Saturday the Rabbi Went Hungry

Home > Other > Saturday the Rabbi Went Hungry > Page 23
Saturday the Rabbi Went Hungry Page 23

by Harry Kemelman


  He reddened and looked away from the rabbi’s direct glance. “It’s common procedure. It’s done by lawyers reg­ularly right in the courtroom. If you can trap your man into admitting his guilt—what’s wrong with it? It wasn’t as though he was innocent.”

  “I’m not quarreling with you.”

  “Well, he admitted that he’d come across Hirsh as you suggested and drove him home. Also that Hirsh passed out within minutes after they’d started. He claimed he tried to wake him up when they got to Hirsh’s house, but he couldn’t budge him. So he decided to leave him there to sleep it off. Only after he’d got home did it occur to him that perhaps he’d forgotten to turn off the motor. By then he was afraid to walk back and see.”

  “And what about the way he used Hirsh to cover up his own mistakes?”

  “He admitted that. As a matter of fact, he gave us a complete picture of what happened at the lab. I guess he was smart enough to realize that we’d find it out eventu­ally, and it would look better for him if he were com­pletely candid with us. It’s only a fool who tries to cover up and then finds he has to keep retreating as we learn more and more. It appears that the original brainstorm was Hirsh’s. He issued the preliminary report in both their names, but then Sykes assigned Hirsh to other work and carried this on by himself. He claims he wasn’t try­ing to steal the credit; that Hirsh just was not as enthusi­astic about his own idea as he was. But he discussed it with Hirsh off and on, and sometimes had Hirsh check his figures.

  “Then Hirsh discovered an error. Sykes told him not to say anything yet, with an idea that he’d admit it gradu­ally in a series of progress reports. One would say that unexpected difficulties had cropped up. Then he’d issue another to the effect that a great deal more work and time were needed. And finally, he’d put one out that would make it clear it was a dud. I guess Hirsh might have gone along, except that his name was on the first report and that the research was being done for Goraltronics.”

  “Hm—that’s interesting. Is that your idea, or did Sykes say Hirsh was concerned about Goraltronics?”

  “No, I got that from Sykes. Evidently, Hirsh felt some sort of obligation to Goralsky for having got him the job. He even hinted that if Sykes didn’t tell the truth he was going to speak to Goralsky himself. Maybe he was just bluffing, but Sykes didn’t know. Goralsky had got him the job, so naturally he had every reason for taking the hint seriously. So late Friday afternoon he went to Quint and told him the truth. He claims he was going to admit he was to blame, but Quint was so upset that he lost his nerve. When Quint assumed it was Hirsh’s fault, he did not correct him. You can understand how Quint felt because he knew about the merger and the stock going up and all that. He wanted to call Hirsh in and fire him right then and there, but Sykes lied and said Hirsh had gone home early because of the holiday. That’s kind of ironic, isn’t it?”

  “It’s even more ironic than you think,” said the rabbi. “Sykes, when he came to visit me that Sunday, remarked that Hirsh would have been alive if he had been a normal practicing Jew.”

  “That’s no lie. Anyway, we typed up his confession and he signed it,” Lanigan went on. “Then we sprung the wiped fingerprint on him. We thought that would break him. You see, if we had mentioned it at the beginning he would have realized it was first-degree murder and prob­ably would have refused to talk. This way, at least we had a confession for the major part and if he broke we’d have it all. He clammed up. Refused to say another word until he conferred with a lawyer.”

  “But you had your case anyway.”

  Lanigan shook his head gloomily. “After his lawyer got through talking to the D.A., we didn’t have much of anything. The fingerprint—or rather the missing fingerprint— would have been peppered by defense counsel. He would have shown that we had men all over that car. He would have argued that one of us could have wiped it acciden­tally with his sleeve. And the confession? They could say it was obtained under duress.”

  “And getting home from the lab—how could that be explained away?”

  “Easy. He started out to walk to the garage and someone gave him a lift. He doesn’t remember the make of car and the driver didn’t give him his name. After all, no one saw him near the Hirsh house.”

