C. Petrie and Clues to the Machine:
The Two Large Pyramids of Giza: Imperfections, or Torsion Analogues?
1. The Vedic Clue: Dynamic Torsion
Angkor Wat, as we saw, disclosed a profound clue into the ancient Vedic cosmology, a cosmology that we have also seen was closely mirrored by that of the ancient Mayans, as well as the Egyptians. But as was also observed, the Vedic cosmology was also worked out in close conjunction with the idea of counter-rotation, of torsion. There is a further confirmation of this view, again from the Vedic literature, as Brophy points out:
As one example, Vedic Scholar S. Yukteswar noted that the original Vedic description of the yuga ages gave the yuga durations in 2 sets of four periods with ratios 4:3:2:1 (4800:3600:2400:1200). addingup to 24,000 years. Modern translations of the Vedas insert the word “divine” before “years” to create 360 times 24,000 (or 8,640,000) years as the full yuga epoch. The modern changing of “years” to “divine years” thus allows the denigration of the ancient Vedas to merely symbolic fantasy that can’t have anything to do with actual human cultural history.
… According to Yukteswar, very ancient Vedic atsronomy conceived of planets revolving around the sun, and “the sun also has another motion by which it revolves around a grand center called Vishnunabhi, which is the seat of the creative power, Brahma, the universal magnetism. Brahma regulates dharma, the mental virtue of the internal world…24
The last highlighted portion exhibits the connection to physics in the proper sense, for the most stable means of creating physical systems from the primordial soup is via rotation, in this case, the idea of rotating systems within rotating systems is a concept known as dynamic torsion. Yet, the outline of the basic concept is present in the Vedic cosmology centuries if not millennia before, and it is from the rotation of the primordial nothing that everything arises.
2. The Twists in The Two Large Pyramids
With the concept of dynamic torsion, we begin to approach the end of our examination of the Grid, and of the functional nature of at least some of the structures — the pyramidal ones — upon it.
In chapter one, the anomalous yields of early thermonuclear testing led us to speculate that these yields might have other explanations than the standard explanations being given at the time, namely, that those bombs were gating energy, for a brief moment, from higher dimensions. In that respect, the torsion research of Russian astrophysicist Nikolai Kozyrev was mentioned, and it is worth recounting what I wrote about him in The Philosopher’s Stone, for the concept now enters the picture as a possible explanation of the functions of pyramids as alchemical machines to manipulate the physical medium itself:
Torsion may be defined as a spiraling motion within the fabric of space and time that folds and pleats the fabric by twisting it. Thesimple analogy of emptying a soda pop can, and then wringing it like a dishrag, illustrates what torsion does. The spirals in the can literally fold and pleat, and the can’s length contracts. This, essentially, is what torsion does to space-time.25
In Korzyrev’s thinking, however, torsion is not an abstract, static thing, but rather a constantly changing, dynamic thing,
for if the basic idea of torsion is that it is related to a rotating system, then it will be apparent that the universe is composed of rotating systems within other rotating systems, producing a continuously changing system with a changing flow of time… time itself takes on dynamic properties.
Such complex, interlocked systems of rotation may be thought of as “knots” of space-time that are so intensely concentrated that they form the objects observed in the physical universe. As such, all systems are in fact “space-time machines,” and since they “contain” space-time they are not ultimately “constrained” by it, but rather, interact constantly, and in some cases, instantaneously, with it.26
The Vedic cosmology says essentially the same thing, and consequently, if one presses the speculation a great deal, one may say that it is saying that torsion forms the ultimate basis for the declined alchemical analogical magic so prevalent in the legacy civilizations.
With these thoughts in mind, we now take a closer look at the two large pyramids of Giza, for there we find the idea of torsion, of a twist, present in the structures themselves. It was the renowned Italian metrologist Stecchini who observed that the Great Pyramid’s four sides were all of slightly different lengths and angles from each other, producing a slight twist to the northwest corner of the structure.27Many who have studied the Great Pyramid have commented on this feature, calling it a “slight imperfection” and other such phrases.
