no doubt about the connection between the praemunire charges and the divorce; see Sp. Cal., iv (i), p.673.
118 Hall, p.788.
119Sp. Cal., iv (i), pp.598-9.
120 Ibid, p.690.
121 Ibid, p.690-1; this Chapuys’s surmise, but since the envoys do not appear to have replied until 17 Sept. he may have been wrong (LP, iv, 6667; LP App, 262.
122Sp. Cal., iv (i), p.727.
123LP, iv, 6618; Sp. Cal., iv (i), pp.712, 719, 721-6, 734-6, 760-2.
124Ibid, p.709; also the view of the Milanese and Ventian ambassador (Mil.Cal., 827; Ven. Cal., iv, 629).
125LP App, 262.
126LP, iv, 6469; Sp. Cal., iv (i), p.712, 719.
127 Ibid, p.758.
128 Ibid.
129 Ibid.
130 Ibid, p.759. It is impossible to give a precise date for the meeting, but Chapuys’s report is dated 15 Oct.
131 See pp.623-4 were the opposite was suggested. One problem here is my lack of legal expertise; but it must also have been rather unchartered waters for the Crown lawyers, making contrary legal opinions possible.
132 It is worth making the point that even if their non-appearance was not an act of defiance, the mere fact that Henry was anxious for a delay in both the prosecutions and the resummoning of parliament, suggests the weakness of his position and therefore a greater incentive to make use of Wolsey.
133Mil.Cal. 833; Sp. Cal., iv (i), p.819 [His report of 27 Nov.]. See LP, xvi, 590 for rather similar remarks about Cromwell after his fall.
134 See especially L. Baldwin Smith, 28 ff, though one needs to bear in mind that the politics of the 1540s is much disputed.
135 So thought Chapuys and the Milanese ambassador (Sp. Cal., iv (i), pp.711, 720-1; Mil.Cal., 827; the suggestion being that in order to strengthen his hand with the French envoys Henry was anxious temporarily to cut the links between them and Francis.
136Sp. Cal., iv (i), pp.737, 788.
137 Ibid, 711-2; Mil. Cal., 827; Ven. Cal., iv, 618.
138Sp. Cal., iv (i), pp.790-1.
139St. P, vii, p.213.
140 PRO Cotton app, xlviii, fo.110 (LP, iv, 6699).
141 Guy, Sir Thomas More, pp.136-8, but revised in EHR, xcvii, pp.487-8; see also Scarisbrick, Henry VIII, 274 ff. and Elton, Reform and Reformation, pp.130-140, where he makes little of Cromwell’s letter, but is anxious to connect the new direction in Henry’s campaign for a divorce in the autumn of 1530 with Cromwell and his fellow radicals.
142 Guy, EHR, xcvii, p.487.
143 When Cromwell assumed a leading position is a crux that may never be resolved, but see inter alia, Elton, Tudor Revolution, pp.71-91. However, it really cannot have been until at least late 1531.
144 The notion was originally Scarisbrick’s in Cambridge Historical Journal, xii, 27-9, but in my view successfuly challenged by Guy in EHR, xcvii, 488-90.
145Sp. Cal, iv (1), p.630.
146LP, iv, 6688.
147 Bodleian Library, MS Jesus Coll 74, fo.194; see also Pollard, Wolsey, p.288.
148 Bradford, pp.323-7 (Sp Cal, iv (i), pp.819-21); Mil.Cal., 832, a view he ascribes to those more friendly to Wolsey, ‘who attribute everything to the envy and fear of his rivals’.
149 Cavendish, p.150.
150 Ibid, p.156.
151 Ibid, p.137.
152Sp. Cal., iv (i), p.819.
153 Ibid, p.630.
154 PRO SP1/58/fo.135v (LP, iv, 6688).
155 BL Add. MS 48066, fos.184, 186-7; St. P, vii, pp.211-5 (LP, iv, 6733).
156 PRO SP1/58/fo.215 (LP, iv, 6763); also A.F. Pollard, p.295, n.3. His suggestion that the bond was extracted because the government was anxious to prevent anything coming out that would in some way jeopardize England’s relations with foreign powers could have some truth in it, but any embarrassment would have been much greater if they had learnt that the conspiracy they were supposed to be involved in was Henry’s invention!
