Invisible darkness : the strange case of Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka

Home > Other > Invisible darkness : the strange case of Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka > Page 2
Invisible darkness : the strange case of Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka Page 2

by Williams, Stephen, 1949-


  I?i recent memory within a hundred mile radius of Niagara Falls hundreds of children have been sacrificed to something. Since 1980 there had been well over a hundred unsolved sex slayings of young women between the ages of twelve and twenty-four in upper New York State and southwestern Ontario alone. It is a rare individual who knows half a dozen of their names. Unsolved is the catchword. Some criminologists think so many remain unsolved because no one in law enforcement will even consider the idea that women are involved with the sex and death of other women. Nikki told me, as soon as she heard that Kristen French’s long, luxurious brunette hair had been crudely cut off that she saw “the hand of a woman.”

  If Nikki is right, and maybe she is, some part of this incredibly deviant world of sexual sadism, which is all about power, control and humiliation, increasingly belongs to Barbie. And in her world Ken has become an instrument of strange, feminine, violent, pathological yearnings. The woman somehow involved in the crimes with which I am concerned and about which Nikki seems to know a great deal—somehow intuitively—is a diminutive, blond woman-child.

  As we sat this Wednesday, April 13, 1993, in Buddy’s Bar, at 10 P.M., all that had really happened was that Bernardo had been arrested and was being held without bail. Karla had retained a local lawyer named George Walker, whose offices were, coincidentally, directly across the street from DeMarco’s pawnshop in Niagara Falls. The newspapers said Karla was in the psychiatric ward of a Toronto hospital receiving “therapy.” One of the nurses on the ward had already told me there was great debate about what kind of person Karla was and how much she really knew about the crimes. The coroner was making plans to exhume Karla’s sister’s body—suspicion was rampant.

  I had a sixth sense there was much more to this story than the official version that Karla Homolka was another victim, an abused sex slave of Paul Bernardo. Vince Bevan had already told press conferences after Bernardo’s arrest that they were watching a second and third suspect. Just recently he had revised the earlier statement and become more specific. He had said they were now only watching a second suspect, a person who was no threat to the public safety and a person whose whereabouts he knew exactly every second of the day.

  In spite of his good looks, yuppie aspirations and university education there was something callow about Paul Bernardo that suggested the crimes with which he was charged were beyond his scope. The police said he raped fifteen women in the Toronto suburb of Scarborough, where he was born and raised, before he moved to St. Catharines. What they did not say was that he didn’t start this dark escapade until after he and Karla met in 1987. As Nikki’s second sight suggested, somehow their relationship might very well have created a third separate character—a kind of symbiosis of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde—a golem with dominant feminine characteristics that came to subsist on sex and death, but otherwise appeared to be the newlyweds next door. Vince should have stuck to his guns in the first instance, when he said they were watching a second and third suspect—he would have been closer to the truth. It made the hair on the back of my neck stand on end.

  “DeMarco has had that skull in his store for some time,” Nikki said. “You know, the guy’s a bit crazy.”

  It does seem to go with the territory, I thought to myself.

  “My sister used to go out with him.”

  “Small world,” I said.

  “Especially down here,” she said.

  Nikki stopped filing her nails. “Can you lend me fifty bucks, Stephen? I’ve got to go.”

  I sort of raised my eyebrow.

  “Look, what good is a psychic without a phone, and they’re going to cut mine off. Be a sweetheart.”

  Before she left, she asked if there was anything I wanted. “Yeah, explain this whole weird case to me, will you?”

  “I’m a psychic, not a shrink. You’ll figure it out.” And with a stripper’s flourish, Nikki turned on her heel, opened the door

  to a cacophony of bowling balls and walked out of my life once more.

  I was down the fifty dollars, three rye-and-gingers, and worst of all on the verge of a truly apocalyptic tale of sedition, violence, sex, death and videotape—unlike anything I was prepared to even imagine.