But is it?
Given all the other extraordinary perfection in the structure, we must ask whether this is a likely explanation, or if this twist in the structure is there intentionally?
There are two things arguing for its intentionality. The first is, as we have seen, the deeply esoteric connection between Egyptian cosmology and the more ancient topological metaphor contained within it, a metaphor connecting it to other ancient cosmologies. Within that metaphor, as we saw, the pyramid itself is seen as an analogue to the whole cosmic process of differentiation. If, as we also suggested, the Great Pyramid could possibly stem from a time of construction somewhere in High Antiquity, such scientific concepts might have been very well-known and deliberately built-in to the structure.
But there is a much stronger argument that suggests this twist was fully intentional, and that is the fact that the second large pyramid of Giza also has such a twist. The great archaeologist and surveyor of Giza, Sir William Flinders Petrie, whose The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh form the “bible” for any serious Giza research, detailed a number of curious features about the Second Pyramid. Observing that the top of the Second Pyramid still has some of its casing stones on it, and taking theodolite readings on the angles, Petrie stated that “From this it is seen that the builders skewed round the planes of the casing as they went upward; the twist being +1’40’’ on the mean of the sides; so that it is absolutely — 3’50’’ from true orientation at the upper part.”28 Additionally, unlike the Great Pyramid, whose alignment to the four cardinal compass points are almost perfect, the Second Pyramid is twisted even further off alignment to the true compass points; in short, the structure itself is twisted, and in addition, twisted off center relative to the compass points.29
The significance of the two large pyramids being twisted is not, in our opinion, accidental, for there is a third consideration that points, once again, very deliberately to the idea that the compound was designed as an analogue of torsion. In The Giza Death Star Deployed I pointed out that when one runs an axis of rotation through the apexof the Great Pyramid, and then rotates the compound through 120 and 240 degrees, two familiar forms result.
Middleton-Jones’ and Wilkie’s Overhead Rotation of Giza through 120 Degrees30
Note that the slight offset of the three large pyramids (remembering that the Great Pyramid is the center of rotation in the above diagram) yields a three-armed swastika, a common symbol of rotation in the Vedic tradition, and if the compound were rotated through 90 degree increments, the resemblance would be even more palpable.
Rotation through 120 and then 240 degrees yields an even more striking symbol, and clearly indicates that the Giza compound was deliberately designed to be rotated, if not in reality, then at least conceptually:
Middleton-Jones’ and Wilkie’s Rotation of Giza Through 240 Degrees31
So what do we have? We have at least three levels of rotation taking place at Giza:
1) Each of the two large pyramids is twisted from bottom to top, with the Great Pyramid being oriented slightly off center and toward the northwest corner;
2) In addition, both large pyramids deviate from true alignment to the four compass points, a divergence particularly true in the case of the Second Pyramid; that is, each is twisted with respect to the Earth itself;
3) Finally, the whole compound is also designed to rotate.
I
n other words, we have rotation within rotation within rotation, all on the surface of the Earth, which is rotating on its axis, revolving around the Sun, which is revolving around the Galactic center.32 To put it succinctly, the Giza Compound is an analogy of the concept of dynamic torsion.
If, therefore, as engineer Christopher Dunn has argued so persuasively in The Giza Powerplant, that the Great Pyramid was a machine for the production of power, or as I have argued in the Giza Death Star Trilogy that it might actually have been designed or utilized as a weapon of some sort, then this fact, plus the three chronological levels of construction evident at Giza, and its overall design, indicate that the entire compound may have been designed as some sort of machine, perhaps even one that modified the original function of the Great Pyramid, the first structure present at the compound on Alford’s alternative scheme of dating. And if the Grid is laid out with respect to Giza, then the machine of which Giza is the center, is truly massive.
The only questions that remain are, what was this vast machine designed to do, and how did it do it?