  “Peter Dodge did.”

  “Peter—the minister? When did you see him?”

  “He dropped in this morning. He got home from Alabama yesterday.”

  “And he saw Sykes?”

  The rabbi nodded. “He takes a walk every evening, and it leads him past Bradford Lane. He had planned to drop in on Hirsh for a talk, but as he came to the corner he saw the house was dark so he went right past. But he did see Sykes—he’s sure that’s who it was—walking down Bradford Lane in the other direction toward his home, of course. At the time he had never met the man and just as­sumed it was someone taking a walk like himself.”

  “Why didn’t he come forward and tell us?”

  “Why should he? He didn’t know that there was mur­der involved.”

  Lanigan began to laugh. “Well, there you have it, Rabbi. We’ve mismanaged this case from the beginning. We just had bad luck all the way. When we were unable to get in touch with Dodge down in Alabama, we asked the police to pick him up for us so we could question him. The minute they found the police were looking for him, the Negroes hid him, of course—one place to another, I don’t suppose he even knew why. Then when he finally returned to his hotel, the Birmingham police did pick him up and called to ask if they should hold him and we told them no, to let him go. After all, we had our man by that time.

  “Well, I don’t suppose it makes any difference really. But it just shows how much luck counts in solving a case. We had bad luck all the way, and then when we finally hit on the right solution it was still a matter of luck. I mean, Sykes happening to stop and offer you a lift so you were able to see that lube sticker—that was a tremen­dous stroke of luck.”

  “Well, we believe in luck, you know.”

  “I suppose everyone does to some degree.”

  “No, I mean we believe in a way you Christians don’t. Your various doctrines—that God observes the fall of every sparrow, that you can change your misfortune by prayer—it all implies that when someone has bad luck he deserves it. But we believe in luck. That is, we believe it is possible for the truly good man to be unlucky, and vice versa. That’s one of the lessons we are taught by the Book of Job.

  “Still, I’m not so sure it was all luck. The whole case was permeated with the feeling of our holy day. Subcon­sciously, I imagine, I thought a great deal about the rela­tions between Hirsh and Sykes, and why Sykes would want to cover up for him. And that’s why the explanation occurred to me so readily when I saw the date on the lube sticker. You see, the whole pattern of the crime was laid out before me in our Yom Kippur service.”

  “How do you mean?”

  “Well, part of that service deals with the ceremony of the selection and sacrifice of the scapegoat by the High Priest in ancient Israel. It was even the subject of my ser­mon. In it I referred to the sacrifice of Abraham, which is the portion of the Scroll read on the day of the New Year, the beginning of the Ten Days of Awe which culminates in Yom Kippur. And that was the whole point of the situ­ation there at the Goddard Lab. In spite of his disassocia­tion from the Jewish community, Hirsh nevertheless played what in the past too often has been the traditional role of the Jew.”

  “You mean—”

  “I mean he was the scapegoat. His very name should have suggested it to me.”

  Lanigan was puzzled. “Hirsh?”

  The rabbi smiled sadly. “No, Isaac.”

  CHAPTER

  THIRTY-NINE

  Rabbi Small paced back and forth in the living room. He was practicing the delivery of his Chanukah sermon, and now and again he would glance at his audience—his infant son, firmly wedged into a corner of the divan. Once he interrupted his discourse to call to Miriam in the kitchen, “You know, dear, he follows me. He’s
actually fo­cusing on me.”

  “Of course, he’s been doing it for days.”

  “ ‘. . . so we must consider the miracle of the lights not only as an example of the intervention of the Divine power—’ ”

  The infant began to pout.

  “You don’t like that? I don’t care for it too much myself. Suppose I say, ‘We are too much inclined to respond to the miraculous—’ ”

  A whimper.

  “How about, ‘The real miracle of Chanukah is not the burning of the cruse of oil for eight days rather than for the expected one; it is that a tiny nation could challenge the power of mighty Greece—’ ”

  A cry.

  “No?”

  The infant took breath and then, his face red and con­torted, emitted another wail at full volume.

  “That bad, eh?”