  Because DeMarco knew that Bernardo had joined the Masons just after he moved to St. Catharines—an assertion that turned out to be true—DeMarco had all kinds of Masonic conspiracy theories about which I was very skeptical. And all his talk about ritual satanic cults and human sacrifices, played out in disarmingly normal, familiar, suburban settings, seemed too obvious. In the end, allowing for DeMarco’s paranoia and penchant for hyperbole and the distance between appearance and reality, these farfetched observations turned out to be more interesting—and ring truer—than all the elaborate psychiatric and conventional religious rationalizations provided by the case as it unfolded. At least they took deviance and an individual’s capacity for evil seriously, without trying to explain it away or forgive it. And Nikki’s instincts turned out to be surprisingly prescient. It was Karla who truly had her hand on the skull. I was, not soon but inevitably, to be drawn to understand what Nikki already understood absolutely.

  HUMAN and SHARES; OUR BED AND EATS AT OUR TABLE;.

  —W.H. Auden

  CHAPTER ONE

  It was 7:30 a.m., Monday morning, March 8, 1993, Sister Josephine, a sixty-two-year-old Carmelite nun from Lindsay, Ontario, woke with a start from a tortured dream which inevitably was about her increasingly tenuous relationship with her beloved companion for life—-Jesus Christ. The internal struggle between her sense of duty and her waning sense of self-worth seemed hopelessly lost, and her forty-year marriage to the Lord on the rocks. A semiretired teacher, unable to perform even the

  most menial tasks, she had become totally withdrawn. She had been diagnosed with endogenous depression and hospitalized a week and a half earlier. At least she knew where she was. She was in Room 802 on the psychiatric ward of Northwestern General Hospital in northern Toronto. As Sister Josephine woke up, she reahzed she was no longer alone.

  A pretty young woman (or was she a girl?) with blond, cashmere hair and a provocatively flimsy nightgown was sitting on the bed opposite. She was wearing a set of headphones, rhythmically tapping the fingers of one hand on a fashion magazine to music only she could hear and painting her toenails pink with the other. A perfect angel, Sister Josephine thought, and smiled at her new companion. The nun would soon learn that her name was Karla—with a K. Karla, seeing the nun was awake, held up an enormous stuffed animal that was reclining on her pillow. “This is Bunky,” she said, with a friendhness and enthusiasm that the nun found refreshing. Sister Josephine only wished she was her old self and could show some spark of enthusiasm in return.

  Dr. Arndt, her psychiatrist, had told her not to worry too much about her present state of dimmed awareness. It was not unusual for people undergoing electro-convulsive therapy—or “buzzing,” as he so irreverently called it—to be “out of it” for the first week or two. “Although it works faster than the drugs,” he said in his heavy Austrian accent, “it can be a bit discombobulating.”

  Dr. Hans Arndt was the senior staff psychiatrist at Northwestern. With his accent, he could just as easily have been sent by central casting. At fifty-eight. Dr. Arndt was bald, bearded and bespectacled. A leading exponent of “buzzing,” known in lay terms as shock treatment, he was also one of those modern, pharmaceutical alchemists who concocted drug-induced “sleep therapies” that put patients out for at least three days at a stretch. Sister Josephine’s angel companion had just been awakened from such a therapy.

  Dr. Arndt knew what was wrong with the nun, but he had not come to any conclusion about the mental health of Karla

  INVISIBLE darkness I7

  Homolka-Bernardo. As he had told her lawyer, George Walker, when he agreed to hospitalize her, “I don’t know if this girl is mad or just bad.”

  On February 26, G
eorge Walker had first called Dr. Arndt’s colleague, psychologist Allan Long, and asked him urgently to organize a psychological and psychiatric evaluation for a new client. And so it came to pass that Dr. Long and his colleague Dr. Arndt arrived at Walker’s offices at 4:30 p.m. on March 3, 1993, to be introduced to this bizarre case. Dr. Arndt had no idea who Karla was—but then, again, he had learned not to be surprised by the chemistry of the human soul.

  The truth was. Dr. Arndt found Niagara Falls fascinating. Historically speaking, the area wore its psychoses on its sleeve. It represented the best of nature and the worst of mankind—a coincidence of geographic purity pitted against the impurity of human behavior. It was the God-given inexhaustible supply of fresh water from the Great Lakes and the manmade ingenuity of an obscure Croatian engineer that had spawned cheap power at the turn of the century, which had in turn led to massive industrialization. That, in turn, had poisoned the land and the water—the minds would foUow.

