by Jon E. Lewis
Despite all the Nazi huff and puff, they were unable to provide actual evidence of the Committee of 300’s existence. (Of course, assassinating Rathenau in a fit of anti-Semitic pique, thus destroying their one “proof ”, hardly helped verification.) Nevertheless, the Committee of 300 continued to be a bogeyman of the Western world, and by 1992 Dr John Coleman, a self-proclaimed former MI6 officer, had decided that the Committee was actually “The Olympians”, a British satanic, aristocratic sect founded in 1727. More, the Olympians/Committee of 300 were the sponsors of all the other secret elites hell-bent on creating a New World Order, including the Bavarian Illuminati, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission – to name just a few.
In all probability, Rathenau never intended the phrase “the Committee of 300” to indicate a literal cabal, or a black magic cult, but a loose alliance of industrialists. In his words, “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves.”
Curiously, John Coleman is alone in finding modern evidence of the Committee of 300. He has a book to sell about the 300, titled Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300, which is available from his website www.coleman300.com. So, no vested interest there, then.
Further Reading
John Coleman, Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300, 1992
CAN
The Cult Awareness Network (CAN) was founded by Patricia Ryan, daughter of Congressman Leo Ryan, who was assassinated in Guyana by members of Jim Jones’s People’s Temple cult. CAN was a counsel and support for families whose sons or daughters had been brainwashed by outfits like Jones’s. The Network also provided information on over two hundred religious cults it considered worrisome. One such was the Church of Scientology. According to Time, CAN received more calls from concerned moms and dads about the Scientology church than any other group. In 1991, Cynthia Kisser, the executive director of CAN, openly criticized Scientology in a 1991 article in Time, saying, “Scientology is quite likely the most ruthless, the most classically terroristic, the most litigious and the most lucrative cult the country has ever seen. No cult extracts more money from its members.”
Mr L. Ron Hubbard’s church was very, very unhappy at such negative attention, and fought back with an expensive advertising campaign, taking out full-colour ads in USA Today for weeks on end. The Scientologists also sicced their house lawyer, Kendrick Moxon, on to CAN, who filed fifty civil lawsuits against the counselling group.
CAN’s annual budget was $300,000 a year. Fighting the Scientologists’ legal eagle in court emptied its coffers and then some. Eventually CAN was driven into bankruptcy, after CAN was found guilty of violating the religious liberties of Jason Scott, a Pentecostalist, who had been kidnapped and subjected to “deprogramming”. CAN was not party to the kidnap, but was implicated because Scott’s mother had called CAN’s helpline, who in turn had referred her to a deprogrammer. And the deprogammer had participated in the kidnap. Usually, the Church of Scientology snubs rival religious groups, but on this occasion old man Hubbard’s outfit kindly allowed its famous lawyer, Kendrick Moxon, to file a civil suit against CAN on Jason Scott’s behalf. The court awarded $1 million in punitive damages against CAN.
So CAN was driven into bankruptcy. And guess who bought it? The Church of Scientology. They altered not a jot about its name or purpose. All they did was replace the staff. So when a concerned mom or dad phones the CAN helpline, they are answered by a Scientologist. That is, a member of the same sect that Cynthia Kisser thought a contender for being the “most ruthless cult” the country had ever seen.
Further Reading
Richard Behar, “The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power”, Time, 6 May 1991
DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Welcome to Denver International Airport (slogan: “Together we soar”), from where you can take flights to London, Frankfurt, Mexico City, LA and Toronto. Or, if you are a VIP, you can take a quick trip down below the runway to the subterranean HQ of the New World Order. Supposedly.