  Miriam appeared in the doorway. “He’s hungry. I’d better feed him.”

  “Perhaps you’d better,” said the rabbi. “I’ll try it on him again after he’s eaten. Maybe he’ll be more receptive on a full stomach.”

  “You’ll do no such thing. After he’s fed, he’s going to bed. Aren’t you, Jonathan?” She nuzzled him, and the cries died down to an uncertain whimper and then stopped. “Besides, I think you’ve got a visitor.”

  It was Moses Goralsky. Through the window, the rabbi saw the old man being helped out of the car by the chauffeur but then refuse further assistance with a shake of the head. Clinging to the handrailing he mounted the steps to the door.

  “Come in, Mr. Goralsky. This is a pleasant surprise.”

  “I have a question, a sheileh. To whom should I come if not to the rabbi?”

  He helped the old man off with his coat and showed him into his study. “I’ll do the best I can, Mr. Goralsky.”

  “You know, when my Ben was in trouble I came to the temple to pray.”

  “I remember.”

  “So you know when I recite the prayers, they’re in Hebrew. I can say the Hebrew, but what I’m saying, this I don’t know, because when did I have a chance to learn? We were a poor family. My father—he worked plenty hard in the old country just to feed us. So after I learned the prayers, he took me out of the cheder, you know, the school, and already I was helping him in his work. That’s how it was with most people those days.”

  “Yes, I know.”

  “So because I don’t understand what the words mean, that means I’m not praying? I have thoughts in my head, while my lips are moving, and by me this is praying. Am I right or wrong, Rabbi?”

  “I suppose it depends on what the thoughts are.”

  “Ah-hah. Now that Saturday, what would my thoughts be? They would be about Ben. I asked God He should help him. He should make the police they should find out the truth so they should let my Ben go.”

  “I would say that was praying, Mr. Goralsky.”

  “So while I was praying, I made a promise. If my Ben goes free, I thought, then I would do something.”

  “You don’t have to bribe God, and you don’t have to make bargains with Him.”

  “Not a bribe. Not even a bargain. I made with myself a promise—a—a vow.”

  “All right.”

  “Now here’s my question, Rabbi. Do I have to keep my promise?”

  The rabbi did not smile. Hands in his pockets, he strode up and down the room, his forehead creased in thought. Finally he turned and faced the old man. “It de­pends on what the promise was. If it was something im­possible, then obviously you’re not bound. If it was something wrong or illegal, again you’re not bound. In any case, where you made the promise to yourself it’s up to you to decide how committed you are.”

  “Let me tell you, Rabbi. Months ago, I was talking to Morton Schwarz, the president of the temple, and I said I wanted a remembrance for my Hannah, which she had died a few months before that. After all, I’m a rich man now, and my son is rich. And my Hannah was with me all the time we were poor. Even when I got rich, she couldn’t enjoy it because already she was sick, in bed most of the time, on a diet so she couldn’t even eat good. So this Morton Schwarz he asks me what I had in mind. The tem­ple could use an air-condition system, maybe a new or­gan.” The old man shrugged his shoulders. “I’m going to make an air-condition system in remembrance of my wife? Where will her name be? On the pipes? And an or­gan is better? I had to fight with myself a long time before I went to your temple because there was an organ there. So should I give the temple an organ in my wife’s memory? So I said, ‘Mr. Schwarz, I don’t want a piece of machinery, and I don’t want any organs. I had it in mind something like a building.’ Nu, that’s all I had to say, and that’s all he had to hear. He tells me he had it in mind to build like an addition to the temple, a special sanctuary which it would be used only for praying, not for meetings or regular business. I told him I was interested.”

  “Did he tell you how much it was likely to cost?”

  “The cost I didn’t care. The money, I can take it with me? Or I got to provide for Ben? Schwarz says more than a hundred thousand; I said even two hundred thousand.”

  “Well—”

  “So then later he shows me a drawing, and he explains how there will be like a gallery so you can stand there and talk when you want to leave the service for a little rest, or after the service, a place you can linger.” He hunched his shoulders and spread his hands. “Believe me, Rabbi, at my age, you’re interested in lingering. You’re not in and you’re not out—sort of halfway.”