This is where the “answers” become highly speculative, and very technical…
Notes
1 John Michell, The New View Over Atlantis, p. 149.
2 John Michell, The New View Over Atlantis, p. 160.
3 Michell also notes that there is a tradition that the casing stones of the Great Pyramid were “said to have been engraved with letters and symbols expressing the entire knowledge of antiquity.” Ibid., p. 137.
4 Ibid., p. 162.
5 Ibid., pp. 156-157.
6 Michell, The New View Over Atlantis, p. 137.
7 See my The Giza Death Star (Adventures Unlimited Press, 2001), pp. 161-179.
8 Ibid., p. 174.
9 Ibid., pp. 174-175.
10 Ibid., p. 176.
11 Farrell, The Giza Death Star, p. 176.
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid.
14 Ibid., pp. 207-209, 217-221, see also The Giza Death Star Deployed, ch. 9.
15 Farrell, The Giza Death Star Deployed, p. 26. For our purposes here, I will review the dating and arguments of Alan Alford presented in that book. For a fuller discussion of the chronological issues there presented, see pp. 25-38.
16 Alan Alford, The Phoenix Solution: Secrets of a Lost Civilization (London, New English Library [Hodder and Stoughton], 1998), p. 6, cited in my The Giza Death Star Deployed, p. 27.
17 Farrell, The Giza Death Star Deployed, pp. 29-30.
18 Farrell, The Giza Death Star Deployed, pp. 31-32.
19 Alan Alford, The Phoenix Solution: Secrets of a Lost Civilization (London, New English Library [Hodder and Stoughton], 1998), p. 6, cited in my The Giza Death Star Deployed, p. 27.
20 My own intuition, as of this writing, is to ascribe great antiquity to Puma Punkhu at least, and possibly to the Great Pyramid as well, and to view the megaliths of Nabta Playa and Europe as the constructions of an elite undertaken in the aftermath of a catastrophe. There are, of course, problems occasioned by that view.
21 Farrell, The Giza Death Star Deployed, pp. 31-32.
22 Thomas G. Brophy, Ph.D., The Origin Map, p. 90.
23 Thomas G. Brophy, Ph.D., The Origin Map, p. 90, emphasis added.
24 Thomas G. Brophy, Ph.D., The Origin Map, p. 91, emphasis Brophy’s.
25 Joseph P. Farrell, The Philosophers’ Stone: Alchemy and the Secret Research for Exotic Matter (Feral House, 2009), p. 156.
26 Ibid., p. 158, emphasis added.
27 Michell, The New View Over Atlantis, p. 147.
28 W. M. Flinders Petrie, The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh (Elibron Classics, 2007), p. 97.
29 Ibid., p. 99.
30 Howard Middleton-Jones and James Michael Wilkie, Giza-Genesis: the Best Kept Secrets (Tempte, Arizona: Dandelion Books, 2001), p. 211.
31 Middleton-Jones and Wilkie, Giza-Genesis: The Best Kept Secrets, p. 213. For further commentary on these two figures, see my The Giza Death Star Deployed, pp. 132-134, 244-250.
32 For the presence of these three levels of celestial rotation at Giza, see again Thomas G. Brophy, Ph.D., The Origin Map, p. 99.
PART FIVE:
THE PHYSICS OF THE “PYRAMID PEOPLES”
"From the relics of the Stone-Age science practised by the adepts of the ancient world it appears: first, that they recognized the existence of natural forces of whose potential we are now ignorant, and learnt to manipulate them; second, that they gained thereby certain insights into fundamental questions of philosophy, the nature of the universe and
the relationship between life and death."
John Michell,
The New View Over Atlantis, p. 197.
13
SPECULATIONS:
THE PRINCIPLES OF ALCHEMICAL ARCHITECTURE AND
ENGINEERING
“According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested, the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear.”
Nikola Tesla1
“In this system that I have invented it is necessary for the machine to get a grip of the earth, otherwise it cannot shake the earth. It has to have a grip on the earth so that the whole of this globe can quiver.”