Denver International Airport (DIA) has been the object of conspiracy movement suspicions since it replaced the old Denver airport at Stapleton in 1995. The new airport – the biggest in the USA – was budgeted at $1.7 billion, but when the last contractor screwed in the last light bulb the cost had jumped to $5 billion. The discrepancy between the two figures, plus the vast amount of soil shifting done, gave credibility to the belief that a secret multilevel building had been constructed underground. Conspiracy researchers Alex Christopher and Philip Schneider claimed to have visited the subterranean complex, and interviewed workers there. Christopher informed radio interviewer Dave Alan:
AC: … this other man told me in private that there is a lot of human slave labor in these deep underground bases being used by these aliens, and that a lot of this slave labor is children. He said that when the children reach the point that they are unable to work any more, they are slaughtered on the spot and consumed.
DA: Consumed by who?
AC: Aliens. Again, this is not from me, but from a man that gave his life to get this information out. He worked down there for close to 20 years, and he knew everything that was going on.
DA: Hmmm. Who do these aliens eat?
AC: They specifically like young human children that haven’t been contaminated like adults. Well, there is a gentleman out giving a lot of information from a source he gets it from, and he says that there is an incredible number of children snatched in this country.
DA: Over 200,000 each year.
AC: And that these children are the main entree for dinner.
DA: How many Draconians are down there?
AC: I have heard the figure of 150,000 just in the New York area.
DA: Underneath New York?
AC: Yes. In some kind of underground base there.
DA: Interesting. Now, you’ve seen pictures of these things?
AC: I have seen them face to face.
DA: You have?
AC: Yes. From some information that has been put out by a group or team that also works in these underground bases that is trying to get information out to people that love this country, there is a war that is going on under our feet, and above our heads, that the public doesn’t know anything about, and its between these alien forces and the humans that are trying to fight them.
DA: What other types have you seen?
AC: The ones that I have seen are the big-eyed Greys and the Reptilians.
Phew. So dangerous was this knowledge that Schneider was (reportedly) murdered by the NWO. Dead men tell no tales.
Those too nervous to sneak down for a peek at the aliens can find all the proof they need about DIA’s dual role as NWO HQ just by visiting the airport’s main (above ground) complex, where the decor gives the game away:
•
A dedication marker in the Great Hall (a Masonic term!) is unambiguously inscribed with a Masonic square and compasses. Also carved in the stone is the legend “New World Airport Commission”. Spooky or what?
•
A mural by the artist Leo Tanguma contains a sword-wielding figure and a rainbow. According to Tanguma, these images are part of his themes of war and the triumph of peace, and living in harmony with Nature. Ex-Florida dentist Len Horowitz , though, maintains in his book Death in the Air that the rainbow is an image code for a revived Nazi plan to spray lethal toxins into the air to bring about the genocide of undesirable populations.
•
The Nazi theme is continued in the design of the airport’s runways. From above, they are shaped like a swastika.
•
The floors in the terminal are inscribed with satanic/Masonic/NWO/Illuminati codes, such as Dzit Dit Gaii and Cochetopa.
Enough already. DIA is not the site of the NWO’s HQ, and there are no below runway constructions filled with aliens eating babies and opponents of the NWO. There are mi
les of underground passages, but these have innocuous purposes. One of Christopher’s photos of the NWO secret tunnels turned out to be a track for a baggage train. Tanguma’s murals are a tad weird, probably not the sort of stuff you want to view before catching a flight, but the man’s an artist for heaven’s sake. (A liberal, Christian artist to boot, so hardly the sort of painter the NWO is going to hire to empathetically communicate its vision.) The codes on the floor are actually Navajo place names. Certainly, the Masons got in on the DIA project, but the Masons like to advertise with plaques and capstones (aged, they need the members because they are literally dying out), thus have been laying capstones of buildings all over America for hundreds of years. “The New World Airport Commission”, declares the airport authority, was a group of businessmen who arranged the opening shindig, and came up with the name because the airport would be “new” and “world-spanning”.
Further Reading
Alex Christopher, Pandora’s Box, 2007
www.mt.net/~watcher/nwodnver.html
THE DREYFUS AFFAIR
Although “L’affaire Dreyfus” occurred over a hundred years ago France still lives in its shadow.