  “And then did he show you the model?”

  “He showed me.”

  “And?”

  “And the model—” he grimaced, “already I wasn’t so crazy over. The building by itself—nice, but attached to the temple, it was already not here not there. The tem­ple—it’s plain, it’s straight; and the new building, it’s fancy. But I’m an architect? What do I know about build­ings? So I wasn’t sure, but that day when I was praying for my Ben, I made it a promise that if they let Ben go I would give the building.”

  “And your question is whether you’re bound by your promise?”

  “That’s the question.”

  “And your objection is that the two, the new and the old, don’t go together?”

  “Not only that, Rabbi. This I could stand already. But all my life, I’m a businessman. Do you know what is a businessman, Rabbi? A businessman, when he spends a dollar he got to get for a dollar merchandise. Makes no difference for what he spends. If he spends for charity, he got to get for a dollar charity. You understand?”

  “I think so.”

  “So to me it seems like this building is mostly wasted. Do we need an extra building for the temple? To put up a building just to put up a building, just to spend the money, it’s not in my nature.”

  “Suppose the building were separate from the main building. Would you feel better about it?”

  “So what would you use it for?”

  “It could be a school,” the rabbi suggested slowly. “Or even a community center.”

  “You need a separate building for a school? If you took the school out of the temple and put it in a separate building, for when would you use the temple? For a cou­ple of days a year? It would be a waste. And a center? Here in Barnard’s Crossing you need a center for the boys to play basketball? In the city, where nobody had a yard and was lots of kids and was dangerous to play in the street—all right. But here, you need a place for kids to play?”

  “Perhaps you’re right—”

  “Remember, Rabbi, just to put up a building, should be a building—this is foolish. Better in this place should be God’s grass and flowers.”

  Then it came to the rabbi. “You’re right, Mr. Goralsky. But there is one building that we do need.” He looked at the old man and spoke carefully. “We could use a chapel for our cemetery. Oh, it wouldn’t be as big as the plan calls for, but it could be the same general design. And it would be especially fitting since your wife was one of the first to be buried there—” />
  Goralsky’s lined face broke into an old man’s smile. “Rabbi, Rabbi, this time you got it. The same design, maybe a little smaller, this would be a nice building for the cemetery. And even a fence, I would be willing to put it in, and flowers and maybe trees. The Hannah Goralsky Memorial Cemetery. It could be like a garden.” Then his face fell. “But my vow, Rabbi. I made a promise for an addition to the temple here in Barnard’s Crossing. In my own mind, I even saw Morton Schwarz’s building—”

  “But did your vow concern this particular arrange­ment of buildings? You made a vow to donate a building to the temple, a memorial to your wife—” He stopped as the old man shook his head.

  “Look, Rabbi, you think I made a vow like I was swearing before a notary? I, Moses Goralsky, do hereby promise. . . . No. Was going through my mind all kinds of pictures, feelings, ideas—not so much words, you understand. But I know what I promised,” he added stubbornly.

  The rabbi nodded thoughtfully. Of course the old man did not verbalize his vow. And he was old enough and rich enough to hold himself to its strict observance, even though he was also shrewd enough to realize that the al­ternate plan, the cemetery chapel, would be much more useful and appropriate. The rabbi rose from his chair and began to stride up and down the room, while Goralsky waited with the patience of the very old.

  The more the rabbi thought of it, the better the plan seemed. No less than Marvin Brown, he realized the im­portance of the cemetery to the congregation. And it would give Morton Schwarz his building—not exactly as he had planned it, but near enough. And it would permit the old man to set up a lasting memorial to his wife’s memory. The problem was, how to permit Mr. Goralsky to do what he actually wanted to do.

  He paused in front of the bookcase and his eyes wan­dered over the large leather-bound tomes that comprised his copy of the Talmud. He selected a volume and took it over to his desk. He leafed through the pages until he found the passage he wanted and swiveled around to face Goralsky.

 

‹ Prev