  Like certain psychopathologies, Niagara Falls’s symptoms lay dormant, invisible for generations. It appealed to Dr. Arndt’s sense of irony that the nearby Love Canal was such a place and had a name that resonated a multipHcity of definitions.

  George Walker’s law offices in Niagara Falls are in a gray-blue, two-story, aluminum-sided building on the corner of Victoria and Queen Streets directly across from DeMarco’s infamous pawnshop. Oddly, Walker had known Karla before the “mad murder pubHcity.” Karla had worked as a veterinary assistant at the Martindale CHnic in nearby St. Catharines, where Walker had taken Kelly, his cancer-riddled Dalmatian, for treatment. He remembered how tender she had been with his beloved pet. After the dog died, he kept its ashes in an urn on the mantelpiece in his living room.

  Karla first put a call in for KeUy’s daddy in the late evening of February 9. She said she wanted to see Walker about a “domestic dispute.” Perhaps it was for the memory of Kelly that Walker agreed to see the “tender” vet’s assistant, who was about to become a pariah. An appointment was set for Karla Homolka-Bernardo to come to see him at 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 11, 1993.

  At first. Walker simply didn’t beheve Karla’s story. It was too incredible. But after she confessed everything, in a relendess, strangely monotonic monologue, his disbehef was quickly replaced by the need for action. First thing to do—her confession in hand—was to start positioning the Attorney-General’s office. In return for immunity, Walker told them that Karla would be happy to betray her estranged husband, Paul Bernardo, and testify categorically that he had murdered Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French.

  Walker had a professional responsibility to determine whether or not Karla was sane enough to stand trial. But he wanted more than that; he wanted to turn this determination to his advantage. Walker knew that he needed a psychiatric game plan for Karla’s defense argument. Drs. Long and Arndt were meant as a stunning, preemptive strike. With astonishing good fortune. Walker would be able to move a chess piece first—and maybe capture the board.

  Considering that Karla’s estranged husband, Paul Bernardo, had been arrested two weeks earlier, on February 17, and that police were now^ ransacking their matrimonial home. Walker knew he had to move quickly. Walker arranged for Karla to secretly meet the doctors who would deUver his psychiatric game plan. They met in the second-floor conference room of his office building at 4:30 p.m. on March 3. At first, when Karla arrived and sat self-consciously in fi-ont of the experienced psychiatrists. Walker wondered if they would find her credible.

  With the power of a natural actress, Karla showed the doctors her wedding pictures. Dr. Arndt, looking to somehow grab her trust, said the wedding pictures looked more like a flineral.

  INVISIBLE darkness I9

  “I fancy myself as a photographer and perhaps I see something that other people don’t,” the doctor said, with a forgiving, empathetic voice.

  “My God,” said Karla with a shock of recognition, “everybody else just oohed and aahed and said how it looked hke a storybook wedding.” Karla seemed dismayed—but only for a second. “But it really was my funeral. It really was… . Yes, that’s what it was.”

  Dr. Arndt now had Karla in his power or—an argument could be offered—was it the other way around? It was Dr. Arndt’s opinion that Karla was in a lot of pain and needed to “spiH”; an Arndtism for unburdening. Clearly she was able to instruct counsel and fit to stand trial. The opinion was clear. Karla should be hospitalized for a “total workup, comprehensive assessment and therapies.” Walker liked that. This scored him some time. And so it was agreed.

  Karla’s mother, Dorothy, delivered her troubled daughter to Northwestern General Hospital on March 4 at 11:30 a.m. Karla was quickly admitted under her mother’s maiden name—Seger. This was a strategy, on the part of the hospital, to try and hide the fact of Karla’s admission. It was important that journalists not know about her movements. On the admission form Karla was described as a “twenty-two-year-old female patient with diagnosis of depression.”

  It was Dr. Arndt’s idea to put Karla and the nun in the same room. Perhaps it appealed to his sense of irony. But above all he thought it might give the Good Sister some benefit—a startling jolt of reality. He had warned the hospital that he would be admitting someone who “might be having a high profile,” but he thought he would let Sister Josephine find out who Karla was on her own.