Alfred Dreyfus – who was Jewish – was an artillery captain in the French Army. In 1894 he was charged with passing military secrets to the German Embassy in Paris, the evidence against him being documents found in the attaché’s rubbish bin of the German written, according to graphologists, in Dreyfus’s hand. Dreyfus was barred from seeing the evidence and sentenced to life imprisonment on the infamous Devil’s Island off the coast of South America.
Four years later, Lieutenant-Colonel Georges Picquart discovered overwhelming evidence that the real culprit was one Major Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy, but before Picquart could obtain a new hearing he was mysteriously transferred to Tunisia. Meanwhile, another officer who supplied clear-cut evidence that the top brass of the Army had forged documents in the Dreyfus case was interrogated. He then committed suicide. The Army, meanwhile, found Esterhazy innocent. Fearful of the public exposure of the injustice done to Dreyfus – and, let us admit it, egged on by their own anti-Semitism – high-ranking officers on the Army’s General Staff and intelligence corps – had begun a cover-up of colossal dimension.
Save for the French novelist Émile Zola the conspiracy may well have succeeded. On 13 January 1898 Zola published an article, “J’Accuse” in the French newspaper The Dawn in which he publicly revealed Esterhazy as the real culprit and named the officers involved in the conspiracy. The Army leadership wrote Zola was engaged in “one of the greatest iniquities of the century”.
The military sued Zola for libel. The trial provoked anti-Dreyfus/Zola rioting in the streets of Paris. Although evidence introduced at the trial by the defence made it obvious that Esterhazy, not Dreyfus, was the traitor, and that the military was covering up the truth, Zola was convicted. To avoid prison, he fled to England. If anything, the military conspiracy escalated: the wholly innocent Picquart was arrested on suspicion of having forged the Esterhazy documents and dismissed from the Army.
By June 1899, however, public opinion had swung in Dreyfus’s favour, and the libel charge against Zola was dismissed. Dreyfus himself was pardoned and, in 1906, his conviction was reversed by the highest court in France. None of the military conspirators, however, was ever brought to trial.
The Dreyfus Affair officially concluded on 21 July 1906 when Dreyfus, reinstated in the Army, was honoured by a dress parade military ceremony. Zola was absent. He had died in 1902 in his Paris home, asphyxiated by fumes from a chimney. Many believe he was murdered by right-wing extremists.
L’Affaire Dreyfus had a violent footnote. During a memorial service for Zola, Dreyfus was shot and wounded by a right-wing journalist.
The journalist was acquitted of attempted murder.
Further Reading
Leslie Derfler, The Dreyfus Affair, 2002
Ruth Harris, The Man on Devil’s Island: Alfred Dreyfus and the Affair that Divided France, 2010
DOCUMENT: “J’ACCUSE”, ÉMILE ZOLA, THE DAWN, 13 JANUARY 1898
An Open Letter to Mr Félix Faure, President of the Republic
Mr President,
Would you allow me, in my gratitude for the benevolent reception that you gave me one day, to draw the attention of your rightful glory and to tell you that your star, so happy until now, is threatened by the most shameful and most ineffaceable of blemishes?
You have passed healthy and safe through base calumnies; you have conquered hearts. You appear radiant in the apotheosis of this patriotic festival that the Russian alliance was for France, and you prepare to preside over the solemn triumph of our World Fair, which will crown our great century of work, truth and freedom. But what a spot of mud on your name – I was going to say on your reign – is this abominable Dreyfus affair! A council of war, under order, has just dared to acquit Esterhazy, a great blow to all truth, all justice. And it is finished, France has this stain on her cheek, History will write that it was under your presidency that such a social crime could be committed.
Since they dared, I too will dare. The truth I will say, because I promised to say it, if justice, regularly seized, did not do it, full and whole. My duty is to speak, I do not want to be an accomplice. My nights would be haunted by the spectre of innocence that suffer there, through the most dreadful of tortures, for a crime it did not commit.