Nikola Tesla 2
We have come a long way since the first chapter, and those early, anomalous yield returns of early hydrogen bomb testing, that suggested some aspect of the world Grid was in play. The journey has taken us from Angkor Wat and an interesting, if disconcerting, masculine-yet-androgynous imagery used to symbolize the physical medium, to Tiwanaku and Puma Punkhu in Bolivia and anachronistic displays of advanced technology, to Tikal, Chichen Itza, and Teotihuacan in Mexico, to even more disconcerting practices of human sacrifice connected to the structures, and to bizarre mythological correspondences between Mesopotamia and the Mayans regarding the engineering of mankind, to curious musical codes in Plato, Pythagoras, and the Vedas, to the sands of the Egyptian desert where a strange megalithic structure encodes quantum mechanical and astrophysical data, to the plateau of Giza, and to yet another example of a “topological metaphor” present in Egyptian cosmology. Along the way we’ve encountered Nazis building on the grid, Nazi and Soviet physicists implying “something was wrong” with standard models, and we’ve encountered a strange topological metaphor and mythological parallels concerning the creation, or better put, the engineering of mankind and “Tower of Babel” moments of history, from to Meso- America to Mesopotamia. We have implied along the way that at least some of these structures — the pyramidal ones — on the world Grid system were alchemical hyper-dimensional machines. Certainly in the case of Egypt the case can be made that, at least from the esoteric point of view, they can be, and possibly were, viewed as such.
But can a stronger case be made that this is the case from a mathematical and scientific standpoint? Can one argue that at least some of these structures were more deliberately and scientifically conceived as “hyper-dimensional” machines, and, if so, what was their purpose?
Indeed such a case can be advanced, and that is the task of this final, and most technical, chapter, but before that case can be fully appreciated and understood, a reprise of the arguments of the previous chapters is now, finally, in order.
A. Summary of the Arguments and Conclusions of the Previous Chapters
1. Historical Arguments and Mythological Parallels
Our historical arguments and mythological parallels can be summarized as follows:
1) There are three overall levels of construction evident throughout the world in conjunction with constructed structures on the world Grid, and paradoxically, the older the structures, the higher the technological skill and scientific knowledge
encoded in them is. Yet, the placement of such sites as Tikal and Teotihuacan on a Grid system that evidently placed the prime meridian through the Great Pyramid’s apex indicates that some consistent body of knowledge survived into the later periods of construction, and that this knowledge may have been the proprietary intellectual culture of a hidden elite or elites constructing them.
2) The consistency of the building and placement of objects on the world Grid system, plus the consistency of the mythological Leitmotifs over time and area also suggests that a detailed plan was in place that arose from that common proprietary intellectual culture of that elite.
3) The high level of scientific knowledge represented by such sites as Giza or Nabta Playa, or for that matter, Teotihuacan, indicate a degree of scientific knowledge that could only have come down from High Antiquity from a civilization and scientific culture equally, if not more, sophisticated as our own. Additionally, some sites, such as Puma Punkhu, exhibit stone working technology equally as if not more sophisticated than our own, and thus a technological sophistication equal if not exceeding our own. It is thus reasonable to seek scientific rationalizations for the functions of these structures on the world Grid.
4) Curiously, as we also saw, the Mayan mythology parallels that of the Mesopotamian in its assertion that mankind was an engineered creature to function basically as the slave or servant of the gods. There is even present in the Mayan mythology a Tower of Babel moment in which mankind is embarked upon a project that somehow threatens the gods’ power over it, and accordingly, a political decision is taken to end that project, whatever it was. It is my speculation that this project was intimately connected to the pyramid building and other constructions associated with the world Grid. The consistent esoteric association of pyramidal structures with “the gods” is an indicator that such structures were associated with the knowledge — that is to say, the science and technology — of “the gods”, and this is particularly the case with the esoteric traditions surrounding the Giza complex, Teotihuacan, and the sites of Meo-America. Again, this argues that scientific rationalizations for the functional purpose of such structures should at least be entertained.
Grid of the Gods Page 32