157 Cavendish specifically mentions that between the Tempests and the Hastings; see Cavendish, p.145.
158 Pollard, Wolsey, p.297. For the belief that he would be unpopular but was not see inter alia Sp. Cal., iv (i), p.515; LP, iv, 6571; Mil.Cal., 817.
159Inter alia, LP, iv, 6330, 6377, 6510, 6523, 6578-9, 6663, 6666.
160LP, iv, 6475, 6554, 6555, 6571.
161LP, iv, 6302, 6335, 6344, 6545.
162LP, iv, 6329, 6341, 6344, 6447, 6545, 6571.
163LP, iv, 6571, 6582, 6583-8.
164Inter alia St. P, iv, 145, 152 (LP, iv, 662, 687).
165St. P, i, p.368 (LP, iv, 6582).
166 See p.615.
167Mil.Cal., 838.
168 Cavendish, p.156.
169 Ibid. p.165.
170 Ibid, p.166
171 Ibid, pp.167, 178.
172 Ibid, p.181-2.
173 Ibid, pp.178-81.
174 Ibid, p.178-9.
175 Ibid, p.179.
176 Bradford, p.336 (Sp. Cal., iv (i), p.833).
177Mil.Cal., 833.
178 Cavendish, p.179.
179 Bellay, Correspondence, p.20 (LP, iv, 5610).
NOTES TO THE NOTES
I have deliberately geared the notes to the Calendars of the State Papers rather than to the documents themselves. This is not because the documents have not been consulted – and where a quote is only to be found in the original, or in the rare cases where the calendars are defective, or there is no calendar, the document reference is given – but because they provide the most readily available means for anyone to check my sources, and are in themselves the best finding list to the documents. Where no page reference is given a document number is to be assumed.
The secondary sources relate very precisely to the bibliography at the back. A single name indicates that only one work by that author is to be found there; initials distinguish one author with the same name from another; where there is no author, or for those authors with more than one work, short titles to the work, or to the periodical in which it appears, have been used.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, R.P. The Better Part of Valour (Seattle, 1962).
Adams, S. ‘Eliza enthroned? The court and its politics’ in The Reign of Elizabeth I, ed. C. Haigh (1984).
Alcock, N.W. ‘Enclosure and depopulation in Burton Dassett: a 16th century view’, Warwickshire History, 3 (1977).
‘Warwickshire grazier and London skinner, 1532-1555’, Records of Social and Economic History, new ser., iv (1981).
Allen, P.S. ‘Dean Colet and Archbishop Warham’, EHR, xvii (1902).
Anderson, Andrew H. ‘Henry, Lord Stafford (1501-63) and the lordship of Caus’, Welsh History Review, 6 (1972-3).
Angelo, S. Spectacle, Pageantry and Early Tudor Policy (1969).
Arber, E. (ed.) The First Printed English New Testament (1871).
Associated Architectural Societies Reports and Papers, xxviii (1905-6).
Aston, M. Lollards and Reformers: image of literacy in late medieval England (1984).
—‘Lollards and literacy’, History, lx (1977).
Aston, T.H. ‘Oxford’s medieval alumni’, PP 74 (1977).
Aston, T.H., Duncan, G.D. and Evans, T.A.R. ‘The medieval alumni of the university of Cambridge’, PP, 86 (1980).
Baker, J.H. (ed) The Reports of Sir John Spelman, Selden Society, (2 vols, 1977-8).
Bangor, the Diocese of
, being a digest of the Registers of the Bishops, A.D. 1512-1646, ed. A.I.Pryce (1923).
Baldwin, J.F. The King’s Council in England during the Middle Ages (1913).
Barlowe, Jerome The Burial of the Mass (Arber reprint, 1871).
Barraclough, G. Papal Provisions (1935).
Baskerville, G. The English Monks and the Suppression of the Monasteries (1937).
Bean, J.M.W. The Estates of the Percy Family, 1416-1537 (1958).