And it is to you, Mr President, that I will proclaim it, this truth, with all the force of the revulsion of an honest man. For your honour, I am convinced that you are unaware of it. And with whom will I thus denounce the criminal foundation of these guilty truths, if not with you, the first magistrate of the country?
First, the truth about the lawsuit and the judgment of Dreyfus. A nefarious man carried it all out, did everything: Lieutenant-Colonel Du Paty de Clam, at that time only a commandant. He is the entirety of the Dreyfus business; it will be known only when one honest investigation clearly establishes his acts and responsibilities. He seems a most complicated and hazy spirit, haunting romantic intrigues, caught up in serialized stories, stolen papers, anonymous letters, appointments in deserted places, mysterious women who sell condemning evidences at night. It is he who imagined dictating the Dreyfus memo; it is he who dreamed to study it in an entirely hidden way, under ice; it is him whom Commander Forzinetti describes to us as armed with a dark lantern, wanting to approach the sleeping defendant, to flood his face abruptly with light and to thus surprise his crime, in the agitation of being roused. And I need hardly say that that what one seeks, one will find. I declare simply that Commander Du Paty de Clam, charged to investigate the Dreyfus business as a legal officer, is, in date and in responsibility, the first culprit in the appalling miscarriage of justice committed.
The memo was for some time already in the hands of Colonel Sandherr, director of the office of information, who has since died of general paresis. “Escapes” took place, papers disappeared, as they still do today; the author of the memo was sought, when ahead of time one was made aware, little by little, that this author could be only an officer of the High Command and an artillery officer: a doubly glaring error, showing with which superficial spirit this affair had been studied, because a reasoned examination shows that it could only be a question of an officer of troops. Thus searching the house, examining writings, it was like a family matter, a traitor to be surprised in the same offices, in order to expel him. And, while I don’t want to retell a partly known history here, Commander Paty de Clam enters the scene, as soon as first suspicion falls upon Dreyfus. From this moment, it is he who invented Dreyfus, the affair becomes that affair, made actively to confuse the traitor, to bring him to a full confession. There is the Minister of War, General Mercier, whose intelligence seems poor; there are the head of the High Command, General De Boisdeffre, who appears to have yielded to his clerical passion, and the assistant manager of the High Command, General Gonse, whose conscience could put up with many things. But, at the bott
om, there is initially only Commander Du Paty de Clam, who carries them all out, who hypnotizes them, because he deals also with spiritism, with occultism, conversing with spirits. One could not conceive of the experiments to which he subjected unhappy Dreyfus, the traps into which he wanted to make him fall, the insane investigations, monstrous imaginations, a whole torturing insanity.
Ah! this first affair is a nightmare for those who know its true details! Commander Du Paty de Clam arrests Dreyfus, in secret. He turns to Mrs Dreyfus, terrorizes her, says to her that, if she speaks, her husband is lost. During this time, the unhappy one tore his flesh, howled his innocence. And the instructions were made thus, as in a fifteenth century tale, shrouded in mystery, with a savage complication of circumstances, all based on only one childish charge, this idiotic affair, which was not only a vulgar treason, but was also the most impudent of hoaxes, because the famously delivered secrets were almost all without value. If I insist, it is that the kernel is here, from whence the true crime will later emerge, the terrible denial of justice from which France is sick. I would like to touch with a finger on how this miscarriage of justice could be possible, how it was born from the machinations of Commander Du Paty de Clam, how General Mercier, General De Boisdeffre and General Gonse could let it happen, to engage little by little their responsibility in this error, that they believed a need, later, to impose like the holy truth, a truth which is not even discussed. At the beginning, there is not this, on their part, this incuriosity and obtuseness. At most, one feels them to yield to an ambiance of religious passions and the prejudices of the physical spirit. They allowed themselves a mistake.