  Sister Josephine put down her Bible and stared toward her roommate, who was absorbed in her Dog World magazine. The veterinarian’s assistant v/as not one to abandon her passions. But by now the nun had begun to suspect that Karla was more

  anomaly than angel. By turns, she could be pleasant, standoffish, taciturn and chatty. Her mood swings always seemed to be in relation to her telephone conversations. She was always on the telephone. Most people who are hospitahzed for depression are withdrawn, dysfunctional, wary of the outside world.

  Karla had none of these symptoms. In fact, Karla was clearly delighted when she got her own way—unhappy when she didn’t. Remarkably outspoken, particularly when she wanted drugs. The more she got, the more she wanted. Some of the nursing staff had qualms about the amount of drugs the infamous patient was ingesting. There was even some talk about substituting placebos.

  Wandering the halls in thigh-high baby dolls, wearing pushup bras, clutching Bunky as if it were the Christ child—pleasant when stoned, obstreperous when straight—Karla now presented a far different figure to Sister Josephine.

  “Do you want me to have a nervous breakdown?” Karla once yelled. “I feel like I’m going to have a nervous breakdown.” Then she had demanded more Demerol. Not only that, she insisted the drug be administered by i.v. push. Up until then, all of her medication had been taken orally. Where did this patient get the idea of the needle? How did she know the medical lingo? The nurses were nervous, to say the least. At one point Karla fixed a night nurse with her strangely ambivalent eyes and demanded, “If I don’t get the drugs I want, the way I want them, you and Dr. Arndt will regret it. I’m telling you— you’ll all regret it!” The nurse was so angry she called Dr. Arndt in the middle of the night to complain—to no avail. The next day he came in and increased her medication and negotiated a compromise—instead of an i.v. push he would concede to administer certain drugs intermuscularly. “All right,” Karla said petulantly, “i.m. —^better than nothing.”

  Sister Josephine’s internal debate about Karla’s mercurial personality was suddenly interrupted when Karla got up directly in front of her and “put on her Blossom hat.” She posed hke a model on the runway and sweetly wished the nun happy Easter.

  Karla had named the hat after Blossom, a favorite character from a popular TV sitcom. “Paul never liked it when I wore hats,” Karla announced coquettishly. “But I am free of him— free! I’m gonna wear whatever damn hat I want to wear.”

  And with that, with all her hat fascination and Bunky’s undying loyalty, Karla lef
t the room in search of God knows what. The incredible thing about Bunky, we would later find out: Karla had given the stuffed bear to Leshe Mahaffy shortly before she was killed. And now the nun was allowed to sit back in the silence of her room and ponder the dilemma of her Lord God.

  It was Easter Sunday, 1993, and Sister Josephme was eagerly awaiting her real sister’s visit. Of all her spiritual colleagues, of all her family, it was her real sister she trusted most of all.

  “Don’t you read the papers? Don’t you watch the television?” her sister asked, trembhng. She knew the reahty of the nun’s situation.

  “That is not Karla Seger, it’s Karla Homolka—Bernardo’s wife!” she said, with no small amount of alarm. And placing her hand on her sister’s Bible, she said, “Don’t you understand? For God’s sake, Jo!”

  So finally the reality of the facade of Karla Seger was explained to Sister Josephine. In the beginning, shock was replaced by denial. In turn, denial was replaced by anger—an anger toward Dr. Arndt, who had put her in this situation in the first place. Here she was, a few yards from the devil incarnate. Arndt would eventually pose Sister Josephine a challenge: “You need a mission. Maybe Karla is your mission?”

  A mission. Yes, the nun needed to minister, to comprehend her ministry; she needed to understand above all the example of another spiritual colleague, Sister Helen Prejean, the New Orlean’s nun who had bonded with a killer on Death Row. Sister Josephine was reminded again of Sister Helen’s admonishment: “There is no such thing as a disposable human being.” There is no such thing, she repeated, waiting for Karla to return

  with Bunky. There is no such thing as a disposable human being.

  But the accursed ambiguity returned to Sister Josephine once more, and challenged her fragile faith. No such thing: “Tell that, oh Lord, to Kristen French and Leslie Mahafiy.”

 

‹ Prev