Behrens, B. ‘The office of the English resident ambassador: its evolution as illustrated by the career of Sir Thomas Spinelly, 1509-22’, TRHS, 4th. ser, xvi (1933).
Beir, A.L. The Problem of the Poor in Tudor and Early Stuart England (1983).
Bellamy, J.G. The Law of Treason in England in the Later Middle Ages (1970).
—Crime and Public Order in England in the Later Middle Ages (1973).
—Criminal Law and Society in Late Medieval and Tudor England (1984).
Bellay, Jean du Ambassades en Angleterre de, ed. V.-L. Bourilly and P. de Vaissire (Archives de l’histoire religieuse de la France, 1905).
—Correspondence du Cardinal Jean du, ed R. Scheurer (Société de l’Histoire de France, 1969).
Beresford, M. and Hurst, J.G. (eds) Deserted Medieval Villages (1971).
Bernard, G.W. The Power of the Early Tudor Nobility (1985).
—War, Taxation and Rebellion in Tudor England (1986).
—‘The fortunes of the Greys, earls of Kent in the early sixteenth century’, HJ, 25 (1982).
—‘The rise of Sir William Compton, early Tudor courtier’, EHR, xcvi (1981).
—‘Pardon of the clergy reconsidered’, JEH, 37 (1986).
—‘Politics and government in Tudor England’, HJ 31 (1988).
—‘The fourth and fifth earls of Shrewsbury: a study in the power of the English nobility’ (D.Phil, Oxford, 1978).
Bindoff, S.T. (ed.) The History of Parliament: The House of Commons, 1509-1558 (3 vols, 1982).
Black, Ladbrooke (ed) The Love Letters of Henry the Eighth (1933).
Blanchard, I. ‘Population change, enclosure and the early Tudor economy’, EcHR, 2nd ser, 23 (1970).
Blatcher, M. The Court of King’s Bench, 1450-1550 (1978).
Blomefield, F., History of Norfolk (2nd ed. 11 vols, Norwich 1805-10).
Boersma, F.L. An Introduction to Fitzherbert’s Abridgement (1981).
Bowden, P.J. The Wool Trade in Tudor and Stuart England (1962).
Bowker, Margaret The Secular Clergy in the Diocese of Lincoln 1495-1558 (1968).
—The Henrician Reformation: The Diocese of Lincoln under John Longland, 1521-1547 (1981).
—‘Some archdeacons’ court books and the Commons supplication against the ordinaries’ in The Study of Medieval Records, ed. D.A. Bullough and R.L. Storey (1971).
Bradford, W. (ed.) Correspondence of the Emperor Charles v (1850).
Bradshaw, B. The Irish Constitutional Revolution of the Sixteenth Century (1975).
Brand, J. History of Newcastle (1789).
Brandi, Karl The Emperor Charles v, trans. C.V. Wedgwood (1965).
Braudel, F. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II (2 vols, 1972).
Bridbury, A.R. ‘English provincial towns in the later Middle Ages’, EcHR, 2nd ser, xxxiv (1981).
Brigden, S.E. ‘Tithe controversy in Reformation England’, JEH, 32 (1981).
—‘The early Reformation in London, 1522-1547: the conflict in the parishes’ (D. Phil., Cambridge, 1979).
Brock, R.E. ‘The career of John Taylor, master of the rolls, as an illustration of early Tudor administrative history (MA. London, 1950).
Brown, A.L. ‘The kings’ councillors in fifteenth century England’, TRHS, 5 ser, xix (1969).
Brown, K.D. ‘The Franciscan Observants in England 1482-1559 (D.Phil, Oxford, 1986).
Brown, J.M. ‘Henry VIII’s book, “Assertio septem sacramentorum”, and the royal title of “Defender of the Faith”’, TRHS, 1st ser, viiii (1880).
Brown, Rawdon (ed) Four years at the court of Henry VIII (2 vols, 1854).
Burne, R. V.H. ‘The dissolution of St Werburgh’s abbey’, Journal of the Chester and North Wales Architectural, Archaeological and Historical Society, n.s., xxxvii (1948).
Burnet, Gilbert History of the Reformation of the Church of England, ed. N. Pocock (7 vols, 1865).
Bush, M.L. ‘The Tudors and the royal race’, History, lv (1970).
—‘The problem of the Far North: a study of the crisis of 1537 and its consequences’, NH, 6 (1971), pp.40-63.
Butley Priory, Suffolk, 1510-1535, The Register and Chronicle of, ed. A.G. Dickens (1951).
Byrne, Muriel St C. (ed) The Letters of King Henry VIII (1936).
Calais, The Chronicle of, ed J.G. Nichols, CS, xxxv (1846).
Calendar of State Papers, Spanish, ed. G.A. Bergenroth, and P. de Gayangos (1862-86).
Calendar of State Papers, Spanish, Further Supplement to, ed. G. Mattingly (1947).
Calendar of State Papers, Venetian, ed. R.Brown, C. Bentinck, H. Brown (9 vols, 1864-1898).
Cameron, T.W. ‘The early life of Thomas Wolsey’, EHR, iii (1888).
Campbell, B.M.S. ‘The population of early Tudor England: a re-evaluation of the 1522 muster returns and 1524 and 1525 lay subsidies’, Journal of Historical Geography, 7 (1981).
Campbell, L. ‘The authorship of the Recueil d’Arras’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, xl (1977).
Carew Manuscripts, Calendar of, 1515-74, ed J.S. Brewer and W. Bullen (1867).
Carus-Wilson, E.M. and Coleman, 0. England’s Export Trade, 1275-1547 (1963).
Catto, J. ‘The king’s servants’ in Henry V: the Practice of Kingship, ed G.L. Harriss (1985).
—‘Religious change under Henry V’ in Henry v: the Practice of Kingship, ed G.L. Harriss (1985).
Cavendish, George The Life and Death of Cardinal Wolsey, ed. R.S. Sylvester, EETS (1959).
Challis, C.E. The Tudor Coinage (1978).
Chambers, D.S. Cardinal Bainbridge in the Court of Rome, 1509 to 1514 (1965).
—‘Cardinal Wolsey and the papal tiara’, BIHR, xxviii (1965).
—‘English representation at the court of Rome in the early Tudor period’ (D. Phil., Oxford, 1962).
Chapters of the Augustinian Canons, ed. H.E. Salter, OHS, lxxiv (1920).
Chapters of the Black Monks, ed. W.A. Pantin, CS, 3 ser, liv (1937).
Cheney, C.R. ‘William Lynwoode’s Provinciale’, The Jurist, 21 (1961).
Chester, A.G. Hugh Latimer: Apostle to the English (Philadelphia, 1954).
—‘A note on the burning of Lutheran books in England’, Library Chronicle, 18 (University of Pennsylvania, 1952).
—‘Robert Barnes and the burning of books’, HLQ 14 (1951).
Chrimes, S.B. An Introduction to the Administrative History of Medieval England (1959).
—Henry VII (1972).
Churchill, I, Canterbury Administration (1933).
Clark, P. English Provincial Society from the Reformation to the Revolution (1977).
Clark, P. and Slack, P. (eds.) Crisis and Order in English Towns 1500-1700 (1972).
Clifford Letters of the Sixteenth Century, ed A.G. Dickens, Surtees Society, clxxii (1962).
Cole, H. (ed) King Henry the Eighth’s Scheme of Bishopricks (1838).
Coleman, D.C. ‘Mercantilism revisited’, HJ, 23 (1980).
Colvin, H.M The White Canons (1951).
Condon, M.M. ‘Ruling elites in the reign of Henry VII’ in Patronage, Pedigree and Power in Later Medieval England, ed C. Ross (1979).
Cooper, J.P. ‘Henry VII’s last years reconsidered’, HJ 2 (1959).
Councils and Synods with other documents relating to the English Church, II, 1205-1265, ed. F.M. Powicke, C.R. Cheney (1964).
Corpus Iuris Canonici, II: Decretales Gregorii IX, ed. A. Friedberg (Leipzig, 1881).